Evaluation of Ventilation Tube Placement and Long-term Audiologic Outcome in Children with Cleft Palate

Tympanostomy Tubes: Are They Necessary? A Systematic Review on Implementation in Cleft Care

OBJECTIVE

To understand the indication for and the effects of early ventilation tube insertion (VTI) on hearing and speech for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP).

DESIGN

We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-guided systematic review of relevant literature.

SETTING

Setting varied by geographical location and level of clinical care across studies.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Patients with CLP who underwent VTI were included.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome measures were hearing and speech following VTI. Secondary outcome measures were tube-related and middle ear complications. Early VTI occurred before or at time of palatoplasty while late VTI occurred after palatoplasty.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles met inclusion criteria. Articles varied among study design, outcome measures, sample size, follow-up, and quality. Few studies demonstrated support for early VTI. Many studies reported no difference in hearing or speech between early and late VTI. Others reported worse outcomes, greater likelihood of complications, or needing repeat VTI following early tympanostomy placement. Several studies had significant limitations, including confounding variables, small sample size, or not reporting on our primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

No consistency was found regarding which patients would benefit most from early VTI. Given the aforementioned variability and sub-optimal methodologies, additional studies are warranted to provide stronger evidence regarding VTI timing in cleft care.

The Impact of Lateral Relaxing Incision on Middle Ear Function in Cleft Palate Repair

Children with cleft palate are susceptible to otitis media with effusion. This study aimed to investigate the effect of lateral relaxing incision (RI) on middle ear function in cleft palate patients who underwent palatoplasty using double-opposing Z-plasty (DOZ). This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent bilateral ventilation tube insertion concurrently with DOZ, wherein RI was selectively performed on the right side of the palate (Rt-RI group) or not (No-RI group). The frequency of VTI, duration of the first ventilation tube retention, and hearing outcomes at the last follow-up were reviewed. Outcomes were compared using the χ2 test and t test. A total of 126 treated ears from 63 non-syndromic children (18 male, 45 female) with cleft palate were reviewed. The mean age at surgery was 15.8±6.17 months. There were no significant differences in the frequency of ventilation tube insertion between the right and left ears within the Rt-RI group or between the Rt-RI and no-RI groups in the right ear. Subgroup analysis for ventilation tube retention time, auditory brainstem response thresholds, and air-conduction pure tone averages showed no significant differences. In the DOZ, the use of RI had no significant effects on middle ear outcomes during 3 years of follow-up. Relaxing incision seems to be safe without concern for middle ear function in children with cleft palate.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Tympanostomy Tubes in Children (Update)

OBJECTIVE

Insertion of tympanostomy tubes is the most common ambulatory surgery performed on children in the United States. Tympanostomy tubes are most often inserted because of persistent middle ear fluid, frequent ear infections, or ear infections that persist after antibiotic therapy. All these conditions are encompassed by the term otitis media (middle ear inflammation). This guideline update provides evidence-based recommendations for patient selection and surgical indications for managing tympanostomy tubes in children. The guideline is intended for any clinician involved in managing children aged 6 months to 12 years with tympanostomy tubes or children being considered for tympanostomy tubes in any care setting as an intervention for otitis media of any type. The target audience includes specialists, primary care clinicians, and allied health professionals.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical practice guideline update is to reassess and update recommendations in the prior guideline from 2013 and to provide clinicians with trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations on patient selection and surgical indications for managing tympanostomy tubes in children. In planning the content of the updated guideline, the guideline update group (GUG) affirmed and included all the original key action statements (KASs), based on external review and GUG assessment of the original recommendations. The guideline update was supplemented with new research evidence and expanded profiles that addressed quality improvement and implementation issues. The group also discussed and prioritized the need for new recommendations based on gaps in the initial guideline or new evidence that would warrant and support KASs. The GUG further sought to bring greater coherence to the guideline recommendations by displaying relationships in a new flowchart to facilitate clinical decision making. Last, knowledge gaps were identified to guide future research.

METHODS

In developing this update, the methods outlined in the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition: A Quality-Driven Approach for Translating Evidence Into Action" were followed explicitly. The GUG was convened with representation from the disciplines of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, otology, pediatrics, audiology, anesthesiology, family medicine, advanced practice nursing, speech-language pathology, and consumer advocacy.

