Treatment of Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis with intravitreal moxifloxacin in a rabbit model

Endophthalmitis: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis from 1993 to 2023

Aims

This study is designed to generalize and depict the research hotspots of endophthalmitis through bibliometric methods and software and analyze the evolutive tendency of the work on this severe disease over the past 30 years.

Methods

This study employed a rigorous bibliometric approach. We identified all endophthalmitis-related literature by conducting a comprehensive search of the Science Citation Index Expanded database under the Web of Science Core Collection. The data was then analyzed and visualized using CiteSpace and VOSviewer, two widely recognized software tools in the field of bibliometrics. CiteSpace was used to analyze the country distributions, dual map overlay of journals, keyword bursts, and co-cited references. VOSviewer was employed to describe the authors and co-cited authors, the journals, the co-cited journals, and the keywords co-occurrence network. This robust methodology ensures the reliability and validity of the study's findings.

Results

A total of 2960 publications, including 2695 articles and 265 reviews, were included in this bibliometric study. There has been no shortage of endophthalmitis-related publications since 1993, with an apparent upward trend during recent years. Possible correlations with the COVID-19 pandemic are also analyzed. These studies were finished by 11,048 authors from 75 countries worldwide, with the United States in the lead. In the keyword co-occurrence network, except for the endophthalmitis term, cataract surgery becomes the keyword with the highest frequency. Different categories of endophthalmitis, including postoperative, post-injection, post-traumatic, and endogenous endophthalmitis, and antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapies of infectious endophthalmitis, are discussed by categories. From the perspective of the timeline, postoperative and post-injection endophthalmitis were the dominant forms before and after the year 2000, respectively. Co-citation analyses reveal that the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) conducted in 1995 provides pivotal guidance for later research. Diverse pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Propionibacterium acnes, Viridians Streptococci, and Bacillus cereus) or fungi (e.g., Candida, Aspergillus, and Fusarium) contribute to varying treatment principles and clinical prognosis, which should be taken seriously. In addition, intravitreal and intracameral antibiotics are the mainstay for treating and preventing infectious endophthalmitis, respectively.

Conclusion

Our bibliometric analysis provides an overview of dynamic evolution and structural relationships in the research field of endophthalmitis. The displayed hotspots and developmental directions have reference values for future investigation.

Clinical Profile, Antibiotic Resistance and Outcomes in Bacterial Endophthalmitis: Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Endophthalmitis as Compared to Other Organisms

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical profile, outcomes and antibiotic resistance in bacterial endophthalmitis.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of a study conducted at a tertiary centre, where 60 consecutive cases of culture-proven bacterial endophthalmitis were included prospectively. Group 1 included coagulase-negative Staphylococcus endophthalmitis (CNSE), while group 2 included the remaining cases. Clinical features, antibiotic resistance and visual outcomes were compared. Visual acuity >3/60 at six months of follow-up was defined as a good visual outcome.

RESULTS

Group 1 had 31 cases, while group 2 had 29. Group 2 included 12 gram-positive and 17 gram-negative isolates. Among the groups, group 2 had more patients with presenting visual acuity below hand motions close to the face (25 vs. 12, p<0.001), poor visual outcomes (26 vs. 3, p<0.001) and retinal detachment (RD) (10 vs. 2, p=0.007). Pseudomonas was most commonly resistant to antibiotics, and ceftazidime (p=0.005) and cefazolin (p=0.009) resistance were higher in group 2 isolates. In group 1, five isolates were resistant to any one of the antibiotics, whereas in group 2, 13 isolates were resistant to any one of the antibiotics (p=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, eyes in the group of endophthalmitis caused by CNSE achieved better visual acuities at the last follow-up compared to eyes with endophthalmitis caused by other bacteria. Antibiotic resistance in isolates other than CNSE is a cause of concern.

