Predictive performance of 'Diprifusor' TCI system in patients during upper abdominal surgery under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia

Risk Factors for Fentanyl-Induced Cough Following General Anesthesia in Adults: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in China

Background

Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) during general anesthesia induction and postoperative nausea and vomiting are common complications, yet the risk factors for FIC remain controversial. This retrospective study was conducted at a single center in China and aimed to investigate the risk factors for fentanyl-induced cough following general anesthesia in adults.

Material/Methods

A total of 601 adult patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled, and the incidence of FIC during general anesthesia induction and postoperative adverse events were recorded. The risk factors for FIC during general anesthesia induction and postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The incidence of FIC, nausea, and vomiting were 21.8%, 6.3%, and 4.5%, respectively. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that pharyngitis history was associated with an increased risk of FIC during general anesthesia induction (odds ratio [OR]: 2.852; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.698–4.792; P<0.001), whereas use of lidocaine could protect against FIC risk (OR: 0.649; 95% CI: 0.557–0.757; P<0.001). However, the characteristics of patients were not associated with the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Conclusions

The findings from this study showed that a history of pharyngitis increased the risk of FIC, while the use of lidocaine was associated with a reduced risk of FIC. The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not affected by fentanyl use or patient characteristics.

[Effect of pre-administered flurbiprofen axetil on the EC50 of propofol during anesthesia in unstimulated patients: a randomized clinical trial]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative use of flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is extensively adopted to modulate the effects of analgesia. However, the relationship between FA and sedation agents remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of FA on the median Effective Concentration (EC50) of propofol.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients (ASA I or II, aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Group A (control group) received 10 mL of Intralipid, and groups B, C and D received 0.5 mg.kg^-1, 0.75 mg.kg^-1 and 1 mg.kg^-1 of FA, respectively, 10 minutes before induction. The depth of anesthesia was measured by the Bispectral Index (BIS). The "up-and-down" method was used to calculate the EC50 of propofol. During the equilibration period, if BIS ≤ 50 (or BIS > 50), the next patient would receive a 0.5 μg.mL^-1-lower (or-higher) propofol Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) concentration. The hemodynamic data were recorded at baseline, 10 minutes after FA administration, after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation.

RESULTS

The EC50 of propofol was lower in Group C (2.32 μg.mL^-1, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.85-2.75) and D (2.39 μg.mL^-1, 95% CI 1.91-2.67) than in Group A (2.96 μg.mL^-1, 95% CI 2.55-3.33) (p = 0.023, p = 0.048, respectively). There were no significant differences in the EC50 between Group B (2.53 μg.mL^-1, 95% CI 2.33-2.71) and Group A (p ˃ 0.05). There were no significant differences in Heart Rate (HR) among groups A, B and C. The HR was significantly lower in Group D than in Group A after intubation (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0.01) and 15 minutes after intubation (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences among the four groups in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at any time point. The MAP of the four groups was significantly lower after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation than at baseline (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

High-dose FA (0.75 mg.kg^-1 or 1 mg.kg^-1) reduces the EC50 of propofol, and 1 mg.kg^-1 FA reduces the HR for adequate anesthesia in unstimulated patients. Although this result should be investigated in cases of surgical stimulation, we suggest that FA pre-administration may reduce the propofol requirement when the depth of anesthesia is measured by BIS.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Models in Chinese Patients with Hepatic Insufficiency

Background

Effects of liver dysfunction on target-controlled infusion (TCI) with Marsh parameters of propofol remain poorly documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of propofol TCI in a cohort of Chinese patients with severe hepatic insufficiency.

Material/Methods

We assigned 32 patients who underwent liver transplantation to 3 groups according to Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. Anesthesia, preceding liver transplantation, was induced and maintained with TCI of 3 μg/mL propofol. Plasma propofol concentration was assessed. Propofol TCI system performance was analyzed in terms of error size, bias, and divergence. Data on plasma propofol concentrations were analyzed, and population pharmacokinetic parameters of propofol were fitted by NONMEM software.

Results

In the CTP C group, measured concentrations of propofol were much higher than those of predictive concentrations, with significantly higher overshoots compared to CTP A patients. Overall, TCI system performance was significantly lower in CTP C patients. Linear regression equations of Cm vs. Cp and a regression model of pharmacokinetics were obtained.

Conclusions

Propofol TCI device performance with Marsh parameters was clinically acceptable in CTP A patients but may not be suitable for patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Effect of sex and polymorphisms of CYP2B6 and UGT1A9 on the difference between the target-controlled infusion predicted and measured plasma propofol concentration

Introduction

To examine whether sex and polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A9 affect the difference between predicted and measured plasma propofol concentration during continuous infusion by target-controlled infusion.

Results

Blood samples of 69 patients (48 men and 21 women) were obtained at 4 h after initial propofol infusion. Percentage performance error (PE) was calculated to assess the difference between measured and predicted propofol concentration. Regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sex and the polymorphisms of CYP2B6 and UGT1A9 for PE were, separately and mutually, estimated with linear regression. Covariates included age and body mass index in the minimal adjusted model, and additionally included clinical factors (mean blood pressure, heart rate, volume of intravenous fluid, surgical site, surgical position, and pneumoperitoneum) in the full adjusted model. PE was higher in men than in women (28.7% versus 10.5%, p = 0.015). Female sex was inversely associated with PE: the minimal adjusted β = − 8.84 (95% CI, − 16.26 to − 1.43); however, the fully adjusted β with clinical factors became not significant. The average of PE did not differ between polymorphisms of CYP2B6 and UGT1A9, and β of CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphisms mutually adjusted with female sex was not significant. Mean blood pressure, heart rate, and volume of intravenous fluid were independently associated with PE in the full adjusted model.

