Transoral Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery

Clinical application of robots in dentistry: A scoping review

PURPOSE

The surge in digitalization and artificial intelligence has led to the wide application of robots in various fields, but their application in dentistry started relatively late. This scoping review aimed to comprehensively explore and map the current status of the clinical application of robots in dentistry.

STUDY SELECTION

An iterative approach was used to gather as much evidence as possible from four online databases, including PubMed, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Japan Science and Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, from January 1980 to December 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 113 eligible articles were selected from the search results, and it was found that most of the robots were developed and applied in the United States (n = 56; 50%). Robots were clinically applied in oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral implantology, prosthodontics, orthodontics, endodontics, and oral medicine. The development of robots in oral and maxillofacial surgery and oral implantology is relatively fast and comprehensive. About 51% (n = 58) of the systems had reached clinical application, while 49% (n = 55) were at the pre-clinical stage. Most of these are hard robots (90%; n = 103), and their invention and development were mainly focused on university research groups with long research periods and diverse components.

CONCLUSIONS

There are still limitations and gaps between research and application in dental robots. While robotics is threatening to replace clinical decision-making, combining it with dentistry to gain maximum benefit remains a challenge for the future.

The evolution of robotics: research and application progress of dental implant robotic systems

The use of robots to augment human capabilities and assist in work has long been an aspiration. Robotics has been developing since the 1960s when the first industrial robot was introduced. As technology has advanced, robotic-assisted surgery has shown numerous advantages, including more precision, efficiency, minimal invasiveness, and safety than is possible with conventional techniques, which are research hotspots and cutting-edge trends. This article reviewed the history of medical robot development and seminal research papers about current research progress. Taking the autonomous dental implant robotic system as an example, the advantages and prospects of medical robotic systems would be discussed which would provide a reference for future research.

Application and Accuracy of Craniomaxillofacial Plastic Surgery Robot in Congenital Craniosynostosis Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to observe the accuracy and security of the craniomaxillofacial plastic surgery robot in congenital craniosynostosis surgery and to enhance and improve its performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed model surgical experiments on computed tomography data of 5 children with congenital craniosynostosis who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital, and model surgical experiments and animal experiments on the skulls of 3 Bama minipigs.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference shown either in model experiments or animal experiments in comparing the actual operation with the surgical simulation and inside the groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The craniomaxillofacial plastic surgery robot has achieved good security and accuracy in model surgery and animal experiments. Further studies are needed to be conducted to confirm its security and accuracy and to continuously improve and refine the robot's performance.

The effect of soft palate reconstruction with the da Vinci robot on middle ear function in children: an observational study

Cleft palate is associated with a high prevalence of middle ear dysfunction, even after palatal repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of robot-enhanced soft palate closure on middle ear functioning. This retrospective study compared two patient groups after soft palate closure with a modified Furlow double-opposing Z-palatoplasty technique. Dissection of the palatal musculature was performed using a da Vinci robot in one group and manually in the other. Outcome parameters were otitis media with effusion (OME), tympanostomy tube use, and hearing loss during 2 years of follow-up. At 2 years post-surgery, the percentage of children with OME had reduced significantly to 30% in the manual group and 10% in the robot group. The need for ventilation tubes (VTs) decreased significantly over time, with fewer children in the robot group (41%) than those in the manual group (91%) needing new VTs during postoperative follow-up (P = 0.026). The number of children presenting without OME and VTs increased significantly over time, with a faster increase in the robot group at 1 year post-surgery (P = 0.009). Regarding hearing loss, significantly lower hearing thresholds were recorded in the robot group from 7 to 18 months postoperatively. To conclude, beneficial effects of robot-enhanced surgery were recorded, suggesting a faster recovery when the soft palate was reconstructed using the da Vinci robot.

Robotic Applications in Orthodontics: Changing the Face of Contemporary Clinical Care

The last decade (2010-2021) has witnessed the evolution of robotic applications in orthodontics. This review scopes and analyzes published orthodontic literature in eight different domains: (1) robotic dental assistants; (2) robotics in diagnosis and simulation of orthodontic problems; (3) robotics in orthodontic patient education, teaching, and training; (4) wire bending and customized appliance robotics; (5) nanorobots/microrobots for acceleration of tooth movement and for remote monitoring; (6) robotics in maxillofacial surgeries and implant placement; (7) automated aligner production robotics; and (8) TMD rehabilitative robotics. A total of 1,150 records were searched, of which 124 potentially relevant articles were retrieved in full. 87 studies met the selection criteria following screening and were included in the scoping review. The review found that studies pertaining to arch wire bending and customized appliance robots, simulative robots for diagnosis, and surgical robots have been important areas of research in the last decade (32%, 22%, and 16%). Rehabilitative robots and nanorobots are quite promising and have been considerably reported in the orthodontic literature (13%, 9%). On the other hand, assistive robots, automated aligner production robots, and patient robots need more scientific data to be gathered in the future (1%, 1%, and 6%). Technological readiness of different robotic applications in orthodontics was further assessed. The presented eight domains of robotic technologies were assigned to an estimated technological readiness level according to the information given in the publications. Wire bending robots, TMD robots, nanorobots, and aligner production robots have reached the highest levels of technological readiness: 9; diagnostic robots and patient robots reached level 7, whereas surgical robots and assistive robots reached lower levels of readiness: 4 and 3, respectively.

