Relationships between integrated oral-nasal differential pressure and velopharyngeal closure

Speech and Language Issues in the Cleft Palate Population: The State of the Art

Objective

State-of-the-art activity demands a look back, a look around, and, importantly, a look into the new millennium. The area of speech and language has been an integral part of cleft palate care from the very beginning. This article reviews the development and progression of our knowledge base over the last several decades in the areas of speech; language; anatomy and physiology of the velopharynx; assessment of velopharyngeal function; and treatment, both behavioral and physical, for velopharyngeal problems.

Method

The clear focus is on the cleft palate condition. However, much of what is reviewed applies to persons with other craniofacial disorders and with other underlying causes of velopharyngeal impairment. A major challenge in the next several years is to sort through speech disorders that have a clear anatomic underpinning, and thus are more amenable to physical management, versus those that may be treated successfully using behavioral approaches. Speech professionals must do a better job of finding and applying ways of treating individuals with less severe velopharyngeal impairment, thus avoiding the need for physical management in these persons or ignoring the speech problem altogether.

Conclusion

Early and aggressive management for speech and language disorders should be conducted. For most individuals born with cleft conditions, a realistic goal should be normal speech and language usage by the time the child reaches the school-age years.

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the velopharyngeal mechanism at rest and during speech in Chinese adults and children

PURPOSE

Recent applications of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique introduced accurate 3-dimensional measurements of the velopharyngeal mechanism. Further standardization of the data acquisition and analysis protocol was successfully applied to imaging adults at rest and during phonation. This study was designed to test and modify a noninvasive protocol for evaluating young children without using general anesthesia. In addition, the velopharyngeal structures and their maximal motion were compared between adults and children.

METHOD

MRI data were acquired in 12 young adults and 9 children at rest and during speech production. Multiple measurements were made on the velopharyngeal and craniofacial structures as well as on the levator veli palatini muscle.

RESULTS

Most of the ratio measurements of structural shape and maximal motion in the velopharyngeal and craniofacial regions were not significantly different between the adults and the children, despite the fact that the children had much smaller structures than the adults.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of the velopharyngeal mechanism remains stable in young children and adults so that the motions of the velum and pharyngeal walls are adequate to close the velopharyngeal port completely.

Speech Aerodynamics and Nasalance in Oral Cancer Patients Treated with Microvascular Transfers

The purpose of the current study was to assess speech aerodynamics and nasal acoustic energy during a follow-up period of 12 months in patients having undergone microvascular free flap reconstruction after tumor ablation from the oral cavity or oropharynx, usually followed by radiotherapy. Velopharyngeal function was assessed in terms of velopharyngeal orifice size by a pressure-flow measurement technique as well as by determining the instrumental correlate of perceived nasality (i.e., nasalance) during speech production. Velopharyngeal closure and nasalance were estimated to be adequate before operation both in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer patients. After the operation, at the group level, the oral cavity patients showed adequate velopharyngeal closure and nasalance. In contrast, the postoperative velopharynx orifice size was significantly bigger in the oropharyngeal cancer patients as compared with the oral cavity patients 6 months after operation. However, based on average aerodynamic as well as the nasalance data, the impairment of velopharyngeal function was not regarded clinically significant at the group level in either group of patients. The present treatment protocol served to maintain the prerequisites for normal or close to normal speech physiology.