1
|
Lai SP, Wang SY, Chan AL, Leung JH, Yip HT. Cost-effectiveness and drug wastage of bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:541-549. [PMID: 38372034 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2319605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy (CT) and drug wastage in treating platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) was assessed. METHODS A three-state partitioned-survival model to compare the clinical and economic outcomes in the treatment of patients with PRrOC from a Taiwan healthcare prospective, extrapolated to two years based on data obtained from the JGOG3023 clinical trial. The primary outcomes of the model were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS In the base-case scenario, using vials of bevacizumab biosimilar (Bevbiol) plus chemotherapy, the ICER was (new Taiwan dollar) NT$ 4,555,878 per QALY gained. The incremental cost savings of an incremental 2.02 QALYs were NT$ 1,605,828 if weight-based Bevbiol plus chemotherapy were used, but the ICER remained high at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. If the cost of Bevbiol were reduced to 50% per vial, adding it to CT would be cost-effective at an acceptable WTP threshold of NTD 2,994,200, with an ICER of NT$ 2,975,484. CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab biosimilars in mg/kg dosage form with chemotherapy are still not cost-effective in Taiwan, but using weight-based dosing will reduce drug waste and save treatment costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih Ping Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shyh-Yau Wang
- Department of Radiology, An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Agnes Lf Chan
- Department of Pharmacy, An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - John Hang Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Hei-Tung Yip
- Management Office for Health Data, Clinical Trial Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chai Y, Liu JL, Zhang S, Li N, Xu DQ, Liu WJ, Fu RJ, Tang YP. The effective combination therapies with irinotecan for colorectal cancer. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1356708. [PMID: 38375031 PMCID: PMC10875015 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1356708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer worldwide and has become one of the major human disease burdens. In clinical practice, the treatment of colorectal cancer has been closely related to the use of irinotecan. Irinotecan combines with many other anticancer drugs and has a broader range of drug combinations. Combination therapy is one of the most important means of improving anti-tumor efficacy and overcoming drug resistance. Reasonable combination therapy can lead to better patient treatment options, and inappropriate combination therapy will increase patient risk. For the colorectal therapeutic field, the significance of combination therapy is to improve the efficacy, reduce the adverse effects, and improve the ease of treatment. Therefore, we explored the clinical advantages of its combination therapy based on mechanism or metabolism and reviewed the rationale basis and its limitations in conducting exploratory clinical trials on irinotecan combination therapy, including the results of clinical trials on the combination potentiation of cytotoxic drugs, targeted agents, and herbal medicine. We hope that these can evoke more efforts to conduct irinotecan in the laboratory for further studies and evaluations, as well as the possibility of more in-depth development in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Chai
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jing-Li Liu
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shuo Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao SAR, China
| | - Na Li
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao SAR, China
| | - Ding-Qiao Xu
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wen-Juan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
| | - Rui-Jia Fu
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yu-Ping Tang
- Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for TCM Compatibility, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Fundamentals and New Drugs Research, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anderson W, Bera K, Smith D, Tirumani SH, Ramaiya N. Emergency department imaging utilization of cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: single-institution 8-year experience. Emerg Radiol 2023; 30:407-418. [PMID: 37129686 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-023-02136-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to highlight the presentations, imaging, and clinical outcomes of cancer patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) while receiving bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy. METHODS Our retrospective study was based on data from a single institution to identify cancer patients who presented acutely to the ED between 2014 and 2021 within 3 months of beginning bevacizumab who subsequently received diagnostic imaging with CT, MRI, ultrasound, and/or nuclear medicine ventilation/perfusion (VQ) scans. Data gathered included presenting symptoms grouped by body system, imaging impressions, and clinical outcomes, including hospitalization and discontinuation of bevacizumab after each ED visit. Imaging examinations and patient charts were reviewed by a team of fellowship-trained radiologists, radiology residents, and medical students. RESULTS A total of 84 patients who presented to the ED were included for analysis. This included 32 (38.1%) males and 52 (61.9%) females, with a mean age of 61.2 years and an age range of 29-91 years. Neurological symptoms were the most common presenting symptoms, followed by abdominal symptoms and respiratory symptoms. Head imaging with CT and MRI was the most common imaging ordered with 55 total examinations, followed by abdominal imaging with 37 CT abdomen/pelvis (A/P) examinations, and then CT chest imaging with 22 examinations. Imaging revealed a serious adverse drug reaction in 21 (25.0%) patients, disease progression in 19 (22.6%), and no acute imaging findings in 44 (52.4%) patients. Imaging diagnoses were significantly associated with treatment planning, with a positive determination of bevacizumab-related serious adverse reaction on imaging leading to discontinuation of bevacizumab (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Multimodality imaging was a commonly used assessment tool for cancer patients receiving bevacizumab who presented to the ED. Imaging played a crucial role in diagnosis in these patients, especially of treatment-related serious adverse reactions and disease progression. Positive imaging findings of serious adverse reactions affected patient management including discontinuation of bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wyatt Anderson
