Anthracycline regimen adherence in older patients with early breast cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy non-adherence, patient-centered communication, and patient-level factors in elderly breast and colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We examined patient-level factors (patient characteristics, disease and treatment factors, and patient experience), patient-centered communication (PCCM), and non-adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) guidelines among breast and colon cancer patients to inform AC adherence promotion and improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics for patient-level factors, PCCM, and AC non-adherence (primary non-adherence, non-persistence at 3 and 6 months) were obtained. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate AC non-adherence after accounting for the identified patient-level factors.

RESULTS

The majority of the sample (n = 577) were White (87%), breast cancer patients (87%), and reported PCCM (provider communication score ≥ 90%, 73%, provider communication score = 100%, 58%). All three levels of AC nonadherence were significantly higher in breast cancer patients (69%, 81%, and 89% for primary non-adherence, and non-persistence at 3 and 6 months, respectively) than colon cancer patients (43%, 46%, and 62%, respectively). Male sex, survey assistance, and low/average ratings of a personal doctor, specialist, and healthcare were associated with lower PCCM. Older age, breast cancer diagnosis, and diagnosis group following 2007-2009 increased the likelihood of all three levels of AC non-adherence. Comorbidities and PCCM-90 were exclusively associated with non-persistence at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy non-adherence varied by cancer diagnosis and treatment factors. The relationship between PCCM and AC non-adherence differed by level of PCCM, time period, and the presence of comorbidities. AC guideline adherence, communication, and value-concordant treatment should be assessed and compared simultaneously to improve our understanding of their interrelationships.

Food to Overcome Outcomes Disparities: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Food Insecurity Interventions to Improve Cancer Outcomes

PURPOSE

Food insecurity is prevalent among low-income immigrant and minority patients with cancer. To our knowledge, this randomized controlled trial is the first to prospectively examine the impact on cancer outcomes of food insecurity interventions, with the goal of informing evidence-based interventions to address food insecurity in patients with cancer.

METHODS

A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted among food-insecure (18-item US Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module score ≥ 3) patients with cancer (N = 117) at four New York City safety net cancer clinics. Arms included a hospital cancer clinic-based food pantry (arm 1), food voucher plus pantry (arm 2), and home grocery delivery plus pantry (arm 3). Treatment completion (primary outcome) and full appointment attendance were assessed at 6 months. Food security status, depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and quality-of-life scores (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) were assessed at baseline and at 6 months.

RESULTS

Voucher plus pantry had the highest treatment completion rate (94.6%), followed by grocery delivery plus pantry (82.5%) and pantry (77.5%; P = .046). Food security scores improved significantly in all arms, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores improved significantly in the pantry and delivery plus pantry arms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings in this preliminary study suggest that voucher plus pantry was the most effective intervention at improving treatment completion, and it met our a priori criterion for a promising intervention (≥ 90%). All interventions demonstrated the potential to improve food security among medically underserved, food-insecure patients with cancer at risk of impaired nutrition status, reduced quality of life, and poorer survival. All patients with cancer should be screened for food insecurity, with evidence-based food insecurity interventions made available.

Adherence to Chemotherapy among Women with Breast Cancer Treated at Tikur Anbessa Specialized and Teaching Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Adherence is important for women with breast cancer because it is a primary determinant for effectiveness of treatment and optimum clinical benefit. Though Breast cancer is the leading cancer in Ethiopia,adherance to chemotherapy is not investigated in Ethiopian women.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess adherence to chemotherapy among women with breast cancer treated at Tikur Anbessa specialized and Teaching Hospital.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study was conducted among 164 breast cancer patients with chemotherapy. After eligible participants were identified, data were collected using face-to-face interviews, card reviews and telephone interviews. Adherence was calculated as the number of doses taken divided by number of recommended or expected doses. Pearson chi-square test was used to evaluate predictors of adherence.

RESULTS

Among a total of 164 breast cancer patients, majority, 119, (72.6%) of them were urban residents. The mean age of study participants was 41.99 + 10.9 years. The majority 149, (90.9%) of patients were married. More than half 94, (57.3%) of the women were literate. In this study, 137 out of 164 (83.5%) women were adherent to their chemotherapy. Of the 27 non adherent participants. he reason for non-adherence to chemotherapy was unknown for 7, (25.9%) of women. Among different identified reasons for non-adherent, sever illness prevents patients to receive chemotherapy. Based on Pearson chi square test, distance from referral center and treatment regimen were significantly associated with non-adherence rate.

CONCLUSION

The present  study the results showed that the majority 137, (83.5%) of patients were in good adherence to their chemotherapy. The most identified factor of non-adherence was inability to come for their therapy as a result of severity of illness. Therefore, expansion of cancer diagnosis and treatment centers should be encouraged in order to maximize patient's access and adherence to chemotherapy.

