Primary correction of nasal septal deformity in unilateral clefts during lip repair-a long-term study

Septal Reposition during Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Second Chance for Correcting Caudal Septal Deviation

BACKGROUND

The authors investigated postoperative nasal morphologic changes in patients undergoing secondary correction of cleft-lip nose with septal repositioning and alar cartilage suspension during preschool age.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of 77 patients who underwent secondary correction of cleft-lip nose. The patients were 5 to 6 years of age and underwent intermediate rhinoplasty by alar cartilage suspension, with or without septal repositioning. They were divided into 2 groups based on time, encompassing septal repositioning (September of 2015 through November of 2017) and control (November of 2009 through August of 2015) groups. The authors performed a photogrammetric comparison by assessing the postoperative nasal morphologic changes using linear and angular measures. The cleft-to-noncleft-side ratio of each parameter was measured for the nostril width and height, nostril area, and caudal septal deviation angle.

RESULTS

Among the 77 patients, 43 were selected as the septal repositioning group and 34 as the control group. Evaluation timing was 5.32 ± 0.45 years of age for the preoperative period (T0), 6.57 ± 0.5 years of age for short-term follow-up (T1), and 9.28 ± 0.65 years of age for long-term follow-up (T2). The septal repositioning group showed significantly improved nostril width ratio and caudal septal deviation angle in the T1 and T2 periods. Septal repositioning significantly decreased the nostril area ratio in the T1 and T2 periods due to decreased cleft-side and increased noncleft-side nostril area.

CONCLUSION

The secondary correction of cleft-lip nose with septal repositioning during preschool age offers a second chance to correct nasal appearance by balancing the nostril symmetry and correcting the caudal septal deviation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Use it or Lose it: Predictors of Compliance and Satisfaction With Postoperative Nasal Stent Therapy After Primary Cleft Lip Repair

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative nasal stents (NSs) are used to improve esthetic outcomes after primary or secondary cleft lip repair (CLR). Prior studies have utilized anthropometric measurements or physician assessment to determine the efficacy of NS, but data on caregiver-reported outcomes is limited. This study aims to assess caregiver compliance and satisfaction with postoperative NS.

METHODS

The authors designed a survey to collect parent-reported postoperative NS usage outcomes. Parents of infants with cleft lip (CL) who used postoperative NS after primary CLR were approached through social media to complete the survey. Data were analyzed to determine factors impacting compliance, satisfaction, and parent-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-five parents completed the questionnaire, and 60% reported noncompliance with NS. Parents with male children (odds ratio: 5.08, P = 0.019) and patients with incomplete CL (odds ratio: 5.72, P = 0.006) were more likely to be non-compliant with NS for over a week. Complete CL and use of presurgical molding therapy were each associated with better overall experience with postoperative NS ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.037), higher appearance ratings ( P = 0.005 and P = 0.0008), and greater satisfaction with nostril shape after surgery ( P = 0.016 and P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limited literature related to caregiver-reported outcomes after postoperative NS for primary CLR, the authors' results align with what has been published regarding this topic. These results can help guide surgeons in counseling patients preoperatively. Larger, multi-institutional studies are needed to better delineate and address factors associated with compliance and satisfaction after NS therapy.

"Primary Correction of the Cleft Nasal Septum: A Systematic Review"

Patients affected by cleft lip and palate have a characteristic nasal deformity; however, the treatment timeline varies amongst providers. There has been a shift from a more conservative approach to earlier intervention in order to allow for more normal development of the nose. Form, function, and future development all must be considered. For this reason, this investigation was undertaken to present the current literature available on the effects to all aspects of primary septoplasty in the cleft nasal deformity.

An initial list of 222 papers was identified, and it was determined that 16 papers fit the inclusion criteria. Studies were included in which the initial age of operation for the majority of patients was between 3 and 12 months and in which patients underwent septal repositioning at the time of cleft lip repair. These papers were all reviewed by a single author initially, and the results recorded. All results were then verified by a second author for accuracy and completeness.

Symmetry was found to be improved by primary septoplasty. Growth was not found to be impaired in any study; data was insufficient to indicate that growth was improved. Obstruction was improved as determined both by imaging, endoscopy, and patient survey. Finally, reoperation rates occurred at an acceptable rate not exceeding that of primary rhinoplasty without septoplasty.