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Health Education Campus, 9501 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Kaustav Bera
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Daniel Smith
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sree Harsha Tirumani
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Nikhil Ramaiya
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu D, Luo Y, Wang P, Li J, Ma L, Huang J, Zhang H, Yang X, Li L, Zheng Y, Fang G, Yan P. Clinical progress of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy and combination therapy for gastric cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1148131. [PMID: 37384288 PMCID: PMC10295723 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1148131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of gastric cancer is increasing year by year. Most gastric cancers are already in the advanced stage with poor prognosis when diagnosed, which means the current treatment is not satisfactory. Angiogenesis is an important link in the occurrence and development of tumors, and there are multiple anti-angiogenesis targeted therapies. To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs alone and in combination against gastric cancer, we systematically searched and sorted out relevant literature. In this review, we summarized the efficacy and safety of Ramucirumab, Bevacizumab, Apatinib, Fruquintinib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Pazopanib on gastric cancer when used alone or in combination based on prospective clinical trials reported in the literature, and sorted response biomarkers. We also summarized the challenges faced by anti-angiogenesis therapy for gastric cancer and available solutions. Finally, the characteristics of the current clinical research are summarized and suggestions and prospects are raised. This review will serve as a good reference for the clinical research of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs in the treatment of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghan Xu
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Yehao Luo
- School of Second Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Linrui Ma
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Xiaoman Yang
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Liqi Li
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Yuhong Zheng
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Gang Fang
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Applied Fundamental Research of Zhuang Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
| | - Peiyu Yan
- Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology Zhuhai MUST Science and Technology Research Institute, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Inci K, Nilsson B, Ny L, Strömberg U, Wilking N, Lindskog S, Giglio D. Targeted Therapy in the Palliative Setting of Colorectal Cancer-Survival and Medical Costs. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15113022. [PMID: 37296984 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Targeted therapy is used alone or together with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess overall survival and medical costs in a cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. (2) Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics of 337 patients and pathological data of colorectal tumors were retrospectively collected in this population-based study. The overall survival and medical costs for patients receiving chemotherapy plus targeted therapy were compared with those for patients receiving chemotherapy only. (3) Results: Patients administered chemotherapy plus targeted therapy were less frail and had more often RAS wild-type tumors but had higher CEA levels than patients receiving chemotherapy only. No prolonged overall survival could be observed in patients receiving palliative targeted therapy. The medical costs for patients undergoing treatment with targeted therapy were significantly higher than for patients treated only with chemotherapy; they were especially higher in the group receiving targeted therapy early than late in the palliative setting. (4) Conclusions: The use of targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer leads to significantly higher medical costs when used early in the palliative setting. No positive effects of the use of targeted therapy could be observed in this study; therefore, we suggest that targeted therapy be used in later lines of palliative therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamuran Inci
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Halland Hospital Varberg, Region Halland, 43237 Varberg, Sweden
| | - Bengt Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Halland Hospital Varberg, Region Halland, 43237 Varberg, Sweden
| | - Lars Ny
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulf Strömberg
- Department of Research and Development, University of Gothenburg, Region Halland, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nils Wilking
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Lindskog
