Impact of Histopathological Risk Factors on the Treatment of Stage IB-IIB Uterine Cervical Cancer

Untold story of human cervical cancers: HPV-negative cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide. Although infection from human papillomavirus (HPV) has been the leading cause of cervical cancer, HPV-negative cervical cancer accounts for approximately 3-8% of all cases. Previous research studies on cervical cancer have focused on HPV-positive cervical cancer due to its prevalence, resulting in HPV-negative cervical cancer receiving considerably less attention. As a result, HPV-negative cervical cancer is poorly understood. Its etiology remains elusive mainly due to limitations in research methodology such as lack of defined markers and model systems. Moreover, false HPV negativity can arise from inaccurate diagnostic methods, which also hinders the progress of research on HPV-negative cervical cancer. Since HPV-negative cervical cancer is associated with worse clinical features, greater attention is required to understand HPV-negative carcinoma. In this review, we provide a summary of knowledge gaps and current limitations of HPV-negative cervical cancer research based on current clinical statistics. We also discuss future directions for understanding the pathogenesis of HPV-independent cervical cancer. [BMB Reports 2022; 55(9): 429-438].

Prognostic factors of 2018 FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer with absence of high/ intermediate surgical-pathological risk factors

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective analysis of a real-world database of open radical hysterectomy in Japan aimed to reveal the clinicopathological findings and clinical outcomes of low-risk patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1143 stage IB1, IB2 and IIA1 (reclassified by FIGO 2018 staging system) patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy between January 2004 and December 2008 from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group database were analyzed. Low-risk patients were defined as those without a tumor size exceeding 4 cm, parametrial tumor involvement, deep (outer half) stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion or lymph nodal metastasis.

RESULTS

61.2% (772/1262) patients with stage IB1, 32.1% (229/932) with stage IB2 and 16.9% (72/294) of stage IIA1 were classified into the low-risk group. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 98.4 and 93.7%, respectively. Histological classification did not affect the survival rates, but stage IIA cases had significantly lower overall survival and disease-free survival (83.5 and 93.8%, respectively) than stage IB cases. The independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival were older age (≧50), histology, clinical stage and clinical stage as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Regarding recurrence, older age, non-SCC and stage IIA1 were independent risk factors for local recurrence, but stage IIA1 was the only independent risk factor for distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

We found that stage IIA1 was the strongest risk factor for survival and recurrence of low-risk uterine cervical cancer (FIGO, 2018). In low-risk cases, stage IIA1 should be considered separately from stage IB.

The Impact of Histological Subtype on Survival Outcome of Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer Who Received Definitive Radiotherapy

The impact of histologic subtype on definitive radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess clinicopathological findings and clinical outcome by histological type in patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer. Ninety-two patients with stage IIB-IVA [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2008] cervical cancer, who underwent definitive radiotherapy between 2013 to 2018, were identified as eligible for this study. The clinical information of the eligible patients was obtained from medical records of our hospital. Seventy-eight patients underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and the remaining 14 patients received radiotherapy alone. Of 92 patients, 83 had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 9 had non-SCC histology. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate of patients with non-SCC was significantly worse than of those with SCC (2-year PFS: 62.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.0020), but overall survival (OS) rate did not statistically differ between the two subtypes (2-year OS: 82.4% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.2157). Pelvic failure-free (PFF) rate of patients with non-SCC histology was significantly worse than of those with non-SCC (2-year PFF; 88.2% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, non-SCC histology was associated with PFS rate, although there was no association with OS rate. In multivariate analysis, non-SCC histology and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. In patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy, patients with non-SCC showed significantly worse PFS rate than those with SCC.

Rethinking the significance of surgery for uterine cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategies based on histological subtypes are unestablished.

AIMS

Rethinking the significance of surgery for uterine cervical cancer.

METHODS

Using the database of cervical cancer stages IB-IIB with extensive hysterectomy (Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2008) established by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group network, we conducted a clinicopathological study of cervical cancer cases reclassified according to the FIGO 2018 staging. In stage IB (FIGO 2018) cervical cancer patients, there was no significant difference in treatment outcome according to histological type, but in stages IIA, IIB, and IIIC1 (FIGO 2018), the treatment outcome of nonsquamous cell carcinoma was significantly worse than that of squamous cell carcinoma. Considering post-treatment health care, it is important to consider ovarian preservation in young patients with cervical cancer, up to stage IIA (FIGO 2018) for squamous cell carcinoma and stage IB1 (FIGO 2018) for nonsquamous cell carcinoma, after careful evaluation of clinicopathological factors before surgery.

DISCUSSION

Locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the cervix is a rare and refractory cancer that has been shown to have low radiosensitivity, and its treatment outcome is still unsatisfactory. A new therapeutic strategy involving multidisciplinary treatment in combination with perioperative chemotherapy at a facility that can provide highly curative surgical treatment is desired.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery is being introduced for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. However, the number of eligible cases should be expanded in a phased manner, based on an objective evaluation of surgical outcomes at the facilities. Omics analysis may be useful to develop a new treatment for human papillomavirus nonrelated cervical cancer, represented by gastric mucinous carcinoma.

HPV-Negative Cervical Cancer: A Narrative Review

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most frequent cancer in women worldwide. HPV infection is associated with the majority of CC cases, but a small proportion of CCs actually test negative for HPV. The prevalence of HPV among CC histotypes is very different. It has been suggested that HPV-negative CC may represent a biologically distinct subset of tumors, relying on a distinct pathogenetic pathway and carrying a poorer prognosis, than HPV-positive CCs. Although, the discordance in terms of sensitivity and specificity between different HPV tests as well as the potential errors in sampling and storing tissues may be considered as causes of false-negative results. The identification of HPV-negative CCs is essential for their correct management. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the clinical and pathological features of this variant. We also discuss the pitfalls of different HPV tests possibly leading to classification errors.

A Single Arm Prospective Pilot Study Examining the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Single Maintenance Therapy Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Cervical Cancer

Although the addition of bevacizumab to platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been recommended as a standard regimen for patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, there is no clear evidence regarding the effectiveness of bevacizumab monotherapy as salvage chemotherapy. This study prospectively examined the efficacy and safety of switching from platinum-based chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab to single maintenance therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Patients were first treated with standard combination chemotherapy. However, if chemotherapy was discontinued because of an adverse event, bevacizumab monotherapy was continued for patients who agreed to participate in this study and provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Independent Review Board of Tohoku University School of Medicine (reception number 2017-1-540). A total of 15 patients (median age of 55 years, range 33-69 years) participated in this study. The median number of cycles of bevacizumab single maintenance administration was 8, and the main reasons for discontinuation were disease progression and adverse events. Bevacizumab single maintenance therapy had a disease control rate of 53.3% (CR 40%, PR 6.7%, SD 6.7%). The most frequent grade 3/4 clinical adverse events were proteinuria (5/15) and hypertension (4/15). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Bevacizumab single maintenance therapy was effective as salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, and the safety profile was generally consistent with those reported in previous studies of bevacizumab monotherapy.