The cleft-columellar angle: a useful variable to describe the unilateral cleft lip-associated nasal deformity

Longitudinal Anatomic Analysis of Primary Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty Outcomes

Background: The unilateral cleft lip deformity is associated with nasal deformities with secondary functional and aesthetic challenges. Objectives: Compare the change in nasal symmetry before and incrementally after primary endonasal cleft rhinoplasty concurrent with lip repair. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of infants undergoing unilateral cleft lip repair. Data collection included demographics, surgical history, and pre- and postoperative alar and nostril photographs analyzed with Image J. Statistical analysis was done using linear and multivariable mixed effect models. Results: Twenty-two patients with a near even gender distribution (46% female) and primarily left-sided cleft lips underwent unilateral lip repair at a mean age of 3.9 months (median 3.0, range 2-12). Mean pre- and postoperative alar symmetry ratios were 0.099 (standard error [SE] 0.0019) and -0.0012 (SE 0.0179), with zero representing perfect symmetry and negative values indicating overcorrection. These values at 1, 2-4, 5-7, 8-12, 13-24, and 25+ months were 0.026, 0.050, 0.046, 0.052, 0.049, and 0.052 (SE range: 0.0015-0.0096), respectively, demonstrating stability of the alar symmetry 4 months postrepair. Conclusions: In this study, patients who underwent an overcorrective primary cleft rhinoplasty concurrent with lip repair had an initial regression of symmetry within the first 4 months postoperatively, followed by observed stabilization.

Influence of Unilateral Cleft Lip Configuration on Long-Term Facial Averageness: A New Three-Dimensional Analysis Approach

Background: Concepts regarding cleft lip and palate care vary widely globally, as there is no international consensus. Consequently, institutional surveillance of cleft concepts is essential. In addition to subjective expert rankings, three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry of the face has become the gold standard for evaluation and objective assessment of facial structures. We evaluated cleft configuration preoperatively to determine the influence thereof on the long-term facial appearance/averageness of unilateral cleft lip patients. Methods: Plaster models of the patient's labio-oral region and nose were made preoperatively, digitized, and cleft configuration assessed (cleft width, cleft-columella angle, nasal projection, heminasal width ratio, transverse lip length, labial height). Between 4 and 12 years after surgery, stereophotogrammetry (3D face scans) were captured to determine the patients' individual facial averageness index (FAI) as a deviation from the population mean, using proportion indices (PIs) of facial landmarks and reference data provided by Farkas and FaceBase. Results: Cleft width (r = 0.77) and columella length correlated strongly with long-term facial averageness (r = 0.52). Decreasing FAI was seen with increasing patient age (r = -0.42), indicating increasing facial averageness. Other cleft properties showed weaker correlations. Cleft alveolus did not have any impact on FAI. Conclusions: The presented method allows objective measurement of facial appearance/averageness as well as preoperative cleft properties. It might be superior to subjective assessments of facial attractiveness/appearance. Objective cleft measurements are strong predictors for future facial averageness. Increasing averageness with growth and age suggests late corrective surgery.

Validation of the Hubli Grading System for Assessing Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip Outcomes

BACKGROUND

When determining whether a cleft lip repair outcome is acceptable, the severity of a patient's cleft at initial presentation must be considered. Currently, there is not a widely agreed upon scale for grading the pre-operative severity or post-operative surgical outcome for patients with unilateral and/or bilateral cleft lip. The aim of this study is to validate the Hubli grading system as a reliable and reproducible system for characterizing cleft lip repair outcomes.

METHODS

Craniofacial surgeon graders independently evaluated 2489 patients from 56 different countries undergoing both unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repair from April 2004 to December 2018. Preoperative severity and postoperative surgical results were assessed, and these grades were combined to determine surgical outcome acceptability based on initial cleft severity. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated as percentages of agreement.

RESULTS

Intrarater and interrater acceptability scores had an agreement of 94.50% and 87.04%, respectively. These results indicate that using the Hubli grading system, independent raters are able to reliably and reproducibly measure the acceptability of a cleft lip repair.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the use of the Hubli grading system to evaluate the acceptability of unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repairs. This is the largest study to date to evaluate cleft lip severity and repair outcomes, and the Hubli grading system is the only scale to determine the acceptability of surgical outcomes based on initial cleft severity. This system is designed to identify surgeons with sub-optimal outcomes in order to implement timely, individualized training on a global scale.