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Halland Hospital Varberg, Region Halland, 43237 Varberg, Sweden
| | - Daniel Giglio
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brooks GA, Tapp S, Daly AT, Busam JA, Tosteson ANA. Cost-effectiveness of DPYD Genotyping Prior to Fluoropyrimidine-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:e189-e195. [PMID: 35668003 PMCID: PMC10496767 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy substantially reduces recurrence and mortality after resection of stage 3 colon cancer. While standard doses of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine are safe for most patients, the risk of severe toxicity is increased for the approximately 6% of patients with dihydropyimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency caused by pathogenic DPYD gene variants. Pre-treatment screening for pathogenic DPYD gene variants reduces severe toxicity but has not been widely adopted in the United States. METHODS We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of DPYD genotyping prior to fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for stage 3 colon cancer, covering the c.1129-5923C>G (HapB3), c.1679T>G (*13), c.1905+1G>A (*2A), and c.2846A>T gene variants. We used a Markov model with a 5-year horizon, taking a United States healthcare perspective. Simulated patients with pathogenic DPYD gene variants received reduced-dose fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for DPYD genotyping. RESULTS Compared with no screening for DPD deficiency, DPYD genotyping increased per-patient costs by $78 and improved survival by 0.0038 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), leading to an ICER of $20,506/QALY. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, The ICER exceeded $50,000 per QALY when the cost of the DPYD genotyping assay was greater than $286. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY DPYD genotyping was preferred to no screening in 96.2% of iterations. CONCLUSION Among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for stage 3 colon cancer, screening for DPD deficiency with DPYD genotyping is a cost-effective strategy for preventing infrequent but severe and sometimes fatal toxicities of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel A Brooks
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH.
| | - Stephanie Tapp
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Allan T Daly
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Anna N A Tosteson
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagi MA, Dewi PEN, Thavorncharoensap M, Sangroongruangsri S. A Systematic Review on Economic Evaluation Studies of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions in the Middle East and North Africa. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:315-335. [PMID: 34931297 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00703-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to the increase in healthcare budget constraint, economic evaluation (EE) evidence is increasingly required to inform resource allocation decisions. This study aimed to systematically review quantity, characteristics, and quality of full EE studies on diagnostic and therapeutic interventions conducted in 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. METHODS PubMed and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify the published EE studies in the MENA region. The quality of reviewed studies was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS The search identified 69 studies. The cost-utility approach was adopted in 49 studies (71 %). More than half (38 studies; 55 %) were conducted in Iran and Turkey. Sixteen countries (62 %) did not have any EE studies. The most frequently analyzed therapeutic areas were infectious diseases (19 studies; 28 %), cardiovascular diseases (11 studies; 16 %), and malignancies (10 studies; 14 %). Ten studies (14 %), 46 (67 %), 12 (17 %), and 1 study (1 %) were classified as excellent, high, moderate, and poor quality, respectively. The mean of items reported was 85.10 % (standard deviation 13.32 %). Characterizing heterogeneity, measurement of effectiveness, time horizon, and discount rate were missed in 21 (60 %), 22 (32 %), 20 (29 %) and 15 (25 %) studies, respectively. Data on effectiveness and utility relied primarily on studies conducted outside the region. CONCLUSIONS The quantity of EE studies in the MENA region remains low; however, overall quality is high to excellent. The availability of local data, capacity building, and national guidelines are vital to improve both the quantity and quality of EE studies in the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi
- Doctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Aljanad University for Science and Technology, Taiz, Yemen.
| | - Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
- Doctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Pharmacy Profession, Faculty of Medicine and health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Montarat Thavorncharoensap
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy Excellence Research (SAPER) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rinaldi I, Winston K, Vincent LD, Wicaksono A, Wardoyo MP, Nurrobi YAS, Leoni J. Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival Comparison of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy Combination Regiment versus Chemotherapy Only Regiment in Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.9375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third-most common cancer in the world, in which 15%–25% of patients already had metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) at the time of diagnosis. The overall survival (OS) of mCRC is poor with the use of chemotherapy.
AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the outcomes of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of adding bevacizumab to different chemotherapy regiments compared to chemotherapy regiments only in the treatment of untreated mCRC.