ACTION STATEMENTS

The GUG made strong recommendations for the following KASs: (14) clinicians should prescribe topical antibiotic ear drops only, without oral antibiotics, for children with uncomplicated acute tympanostomy tube otorrhea; (16) the surgeon or designee should examine the ears of a child within 3 months of tympanostomy tube insertion AND should educate families regarding the need for routine, periodic follow-up to examine the ears until the tubes extrude.The GUG made recommendations for the following KASs: (1) clinicians should not perform tympanostomy tube insertion in children with a single episode of otitis media with effusion (OME) of less than 3 months' duration, from the date of onset (if known) or from the date of diagnosis (if onset is unknown); (2) clinicians should obtain a hearing evaluation if OME persists for 3 months or longer OR prior to surgery when a child becomes a candidate for tympanostomy tube insertion; (3) clinicians should offer bilateral tympanostomy tube insertion to children with bilateral OME for 3 months or longer AND documented hearing difficulties; (5) clinicians should reevaluate, at 3- to 6-month intervals, children with chronic OME who do not receive tympanostomy tubes, until the effusion is no longer present, significant hearing loss is detected, or structural abnormalities of the tympanic membrane or middle ear are suspected; (6) clinicians should not perform tympanostomy tube insertion in children with recurrent acute otitis media who do not have middle ear effusion in either ear at the time of assessment for tube candidacy; (7) clinicians should offer bilateral tympanostomy tube insertion in children with recurrent acute otitis media who have unilateral or bilateral middle ear effusion at the time of assessment for tube candidacy; (8) clinicians should determine if a child with recurrent acute otitis media or with OME of any duration is at increased risk for speech, language, or learning problems from otitis media because of baseline sensory, physical, cognitive, or behavioral factors; (10) the clinician should not place long-term tubes as initial surgery for children who meet criteria for tube insertion unless there is a specific reason based on an anticipated need for prolonged middle ear ventilation beyond that of a short-term tube; (12) in the perioperative period, clinicians should educate caregivers of children with tympanostomy tubes regarding the expected duration of tube function, recommended follow-up schedule, and detection of complications; (13) clinicians should not routinely prescribe postoperative antibiotic ear drops after tympanostomy tube placement; (15) clinicians should not encourage routine, prophylactic water precautions (use of earplugs or headbands, avoidance of swimming or water sports) for children with tympanostomy tubes.The GUG offered the following KASs as options: (4) clinicians may perform tympanostomy tube insertion in children with unilateral or bilateral OME for 3 months or longer (chronic OME) AND symptoms that are likely attributable, all or in part, to OME that include, but are not limited to, balance (vestibular) problems, poor school performance, behavioral problems, ear discomfort, or reduced quality of life; (9) clinicians may perform tympanostomy tube insertion in at-risk children with unilateral or bilateral OME that is likely to persist as reflected by a type B (flat) tympanogram or a documented effusion for 3 months or longer; (11) clinicians may perform adenoidectomy as an adjunct to tympanostomy tube insertion for children with symptoms directly related to the adenoids (adenoid infection or nasal obstruction) OR in children aged 4 years or older to potentially reduce future incidence of recurrent otitis media or the need for repeat tube insertion.

Critérios para a classificação do grau da perda auditiva e proteção social de pessoas com essa deficiência

RESUMO Objetivos: identificar critérios adotados nacional e internacionalmente para classificação do grau da perda auditiva, compará-los com o estabelecido na legislação brasileira e discutir as possíveis consequências dessa legislação para a proteção social de Pessoas com Deficiência (PcD) auditiva. Métodos: realizou-se uma revisão narrativa para a identificação dos critérios utilizados nessa classificação. A busca foi realizada em abril de 2020, a partir das plataformas BVS e PUBMED. Foram incluídos estudos publicados entre 2015 e 2019, em inglês, espanhol e português, sobre pesquisas primárias realizadas com seres humanos e menção explícita aos critérios utilizados para a classificação do grau da perda auditiva. Revisão da Literatura: observou-se que há uma predileção pela média entre as frequências de 0,5, 1, 2 e 4 kHz. A legislação brasileira não segue esse critério, o que pode ser uma barreira para o acesso das PcD auditiva aos programas de proteção social. Considerações Finais: não há consenso sobre qual é o melhor critério, todavia há predominância de utilização do considerado mais abrangente para a avaliação auditiva, que não é o legalmente adotado no Brasil. É necessário um debate sobre o critério legal brasileiro, a fim de promover os direitos sociais instituídos para parte das PcD auditiva no Brasil.