Primary septoplasty leads to better aesthetic symmetry and function of the cleft nose without impairing growth. This change is maintained into adulthood often without the need for revisionary surgery.

Treatment Modalities to Achieve Nasal Symmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip/Nasal Deformity: An Objective and Comparative Evaluation

Introduction

Primary cleft lip repair techniques do not address the nasal deformity adequately resulting in nasal asymmetry. Maneuvers employed to minimize this have varying degrees of success.

Aim

To assess the outcome of different treatment modalities employed to establish nasal symmetry in unilateral cleft lip.

Methods

100 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip/ palate operated for primary cheiloplasty with modified Millard's rotation advancement technique were divided into five groups. Group 1: lip repair alone, Group 2: NAM followed by lip repair, Group 3: lip repair followed by placement of conformers, Group 4: NAM followed by lip repair and placement of conformers, Group 5: lip repair with semi-open rhinoplasty. Objective assessment was done using measurable parameters after 12 months post-operatively on a 1:1 standard photograph.

Results

Group 5 showed statistical significance in all parameters assessed. Progressive improvement in nasal symmetry was noted from Group 1 to Group V.

Conclusion

In our study, group V, i.e., modified Millard's repair with semi-open rhinoplasty improved the results in terms of all the objective parameters assessed. The results of the other groups showed improvement though not consistent in all parameters. Naso-alveolar molding is an effective adjunct. Additionally, nasal conformers proved to be of great value in retaining the results obtained post-surgery.

"Septoplasty" Performed at Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Call for Accurate Terminology

OBJECTIVE

Primary cleft nasal repair can include septal reconstruction. We hypothesize that primary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty have fundamental differences that render these procedures as distinct surgical entities.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases performed on pediatric cleft and general adult septoplasty techniques through December 2021. (PROSPERO ID CRD42022295763).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Collected data included information on septal dissection, septal detachment, and management of the bony and cartilaginous septum.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight pediatric cleft septoplasty and 229 adult septoplasty studies were included. Dissection in primary cleft septoplasty was limited to the anterocaudal septum, while secondary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty techniques entailed wide exposures of the cartilaginous septum with or without exposure of the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid. In primary cleft septoplasty, detachment of the septum was mostly limited to the nasal spine and anterior base of the cartilaginous septum, while secondary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty included detachment from the vomer, and ethmoid. In the few reports of cartilage excision during primary cleft septoplasty, removal was limited to the anterior inferior border of the septum, while secondary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty included excision of the cartilaginous and bony septum.

CONCLUSION

Primary cleft septoplasty is distinct from septoplasty performed on facially mature patients. More specifically, septal dissection and detachment are limited to the anterior caudal area during primary lip repair, with rare removal of cartilage or bone. Given these differences, the authors suggest the term "septal reset" to describe septoplasty performed during primary cleft nasal repair.

Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Results, Growth Restriction, and Avoiding Secondary Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Primary rhinoplasty during correction of unilateral cleft lip continues to be a topic of debate because of concerns that early nasal intervention may affect nasal and maxillary development over the long term. This study aims to determine the volume and quality of evidence for and against primary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were pulled from PubMed and EMBASE and screened by title and abstract. Studies with human participants undergoing rhinoplasty at the time of unilateral cleft lip repair and some evaluation of the nasal outcome were included. Studies with a large proportion of syndromic patients, case reports, editorials, letters, reviews, studies exclusive to bilateral clefts, and studies not available in English were excluded. Those that met criteria were then systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were included. Ten articles that assessed the results of primary rhinoplasty subjectively all supported cleft lip repair with primary rhinoplasty. Sixteen articles assessed the results of primary rhinoplasty objectively, with 15 supporting primary rhinoplasty during cleft lip repair. Eight of nine studies that evaluated nasal growth and development over time found no restriction in nasal development. Five studies with a follow-up period of at least 6 years found that the percentage of patients who avoided revision rhinoplasty ranged from 43% to 100%. There were significant risks of bias in the majority of studies.