METHODS: Literature searching was done in databases such as PubMed, EBSCO, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect. The primary outcome measured in this systematic review and meta-analysis was OS, while the secondary outcome was PFS. Hazard ratio (HR) was used as the main summary measure with 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was measured using a funnel plot.
RESULTS: Literature searching resulted in 11 selected studies, 9 selected for meta-analysis. Addition of bevacizumab showed significant better results in OS (HR 0.83, CI 95% 0.74–0.93; p = 0.002; I2 = 29%) and PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51–0.75; p < 0.0001, I2 = 78%).
CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy resulted in better OS and PFS in untreated mCRC. Further studies are needed to confirm PFS benefit from the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy due to significant heterogeneity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Liao W, Xu H, Hutton D, Wu Q, Zhou K, Luo H, Lei W, Feng M, Yang Y, Wen F, Li Q. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fourth- or Further-Line Ripretinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Front Oncol 2021; 11:692005. [PMID: 34938653 PMCID: PMC8685288 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.692005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The INVICTUS trial assessed the efficacy and safety of ripretinib compared with placebo in the management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Method We used a Markov model with three health states: progression-free disease, progression disease and death. We parameterized the model from time-to-event data (progression-free survival, overall survival) of ripretinib and placebo arms in the INVICTUS trial and extrapolated to a patient’s lifetime horizon. Estimates of health state utilities and costs were based on clinical trial data and the published literature. The outcomes of this model were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainty was tested via univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results The base-case model projected improved outcomes (by 0.29 QALYs) and additional costs (by $70,251) and yielded an ICER of $244,010/QALY gained for ripretinib versus placebo. The results were most sensitive to progression rates, the price of ripretinib, and health state utilities. The ICER was most sensitive to overall survival. When overall survival in the placebo group was lower, the ICER dropped to $127,399/QALY. The ICER dropped to $150,000/QALY when the monthly cost of ripretinib decreased to $14,057. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that ripretinib was the cost-effective therapy in 41.1% of simulations at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000. Conclusion As the fourth- or further-line therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, ripretinib is not cost-effective in the US. Ripretinib would achieve its cost-effectiveness with a price discount of 56% given the present effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiting Liao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Huiqiong Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - David Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Qiuji Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kexun Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hui Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Wanting Lei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingyang Feng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Feng Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiu Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Koilakou S, Petrou P. Economic Evaluation of Monoclonal Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Mol Diagn Ther 2021; 25:715-734. [PMID: 34816395 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00560-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has doubled over the last 20 years partly due to the introduction of advanced biologic therapies. However, these treatment modalities bear significant costs on healthcare systems globally, and may jeopardize their fiscal sustainability. The aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise the economic evaluations of monoclonal antibodies in mCRC. METHODOLOGY A literature search was performed in the electronic databases of: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EMBASE, EMBASE Alert, PUBMED, NHS Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment Database for full articles published from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020. RESULTS Twenty economic analyses were identified in the literature that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and evaluated the cost-effectiveness of (a) bevacizumab as first-line treatment for mCRC and as maintenance treatment, (b) cetuximab as first-line treatment, (c) panitumumab versus bevacizumab and cetuximab versus bevacizumab as first-line treatment, (d) aflibercept and ramucirumab as second-line treatment, (e) cetuximab and panitumumab as third-line treatment, (f) cetuximab versus panitumumab as later lines of treatment, and (g) RAS testing prior to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment. CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is cost-effective as neither first-line treatment nor maintenance treatment. Sequential treatment with bevacizumab in first-line and second-line treatment was also not cost-effective. Testing for KRAS and extended RAS mutations is cost-effective and should be performed prior to anti-EGFR treatment. In the RAS wild-type subgroup of mCRCs the use of anti-EGFR (panitumumab or cetuximab) in first-line treatment leads to a more favorable cost-effectiveness profile than the corresponding anti-VEGF (bevacizumab). Cetuximab is not cost-effective as a first-line treatment. Anti-EGFR administration is not a cost-effective strategy in third-line treatment, even for RAS wild-type mCRCs, compared to best supportive care. Aflibercept was superior to ramucirumab and costed less, but neither were cost-effective compared to standard care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Panagiotis Petrou
