Influence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on the effect of chemotherapy upon ovarian cancer and the prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage: an experimental study with nu/nu athymic mice

Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists Have an Anti-apoptotic Effect on Cumulus Cells

Background: Ovaries are sensitive to chemotherapy, which may lead to early depletion of primordial follicle reserve. One strategy for gonadal function preservation is temporary ovarian suppression with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone agonists (GnRHa) during chemotherapy. To date, GnRHa protective mechanism of action remains not fully elucidated. Methods: We collected 260 immature cumulus cell-oocyte complexes (COC) from 111 women < 38 years old, with a normal ovarian reserve. The COC were randomly assigned to the following groups: (a) control; culture with the addition of (b) GnRHa; (c) cyclophosphamide; (d) cyclophosphamide plus GnRHa. After in vitro treatments, RNA and proteins were extracted from oocytes and cumulus cells (CC), separately. Potential effects of drugs were evaluated on GnRH receptors, apoptosis pathways, ceramide pathway, and glutathione synthesis by quantitative PCR and, whenever possible, by Western blot. Results: Cyclophosphamide triggered activation of the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis mediated by BAX in CC. The co-administration of GnRHa inhibited the apoptosis pathway in CC. According to our model, the GnRHa does not directly act on oocytes, which do not express GnRH receptors. Moreover, glutathione synthesis was decreased after GnRHa treatment both in CC and oocytes. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the protective mechanisms induced by GnRHa is mediated by an anti-apoptotic effect on CC.

Ovarian protection with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy in cancer patients: From biological evidence to clinical application

Survivorship issues are an area of crucial importance to be addressed as early as possible by all health care providers dealing with cancer patients. In women diagnosed during their reproductive years, the possible occurrence of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is of particular concern being associated with important menopause-related symptoms, psychosocial issues as well as infertility. Temporary ovarian suppression by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy has been studied to reduce the gonadotoxic impact of chemotherapy thus diminishing the chance of developing POI. Despite more than 30 years of research in both preclinical and clinical settings, the performance of this strategy has remained highly debated until recently. In particular, the potential mechanisms of action for the protective effects of GnRHa during chemotherapy are still not clearly identified. Nevertheless, important novel research efforts in the field have better elucidated the role of this option that is now endorsed for clinical use by several guidelines. This manuscript aims at providing an extensive overview of the literature on the use of temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy in cancer patients by addressing its biological rationale, the available preclinical and clinical evidence as well as the still existing grey zones in this field that future research efforts should address.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists for fertility preservation: unraveling the enigma?

STUDY QUESTION

Can gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) preserve long-term fertility when administered prior to and concomitantly with chemotherapy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

GnRH-a display a differential protective effect on fertility, depending upon the specific chemotherapy-induced mechanism of ovarian injury.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The role of GnRH-a in fertility preservation has been constantly debated and their use is considered experimental due to conflicting clinical evidence and paucity of data regarding their mechanism for ovarian protection.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In vivo model: 7-8 weeks old imprinting control region (ICR) mice were injected with GnRH-a (Leuprolide-acetate) or saline prior to and concomitantly with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin or saline and sacrificed at various time-points on a longitudinal follow-up; 24 h (n = 36), 1 week (n = 40), 1 month (n = 36) and 9 months (n = 66) post chemotherapy treatment. Blood samples were drawn on Day 0 and on a monthly basis after chemotherapy treatment. On the day of sacrifice, blood samples were drawn and ovaries excised and processed for either immunohistochemistry (IHC), protein or RNA extraction. In vitro model: 21-23 days old Wistar-derived rats were sacrificed, their ovaries excised and primary granulosa cells (PGC) were either isolated for in vitro culture, or processed for immunofluorescence (IF) as well as for protein or RNA extraction.

MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Ovarian reserve was estimated by serial measurements of serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), quantified by the AMH Gen II ELISA assay. Ovarian AMH and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) were detected by immunoblotting. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was measured by quantitative PCR. Ovarian GnRH receptor (GnRHR), AMH and CD34 were visualized by IHC, and apoptosis was evaluated using TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase)-mediated dUDP nick-end labeling (TUNEL).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Cyclophosphamide-induced ovarian injury caused a prompt decrease in AMH level (P < 0.01) and a further long-term decline in serum AMH (P = 0.017), indicating damage to the ovarian reserve. Pretreatment with GnRH-a diminished AMH-decrease (P < 0.05) and maintained serum AMH level in the long run (P < 0.05). Doxorubicin-exerted ovarian-vascular-injury is also displayed by an acute increase in ovarian VEGF level (P < 0.05) and a sustained decrease in serum AMH level (P < 0.001). This was followed by ovarian recovery manifested by increased neovascularization. GnRH-a delayed the recovery in AMH level and decreased the level of VEGF (P < 0.001), thus interfering with the vascular recovery subsequent to doxorubicin-induced vascular damage.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

To portray the differential mechanism of each chemotherapy, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin were given separately, whereas most of the clinical protocols include several types of chemotherapies. Thus, future study should explore a prospective evaluation of various chemotherapies, as well as combined chemotherapeutic protocols.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our study demonstrates that different chemotherapy agents affect the ovary via diverse mechanisms and thus the administration of GnRH-a concomitantly, could be beneficial to a subpopulation of patients treated with cyclophosphamide-based protocols.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This work was partially supported by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) to I.B.-A. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Stability, permeability and growth-inhibitory properties of gonadotropin-releasing hormone liposaccharides

PURPOSE

In this study we aimed to address the poor drug-like properties of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) peptide through modification with lipids and carbohydrates.

METHODS

GnRH peptide was conjugated to 2-amino-D,L-octanoic acid (C8) and 2-amino-D,L-dodecanoic acid (C12) in monomer and dimer, along with (6-9) or without (2-5 and 11) a glucose moiety. Peptides were tested for their biological activity using different tumour cell lines. The toxicity of the constructs was evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).

RESULTS

All (glyco)lipopeptides showed improved metabolic stability in Caco-2 cell homogenates. Those with single lipid moiety (2, 4 and 8) exhibited prodrug-like properties. Permeability across Caco-2 cell monolayers was enhanced in the dimer C8-modified (glyco)lipopeptide (3) and the lipopeptide with C12 inserted mid-sequence (11). Most of the constructs showed moderate-to-high antiproliferative activity against GnRH-receptor positive DU145 and OVCAR-3 cells (up to 60%). Compound 11 was the most effective with IC50 = 26.4 ± 1.07 μg.ml(-1), which was comparable to triptorelin (25.1 ± 1.14 μg.mL(-1)). The sensitivity of OVCAR-3 cells to the effect of all analogues except for 11 decreased significantly in estrogen-reconstituted media. Only compounds 2, 4, 5 and 8 showed a steroid-dependent effect in DU145 cells. No compounds exhibited significant toxicity on PBMCs.

CONCLUSION

These results indicated lipidation and glycosylation improves the druggability of GnRH and could lead to an increased direct antitumour activity in some hormone dependent and independent reproductive cancers.