CONCLUSION

The majority of studies reviewed support that primary rhinoplasty during unilateral cleft lip repair results in good outcomes with limited or no effect on nasal growth.

Long-Term Results of the Murawski Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

BACKGROUND

In 1968, Ralph Millard published his "Millard II" method for repair of wide, complete unilateral cleft lip and nose deformity. In 1979, Murawski published a major modification of the Millard II procedure in Polish. This motif was taken up 8 years later by Mohler and 22 years later by Cutting. The Murawski variation on the Millard II procedure has become a dominant motif in unilateral cleft lip repair worldwide. This brief report intends to introduce the method to the English language literature and present long-term results.

METHODS

The Murawski method alters the Millard II procedure by changing the upper medial curve into a point in the columellar base. This creates a broad C flap used to fill the entire defect produced by downward rotation of the medial lip. Millard's lateral advancement flap becomes unnecessary. A lateral approach to primary nasal reconstruction allows the lateral C flap to be used to construct the nasal floor and sill. The method is described using a physics-based surgical simulator.

RESULTS

Long-term results of the method are demonstrated with four patients with 15 to 25-year follow-up. None of these patients had any revisions to the lip or nose.

CONCLUSIONS

The Murawski repair was the first to modify the Millard II repair by sharpening the medial columellar incision, eliminating the need for a lateral advancement flap. This motif was put forth in the years to follow by Mohler and Cutting. Long-term results of the method are presented.

Evolving Trends in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Based on Continuous Certification by the American Board of Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) began collecting data from unilateral cleft lip (UCL) corrections in 2011 as a component of the continuous certification process. We evaluated these data to understand practice patterns in UCL repair, in the United States, and whether these practice patterns had changed over the past 9 years.

METHODS

Tracer data for UCL correction were reviewed from its inception in October 2011 through 2016 and compared to UCL cases between 2017 and March 2020. Trends in practice patterns were evaluated against literature reviews meant to coincide with the ABPS continuous certification data.

RESULTS

A total of 520 cases were included from October 2011 to March 2020. Median age of UCL repair was 4 months and 66% of patients were male. Fifty-one percent of cases presented with a complete cleft lip. There was a decrease in postoperative adverse events when data from 2011 to 2016 was compared to 2017 to 2019 (P = 0.020). Revisions were the most common postoperative adverse event (2%). There was a decrease in nasoalveolar molding from 25% to 12% (P < 0.001) and 56% of total cases underwent a concurrent primary cleft rhinoplasty. The rate of gingivoperiosteoplasty at the time of primary cleft lip repair also fell (9% versus 1%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This article reviews tracer data obtained by the ABPS for UCL repair. The American Board of Plastic Surgery tracer data provides a national, cleft lip-specific database with longer follow-up times than other large databases.

How to Get Consistently Good Results in Cleft Lip Repair

This article serves as a practical guide for plastic surgeons focusing on repair of primary cleft lip and nasal deformity. We discuss the key anatomic disruption present in cleft lip and nasal deformity and the goals of primary repair. In addition, our preferred surgical technique for unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity is summarized along with technical pearls and pitfalls.

The Nasoalveolar Molding Cleft Protocol: Long-Term Treatment Outcomes from Birth to Facial Maturity

BACKGROUND

The authors present outcomes analysis of the nasoalveolar molding treatment protocol in patients with a cleft followed from birth to facial maturity.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of cleft patients who underwent nasoalveolar molding between 1990 and 2000. Collected data included surgical and orthodontic outcomes and incidence of gingivoperiosteoplasty, alveolar bone grafting, surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency, palatal fistula repair, orthognathic surgery, nose and/or lip revision, and facial growth.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients met inclusion criteria (69 with unilateral and 38 with bilateral cleft lip and palate). Eighty-five percent (91 of 107) underwent gingivoperiosteoplasty (unilateral: 78 percent, 54 of 69; bilateral: 97 percent, 37 of 38). Of those patients, 57 percent (52 of 91) did not require alveolar bone grafting (unilateral: 59 percent, 32 of 54; bilateral: 54 percent, 20 of 37). Twelve percent (13 of 107) of all study patients underwent revision surgery to the lip and/or nose before facial maturity (unilateral: 9 percent, six of 69; bilateral: 18 percent, seven of 38). Nineteen percent (20 of 107) did not require a revision surgery, alveolar bone grafting, or orthognathic surgery (unilateral: 20 percent, 14 of 69; bilateral: 16 percent, six of 38). Cephalometric analysis was performed on all patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. No significant statistical difference was found in maxillary position or facial proportion. Average age at last follow-up was 20 years (range, 15 years 4 months to 26 years 10 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasoalveolar molding demonstrates a low rate of soft-tissue revision and alveolar bone grafting, and a low number of total operations per patient from birth to facial maturity. Facial growth analysis at facial maturity in patients who underwent gingivoperiosteoplasty and nasoalveolar molding suggests that this proposal may not hinder midface growth.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Variational Characteristics of Nasolabial Appearance and Its Influencing Factors for the Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair With Modified Huaxi Technique