- Pharmacoepidemiology-Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacy School, School of Sciences and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang J, Liu R, Ektare V, Stephens J, Shelbaya A. Does Biosimilar Bevacizumab Offer Affordable Treatment Options for Cancer Patients in the USA? A Budget Impact Analysis from US Commercial and Medicare Payer Perspectives. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:605-618. [PMID: 33506318 PMCID: PMC8270829 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00637-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bevacizumab remains the most widely used and most thoroughly characterized angiogenesis inhibitor for a range of advanced cancers. Bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev®), a biosimilar of bevacizumab, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which provides a less costly option. This study aimed to evaluate the financial impact of introducing bevacizumab-bvzr from US commercial and Medicare payer perspectives. METHODS A Microsoft Excel-based budget impact model was developed over a 5-year time horizon. Target population was patients to be treated with bevacizumab for FDA-approved indications. Drug costs (2020 US$) were based on average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost, accounting for payer-specific reimbursement models and provider settings. Drug dosing and duration were based on prescribing information and pivotal trial publications. RESULTS In a hypothetical 10-million-member health plan, 503 and 723 patients were estimated to be treated with bevacizumab in year 1 and year 5, respectively. Assuming an annual market shift of 1.7%, 3.6%, 6.7%, 9.4%, and 11.9% to bevacizumab-bvzr, an annual cost saving of $313,363 ($0.003 per member per month [PMPM]) was estimated for a commercial payer and $92,880 ($0.001 PMPM) for Medicare in year 1. Cumulative 5-year cost savings were $7,030,924 ($0.012 PMPM) for a commercial payer and $4,059,257 ($0.007 PMPM) for Medicare. More than half of the cost savings was attributed to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of biosimilar bevacizumab-bvzr was estimated to provide substantial cost savings for US payers, which would allow additional patients access to bevacizumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyan Yang
- Patient Health and Impact (PHI), Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
- Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy (ISERP), Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rongzhe Liu
- Pharmerit, an OPEN Health Company, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Varun Ektare
- Pharmerit, an OPEN Health Company, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Ahmed Shelbaya
- Patient Health and Impact (PHI), Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pataky RE, Beca J, Tran D, Dai WF, Dvorani E, Isaranuwatchai W, Peacock S, Alvi R, Cheung WY, Earle CC, Gavura S, Chan KKW. Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab With First-Line Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Studies in Three Canadian Provinces. MDM Policy Pract 2021; 6:23814683211021060. [PMID: 34212111 PMCID: PMC8216386 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211021060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Real-world evidence can be a valuable tool when clinical trial data are incomplete or uncertain. Bevacizumab was adopted as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on significant survival improvements in initial clinical trials; however, survival benefit diminished in subsequent analyses. Consequently, there is uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab therapy achieved in practice. Objective. To assess real-world cost-effectiveness of first-line bevacizumab with irinotecan-based chemotherapy versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy alone for mCRC in British Columbia (BC), Saskatchewan, and Ontario, Canada. Methods. Using provincial cancer registries and linked administrative databases, we identified mCRC patients who initiated publicly funded irinotecan-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, in 2000 to 2015. We compared bevacizumab-treated patients to historical controls (treated before bevacizumab funding) and contemporaneous controls (receiving chemotherapy without bevacizumab), using inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting with propensity scores to balance baseline covariates. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) using 5-year cost and survival adjusted for censoring, with bootstrapping to characterize uncertainty. We also conducted one-way sensitivity analysis for key drivers of cost-effectiveness. Results. The cohorts included 12,112 (Ontario), 1,161 (Saskatchewan), and 2,977 (BC) patients. Bevacizumab significantly increased treatment costs, with mean ICERs between $78,000 and $84,000/LYG (life-year gained) in the contemporaneous comparisons and $75,000 and $101,000/LYG in the historical comparisons. Reducing the cost of bevacizumab by 50% brought ICERs in all comparisons below $61,000/LYG. Limitations. Residual confounding in observational data may bias results, while the use of original list prices overestimates current bevacizumab cost. Conclusion. The addition of bevacizumab to irinotecan-based chemotherapy extended survival for mCRC patients but at significant cost. At original list prices bevacizumab can only be considered cost-effective with certainty at a willingness-to-pay threshold over $100,000/LYG, but price reductions or discounts have a significant impact on cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaclyn Beca
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Tran
- Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Wei Fang Dai