Objective Assessment of the Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Severity and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Optimization of care to correct the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity is hampered by lack of objective measures to quantify preoperative severity and outcome. The purpose of this study was to develop a consensus standard of nasal appearance using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry; determine whether anthropometric measurements could be used to quantify severity and outcome; and determine whether preoperative severity predicts postoperative outcome.

METHODS

The authors collected facial three-dimensional images of 100 subjects in three groups: 45 infants before cleft lip repair; the same 45 infants after cleft lip repair; and 45 children aged 8 to 10 years with previous repairs. Five additional age-matched unaffected control subjects were included in each group. Seven expert surgeons ranked images in each group according to nasal appearance. The rank sum score was used as consensus standard. Anthropometric analysis was performed on each image and compared to the rank sum score. Preoperative rank and anthropometric measurements were compared to postoperative rank.

RESULTS

Interrater and intrarater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.76; Pearson correlation, >0.75) on each of the three image sets. Columellar angle, nostril width ratio, and lateral lip height ratio were highly correlated with preoperative severity and moderately correlated with postoperative nasal appearance. Postoperative outcome was associated with preoperative severity (rank and anthropometric measurement).

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus ranking of preoperative severity and postoperative outcome can be achieved on three-dimensional images. Preoperative severity predicts postoperative outcomes. Columellar angle, nostril width ratio, and lateral lip height ratio are objective measures that correlate with consensus ratings by surgeons at multiple ages.

The Microsurgical Approach in Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty-An Anthropometric Analysis

PURPOSE

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons use different approaches to repair the nasal deformity of patients with a cleft lip deformity, differing in technique and timing. The aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze a new surgical technique to treat the cleft nasal deformity at 4 to 6 weeks of life using a microscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven newborn patients with a cleft lip deformity were treated by primary repair of the nasal deformity using a microscope at 4 to 6 weeks of life. The procedure includes a columellar incision, alar cartilage plication sutures according to Daniel (Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1491, 1999), and trans-columellar sutures. All patients were photographed at specific time points up to 1 year after surgery. Established angles and distances were analyzed and compared with normal values of age-matched children by Farkas (Anthropometry of the Head and Face [ed 2]. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1994).

RESULTS

All parameters improved through surgery and showed stable values at follow-up assessments. Almost ideal values concerning symmetry, as indicated by columellar deviation and nostril comparison, were obtained. Measurements of nasal morphology were similar to established norm values.

CONCLUSION

The authors recommend the early treatment of cleft nasal deformity using microscopic surgery because it shows stable and symmetrical results at least up to 1 year after surgery. Clinical observations up to adolescence suggest no growth disturbance or deterioration of nasal shape.

Novel computer vision analysis of nasal shape in children with unilateral cleft lip

BACKGROUND

Optimization of treatment of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity (uCLND) is hampered by lack of objective means to assess initial severity and changes produced by treatment and growth. The purpose of this study was to develop automated 3D image analysis specific to the uCLND; assess the correlation of these measures to esthetic appraisal; measure changes that occur with treatment and differences amongst cleft types.

METHODS

Dorsum Deviation, Tip-Alar Volume Ratio, Alar-Cheek Definition, and Columellar Angle were assessed using computer-vision techniques. Subjects included infants before and after primary cleft lip repair (N = 50) and children aged 8-10 years with previous cleft lip (N = 50). Two expert surgeons ranked subjects according to esthetic nose appearance.

RESULTS

Computer-based measurements strongly correlated with rankings of infants pre-repair (r = 0.8, 0.75, 0.41 and 0.54 for Dorsum Deviation, Tip-Alar Volume Ratio, Alar-Cheek Definition, and Columellar Angle, p < 0.01) while all measurements except Alar-Cheek Definition correlated moderately with rankings of older children post-repair (r ∼ 0.35, p < 0.01). Measurements were worse with greater severity of cleft type but improved following initial repair. Abnormal Dorsum Deviation and Columellar Angle persisted after surgery and were more severe with greater cleft type.

CONCLUSIONS

Four fully-automated measures were developed that are clinically relevant, agree with expert evaluations and can be followed through initial surgery and in older children. Computer vision analysis techniques can quantify the nasal deformity at different stages, offering efficient and standardized tools for large studies and data-driven conclusions.