ALTERNATIVE INTRAVITREAL ANTIBIOTICS: A Systematic Review for Consideration in Recalcitrant or Resistant Endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

To organize, categorize, and create a quick reference guide for the use of intravitreal antibiotic alternatives to the standard combination of vancomycin and ceftazidime for the treatment of endophthalmitis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The authors searched for all available information regarding intravitreal antibiotics in the last 21 years. Manuscripts were selected according to relevance, level of information, and the available data regarding intravitreal dose, potential adverse effects, bacterial coverage, and relevant pharmacokinetic information.

RESULTS

The authors included 164 of 1810 manuscripts. The antibiotics were classified according to their class into fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, glycopeptide and lipopeptide, penicillins and beta-lactams, tetracyclines, and miscellaneous. The authors also included information regarding intravitreal adjuvants for the treatment of endophthalmitis and one ocular antiseptic.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of infectious endophthalmitis is a therapeutic challenge. The current review summarizes the properties of possible intravitreal antibiotic alternatives that should be considered in cases of suboptimal response to initial treatment.

Study of the Correlation Between Severity of Endophthalmitis and Posterior Vitreous Detachment Using a Rabbit Endophthalmitis Model

Purpose

We have reported that the absence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is related to the onset and severity of infectious endophthalmitis, based on clinical experience. To demonstrate clinical findings in animal models, we created endophthalmitis models for the presence or absence of PVD and examined differences in severity.

Method

We estimated a rabbit infectious eye model with and without PVD using Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PVD(+) and PVD(-) groups). After injection of bacteria inoculation for 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours, we evaluated the clinical score of the anterior chamber (n = 14). Removing the vitreous and retina from the enucleated eyeballs, the number of bacteria was counted using each specimen (n = 12). In addition, the number of inflammatory cells approximately 3 mm2 around the optic disc and histopathologic grading of intraocular inflammation was compared from histopathologic images (n = 7). Electroretinogram (ERG) was performed in experimentally infected rabbit eyes in both groups at three times after injection of the bacterial suspension.

Results

There was no difference between the two groups in the clinical score of the anterior chamber of each time phase, but the bacterial cultures showed significantly fewer bacteria in the PVD(-) group 24 hours after bacterial inoculation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of inflammatory cells was significantly less in the PVD group (P < 0.05). As a result of ERG, the decreases of a- and b-waves in amplitude were significantly greater in the PVD(-) group than in the PVD(+) group.

Conclusions

The present study confirms using animal models that the absence of PVD contributed to the severity of bacterial endophthalmitis.

The cereus matter of Bacillus endophthalmitis

Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) endophthalmitis is a devastating intraocular infection primarily associated with post-traumatic injuries. The majority of these infections result in substantial vision loss, if not loss of the eye itself, within 12-48 h. Multifactorial mechanisms that lead to the innate intraocular inflammatory response during this disease include the combination of robust bacterial replication, migration of the organism throughout the eye, and toxin production by the organism. Therefore, the window of therapeutic intervention in B. cereus endophthalmitis is quite narrow compared to that of other pathogens which cause this disease. Understanding the interaction of bacterial and host factors is critical in understanding the disease and formulating more rational therapeutics for salvaging vision. In this review, we will discuss clinical and research findings related to B. cereus endophthalmitis in terms of the organism's virulence and inflammogenic potential, and strategies for improving of current therapeutic regimens for this blinding disease.

A Review of the Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids as an Adjuvant to Antibiotics in Infectious Endophthalmitis

Infectious endophthalmitis is an important cause of vision loss worldwide. This entity most often occurs as a complication of intraocular surgery especially following cataract surgery or intravitreal injection. Endophthalmitis is regarded as a serious complication following ocular surgery and the final visual outcome is fundamentally contingent on timely recognition and intervention. Intravitreal and oral antibiotics in combination with pars plana vitrectomy or vitreous aspiration remain the mainstay in the management of endophthalmitis. However, significant inflammation may persist even after sterilization of the intraocular cavities with appropriate antibiotics resulting in failure of treatment. This forms the basis for the use of intravitreal corticosteroids as an adjuvant to antibiotics in the management of infectious endophthalmitis. In the index manuscript, we review the existing literature to determine the role of intravitreal corticosteroids as an adjuvant to antibiotics in treating infectious endophthalmitis, and discuss their beneficial effects and controversial concerns.