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Riaz Alvi
- Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Colorectal Cancer. A Review of the Clinical Data. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051031. [PMID: 33804554 PMCID: PMC7957514 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the late 1990s, therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has changed considerably, and the combination of doublet or triplet chemotherapy and a targeted agent are now routinely used. The targeting of angiogenesis, the development of new blood vessels, represents a key element in the overall treatment strategy. Since the approval in 2004 of the first anti-angiogenetic drug, multiple agents have been approved and others are currently under investigation. We present an overview of the recent literature on approved systemic treatment of mCRC, with a focus on anti-angiogenic drugs, and current treatment approaches, and elaborate on the future role of angiogenesis in colorectal cancer as seen from a clinical perspective. The treatment of mCRC, in general, has changed from "one strategy fits all" to a more personalized approach. This is, however, not entirely the case for anti-angiogenetic treatments, partly due to a lack of validated biomarkers. The anti-angiogenetic standard treatment at the present primarily includes monoclonal antibodies. The therapeutic field of angiogenesis, however, has received increased interest after the introduction of newer combinations. These approaches will likely change the current treatment strategy, once again, to the overall benefit of patients.
Collapse
|
14
|
Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Current Issues in Genomics and Therapeutics. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:31. [PMID: 33582932 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01019-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is a type of thyroid carcinoma with the most aggressive biological behaviour amongst thyroid cancer. Here, we review the current genomic and the impacts of advances in therapies to improve the management of patients with the cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Common mutations being identified in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma are p53 and TERT promoter mutations. Other common mutated genes included BRAF, RAS, EIF1AX, PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT1, SWI/SNF, ALK and CDKN2A. Changes in expression of different microRNAs are also involved in the pathogenesis of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Curative resection combined with radiotherapy and combination chemotherapies (such as anthracyclines, platins and taxanes) has been shown to have effects in the treatment of some patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Newer molecular targeted therapies in clinical trials target mostly the cell membrane kinase and downstream proteins. These include targeting the EGFR, FGFR, VEGFR, c-kit, PDGFR and RET on the cell membrane as well as VEGF itself and the downstream targets such as BRAF, MEK and mTOR. Immunotherapy is also being tested in the cancer. Updated knowledge of genomic as well as clinical trials on novel therapies is needed to improve the management of the patients with this aggressive cancer.
Collapse
|
15
|
Harkins RA, Flowers CR. How should clinicians interpret conflicting cost-effectiveness analyses for the treatment of lymphoma across nations and payer models? Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 61:3283-3286. [PMID: 33143518 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1837798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Department Chair, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Degeling K, Wong HL, Koffijberg H, Jalali A, Shapiro J, Kosmider S, Wong R, Lee B, Burge M, Tie J, Yip D, Nott L, Khattak A, Lim S, Caird S, Gibbs P, IJzerman M. Simulating Progression-Free and Overall Survival for First-Line Doublet Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Based on Real-World Registry Data. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:1263-1275. [PMID: 32803720 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00951-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simulation models utilizing real-world data have potential to optimize treatment sequencing strategies for specific patient subpopulations, including when conducting clinical trials is not feasible. We aimed to develop a simulation model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for first-line doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for specific subgroups of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients based on registry data. METHODS Data from 867 patients were used to develop two survival models and one logistic regression model that populated a discrete event simulation (DES). Discrimination and calibration were used for internal validation of these models separately and predicted and observed medians and Kaplan-Meier plots were compared for the integrated DES. Bootstrapping was performed to correct for optimism in the internal validation and to generate correlated sets of model parameters for use in a probabilistic analysis to reflect parameter uncertainty. RESULTS The survival models showed good calibration based on the regression slopes and modified Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics at 1 and 2 years, but not for short-term predictions at 0.5 years. Modified C-statistics indicated acceptable discrimination. The simulation estimated that median first-line PFS (95% confidence interval) of 219 (25%) patients could be improved from 175 days (156-199) to 269 days (246-294) if treatment would be targeted based on the highest expected PFS. CONCLUSIONS Extensive internal validation showed that DES accurately estimated the outcomes of treatment combination strategies for specific subpopulations, with outcomes suggesting treatment could be optimized. Although results based on real-world data are informative, they cannot replace randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Degeling