Criteria to classify degrees of hearing loss and the social protection of people with this disability

ABSTRACT Purpose: to identify criteria used nationally and internationally to classify degrees of hearing loss, compare them with what is established in the Brazilian law, and discuss possible consequences of such a law on the social protection of people with hearing loss. Methods: a narrative review was conducted to identify the criteria used in this classification, by searching the platforms VHL and PubMed in April 2020. It included primary human research explicitly mentioning the criteria used to classify the degree of hearing loss, published between 2015 and 2019 in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Literature Review: there is a preference for the four-frequency mean at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The Brazilian law does not follow these criteria, which may pose a barrier to people with hearing loss, hindering their access to social protection programs. Final Considerations: there is no consensus on the best criteria, although the most encompassing ones in hearing assessment predominate - which are not the ones legally used in Brazil. It is necessary to debate the Brazilian legal criteria to ensure existing social rights to part of people with hearing loss in Brazil.

Speech and Audiology Outcomes After Single-Stage Versus Early 2-Stage Cleft Palate Repair

PURPOSE

The timing and management of patients with cleft palates have been controversial. Early soft palate closure at the time of cleft lip repair followed by hard palate closure at a second stage has been hypothesized to improve speech and audiology outcomes. This study compares cleft palate patients who have undergone single-stage versus 2-stage cleft palate repairs and the outcomes on speech and hearing.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients with diagnosis of cleft lip with complete cleft palate who underwent either single or 2-stage repair from 2006 to 2012. Data collected included age at each surgery, necessity of further speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency, frequency of tympanostomy tube placement, presence of hearing loss, and speech assessment data graded per the validated Americleft speech scale.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were identified and subdivided into groups of single-stage and 2-stage repair. The mean age at the time of single-stage palate repair was 13.3 months. For the 2-stage group, the mean ages were 4.2 and 11.8 months for the soft palate and hard palate repairs, respectively. Comparing the single-stage versus 2-stage palate repairs, there was no significant difference in all speech parameters including hypernasality, hyponasality, nasal air emission, articulation, expressive language, receptive language, speech intelligibility, and speech acceptability for both unilateral and bilateral cleft lip/palate patients. Two-stage repair was associated with increased number of tympanostomy tube placement compared with single-stage repair (relative risk, 1.74; P = 0.009), and the first set of tubes was performed at a statistically significantly younger age, 4.5 months in the 2-stage repair compared with 16.9 months in the single-stage (P = 0.012) with 87.5% performed with first stage of repair. However, there was no difference in the types, degrees of hearing loss, or the presence of at least mild conductive hearing loss at latest follow-up audiograms between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant benefit with respect to speech or hearing outcomes between single-stage and 2-stage cleft palate repairs. This advocates for surgeon and family preference in the timing of cleft palate repair.

Subannular Tubes in Children With Cleft Palate

OBJECTIVE

To investigate subannular tube (SAT) placement as an alternative treatment of chronic middle ear disease in children with cleft palate.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

All children with cleft palate with intractable otitis media with effusion and/or with tympanic membrane retraction, operated for insertion of 1 or more sets of transtympanic tubes followed by SAT in a tertiary center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Audiological outcomes, average duration of tubes, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included 21 children with cleft palate, aged 3 to 14 years. A total of 38 ears was evaluated. The median time of follow-up was 42 months. During follow-up, 69.2% of the patients had no complications. Observed complications were otorrhea (13.5%) and tube obstruction (7.7%). In 7.9% of the cases, otitis media with effusion relapsed after tube extrusion. By the end of the study, 76.3% of the tubes remained in situ and 68.4% of the tympanic membranes had the SAT in place and had no significant alterations. The mean duration of SATs was 16 months, which was significantly superior to transtympanic tube duration. A significant sustained improvement in the hearing of children with SATs was observed.

CONCLUSION

Subannular tube insertion results in hearing improvement to normal range and tympanic retraction pockets reversion in children with cleft palate with persistent otitis media with effusion and tympanic retraction/atelectasis. This surgery appears to be safe and provides long-term efficient middle ear aeration. Strict postoperative follow-up is crucial for the success of the treatment.

Long-term outcomes in children with and without cleft palate treated with tympanostomy for otitis media with effusion before the age of 2 years

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes of children with and without cleft palate receiving early treatment for otitis media with effusion (OME) are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare long-term otological and audiological outcomes between children with and without cleft palate treated with tympanostomy for OME before the age of 2 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-five children (180 ears) with cleft palate (study group) and 97 children (185 ears) without (control group) were followed-up to a maximum age of 7 years. We retrospectively analyzed the audiological outcomes at the age of 7 years, and the otological outcomes at the last examination.

