A Phase I Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Higher-Dose Icotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Long-term safety of icotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective, real-world study

Background

Lung cancer is a global health problem with a high mortality, and the development of target therapy has led to a revolution in the treatment of lung cancer in recent years. Favorable efficacy and safety of icotinib have been demonstrated in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, minimal data are available to describe the long-term safety of icotinib in NSCLC patients.

Methods

We reviewed the safety data from 1,321 advanced NSCLC patients who were treated with icotinib. The primary endpoint was the long-term safety, defined as any adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred after 6 months of icotinib administration.

Results

Fewer ADRs were noticed over 6 month administration of icotinib than within 6 months in overall population (24.3% vs. 65.4%), and elderly patients (23.6% vs. 66.9%). The majority of ADRs were grade 1–2 in severity over 6 month exposure of icotinib in overall population as well as elderly patients. In overall population, the most common ADRs of icotinib during long-term use were rash (16.4%) and diarrhea (5.3%), while the incidences were 31.8% and 13.2% in the induction period, respectively. In elderly population, the most common ADRs of icotinib during long-term use were rash (15.7%) and diarrhea (4.7%), while the incidences were 27.8% and 14.9% in the induction period, respectively, and more inching was observed in the induction period as compared with long term use (6.3% vs. 0.3%).

Conclusions

There was an evidence of decreased frequency of icotinib-induced ADRs over time, and icotinib was well-tolerated in elderly NSCLC patients.

Routine-Dose and High-Dose Icotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Exon 21-L858R Mutation: the Randomized, Phase II, INCREASE Trial

PURPOSE

Our primary purpose is to explore safety and efficacy of high-dose icotinib in comparison with routine-dose icotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring 21-L858R mutation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutant (21-L858R or exon 19 deletion at 2:1) NSCLC were enrolled. Patients with 21-L858R mutation were randomized to receive routine-dose icotinib (125 mg, thrice daily; L858R-RD) or high-dose icotinib (250 mg, thrice daily; L858R-HD), whereas patients with exon 19 deletion received only routine-dose icotinib (19-Del-RD) until progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS), assessed by an independent review committee.

RESULTS

From May 2015 to November 2017, 253 patients (86 in L858R-RD; 90 in L858R-HD; and 77 in 19-Del-RD) were enrolled. The mPFS in L858R-HD group was similar to that in 19-Del-RD group (12.9 months and 12.5 months, respectively) and was significantly longer than that in L858R-RD group [12.9 months vs. 9.2 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53-1.05]. A longer but statistically nonsignificant mPFS was observed between 19-Del-RD and L858R-RD groups (12.5 months vs. 9.2 months, HR: 0.80; 95% CI, 0.57-1.13). A higher objective response rate (ORR) was observed in L858R-HD group compared with L858R-RD group (73% vs. 48%), also between 19-Del-RD and L858R-RD groups (75% vs. 48%). Similar incidences of grade 3/4 toxicities were observed among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose icotinib improved mPFS and ORR in patients with NSCLC harboring 21-L858R mutation with acceptable tolerability, which could be a new therapeutic option for this patient population.

Durable response to pulsatile icotinib for central nervous system metastases from EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a catastrophic complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including brain and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, and are always accompanied by a poor prognosis. Despite the continuous development of existing treatments, the therapy of CNS metastases remains challenging.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a patient who was definitively diagnosed with brain and leptomeningeal metastases from NSCLC with a targeted mutation in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). A standard dosage of icotinib (125 mg three times daily) was implemented but ineffective. CNS lesions developed despite stable systemic control, so pulsatile icotinib (1125 mg every 3 d) was administered. This new strategy for administration has lasted 25 mo so far, and resulted in complete remission of neurological symptoms, almost vanished lesions, and longer survival with no notable side effects.

CONCLUSION

This is the first successful example of pulsatile icotinib for treating isolated CNS progression from EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, providing a new alternative for the local treatment of CNS metastases.