Steroid-Resistant Late Acute Rejection after a Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Late acute cellular rejection after switch to everolimus monotherapy at 11 months following liver transplantation

Background

Acute cellular rejection beyond the 6th month posttransplant is an uncommon complication after liver transplantation. The inadequate immunosuppression (IS) remains the main risk factor. We report a case of acute cellular rejection after a switch to everolimus monotherapy at 11 months following liver transplantation.

Case presentation

This was a 69-year-old man who underwent liver transplantation after hepatocellular carcinoma. The initial immunosuppression was a combination of three immunosuppressive drugs (corticosteroids + tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil). The corticosteroid therapy was stopped at the 4th month posttransplant. Serious side effects of the immunosuppressive drugs (agranulocytosis and renal dysfunction), which occurred 4 months after transplantation, required a reduction and then a discontinuation of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Everolimus was introduced as a replacement. The patient was consulted at 11 months after liver transplantation, 1 month after stopping the two immunosuppressive drugs, for liver function test abnormalities such as cytolysis and anicteric cholestasis. A moderate late acute cellular rejection was confirmed by a liver biopsy. A satisfactory biological evolution was observed following corticosteroid boluses and optimization of basic immunosuppressive drugs.

Conclusion

Late acute cellular rejection remains an uncommon complication, observed mostly in the first year after liver transplantation. The main risk factor is usually the decrease of immunosuppression.

Advances in Rejection Management: Prevention and Treatment

Extended survival of liver transplant recipients has brought rejection management to the forefront of liver transplant research. This article discusses T-cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic rejection. We focus on the prevention and then discuss treatment options. Future directions of rejection management include biomarkers of rejection, which may allow for monitoring of patients who are considered high risk for rejection and detection of rejection before there is any clinical evidence to improve graft and patient survival. With improved graft life and survival of liver transplant recipients, the new frontier of rejection management focuses on immunosuppression minimization, withdrawal, and personalization.

Acute Graft Dysfunction 17 Years After Liver Transplant: A Challenging Clinical and Histologic Manifestation of Hepatitis E

Acute hepatitis E virus infection after liver transplant is a challenging clinical phenomenon. Due to its unspecific clinical and histological presentation, the diagnosis of acute or chronic hepatitis E virus infection can be difficult in unclear cases of elevated liver enzymes. Here, we report the case of a 56-year-old male patient who presented to our center for 17-year follow-up after liver transplant with α1-antitrypsin deficiency. The patient was asymptomatic but had remarkably increased transaminases and cholestasis parameters. Blood levels for immunosuppressives were in the normal range, and cholestasis and deteriorated liver perfusion were excluded by ultrasonographic examination. A liver biopsy was performed that was histologically interpreted as acute cellular rejection grade I. Accordingly, the patient was treated with 5-day high-dose intravenous steroids and increased doses of the maintenance immunosuppressive agents, resulting in the slow normalization of the liver enzymes. Extended laboratory examinations revealed presence of acute hepatitis E virus infection, and a retrospectively immunohistologic staining of the liver biopsy was positive for hepatitis E virus antigen. Acute hepatitis E virus infection can be a reason for acute allograft dysfunction after liver transplant. This differential diagnosis should be kept in mind, especially when graft dysfunction occurs long after transplant.

Steroid-resistant acute rejection after cadaveric liver transplantation: experience from one single center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Steroid-resistant acute rejection (SRAR) is an infrequent event under current immunosuppressant but still a risk factor leading to graft loss and patients' death after liver transplantation. There are several strategies for managing this complication according to current literatures, but none of the treatment seems convincing and widely accepted. Here we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of a cohort of patients to gain an insight into this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 962 adult patients receiving whole liver grafts at a single center between January 2004 and December 2012 were studied. One hundred and forty-two recipients experienced 158 episodes of acute rejection after the operation, 14 recipients had no response to steroid bolus treatment. The clinical data was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Incidence rate of acute rejection after liver transplant in our single center was 14.7% (142/962), among them 8.8% (14/158) were steroid-resistant. These episodes occurred on 19days (6-72days) after the operation, 3 were controlled by anti-T3-receptor antibody (OKT3) treatment, 4 were reversed by IL-2 receptor inhibitors combining with MMF treatment, 2 were reversed by antithymocyte globulin (ATG) treatment. Five did not recover and 2 received retransplantation. Mortality associated with SRAR was 28.6% (4/14, 1 died from acute liver failure, 1 from chronic liver failure, 1 from renal failure after retransplantation and 1 from pulmonary infection after OKT3 treatment).

CONCLUSION

SRAR is a severe complication with high mortality after liver transplantation; ATG might serve as a potential treatment.

Quality of life and problems affecting recipients more than 10 years after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

We initiated living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in 1991, allowing us to examine issues related to long-term survival. The aim of this study was to review the long-term outcomes of LDLT in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed 116 LDLT from 1991 to present, including 17 recipients who survived >10 years. They were evaluated for growth, immunosuppressive therapy, complications, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

The average age at LDLT was 5.4 years (range, 6 months to 17 years), with a present average age of 17.2 years (range, 11-28 years). At the time of LDLT, 6 recipients had growth retardation with body weights low for age by 2 standard deviations (SD). However, 4 of 6 recipients who underwent LDLT before age of 2 years caught up, reaching average heights and body weights for their ages. Among 6 recipients who were diagnosed with acute rejections by biopsy >5 years after LDLT, 5 improved after steroid pulse therapy. One recipient with a steroid-resistant acute rejection was administered deoxyspergualin after steroids. Chronic rejection was not observed in this series. One recipient has not required immunosuppressive therapy for >4 years with a good present condition.

CONCLUSION

The majority of LDLT recipients achieved a good QOL during long-term survival; they are pursuing normal studies.

IL-10 and IL-4 in Skin Allograft Survival Induced by T-Cell Depletion plus Deoxyspergualin

The mechanisms mediating T-cell depletion plus 15-deoxyspergualin (DSG)-induced prolonged allograft survival or tolerance are uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of IL-4 and IL-10 in prolonged allograft survival induced by T-cell depletion plus DSG. MHC mismatched skin allograft transplantation was performed, using wild-type and three separate knockout (i.e., IL-4–/–, Stat6–/-, or IL-10–/–) mice as recipients. Induction therapy consisted of T-cell depletion and or brief course of DSG. The data demonstrate that monotherapy with T-cell-depleting mAbs or DSG prolonged skin allograft survival, compared to controls, in wild-type Balb/c recipients [median survival time (MST) = 25 and 21 vs. 10 days, p < 0.007]. T-cell depletion plus DSG further augmented skin allograft survival in wild-type animals relative to monotherapy (MST = 35 days vs. 25 and 21 days, p < 0.006 vs. mAbs or DSG only), and was equally effective in IL-4–/– and Stat6–/– recipients. In contrast, combined therapy was no better than monotherapy in IL-10–/– animals (p > 0.05). Furthermore, skin allograft survival after combined therapy was shorter in IL-10–/– versus wild-type recipients (MST 20 and 41 days, respectively, p < 0.001). IL-4-mediated signaling through Stat6 is dispensable for prolonged allograft survival induced by T-cell depletion plus DSG. In contrast, IL-10 appears to be important for prolonged allograft survival induced by combined therapy in this model.