PURPOSE

After many years in clinical practice, the authors found that the long-term aesthetics of the upper lip and nose following repair of a unilateral cleft lip deformity using the Huaxi method remained unsatisfactory. The immediate postoperative effect was often good, while the long-term postoperative effect was poor. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and influencing factors of a modified Huaxi method for repairing unilateral cleft lip over time, and to explore the relationship between immediate and long-term outcomes after cleft lip surgery.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral cleft lip who visited the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the Stomatological Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from June 2014 to March 2016 were selected. The study group consisted of 51 consecutive patients (30 boys and 21 girls), aged between 3 months and 2 years. Of these, 24 presented with complete unilateral cleft lip (12 wore a nasoalveolar mold as required, 12 did not) and 27 with incomplete unilateral cleft lip (13 wore a nasoalveolar mold as required, 14 did not). Photographs were taken of 51 patients before surgery and immediately, 7 days, and 6 months postoperatively. Various indexes of nasolabial contour of each patient were measured using iWitness photogrammetry, and the slit width; lip height ratio, lip width ratio, nostril width ratio, and nostril height ratio of the healthy side; and degree of deviation of the nasal columella were calculated.

RESULTS

Long-term symmetry of lip height and width remained stable postoperatively (P > 0.05), whereas nostril height symmetry was significantly reduced (P > 0.05). Nasal width symmetry and midpoint deviation of the nasal columella were stable in patients with nasoalveolar molding (P > 0.05), but significantly decreased in patients without nasoalveolar molding (P < 0.05). In patients with complete unilateral cleft lip, there was a significant correlation between fissure width and lip width symmetry 6 months postoperatively (r = 0.431, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The symmetry of the upper lip is satisfactory and stable following surgical repair with the modified Huaxi technique. However, undercorrection of nasal symmetry is commonplace. Fissure width and nasoalveolar molding may influence long-term aesthetics following unilateral cleft lip repair.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Primary Deformity and Longitudinal Changes following Primary Correction of the Nasal Foundation

BACKGROUND

Objective assessment of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity and the longitudinal changes with treatment is critical for optimizing cleft care.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing cleft lip repair and foundation-based rhinoplasty were included (n = 102). Three-dimensional images preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age were assessed and compared to age-matched controls. Images were normalized to standard horizontal, craniocaudal, and anteroposterior axes.