Understanding racial-ethnic differences in patient-centered care (PCC) in oncology through a critical race theory lens: A qualitative comparison of PCC among Black, Hispanic, and White cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Patient-centered care (PCC) experiences can vary by race and ethnicity and likely contribute to cancer care disparities. We compared PCC concepts between Non-Hispanic White (White), Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic Black (Black) cancer patients utilizing Critical Race Theory (CRT) to understand the relationships between racial-ethnic identity and PCC.

METHODS

A thematic analysis and in-depth CRT-informed analysis of individual interviews exploring patient values, unmet needs, preferences, and priorities were performed.

RESULTS

Participants were aged> 25 yrs old, 53% male, and included 5 Hispanic, 4 Black and 6 White cancer patients. Unmet needs for time to make decisions, and provider interaction between visits and the value for finding meaning in the illness emerged among Blacks and Whites. The unmet need for a long-term treatment plan emerged among Blacks, and the preference of research participation among Whites. A value for optimism was observed among Hispanics and Whites. Racial-ethnic variations in patient descriptions and experiences of their values, unmet needs, preferences, and priorities were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Underrepresented groups face subtle but significant challenges in feeling cared for and understood, voicing concerns, and obtaining quality care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Increased mutual understanding and provider knowledge of unique PCC experiences among underrepresented cancer patients are needed.

Adherence to Lenalidomide in Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

One of the most common orally administered antimyeloma agents, lenalidomide, has significantly improved outcomes in multiple myeloma, including in older patients. However, despite its utilization and cost, the rates and factors related to adherence to lenalidomide in older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma remain unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over age 65 years being treated with lenalidomide therapy between the years 2007 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases. Adherence was measured as medication possession ratio (MPR), which was defined as the ratio of the number of days the patient had pills in their possession to the number of days in the observation period in the first year after myeloma diagnosis. MPR of < 90% was considered poor adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 793 patients were included in the analysis. The mean MPR in our cohort was 89.5 ± 9.3%. Overall, 38% (n = 302) of the patients were considered to have poor adherence. Factors associated with poor adherence included increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.03 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.05; P = .024), black race (aOR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.08-2.73; P = .022), and polypharmacy (aOR = 1.04 per medication; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Over a third of older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were considered to have poor adherence to lenalidomide, using the MPR as a surrogate for adherence. This highlights the need to further understand factors and devise strategies to support adherence in this patient cohort.

Compliance with multidisciplinary team meeting management recommendations

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate patient compliance with management recommendations given by a breast cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT), assess for reasons for noncompliance, and perform an exploratory assessment on breast cancer outcomes in noncompliant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was undertaken for patients selected by their primary clinician to be discussed at the MDT of Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA in Perth between 1st March 2011 and the 28th February 2016. The primary objective was the rate of compliance with MDT management recommendations. Secondary objectives included factors associated with noncompliance, rate of clinical trial uptake, and impact of treatment noncompliance on breast cancer events in a subgroup of early breast cancer (EBC) patients.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

A total of 2614 MDT management recommendations were made for 925 patients. Overall, 92% were compliant with all recommendations given. Clinical trial recruitment was successful in 84.1%. The reasons given for treatment noncompliance were fear of toxicity, choosing an alternative treatment, and treatment inconvenience. In a subset of 337 EBC patients, there was a significantly higher rate of contralateral breast cancer, distant recurrence, and breast cancer-specific death, P = .0016, in those who were noncompliant. Our study demonstrates a high rate of MDT treatment recommendation compliance and clinical trial recruitment. In a subgroup of EBC patients, noncompliance was associated with significantly worse outcomes. Attention to educating patients to minimize their fear of treatment toxicity and ensuring their understanding of evidence-based treatment may lead to lower rates of noncompliance.

Factors influencing oral adherence: qualitative metasummary and triangulation with quantitative evidence

BACKGROUND

Concern about adherence to oral agents among patients with cancer has grown as more oral agents are being used for cancer treatment. Knowledge of common factors that facilitate or inhibit adherence to oral medication regimens can be beneficial to clinicians in identifying patients at risk for nonadherence, in planning care to address barriers to adherence, and in educating patients about ways to improve adherence.

OBJECTIVES

The focus of this review is to synthesize the evidence about factors that influence adherence and identify implications for practice.

METHODS

Literature was searched via PubMed and CINAHL®. Evidence regarding factors influencing adherence was synthesized using a metasummary of qualitative research and triangulated with findings from quantitative research.

FINDINGS

Forty-four factors influencing adherence were identified from 159 research studies of patients with and without cancer. Factors associated with adherence in oncology and non-oncology cases included provider relations, side effects, forgetfulness, beliefs about medication necessity, establishing routines for taking medication, social support, ability to fit medications in lifestyle, cost, and medication knowledge. Among patients with cancer, depression and negative expectations of results also were shown to have a negative relationship to adherence.