RESULTS

The percentages of children with OME resolution before the age of 7 years were 47.4% and 60% in the study and control groups, respectively, and those of ears with healed tympanic membrane were 71.7% and 79.5% in the corresponding groups. Significantly more ears were subjected to retympanostomy in the study (31.1%) than in the control group (21.6%). Mean pure-tone average (0.5‒4 kHz) was 15.6 dB HL and 14.3 dB HL for the corresponding groups.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Otological and audiological outcomes in both groups were similar. The audiological prognosis was favorable regardless of the cleft palate condition.

Change in Initial Tympanostomy Tube Placement Timing Yields Decreased Burden of Care Without Increased Complications in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

Objective:

To report a practice audit of the consequences of a change in protocol in the timing of placement of tympanostomy tubes in infants with cleft lip and palate.

Participants:

All children with a diagnosis of cleft lip and palate, treated between November 1998 and May 2006 under the old protocol, and between December 2012 and July 2016 under a new protocol. Under the old protocol, tympanostomy tubes were first inserted at the time of lip repair at around age 2 months. Under the new protocol, tympanostomy tubes were deferred until the time of palate repair around the age of 9 months. Children with syndromic diagnoses other than Stickler syndrome and Van der Woude syndrome, and children who failed newborn hearing screen were excluded.

Main Outcome Measures:

Incidence of otorrhea from birth to 6 months after palate repair and presence of hearing loss at ages 1 and 2.

Results:

Deferral of tympanostomy tubes until the time of palate repair decreases the burden of care due to otorrhea as compared to early tympanostomy tubes at the time of lip repair. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hearing thresholds at or below 15 dB at age 1 or 2.

Conclusions:

Placement of tympanostomy tubes at the time of palate repair balances the goals of minimizing the adverse effects from middle ear effusion and minimizing the burden of care on our patients and their families.

The impact of cleft lip and/or palate on parental quality of life: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/CP/CLP) is one of the most common congenital anomalies. Children may suffer from a variety of health problems including difficulties with feeding and speech, middle ear problems, hearing loss and associated psychosocial concerns. The extent of impact of this disorder on the parents, however, has not yet been thoroughly evaluated. This pilot study was performed to evaluate the impact of having a child with CL/CP/CLP on the parents' quality of life (QoL) and family functioning and to compare between cleft subgroups.

METHODS

Forty-five parents with children aged 6 months to 6 years with CL/CP/CLP, followed by the multidisciplinary orofacial cleft team of Ghent University Hospital, completed following standardized questionnaires: Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), Family Impact Scale (FIS) and Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument (CarerQoL). Subgroups were compared with diverse unpaired statistical tests.

RESULTS

Younger children (6m-2y) with CL/CP/CLP entail more impact on parental QoL compared to children aged 2-4y old (p=0.04, ε²=0.15/p=0.02, ε²=0.17/p=0.02, ε²=0.17). Families from children with a syndromic cleft also encounter more impact (p=0.04, r=0.32 /p=0.01, r=0.37 /p=0.008, r=0.40/p=0.003, r=0.45). Prenatal orofacial cleft diagnosis is associated with a higher reporting of family conflicts (p=0.04, r=0.32). In case of non-syndromic clefts, families having children with CLP report more family conflicts compared to CL or CP (p=0.02, ε²=0.46). Parental education and number of children within the household showed no significant impact on parental QoL.

CONCLUSION

This cross-sectional study confirms that having a child with CL/CP/CLP impacts the parental QoL. This study was performed as a pilot-study for larger multicentre studies, future development of effective screening tools and identification of subgroups at risk. Long-term multidisciplinary follow-up should involve family-centred support.

Ear- and hearing-related impact on quality of life in children with cleft palate: Development and pretest of a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument

OBJECTIVES

To investigate to what extent middle ear problems and associated hearing loss affect quality of life (QoL) of children born with a cleft palate.

METHODS

Fifty-five children aged between 6 and 18 years, born with non-syndromic cleft palate ± cleft lip (CP/L) were included. A new health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire was generated with consideration of the following domains of QoL: communication, hearing loss, physical symptoms, limitation of activities and socio-emotional impact.