Conclusions

Under 4 h anesthesia with propofol target-controlled infusion in our population, sex differences appeared to exist in the propofol concentration, which might be largely mediated by clinical factors, such as hemodynamic status.

Trial registration

UMIN-CTR UMIN000009015, Registered 1 October 2012

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40981-018-0196-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Performance of TCI Propofol Using the Schnider Model for Cardiac Surgery on Cardiopulmonary Bypass-A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the performance of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol using the Schnider pharmacokinetic model in patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

DESIGN

This was a prospective pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

A tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

This study is comprised of 10 patients, aged between 46 and 81, who underwent elective cardiac surgery requiring the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Anesthetic technique was standardized. Hypnosis was maintained using TCI of propofol, titrated to achieve a bispectral index of 30 to 60. Calculated plasma propofol concentrations were recorded at 5 time points in total, before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood propofol concentration was measured at each of these time points.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The prediction errors and absolute prediction errors were calculated for each sample. From these, the median prediction error (MDPE) and its absolute value (MDAPE) were derived. Agreement between predicted and measured propofol concentrations was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot. Mean prediction errors were also compared pre-, on, and post-bypass using the generalized linear latent and mixed model. The MDPE and MDAPE were both found to be 45%, indicating significant bias toward under-prediction in the Schnider pharmacokinetic model. This bias was increased at an average propofol concentration of 4.5 μg/mL and above. A significant decrease in mean prediction error was noted while on bypass (45.6%, 95% confidence intervals 9.2-82.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the Schnider pharmacokinetic model for TCI propofol was poor, with a tendency toward under-prediction of blood propofol concentration, especially at higher average concentrations of propofol. While mitigating the risk of awareness, the risk of other adverse effects like hypotension and cardiorespiratory depression is increased. Patients should therefore be adequately monitored, and predicted plasma propofol concentrations taken in context with other patient parameters. A lower target concentration of propofol is probably sufficient to maintain an adequate depth of anesthesia as measured by BIS.

Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction

OBJECTIVE

Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia.

METHODS

A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18-64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%-11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%-60.0%, P=0.000), as were the severity grades (P=0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.

Elective cholecystectomy performed on patient with variegate porphyria-Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion

Porphyria is caused by disorders of enzymes that synthetize porphyrins. Both elective and emergency surgical procedures on patient suffering from porphyria may provoke acute symptoms. These patients require special anesthetic management since some of commonly used anesthetic agents may also induce acute manifestation of porphyria. We present the case of 53-year-old woman previously diagnosed with porphyria who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion was used. Such conduct proved to be safe regarding clinical symptoms, although biochemical markers were slightly elevated after procedure. Propofol seems to be the safest hypnotic drug to use in porphyria; however, special care should be taken is such cases.

Evaluation of SLOG/TCI-III pediatric system on target control infusion of propofol

Background

The target-controlled infusion-III (SLOG/TCI-III) system was derived from a model set up by the local pediatric population for target control infusion of propofol.

Methods

The current study aimed at evaluating the difference between target concentrations of propofol and performance, which was measured using the SLOG/TCI-III system in children. Thirty children fulfilling the I-II criteria according to American Society of Anesthesiology were enrolled in the study. The target plasma concentration of propofol was fed into the SLOG/TCI-III system and compared with the measured concentrations of propofol. Blood samples were collected and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector. The performance error (PE) was determined for each measured blood propofol concentration. The performances of the TCI-III system were determined by the median performance error (MDPE), the median absolute performance error (MDAPE), and Wobble (the median absolute deviation of each PE from the MDPE), respectively.

Results

Concentration against target concentration showed good linear correlation: concentration = 1.3428 target concentration - 0.2633 (r = 0.8667). The MDPE and MDAPE of the pediatric system were 10 and 22%, respectively, and the median value for Wobble was 24%. MDPE and MDAPE were less than 15 and 30%, respectively.

Conclusions

The performance of TCI-III system seems to be in the accepted limits for clinical practice in children.

Propofol for sedation in neuro-intensive care

Interventions in the intensive care unit often require that the patient be sedated. Propofol is a widely used, potent sedative agent that is popular in critical care and operating room settings. In addition to its sedative qualities, propofol has neurovascular, neuroprotective, and electroencephalographical effects that are salutory in the patient in neurocritical care. However, the 15-year experience with this agent has not been entirely unbesmirched by controversy: propofol also has important adverse effects that must be carefully considered. This article discusses and reviews the pharmacology of propofol, with specific emphasis on its use as a sedative in the neuro-intensive care unit. A detailed explanation of central nervous system and cardiovascular mechanisms is presented. Additionally, the article reviews the literature specifically pertaining to neurocritical care use of propofol.

Wirkortäquilibration, Anschlagzeit, „time to peak effect“

Contrary to the situation in "classical" clinical pharmacology, non-steady state phenomena play a fundamental role for clinical pharmacology in anesthesia. Their understanding is of tantamount importance for the safe and efficient application of drugs relevant to anesthesia. Concepts like optimised target-controlled infusion (TCI), effect compartment targeting and the small margin of error tolerable during maintained spontaneous ventilation, force the anesthesiologist to acquire a firm understanding of the difference between the concentration time course at the effect side vs. time course of the plasma concentration. The underlying concepts, their application for the rational use of muscle relaxants, propofol with TCI systems, volatile anaesthetics and opioids will be discussed.