Alternative Applications of Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS): A Systematic Review

Background: The role of robotic surgery in the field of oncology has been widely described, in particular for the tumours of the oropharynx and larynx, but its efficacy for benign pathology is inconsistent. Methods: An exhaustive review of the English literature on trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) for benign conditions was performed using PubMed electronic database. Results: The research was performed in March 2019 and yielded more than eight hundred articles, with 103 meeting the inclusion criteria and considered in the present study. Conclusions: The application of TORS for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome seems to be particularly well documented. Additionally, there exists a special interest in its use where high precision in limited anatomic space is required. There are still different structural and economic limitations for the application of TORS, however, the progressive technologic innovations and the increasing adoption of robotic surgery seem to encourage the uptake of this technique.

Robotics in Cleft Surgery: Origins, Current Status and Future Directions

The field of robotic surgery is an exciting and growing field that has bolstered its way to become a mainstream application in a number of surgical disciplines. The application of robotic surgery in cleft surgery is novel and has captivated many with the benefit it provides: the slender and small arms with wrist articulation at the instrument tip; motion scaling; tremor elimination; and high fidelity, three-dimensional visualization make the robot a very attractive platform for use in confined spaces with small surgical targets. The story of the origin of robotic surgery in cleft surgery is an interesting one, and one that has arisen from other allied surgical specialities to render robotic cleft surgery as its own specialised field. A field that has coined its own terms and has demonstrated a number of applications for its use. This review details the origins of robotic cleft surgery, its evolution and its current status and elaborates on future directions to enhance its application.

Utilization of a robotic mount to determine the force required to cut palatal tissue

Determination of the material properties of soft tissue is a growing area of interest that aids in the development of new surgical tools and surgical simulators. This study first aims to develop a robot-operated tissue testing system for determination of tissue cutting forces. Second, this system was used to ascertain the cutting properties of the hard and soft palate mucosa and soft palate musculature for the purpose of developing a robotic instrument for cleft palate surgery and a cleft-specific surgical simulator. The palate tissue was cut with a 15 blade mounted to the robot with varying angles (30°, 60°, 90°) and speeds (1.5, 2.5, 3.5 cm/s) of cutting to imitate typical operative tasks. The cutting force range for hard palate mucosa, soft palate mucosa and soft palate muscle were 0.98-3.30, 0.34-1.74 and 0.71-2.71 N, respectively. The break-in force of the cut (i.e. force required for the blade to penetrate the tissue) is significantly impacted by the angle of the blade relative to the tissue rather than the cutting speed. Furthermore, the total surface area of the tissue in contact with the blade during the cut has a significant impact on the total force expended on the tissue.

A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-From Inception to the Future

Background

The use of robots in surgery has become commonplace in many specialties. In this systematic review, we report on the current uses of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery and looks to future roles for robotics in this arena.

Methods

A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus was performed using appropriate search terms in order to identify all applications of robot-assistance in plastic and reconstructive surgery. All articles were reviewed by two authors and a qualitative synthesis performed of those articles that met the inclusion criteria. The systematic review and results were conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

A total of 7,904 articles were identified for title and abstract review. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Robotic assistance in plastic and reconstructive surgery is still in its infancy, with areas such as trans-oral robotic surgery and microvascular procedures the dominant areas of interest currently. A number of benefits have been shown over conventional open surgery, such as improved access and greater dexterity; however, these must be balanced against disadvantages such as the lack of haptic feedback and cost implications.

Conclusion

The feasibility of robotic plastic surgery has been demonstrated in several specific indications. As technology, knowledge, and skills in this area improve, these techniques have the potential to contribute positively to patient and provider experience and outcomes.

Infant Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: A Feasibility Assessment Using a Realistic Cleft Palate Simulator

BACKGROUND

A surgical robot offers enhanced precision, visualization, and access and the potential to improve outcomes in cleft palate surgery. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the da Vinci robot for cleft palate repair in infants using a cleft palate simulator test bed.

METHODS

A high-fidelity cleft palate simulator was developed that allows performance of a robotic cleft palate repair procedure. A complete cleft palate repair was performed with the da Vinci Si with 5-mm instruments and the da Vinci Xi with 8-mm instruments. The advantages of the robotic approach were assessed in comparison with using standard instruments. For each system, arm repositioning, collisions, instrument and endoscope excursion, wrist orientation, and vision were compared for 12 steps of the repair.

RESULTS

The cleft palate simulator provided a reproducible platform for testing robotic cleft palate surgery. The advantages of the robotic approach were the ability to articulate a miniature wrist intraorally with superior visualization, increased ambidexterity, and improved ergonomics compared with using standard instruments. Cleft palate repair with the Xi was superior to the Si with respect to arm repositioning, instrument collisions and excursion, and wrist orientation. However, Xi performance remained suboptimal because of the larger instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic cleft palate repair using the da Vinci system offers advantages compared with the traditional approach. Cleft palate repair is more feasible with the Xi and 8-mm instruments. However, performance is limited by the instrumentation, which requires modification to ensure safety and efficacy.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.