Multidisciplinary Therapy of Locally Far‐Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer with Fixed Perioperative Sequence of Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy, Surgery, and Radiotherapy: Long‐Term Results

Vinorelbine's anti-tumor actions may depend on the mitotic apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation: hypotheses with implications for chemo-immunotherapy of advanced cancers and pediatric gliomas

Vinorelbine is a very potent chemotherapeutic agent which is used to treat a number of cancers including breast and non-small cell lung tumors. Vinorelbine mainly acts via blocking microtubules and induces a specific type of cell death called 'mitotic catastrophe/apoptosis' subsequent to mitotic slippage, which is the failure of cells to stay in a mitotic arrested state and replicating their DNA without cytokinesis. Glial tumor cells are especially sensitive to mitotic slippage. In recent years, vinorelbine demonstrated potency in pediatric optic and pontine gliomas. In this manuscript, we propose that vinorelbine's anti-tumor actions involve mitotic apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation. Intravenous infusion of vinorelbine induces a peculiar severe pain in the tumor site and patients with highly vascularized, oedematous and necrotic tumors are particularly vulnerable to this pain. Severe pain is a sign of robust inflammation and anti-inflammatory agents are used in treatment of this side effect. However, no one has questioned whether inflammation contributes to anti-tumor effects of vinorelbine, despite the existing data that vinorelbine induces Toll-Like Receptor-4 (TLR4), cytokines and cell death in endothelial cells especially under hypoxia. Robust inflammation may contribute to tumor necrosis such as seen during immunotherapy with lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Evidence also emerges that enhanced cyclooxygenase activity may increase cancer cell death in certain contexts. There are data indicating that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) could block anti-tumor efficacy of taxanes, which also work mainly via anti-microtubule actions. Further, combining vinorelbine with immunostimulant cytokines provided encouraging results in far advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, which are highly antigenic tumors. Vinorelbine also showed potential in treatment of inflammatory breast cancer. Finally, pontine gliomas - where partial activity of vinorelbine is shown by some studies - are also tumors which partially respond to immune stimulation. Animal experiments shall be conducted whether TLR4-activating molecules or immune-checkpoint inhibitors could augment anti-tumor actions of vinorelbine. Noteworthy, TLR4-activation seems as the most promising way of cancer immunotherapy, as a high percentage of molecules which demonstrated clinical benefits in cancer treatment are activators of TLR4, including BCG vaccine, monophosphoryl lipid A and picibanil (OKT-432). The provided data would be meaningful for the oncological practice.

[Systemic treatments of inflammatory breast cancer: an overview]

The poor prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is due to its strong metastatic potential. During the last three decades, the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), and its improvement with successive additions of anthracyclines and then taxanes, allowed to double the survival. However, the 5-year survival still remains lower than 50%, with the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant CT being a major prognostic factor. Since 1995, several innovative approaches have been evaluated. Initially, the trials of high-dose CT with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have generated promising results, but ultimately failed to change standards of treatment, in particular because of its toxicity. More recently, a few targeted therapies, combined to conventional CT, have been assessed, due to the frequent overexpression of HER2 and EGFR and the important vascularization of IBC. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, has shown a clear advantage in terms of pCR and survival in studies dedicated to, HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancers, including IBC. Lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor anti-HER2 and EGFR, has shown significant activity in two phase II studies dedicated to HER2-positive IBC. The interest of HER2-double blockade by the combination of trastuzumab-pertuzumab combined to docetaxel has been demonstrated in term of pCR in the NEOSPHERE study which also included HER2-positive IBC. Among the anti-angiogenic drugs tested in studies dedicated to IBC, bevacizumab has given the most interesting results in term of efficacy/toxicity ratio. In the Beverly 2 study HER2-positive IBC patients were treated by the combination chemotherapy, trastuzumab and bevacizumab: the rate of pCR was 64%, and the 3-year disease-free and overall survivals were 68% and 90%, respectively; the increase of endothelial cells circulating was inversely correlated to the probability of pCR. All those treatments have been extrapolated from standard breast cancers. Thus, a deep molecular knowledge of IBC appears to be critical in order to develop specific treatments effectively targeting its particular aggressiveness.

The effects of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has become, in many centers the standard of care. An increasingly encountered trend is the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to downstage high stage tumors and to decrease tumor burden prior to definitive oncologic surgery. These agents clearly provide a survival benefit, but also have the potential to adversely affect the surgical course of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. The use of new biologic and hormonal agents may also have effects on surgery and reconstruction. Furthermore, chemotherapeutic agents as a whole may impair cellular functions necessary for normal recovery from surgery. In this paper we present a concise review for the reconstructive surgeon on adverse effects of chemotherapeutic, hormonal and biologic agents used for treatment of breast cancer, important perioperative issues, and also discuss their potential effect on breast reconstruction.

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium

Despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy in recent years, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue. Biological characteristics and clinical behavior varies widely, ranging from indolent to locally aggressive or generalized disease. In depth knowledge of biology of cancer progression and cancer could lead to the identification of tumor characteristics associated with outcome. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) integrated into a multimodality program is nowadays the established treatment in LABC. Although our efforts in this research task are ongoing, of special clinical interest is the integration of anti-HER2 and other biological therapies, as anti-angiogenesis targeted treatments, that may further improve the long term control of LABC. Clinical management of LABC could be modified based on molecular biology and an approach tailored to each patient will optimize therapy.

Neoadjuvant sequential epirubicin and docetaxel followed by surgery-radiotherapy and post-operative docetaxel or gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination based on primary response: a multimodality approach for locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue despite progress achieved in recent years. Herein, we present the mature results of a multimodality treatment program tailoring epirubicin (EPI), docetaxel (DOC) and gemcitabine-vinorelbine (GEV) peri-operatively in LABC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage III, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status ≤2 patients were eligible. A biopsy documentation had to be performed before the start of chemotherapy (CT). Treatment consisted of four EPI (100 mg/m(2), d1q2w) followed by three DOC (100 mg/m(2), d1q3w); surgery 3-4 weeks from CT completion, followed by radiation therapy (RT) and CT according to response; partial or complete (PR/CR):DOC, no change or progressive disease (NC/PD):GEV. Primary endpoints were: (a) response and conversion to operability/conservative surgery and (b) overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR).

RESULTS

Fifty-six women, aged 32-75 (median 52 years), 24 IIIA and 32 IIIB were enrolled; 53 patients completed the entire program. Toxicity was acceptable and no treatment-related death was observed.

EFFICACY

clinical response rate (RR) 71.4% (40 patients); clinical complete response rate 33.9% (19 patients). Pathological response rate (RR) 67.8% (38 patients); pathological complete response rate 21.4% (12 patients). 33 (58.9%) and 19 (33.9%) patients, respectively, had radical and conservative operations without increased morbidity. After a median follow-up of 62 months, median OS has not yet been reached, while median TTR was 42 months. OS was longer in patients with clinical (p = 0.004) and pathological response (p = 0.002), RT (p < 0.0001) and post-operative DOC (p = 0.038). TTR was favorably affected by pR (p < 0.0001), RT (p < 0.0004) and post-operative DOC (p = 0.005). Pre-operative CT seemed to be equally active throughout all subgroups according to histology, ER/PR and HER2 status.

CONCLUSION

The treatment program of the present study allowed for the completion of an effective therapy at the cost of acceptable toxicity. The results of this study suggest a central role of CT for LABC and the value of eventually dose-dense, EPI- and DOC-based CT in a large proportion of LABC patients, regardless of biological tumor profile. Furthermore, tumor response (cR, pR) is an important surrogate for patients survival and further therapy management.