RESULTS

Cleft subalare was similar in position relative to controls but was 1.6 mm retrodisplaced. Subnasale was deviated 4.6 mm lateral to midline and had the greatest displacement of any landmark. Noncleft subalare was displaced 2.3 mm laterally. Regression analysis with deviation of subnasale from the midline as a dependent variable revealed progressive lateral displacement of noncleft subalare, narrowing of noncleft nostril, and intercanthal widening. Surgery corrected nasal base displacements along all axes, resulting in landmark positions similar to controls. Symmetry of nasal base correction persisted at 5-year follow-up, with no recurrent cleft alar base retrusion, regardless of initial cleft type.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity may be "driven" by displacement of the anterior nasal spine and caudal septum. The cleft alar base is normal in position but retruded, whereas the noncleft alar base is displaced laterally. Changes with surgery involve anterior movement of the cleft alar base but also include medial movement of the noncleft alar base and columella. Symmetry of correction, including alar base retrusion, was stable over time and did not rely on alveolar bone grafting.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Foundation-Based Approach to Primary Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip results in disruption of the nasal foundation and collapse of tip structures. Most approaches to primary rhinoplasty focus on correction of lower lateral cartilages; however, recurrent deformity is common, and secondary revision is frequently required. The authors describe an alternate approach that focuses on the foundation to "upright the nose," without any nasal tip dissection. This study assessed changes with surgery and with growth. Secondary goals were to compare methods of sidewall reconstruction and septoplasty and to identify predictors of relapse.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing repair (n = 102) were assessed. Images were captured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age (when available) using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Standard anthropometric and contemporary shape-based analysis (volume ratio, dorsal deviation, and alar-cheek definition) was performed to assess longitudinal changes. Images of age-matched normal control subjects were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Significant changes in anthropometric and morphometric measurements occurred following surgery. Postoperative form was similar to controls immediately after surgery and at 5 years. Nasal corrections were satisfactory, and only two patients have elected to undergo revision. When subjects were grouped according to cleft type, we found the same trends. When comparing different methods of nasal sidewall reconstruction or septoplasty, we found no differences. Alveolar cleft width was a significant predictor of worse preoperative and postoperative form.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant nasal correction can be achieved by means of reconstruction of nasal foundation, without nasal tip dissection. Preservation of tissue planes may allow for easier secondary revision, if necessary.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

[Septoplasty during primary unilateral cleft lip repair]

Primary repair of cleft lip and palate has become a nasal and lip repair. In the aim to improve our nasal results on symmetry we perform an extensive septoplasty to put the nose in a good shape and a median axis. This septoplasty without resection of cartilage does not cause growth disorders to the nose and it promotes maxillary growth by improving early nasal breathing. It can prevent secondary rhinoplasty, source of new scars (externally, fork). But rhinoplasty will increase the incidence of scar contraction, thus shaping with a nasal conformer is essential.

Primary Septal Cartilage Graft for the Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Since 2006, the authors have explored the option of using septal cartilage as an alar rim graft on the cleft side during primary rhinoplasty to improve nasal symmetry. The aim of this study was to compare the nasal shape with or without rim graft.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate were included; 39 patients had septal cartilage as the rim graft, and 59 patients did not. Measurements of the nostril height, nostril width, one-fourth medial part of nostril height, nostril area, nasal dome height, and nostril axis were obtained on the cleft and noncleft sides. Ratios of these measurements were calculated. These ratios were then compared between the graft and nongraft groups. The levels of asymmetry were categorized into four levels-less than 5 percent, 5 to 10 percent, 10 to 15 percent, and greater than 15 percent-based on the percentages deviated from perfect symmetry (100 percent). Panel assessment was also performed. Nasolabial angle and tip projection ratio were measured for the comparison of nasal growth.

RESULTS

The nostril height, height-to-width ratio, and nasal dome height were higher in the graft group (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The graft group showed more consistency regarding the nostril shape and axis, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The nasolabial angle and tip projection ratio showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that the use of a primary septal cartilage graft may offer better support at the alar rim and improve the long-term outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The Millard Rotation-Advancement Cleft Lip Repair: 50 Years of Modification

Since its inception in 1955, Millard's rotation-advancement repair has been one of the most popular techniques used in the care of patients with a cleft lip. Over the past half century, Millard's repair has evolved and laid the foundation for many other repair techniques that have followed in its footsteps. This publication compares Millard's rotation-advancement technique to the various repairs used today. The purpose of this article is to lend perspective as to the impact of Millard repair over the past 50 years in the treatment of cleft lip.

Evidence-based medicine: The cleft lip nasal deformity

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Describe the components of unilateral and bilateral secondary cleft lip nasal deformity. (2) Discuss current methods of assessing the deformity and outcomes. (3) Discuss primary treatment options including the use of preoperative orthopedics, nasal molding techniques, and the primary cleft rhinoplasty. (4) Design a treatment plan for cleft patients that will optimize the outcome of nasal appearance and function. (5) Discuss the evidence regarding outcomes of current practices, and describe areas where more research is needed.