Modeling intraocular bacterial infections

Bacterial endophthalmitis is an infection and inflammation of the posterior segment of the eye which can result in significant loss of visual acuity. Even with prompt antibiotic, anti-inflammatory and surgical intervention, vision and even the eye itself may be lost. For the past century, experimental animal models have been used to examine various aspects of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of bacterial endophthalmitis, to further the development of anti-inflammatory treatment strategies, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and efficacies of antibiotics. Experimental models allow independent control of many parameters of infection and facilitate systematic examination of infection outcomes. While no single animal model perfectly reproduces the human pathology of bacterial endophthalmitis, investigators have successfully used these models to understand the infectious process and the host response, and have provided new information regarding therapeutic options for the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis. This review highlights experimental animal models of endophthalmitis and correlates this information with the clinical setting. The goal is to identify knowledge gaps that may be addressed in future experimental and clinical studies focused on improvements in the therapeutic preservation of vision during and after this disease.

Temporal retinal transcriptome and systems biology analysis identifies key pathways and hub genes in Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis

Bacterial endophthalmitis remains a devastating inflammatory condition associated with permanent vision loss. Hence, assessing the host response in this disease may provide new targets for intervention. Using a mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) endophthalmitis and performing retinal transcriptome analysis, we discovered progressive changes in the expression of 1,234 genes. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses revealed the major pathways impacted in endophthalmitis includes: metabolism, inflammatory/immune, antimicrobial, cell trafficking, and lipid biosynthesis. Among the immune/inflammation pathways, JAK/Stat and IL-17A signaling were the most significantly affected. Interactive network-based analyses identified 13 focus hub genes (IL-6, IL-1β, CXCL2, STAT3, NUPR1, Jun, CSF1, CYR61, CEBPB, IGF-1, EGFR1, SPP1, and TGM2) within these important pathways. The expression of hub genes confirmed by qRT-PCR, ELISA (IL-6, IL-1β, and CXCL2), and Western blot or immunostaining (CEBP, STAT3, NUPR1, and IGF1) showed strong correlation with transcriptome data. Since TLR2 plays an important role in SA endophthalmitis, counter regulation analysis of TLR2 ligand pretreated retina or the use of retinas from TLR2 knockout mice showed the down-regulation of inflammatory regulatory genes. Collectively, our study provides, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of the transcriptomic response and identifies key pathways regulating retinal innate responses in staphylococcal endophthalmitis.

Antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of moxifloxacin on rat retinal ganglion cells

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of moxifloxacin on cultured rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC5).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rat retinal ganglion cells were exposed to various concentration of moxifloxacin (5-1500 μg/mL). For antiproliferative properties, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) test was performed. Cellular cytotoxicity was assessed by using the Live/Dead viability/cytotoxicity assay and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy after 24 and 72 h of incubation, respectively.

RESULTS

Neither cytotoxic nor antiproliferative effect of moxifloxacin was observed below 50 μg/mL on RGC5 cells after 24 and 72 h of incubation. At higher concentrations of moxifloxacin (150 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 1500 μg/mL (p < 0.001)) the number of viable cells and the proliferation rate of RGC5 were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a dose-dependent cytotoxic and antiproliferative effect of moxifloxacin on RGC5. Therefore, intracameral application of moxifloxacin should be used cautiously in patients with increased risk of retinal ganglion cells damage, particularly in glaucoma patients.

Severe bacterial endophthalmitis: towards improving clinical outcomes

Endophthalmitis is an infection and inflammation of the interior of the eye that can result in significant vision loss. This infection occurs as a result of the seeding of organisms into the interior of the eye following surgery (postoperative), trauma (post-traumatic) or an infection in another site in the body (endogenous). The general rate of endophthalmitis has remained steady over the past several years. However, the increased use of intraocular injections to treat various degenerative and inflammatory ocular diseases, in addition to the already large and growing number of invasive ocular surgeries, may increase the opportunities in which organisms can gain access to the eye. In most cases of endophthalmitis, useful vision can be retained if proper treatment is instituted. However, in severe cases of bacterial endophthalmitis, blindness often occurs despite treatment. This article summarizes information on endophthalmitis epidemiology, treatment issues and current regimens, and recent experimental and clinical efforts to improve the outcome of severe and blinding forms of bacterial endophthalmitis.

Role of inflammation in endophthalmitis

Inflammation originating from infection of the vitreous cavity is called endophthalmitis. Attention has been focused on the epidemiologic, microbiologic reports, and treatment options; unfortunately, the role of the host immune reaction in the visual function damage is still not well understood. Endophthalmitis occurs most frequently after cataract surgery. In this paper we review the published literature regarding inflammatory mediators and apoptosis during the course of endophthalmitis. Toll-like receptors, cytokines, high-mobility group box 1 proteins, aB-crystallin and apoptosis have been studied during clinical and experimental cases of endophthalmitis. Further understanding of the host-immune reaction to vitreous infection is essential for the development of new therapies. The use of intravitreal antibiotics and corticosteroids, vitrectomy and systemic antibiotics for the preservation of visual function is still discouraging.

Bacterial endophthalmitis in the age of outpatient intravitreal therapies and cataract surgeries: host-microbe interactions in intraocular infection

Bacterial endophthalmitis is a sight threatening infection of the interior structures of the eye. Incidence in the US has increased in recent years, which appears to be related to procedures being performed on an aging population. The advent of outpatient intravitreal therapy for management of age-related macular degeneration raises yet additional risks. Compounding the problem is the continuing progression of antibiotic resistance. Visual prognosis for endophthalmitis depends on the virulence of the causative organism, the severity of intraocular inflammation, and the timeliness of effective therapy. We review the current understanding of the pathogenesis of bacterial endophthalmitis, highlighting opportunities for the development of improved therapeutics and preventive strategies.

[Intracameral moxifloxacin: a safe option for endophthalmitis prophylaxis? In vitro safety profile for intraocular application]

BACKGROUND

Moxifloxacin (Vigamox), a 4th-generation fluoroquinolone, covers most isolates causing endophthalmitis. It is safe and effective for systemic and topical use; however, only very limited data are available on prophylactic intracameral administration to prevent endophthalmitis. This study investigated the safety of Vigamox for intracameral application in a cell-culture model.

METHODS

The endothelial toxicity of moxifloxacin (Vigamox) was evaluated in cultured human corneas. Primary human retinal pigment epithelium cells (RPEs), trabecular meshwork cells (TMCs), lens epithelium cells (LECs), and corneal endothelial cells (CECs) were treated with concentrations of Vigamox. Toxic effects were evaluated after 24 h (MTT assay and live-dead assay). By treating TMC, CEC, and RPE cells either with oxidative stress or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), the effects of moxifloxacin on cellular viability under conditions of inflammation were investigated.

RESULTS

No corneal endothelial toxicity could be detected after 30 days of treatment with moxifloxacin 500 microg/ml. Primary RPEs, TMCs, LECs, and CECs showed adverse effects on proliferation and viability only at concentrations higher than 150 microg/ml moxifloxacin. After preincubation with TNF-a, LPS, and IL-6 for 24 h and subsequent treatment with moxifloxacin at concentrations of 10-150 microg/ml for 24 h, no significant decrease in proliferation or viability was observed. H2O2 exposure did not increase cellular toxicity

CONCLUSION

Vigamox did not show significant toxicity on primary RPEs, TMCs, LECs, CECs, or human corneal endothelium at concentrations up to 150 microg/ml. The MIC90 of moxifloxacin for pathogens commonly encountered in endophthalmitis is known to be in the range of 0.25-2.5 microg/ml. Therefore, intracameral use of Vigamox at concentrations up to 150 microg/ml may be safe and effective for preventing endophthalmitis after intraocular surgery.

Endophthalmitis: Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, management, and perspectives

Endophthalmitis is a rare but sight-threatening complication that can occur after ocular surgery or trauma or as a consequence of systemic infection. To optimize visual outcome, early diagnosis and treatment are essential. Over recent decades, advances in hygienic standards, improved microbiologic and surgical techniques, development of powerful antimicrobial drugs, and the introduction of intravitreal antibiotic therapy have led to a decreased incidence and improved management of endophthalmitis. However, endophthalmitis still represents a serious clinical problem. This review focuses on current principles and techniques for evaluation and treatment of endophthalmitis. In addition, it addresses recent developments regarding antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of infectious endophthalmitis.

Comparison of antifungal efficacies of moxifloxacin, liposomal amphotericin B, and combination treatment in experimental Candida albicans endophthalmitis in rabbits

The goal of this study was to compare in vitro and in vivo efficacy of moxifloxacin and liposomal amphotericin B (Amp-B) monotherapies and combination treatment against Candida albicans in an exogenous endophthalmitis model in rabbit eyes. Microplate dilution tests and checkerboard analysis were performed to detect in vitro efficacies. Endophthalmitis was induced by intravitreal injection of C. albicans in 40 rabbit eyes with simultaneous intravitreal drug injection according to prophylactic treatment groups. Group 1 (control group) received 0.1 mL of balanced salt solution, group 2 (moxi group) 100 microg moxifloxacin/0.1 mL, group 3 (Amp-B group) 10 microg liposomal Amp-B/0.1 mL, and group 4 (combi group) both 100 microg moxifloxacin/0.1 mL [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] and 10 microg liposomal Amp-B/0.05 mL intravitreally. Clinical examination, quantitative analysis of microorganisms, and histopathologic examination were performed as in vivo studies. The minimum inhibitory concentration of liposomal Amp-B against C. albicans was found to be 1 microg/mL. Moxifloxacin showed no inhibition of in vitro C. albicans growth. The minimum inhibitory concentration values of liposomal Amp-B for C. albicans were reduced two- to eightfold with increasing concentrations of moxifloxacin in vitro. In vivo, there was no C. albicans growth in the combi group (zero of eight eyes), whereas three eyes (37.5%) showed growth in the Amp-B group. Vitreous inflammation, retinal detachment, focal retinal necrosis, and outer nuclear layer loss were found to be lower in the moxi group compared with the control group. Ganglion cell and inner nuclear layer loss was observed in all eyes (100%) in both the moxi and combi groups, whereas only in 25% (two of eight eyes) in the Amp-B group. Moxifloxacin strongly augments the efficacy of liposomal Amp-B against C. albicans in vitro, although it has no in vitro antifungal activity when used alone. It is interesting that we found a synergistic effect for in vitro tests but failed to demonstrate it in vivo. When 100 microg moxifloxacin/0.1 mL is given intravitreally, it has some toxic effects that are limited to the inner retinal layers.

Intracameral moxifloxacin: in vitro safety on human ocular cells

PURPOSE

The fourth-generation fluoroquinolone, moxifloxacin, covers most gram-positive and gram-negative isolates causing endophthalmitis. It is safe and effective for systemic and topical use, but only limited data are available on prophylactic intracameral administration to prevent endophthalmitis. This study uses a cell culture model to investigate the safety of moxifloxacin for intracameral application.

METHODS

Endothelial toxicity of moxifloxacin was evaluated in cultured human corneas. Possible toxic effects of moxifloxacin (10-750 microg/mL) in corneal endothelial cells (CEC), primary human trabecular meshwork cells (TMC), and primary human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells were evaluated after 24 hours and under conditions of oxidative and inflammatory stress by treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha, lipopolysaccharides, or interleukin-6. Toxicity was evaluated by tetrazolium dye reduction assay, and cell viability was quantified by a microscopic live-dead assay.

RESULTS

No corneal endothelial toxicity could be detected after 30 days of treatment with 500 microg/mL moxifloxacin. Concentrations up to 150 microg/mL had no influence on CEC, TMC, or RPE cell proliferation or on cell viability when administered for 24 hours. After preincubation with tumor necrosis factor alpha, lipopolysaccharides, or interleukin-6 for 24 hours and subsequent treatment with moxifloxacin at concentrations from 10 to 150 microg/mL for 24 hours, no significant decrease in proliferation or viability was observed. Hydrogen peroxide exposure did not increase cellular toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no significant toxicity for moxifloxacin on CEC, TMC, RPE cells, or human corneal endothelium for concentrations up to 150 microg/mL. The minimum inhibitory concentration of moxifloxacin to inhibit 90% of pathogens commonly encountered in endophthalmitis is known to be in the range of 0.25-2.5 microg/mL. Therefore, prophylactic intracameral use of moxifloxacin at concentrations up to 150 microg/mL may be safely used to prevent endophthalmitis after intraocular surgery.

[Advantages of corticosteroids in managing acute bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis]

Most studies show a trend toward a beneficial or at least neutral effect of associating corticosteroids and antibiotics. However, caution must be taken, with various factors considered: the type, virulence, and size of the inoculum, and the treatment chosen. Early intravitreal administration of 400 microg of dexamethasone seems to be beneficial in treating postoperative Staphylococcus epidermidis-related endophthalmitis. However, a large-scale prospective, randomized, controlled study is mandatory to gain evidence supporting steroid therapy in postoperative endophthalmitis.

Toward improving therapeutic regimens for Bacillus endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

Bacillus cereus causes the most virulent and refractory form of endophthalmitis. The authors analyzed the effectiveness of early treatment with vancomycin or gatifloxacin, with or without dexamethasone, for experimental B. cereus endophthalmitis.

METHODS

Rabbit eyes were injected intravitreally with 100 colony-forming units of B. cereus. At 2, 4, or 6 hours after infection, eyes were injected intravitreally with 0.1 mL gatifloxacin (0.3%), vancomycin (1.0%), either antibiotic plus dexamethasone, dexamethasone alone (1.0%), or PBS. Eyes were analyzed by electroretinography, bacterial quantitation, and antibiotic penetration analysis. Drug toxicity toward Müller cells, retinal pigment epithelium, and cones was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Eyes treated at 2 hours with vancomycin or gatifloxacin, with or without dexamethasone, maintained higher ERG amplitudes than the dexamethasone alone and PBS control groups. Eyes treated with antibiotic plus dexamethasone at 6 hours had reduced retinal function compared to antibiotic treatment alone. With the exception of vancomycin with or without dexamethasone at 6 hours, all antibiotic treatments sterilized eyes. Only gatifloxacin reached aqueous concentrations greater than the minimal inhibitory concentration for B. cereus when measured at 8 hours. Neither gatifloxacin nor vancomycin was toxic to retinal cells in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intravitreal injection of vancomycin or gatifloxacin improved the therapeutic outcome of B. cereus endophthalmitis. The addition of dexamethasone to antibiotic treatment did not provide a therapeutic benefit over antibiotics alone and appeared to reduce the antibiotic efficacy of vancomycin 6 hours after infection. In this model, delay in treatment past 6 hours significantly reduced the potential for salvaging useful vision.

Effects of intravitreal moxifloxacin and dexamethasone in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of intravitreal moxifloxacin and moxifloxacin and dexamethasone combination in an experimental rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis.

METHODS

The right eyes of 24 rabbits weighing 2 to 3 kg were used. Ten thousand colony-forming units (CFU) of S. aureus in 0.1 ml saline solution were inoculated into the vitreous cavity. The eyes were randomly assigned to one of the four groups equally. Twenty-four hours after the inoculation of S. aureus, group 1 received 50 microg moxifloxacin, group 2 received 50 microg moxifloxacin plus 400 microg dexamethasone, and group 3 received 1 mg vancomycin intravitreally. No treatment was given to group 4. Clinical examination scores were recorded. Vitreous aspirates were obtained for microbiological analysis just before sacrifice, and the eyes were enucleated for histopathologic examination. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

In all treatment groups, mean number of CFU and histopathologic score were significantly lower compared with control group (p<0.05), and the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The clinical score was not significantly different between groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal injection of 50 microg moxifloxacin was effective in the treatment of S. aureus endophthalmitis. Bacteriological, histopathologic, and clinical outcomes after treatment using moxifloxacin, moxifloxacin and dexamethasone combination, and vancomycin were comparable. Intravitreal moxifloxacin may be an option in the treatment of S. aureus endophthalmitis.

Bacterial endophthalmitis: therapeutic challenges and host-pathogen interactions

Endophthalmitis is an infection of the posterior segment of the eye that frequently results in loss of vision. This devastating result occurs despite prompt and often aggressive therapeutic and surgical intervention. Over the past decade, research has centered on determining the bacterial and host factors involved in this potentially blinding disease. The initial focus on the bacterial factors responsible for intraocular virulence has recently expanded into analysis the inflammatory response to infection, including the molecular and cellular interactions between the pathogen and host. This review discusses the epidemiology and therapeutic challenges posed by endophthalmitis, as well as recent findings from the analysis of interactions between the host and pathogen. Based on these findings, a model for the pathogenesis of endophthalmitis is presented. A more comprehensive understanding of the molecular and cellular interactions taking place between pathogen and host during endophthalmitis will expose possible therapeutic targets designed to arrest the infection and prevent vision loss.

Intracameral Vigamox (moxifloxacin 0.5%) is non-toxic and effective in preventing endophthalmitis in a rabbit model

PURPOSE

To determine whether Vigamox (moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution) can be safely injected intracamerally to prevent Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis in a rabbit model.

DESIGN

Animal study.

METHODS

The safety and bactericidal-effectiveness of Vigamox were evaluated in three stages using 189 New Zealand White rabbits. (Stage 1) The toxicity of two intravitreal doses of Vigamox (moxifloxacin 500, 250 microg) was compared with vancomycin (1 mg) and saline. (Stage 2) A reproducible rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis was established. (Stage 3) The bactericidal effect of intracameral Vigamox (moxifloxacin 500, 250, 125, 50 microg) was compared with vancomycin (1 mg) and saline. Intracameral antibiotic therapy commenced immediately after Staphylococcus aureus intravitreal challenge (5000 cfu). Toxicity was evaluated by masked clinical examination using a slit-lamp, an indirect ophthalmoscope, and corneal-ultrasound pachymetry. The clinical examination included the exterior eye, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and retina. The presentations were graded on a severity scale of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3. The bactericidal efficacy was determined using intracameral colony counts.

RESULTS

In the toxicity studies without bacterial challenge, the clinical scores of rabbits injected intracamerally with Vigamox were statistically equivalent to rabbits given intracameral vancomycin or saline. In the efficacy studies, eyes treated intravitreally with Vigamox, at all doses, or vancomycin were negative for Staphylococcus aureus and nontreated controls remained culture-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Vigamox appears to be nontoxic for intracameral injection and effective in preventing experimental endophthalmitis in the rabbit model. Further studies will determine the clinical role of intracameral Vigamox for surgical prophylaxis and postoperative therapy.