Fertility outcomes in infertile women with complex hyperplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia who received progestin therapy and in vitro fertilization

Pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients with endometrial hyperplasia with or without atypia undergoing in vitro fertilization: the early-follicular long protocol is superior to midluteal long protocol

Background

Although in vitro fertilization (IVF) in infertile patients with endometrial hyperplasia is common after drug treatment, the pregnancy outcomes are often unsatisfactory. Till date, no studies have reported the outcome of patients with endometrial hyperplasia treated using early-follicular long (EL) protocol and midluteal long (ML) protocol.

Objective

To evaluate the pregnancy outcomes and disease prognosis of patients with endometrial hyperplasia with or without atypia undergoing IVF treatment with EL protocol or ML protocol.

Methods

This was a retrospective study in university-affiliated reproductive medical center. A total of 138 patients with endometrial hyperplasia undergoing IVF treatment were included to compare the pregnancy outcomes and disease prognosis between EL and ML protocols. We further matched 276 patients with normal endometrium to compare the pregnancy outcomes between patients with endometrial hyperplasia and patients with normal endometrium under different controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol.

Results

In patients with endometrial hyperplasia, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly higher in EL protocol than in ML protocol (61.8% vs. 43.5%, P=0.032; 50.0% vs. 30.6%, P= 0.022). In the ML protocol, patients with endometrial hyperplasia had significantly lower CPR and LBR than those with normal endometrium (43.5% vs. 59.7%, P=0.037; 30.6% vs. 49.2%, P=0.016). While in the EL protocol, they achieved similar CPR and LBR as patients with normal endometrium (61.8% vs. 69.7%, P=0.232; 50.0% vs. 59.9%, P=0.156). In patients with endometrial hyperplasia, COS protocol was an independent factor affecting clinical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.479; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.154-5.327) and live birth (adjusted OR 2.730; 95% CI 1.249-5.966). After 1-10 years of follow-up, no significant difference was found in the recurrence rate of endometrial lesions between both treatment groups.

Conclusions

For patients with endometrial hyperplasia undergoing IVF treatment, the EL protocol is superior to ML protocol, and in the EL protocol, they can achieve similar pregnancy outcomes as patients with normal endometrium.

Fertility-Sparing Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma and Endometrial Hyperplasia: Pregnancy Outcomes after Embryo Transfer

The goal of fertility-sparing treatment (FST) for patients desiring future fertility with EMCA, and its precursor EH, is to clear the affected tissue and revert to normal endometrial function. Approximately 15% of patients treated with FST will have a live birth without the need for assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite this low number, little information exists on the pregnancy outcomes of patients who utilize ART. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer in patients with EMCA or EH who elected for FST. This retrospective cohort study at a large urban university-affiliated fertility center included all patients who underwent embryo transfer after fertility-sparing treatment for EMCA or EH between January 2003 and December 2018. Primary outcomes included embryo transfer results and a live birth rate (defined as the number of live births per number of transfers). There were 14 patients, three with EMCA and 11 with EH, who met the criteria for inclusion with a combined total of 40 embryo transfers. An analysis of observed outcomes by sub-group, compared to the expected outcomes at our center (patients without EMCA/EH matched for age, embryo transfer type and number, and utilization of PGT-A) showed that patients with EMCA/EH after FST had a significantly lower live birth rate than expected (Z = −5.04, df = 39, p < 0.01). A sub-group analysis of the 14 euploid embryo transfers resulted in a live birth rate of 21.4% compared to an expected rate of 62.8% (Z = −3.32, df = 13, p < 0.001). Among patients with EMCA/EH who required assisted reproductive technology, live birth rates were lower than expected following embryo transfer when compared to patients without EMCA/EH at our center. Further evaluation of the impact of the diagnosis, treatment, and repeated cavity instrumentation for FST is necessary to create an individualized and optimized approach for this unique patient population.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Metformin as an Adjuvant Therapy for Infertile Women With Endometrial Complex Hyperplasia/Complex Atypical Hyperplasia and Their Subsequent Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the adjuvant efficacy of metformin treatment to achieve pathological complete response (CR) in patients with endometrial complex hyperplasia (CH) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), and secondarily, to evaluate their pregnancy outcomes after following assisted reproductive technology (ART).

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study analyzed 219 patients diagnosed with infertility and CH/CAH from January 2016 to December 2020. Among these patients, 138 were assigned to the control group (progesterone alone) and 81 were assigned to the study group (progesterone+metformin). After 8/12 weeks of therapy, the treatment responses were assessed by histological examination of curettage specimens obtained by hysteroscopy. Once the pathological results indicated CR, the patients were able to receive ART. The ART treatment and follow-up data of these patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

116 patients in the control group achieved CR, compared with 76 patients in the study group. The CR rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the study group (P=0.034). We then divided the patients into subgroups to compare the treatment responses. In the subgroup analyses, patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² and patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) had higher CR rates in the metformin group compared with the control group (P=0.015, P=0.028 respectively). Subsequently, 68 patients in the control group and 47 patients in the study group received an ART cycle. We examined the pregnancy indications and found no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Regression of CH/CAH may be improved by progesterone+metformin compared with progesterone alone. The effect was particularly pronounced in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² and patients with PCOS. Metformin had no obvious effect on subsequent ART outcomes. The trial is registered on the publicly accessible website.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=15372, identifier ChiCTR-ONR-16009078.

LNG-IUS combined with progesterone ameliorates endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcomes of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the positive effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) combined with progesterone on endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcomes of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EEC).

METHODS

Patients with AEH or EEC admitted to our hospital were enrolled, and assigned to a control group (con group) and a combination group (com group). Patients in the con group were treated with LNG-IUS, while those in the com group were treated with LNG-IUS combined with progesterone. After treatment, the two groups were compared in efficacy, menstrual blood volume (pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score), and changes in endometrial thickness. In addition, the incidence of adverse drug reactions and pregnancy outcomes of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference in PBAC score and endometrial thickness between patients with AEH or EEC in the con group and those in the com group, but after 3 months and 6 months of treatment, the com group got a better PBAC score and better changes of endometrial thickness than the con group, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions in the com group was also significantly lower than that in the con group. In addition, the follow-up results of pregnancy outcomes of patients showed that the fertility rate and total effective rate of the com group were both significantly higher than those of the con group (both P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

LNG-IUS combined with progesterone is more effective in treating patients with AEH or EEC. It can effectively improve the endometrial thickness of patients and fertility rate of those with fertility requirements after treatment.

Creation of a rabbit model for intrauterine adhesions using electrothermal injury

The pathogenesis and therapeutic treatment of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) remain unsolved, highlighting the need for stable and effective experimental animal models. In this study, uterine electrocoagulation of twenty-one female New Zealand White rabbits was carried out to establish an IUA model. As rabbits have two completely separate uterine horns, each rabbit had its own internal control: one uterine horn was given an electrothermal injury (Group A, n=21), and the contralateral uterine horn received no treatment and served as the control (Group B, n=21). The endometrial morphology, number of endometrial glands, area of endometrial fibrosis, and number of implanted fetuses were compared between the two groups. In Group A, the numbers of endometrial glands on Days 7 and 14 and the number of implanted fetuses were significantly lower than those in Group B (P<0.05, P<0.05, and P<0.01, respectively), while the ratio of the area with endometrial stromal fibrosis to the total endometrial area was significantly increased (P<0.01). These results suggest that this method of electrothermal injury is effective for the establishment of a rabbit IUA model between 7 and 14 d after surgery.