Prevalence of medication therapy adherence in the elderly and related factors

RESUMO Objetivo: verificar a prevalência de adesão à terapêutica medicamentosa entre idosos em atendimento ambulatorial e se há associação entre tal adesão e fatores demográficos, socioeconômicos e condições de saúde. Método: estudo exploratório, descritivo, transversal, quantitativo, realizado nos ambulatórios de um hospital universitário no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Participaram 107 idosos, selecionados por conveniência, que responderam a três instrumentos de coleta de dados. Realizou-se análise estatística descritiva e inferencial. Resultados: a prevalência de adesão foi de 86,9%. Houve associação estatisticamente significante entre a variável adesão e receber orientações do médico sobre como fazer uso dos medicamentos e apresentar reação adversa. Conclusão: é importante que os enfermeiros conheçam a prevalência de adesão aos medicamentos e os fatores a ela relacionados para melhor planejamento de intervenções que promovam o sucesso terapêutico.

Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of hospitalization between patients with early-stage breast cancer who received different chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We identified 3,567 patients older than age 65 years from the SEER/Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare database and 9,327 patients younger than age 65 years from the MarketScan database who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 2003 and 2007. The selection was nonrandomized and nonprospectively collected. We categorized patients according to the regimens they received: docetaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (A) and C, TAC, AC + T, dose-dense AC + paclitaxel (P) or AC + weekly P. We compared the rates of chemotherapy-related hospitalizations that occurred within 6 months of chemotherapy initiation and used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the factors associated with these hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Among patients younger than age 65 years, the hospitalization rates ranged from 6.2% (dose-dense AC + P) to 10.0% (TAC), and those who received TAC and AC + T had significantly higher rates of hospitalization than did patients who received TC. Among patients older than age 65 years, these rates ranged from 12.7% (TC) to 24.2% (TAC) and the rates of hospitalization of patients who received TAC, AC + T, AC, or AC + weekly P were higher than those of patients who received TC.

CONCLUSION

TAC and AC + T were associated with the highest risk of hospitalization in patients younger than age 65 years. Among patients older than age 65 years, all regimens (aside from dose-dense AC + P) were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization than TC. Results may be affected by selection biases where less aggressive regimens are offered to frailer patients.

Factors influencing adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a disease that mostly affects older adults. Treatment adherence is crucial to obtain optimal outcomes such as cure or improvement in quality of life. Older adults have numerous comorbidites as well as cognitive and sensory impairments that may affect adherence. The aim of this systematic review was to examine factors that influence adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Systematic review of the literature published between inception of the databases and February 2013. English, Dutch, French and German-language articles reporting cross-sectional or longitudinal, intervention or observational studies of cancer treatment adherence were included. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Web of Science, ASSIA, Ageline, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), SocAbstracts and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers reviewed abstracts and abstracted data using standardized forms. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2011.

RESULTS

Twenty-two manuscripts were identified reporting on 18 unique studies. The quality of most studies was good. Most studies focused on women with breast cancer and adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy. More than half of the studies used data from administrative or clinical databases or chart reviews. The adherence rate varied from 52% to 100%. Only one qualitative study asked older adults about reasons for non-adherence. Factors associated with non-adherence varied widely across studies.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence was common across studies but little is known about the factors influencing non-adherence. More research is needed to investigate why older adults choose to adhere or not adhere to their treatment regimens taking into account their multimorbidity.

Comparative studies of how living circumstances influence medication adherence in ≥65 year olds

BACKGROUND

Resources to help the older aged (≥65 year olds) manage their medicines should probably target those in greatest need. The older-aged have many different types of living circumstances. There are different locations (urban, rural), different types of housing (in the community or in retirement villages), different living arrangements (living alone or with others), and different socioeconomic status (SES) circumstances. However, there has been limited attention to whether these living circumstances affect adherence to medicines in the ≥65 year olds.

AIM OF THE REVIEW

The aim was to determine whether comparative studies, including logistic regression studies, show that living circumstances affect adherence to medicines by the ≥65 year olds.

METHODS

A literature search of Medline, CINAHL and the Internet (Google) was undertaken.

RESULTS

Four comparative studies have not shown differences in adherence to medicines between the ≥65 year olds living in rural and urban locations, but one study shows lower adherence to medicines for osteoporosis in rural areas compared to metropolitan, and another study shows greater adherence to antihypertensive medicines in rural than urban areas. There are no comparative studies of adherence to medicines in the older-aged living in indigenous communities compared to other communities. There is conflicting evidence as to whether living alone, being unmarried, or having a low income/worth is associated with nonadherence. Preliminary studies have suggested that the older-aged living in rental, low SES retirement villages or leasehold, middle SES retirement villages have a lower adherence to medicines than those living in freehold, high SES retirement villages.

CONCLUSIONS

The ≥65 year olds living in rural communities may need extra help with adherence to medicines for osteoporosis. The ≥65 year olds living in rental or leasehold retirement villages may require extra assistance/resources to adhere to their medicines. Further research is needed to clarify whether living under certain living circumstances (e.g. living alone, being unmarried, low income) has an effect on adherence, and to determine whether the ≥65 year olds living in indigenous communities need assistance to be adherent to prescribed medicines.