SUMMARY

This is the third Maintenance of Certification article on the secondary cleft lip nose deformity. In the first article, Guyuron defined the deformities and described techniques for the definitive (adult) rhinoplasty. The second article, by Zbar and Canady, presented evidence regarding the assessment, surgical treatment, and outcomes from the literature published between 1999 and 2009. In this article, the authors summarize important points from the first two articles and then concentrate on the evidence for the following topics: (1) methods currently used in evaluating the severity of the deformities; (2) methods used in evaluating outcomes of different treatments; (3) benefits of rhinoplasty performed at the time of the lip repair and evidence for the effect of rhinoplasties performed after infancy but before maturity; (4) presurgical orthopedics and nasoalveolar molding; (5) common surgical techniques used in primary cleft rhinoplasties; and (6) impact of the nasal deformity on quality of life. Overall, there is little high-level evidence regarding the outcomes of cleft nasal deformity treatment, leaving much room for future study.

Unilateral cleft lip/nose repair using an equal bows /straight line advancement technique - A preliminary report and postoperative symmetry-based anthropometry

In the evolution of cleft lip repair there has been continuous attempt to minimize local trauma, improve lip and nasal appearance and, especially, prevent conspicuous scars. The surgical technique presented meets these criteria, resulting in an appropriate scar course in children with a specific philtral ridge shape. Postoperative digital anthropometry was performed in 18 patients who underwent unilateral cleft lip repair using the equal bows/straight line advancement technique and in matched healthy control individuals. Symmetry values were assessed for lip length, philtral ridge length, vermilion height, width of the alar base, nasocanthal length, circumference of the nostrils, nostril width and height in both cleft and control groups. Evaluation revealed no significant differences in the symmetry values between cleft patients and control group (lip length: p = 0.71, philtral ridge length: p = 0.52, vermilion height: p = 0.23, alar base width: p = 0.69, nasocanthal length: p = 0.25, nostril circumference: p = 0.17, nostril width: p = 0.34, nostril height: p = 0.33). Principles of cleft lip repair can be achieved using the described technique which provides adequate lip length and natural nasal appearance in patients with a parallel-shaped philtral ridge.

Effect of primary correction of nasal septal deformity in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the craniofacial morphology

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term effect of primary correction of the nasal septum during lip repair in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate on the craniofacial morphology.

MATERIAL, SUBJECTS, METHODS

The study material consisted of 54 lateral cephalograms made at the ages 7-22, including 28 cephalograms of patients from a study group (aged 7-14 years) after a primary correction of the nasal septum during lip closure and 26 cephalograms of patients from a control group (aged 12-22 years) operated on without septal correction. All cephalograms have been analysed with regard to skeletal, dental and soft-tissue relationships. Data distribution has been checked using Shapiro-Wilk test (α = 0.05). Student t-test was used to compare values of normal distribution and for the latter - Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

The comparison of all cephalometric values between the study and control groups revealed a statistically significant (α = 0.05) difference only for H (p = 0.0267), 1+: NB angle (p = 0.0175) and 1+: NA (mm) (p = 0.0249). Each of the three cephalometric measurements mentioned were greater in the study than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

No negative effect from the primary nasal septum correction on maxillary development could be found in the study group.

Repair of nostril stenosis using a triple flap combination: boomerang, nasolabial, and vestibular rotation flaps

Tissue losses within the nose due to various reasons result in the loss of normal anatomy and function. The external nasal valve area is one of the most important functional components of the nose. The columella, lobule, nostril, and alar region are among the components forming the external nasal valve area. Deformities of the nostrils are among the most frequently observed features that interfere with the functional anatomy of the nose. Malformations of the nostrils often emerge subsequent to cleft lip repairs. Stenoses are a common type of pathology among nostril deformities. In cases where a stenosis has formed, breathing problems and developmental anomalies may occur. In the patient with nostril stenosis presented in this report, there was a serious alar collapse and contracture subsequent to a cleft lip repair. In order to repair the nostril stenosis, a "boomerang flap" was chosen. This boomerang flap was used in combination with a nasolabial flap, a vestibular rotation flap, and a conchal cartilage graft to achieve a satisfactory repair.