RESULTS

Major psychosocial problems were not reported in the majority of children as a result of their ear and hearing problems. However, according to their parents, 2 out of 3 children, had difficulty speaking clearly and understandably. These communication problems led to behavioural problems and social isolation in 1 out of 5 children. Scholastic achievement was negatively influenced by two factors: hearing loss and sleep disturbance due to ear problems.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge this is the first study to quantitatively measure the ear- and hearing-related impact on QoL in children born with CP/L. Large-scale, multicentre studies are needed to further research and expand on the findings of this pilot study.

Contribution of the Use of a Pen-Type Endoscope to Evaluate and Treat Ears Simultaneously During Cleft Palate Surgery in Late Presented Cases

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of secretory otitis media is very high among the nonoperated cleft palate patients.

METHODS

Ninety-one cleft palate operations were performed on late presented cases in Sudan, Africa. The surgeries were performed according to the Veau-Wardill-Kilner push-back technique. A laptop connected pen-type endoscopic camera was used to evaluate the tympanic membrane and address middle ear disease in all patients simultaneously. The procedure was performed after removing wax from the external auditory canal. A small incision was made with a myringotomy knife through the layers of the tympanic membrane if any sign of fluid collection was observed, after which the middle ear effusion was evacuated and the ventilation tube was inserted.

RESULTS

This procedure was undertaken in 182 ears; 41 ears (22.5%) were healthy, 19 ears (10.5%) had chronic perforations, 122 ears (67%) underwent myringotomy procedures, and 54 (44.2%) were treated by inserting a ventilation tube. Despite the challenging work environment, standard monitoring facilities were available and all operations were completed with no early complications.

CONCLUSION

The pen-type camera instead of an operating microscope was a tremendous contribution, as it was easy to handle and contributed to the good outcomes. The use of this technique is strongly recommended in surgical camps.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Children with Cleft Palate: Predictors of Otologic Issues in the First 10 Years

Objective

To evaluate the characteristics of children with cleft palate associated with persistent otologic issues in the first 10 years of life.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Single academic center.

Subjects and Methods

Children born with cleft palate from 2003 to 2007 and treated by the UC Davis Cleft and Craniofacial Team between January 2003 and December 2017 were included in the study. Data from 143 patients were analyzed via Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests for univariate analysis and logistic regression to determine adjusted odds ratios.

Results

The median length of follow-up was 9.9 years, and the age at last ear examination was 10.7 years. At the last evaluation, unresolved otologic issues were common, with at least 1 ear having a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation (16.1%), a tympanostomy tube (36.2%), or conductive hearing loss (23.1%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, history of palate revision or speech surgery was associated with having a TM perforation ( P = .02). The only clinical variables associated with conductive hearing loss was the presence of a TM perforation ( P < .01) or a genetic abnormality ( P = .02). Severity of palatal clefting was not associated with specific otologic or audiologic outcomes after adjusting for other characteristics.

Conclusion

A large proportion of children with cleft palate have persistent otologic issues at age 10 years and would benefit from continued close monitoring well after the age when most children have normalized eustachian tube function. Prolonged otologic issues were not found to be associated with cleft type.

Otologic Outcomes With Two Different Surgical Protocols in Patients With a Cleft Palate: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare otologic outcomes in patients with cleft palate who underwent 2 different surgical protocols.

DESIGN

Monocentric retrospective analysis of medical reports.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

All consecutively treated patients affected by a cleft palate, born between January 1998 and December 2002 (group 1) and between January 2007 and December 2010 (group 2).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in group 1 underwent Veau-Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty at 10 months and had ventilation tubes inserted in case of otitis media with effusion (OME) during surgery. Patients in group 2 underwent Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty at 5 months. Ventilation tubes were inserted only in case of persistent OME.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The need for a second set of ventilation tubes to be inserted in case of persistent OME, the presence of OME at the age of 2 years, and tympanic abnormalities at the age of 5 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference either for the presence of OME at the age of 2 years (27 [45%] vs 32 [57.14%], respectively, in groups 1 and 2; P = .191) or for tympanic abnormalities at the age of 5 years (20 [33.33%] vs 15 [26.79%]; P = .433). Statistically significant difference was found for the need to insert a second set of ventilation tubes in case of persistent OME (29 [48.33%] vs 12 [21.42%], respectively; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Early Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty may reduce persistent OME and consequently the need for ventilation tubes insertion, compared to later Veau-Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty.