Renal biopsy findings in children receiving long-term treatment with cyclosporine a given as a single daily dose

Cyclosporine C2 monitoring for the treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children: a multicenter randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial was conducted from July 1, 2005 to March 29, 2011 to compare two protocols for treating children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome using microemulsified cyclosporine.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Ninety-three children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome were randomly assigned to group A (n=46) or group B (n=47). In both groups, the 2-hour postdose cyclosporine level was monitored. For group A, the cyclosporine target was set to 600-700 ng/ml for the first 6 months and 450-550 ng/ml for the next 18 months; for group B, it was set to 450-550 ng/ml for the first 6 months and 300-400 ng/ml for the next 18 months. The primary end point was the sustained remission rate. At the end of the study, if there was no difference in safety profile between the two groups and the sustained remission rate in group A was superior to group B with a decision threshold of 8%, then the regimen for group A would be determined the better treatment.

RESULTS

Eight children from an ineligible institution, where cyclosporine levels were not measured, were excluded from all analyses. At 24 months, the sustained remission rate was nonsignificantly higher in group A (n=43) than group B (n=42; 64.4% versus 50.0%; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.11; P=0.09), and the progression-free survival rate was significantly higher (88.1% versus 68.4%; hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.94; P=0.03). The relapse rate was significantly lower in group A than group B (0.41 versus 0.95 times/person-year; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.84; P=0.02). The rate and severity of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The sustained remission rate was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, but the regimen with the higher 2-hour postdose cyclosporine level target improved progression-free survival and reduced the relapse rate.

Nephrotoxicity of once-daily cyclosporine A in minimal change nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Although once-daily cyclosporine (CsA) therapy may have greater nephrotoxic-sparing effects than standard twice-daily therapy, little information is available in children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) regarding histological analysis after long-term once-daily administration.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

A prospective study of the clinical efficacy and comparison between pre- and post-treatment renal biopsy findings in ten children (mean age, 8.8 years) with steroid-dependent MCNS who were administered once-daily CsA therapy for more than 24 months (mean ± SD, 30 ± 3.7) was performed in Saitama Children's Medical Center. Administration of once-daily CsA therapy (mean dose, 2.8 ± 0.6 mg/kg/day; mean C2 levels, 670 ± 64 ng/ml) resulted in a significant reduction in the median relapse rate from 4.6 to 0.2 times per year, and five patients did not experience a relapse of NS. Furthermore, mean threshold of prednisolone dose significantly reduced from 1.2 to 0.02 mg/kg on alternate days. However, two patients showed evidence of chronic CsA nephrotoxicity (CsAN).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily CsA therapy appears to be effective in children with steroid-dependent MCNS. However, follow-up renal biopsies should be performed to investigate the presence of CsAN after more than 24 months of treatment with once-daily regimen as well as with the conventional twice-daily regimen.

Benefits of once-daily administration of cyclosporine a for children with steroid-dependent, relapsing nephrotic syndrome

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is an effective steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-dependent, relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDRNS). The efficacy and safety of single-daily dose administration (SDD protocol) of CsA in selected patients with SDRNS has been reported. However, the efficacy of initial CsA treatment for children with SDRNS using the SDD protocol remains to be elucidated. The SDD protocol might be associated with lower clinical toxicity, compared to the conventional twice-daily dose administration (TDD protocol). Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SDD protocol versus the TDD protocol in patients with SDRNS. The data from 19 patients (9.9 +/- 4.2 years old) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Ten patients treated according to the SDD protocol for a mean of 27 months (SDD group), while 9 patients treated with the TDD protocol for a mean of 35 months (TDD group) as an initial CsA treatment. Although the mean daily CsA dose was significantly lower in the SDD group (1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/kg/day vs. 3.7 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/day, P < 0.01), there were no differences between the two groups in the mean minimum dose of prednisolone required for maintenance of clinical remission nor in the calculated relapse rate. One patient in the TDD group developed biopsy-proven mild CsA nephrotoxicity, whereas no patient in the SDD group showed nephrotoxicity. Despite a small number of patients, this study may support that the SDD protocol is at least as effective as the conventional TDD protocol, and is more cost-effective for selected children with SDRNS.

Effective treatment of young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing lupus nephritis with tacrolimus given as a single daily dose: an open-label pilot study

The objective of the current work is to report the preliminary experience with tacrolimus (TL) administered as a single-dose daily for maintenance therapy of young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Six consecutive patients with long-standing SLE were recruited for a 6-month open-label trial of single-dose-daily administration of tacrolimus (3 mg/day) without dose up of concomitantly administered prednisolone (PDN). TL treatment was started at the time of the most recent flares. Data on the clinical and serologic lupus activity were collected prospectively. The baseline characteristics of the patients were: mean age, 20 years; urinary protein/creatinine ratio, 1.22 +/- 1.94; serum C3 level, 70.8 +/- 21.2 (normal, 79-152 mg/dL); serum complement hemolytic activity (CH50), 22.2 +/- 10.3 (normal, 23-46 U/mL); serum anti-dsDNA antibody titer, 60.4 +/- 71.7 IU/mL (normal, < 12.0 IU/mL); serum creatinine, 0.55 +/- 0.11 mg/dL; European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) index, 5.2 +/- 2.6. Despite the gradual tapering of the PDN dose, marked improvement as compared with the baseline values was observed in the ECLAM index examined at one and three months and serological parameters examined at three months after the start of treatment. After a 6-months' therapy, complete response was achieved in all of the patients (serum CH50 value, 27.7 +/- 8.3 U/mL; serum anti-dsDNA antibody titer, 28.4 +/- 27.9 U/mL and the ECLAM index, 1.2 +/- 1.2 (P < 0.05), respectively), except in one patient who showed WHO class V lupus nephritis. No serious adverse effects were observed. These data suggest that TL, even when administered as a single-daily dose, is effective and safe for selected young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing SLE. However, further studies on a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these results.