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Health Services Research, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Hui-Li Wong
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hendrik Koffijberg
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Azim Jalali
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeremy Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Suzanne Kosmider
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel Wong
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew Burge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Desmond Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Louise Nott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Adnan Khattak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Stephanie Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Susan Caird
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Cancer Health Services Research, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mitchell AP, Dey P, Ohn JA, Tabatabai SM, Curry MA, Bach PB. The Accuracy and Usefulness of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Evidence Blocks Affordability Rating. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:737-745. [PMID: 32201922 PMCID: PMC8357422 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00901-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines' Evidence Blocks has the broadest scope of the several oncology value assessment frameworks. The Evidence Blocks includes the Affordability criterion, which reflects the financial cost of each treatment on a 1-5 scale. The accuracy of Affordability is unknown. METHODS We calculated Medicare costs for all first-line and maintenance treatments for the 30 cancers with the highest incidence in the USA that had published NCCN Evidence Blocks as of 31 December 2018. We assessed the accuracy and consistency of Affordability across different treatments and cancer types. Among different treatments for the same indication, we determined the frequency with which the Affordability assessment was consistent with calculated treatment costs. RESULTS There were a total of 1386 treatments in our sample. Lower Affordability scores were associated with higher costs. There was significant variation in cost at each level of Affordability; for treatments with Affordability = 1 (very expensive), costs ranged from $US4551 to $US43,794 per month for treatments administered over an undefined time period and from $US2865 to $US500,982 per course of therapy for treatments administered over a defined time period. Among treatments for the same indication, Affordability was discrepant with calculated treatment costs in 7.9% of pairwise comparisons, identifying the higher-cost treatment as being more affordable. Discrepancies were reduced when we reassigned Affordability scores based on calculated treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS Evidence Blocks Affordability generally correlated with treatment costs but contained discrepancies, which may limit its usefulness to clinicians in comparing costs. This study suggests that the Affordability score may be improved by indexing more directly to specified dollar value thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron P Mitchell
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Pranammya Dey
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jennifer A Ohn
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara M Tabatabai
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael A Curry
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter B Bach
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Degeling K, Vu M, Koffijberg H, Wong HL, Koopman M, Gibbs P, IJzerman M. Health Economic Models for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Methodological Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:683-713. [PMID: 32319026 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00908-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive and detailed review of structural and methodological assumptions in model-based cost-effectiveness analyses of systemic metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatments, and discuss their potential impact on health economic outcome estimates. METHODS Five databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment and National Health Service Health Economic Evaluation Database) were searched on 26 August 2019 for model-based full health economic evaluations of systemic mCRC treatment using a combination of free-text terms and subject headings. Full-text publications in English were eligible for inclusion if they were published in or after the year 2000. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist was used to assess the reporting quality of included publications. Study selection, appraisal and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. RESULTS The search yielded 1418 publications, of which 54 were included, representing 51 unique studies. Most studies focused on first-line treatment (n = 29, 57%), followed by third-line treatment (n = 13, 25%). Model structures were health-state driven (n = 27, 53%), treatment driven (n = 19, 37%), or a combination (n = 5, 10%). Cohort-level state-transition modelling (STM) was the most common technique (n = 33, 65%), followed by patient-level STM and partitioned survival analysis (both n = 6, 12%). Only 15 studies (29%) reported some sort of model validation. Health economic outcomes for specific strategies differed substantially between studies. For example, survival following first-line treatment with fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin ranged from 1.21 to 7.33 years, with treatment costs ranging from US$8125 to US$126,606. CONCLUSIONS Model-based cost-effectiveness analyses of systemic mCRC treatments have adopted varied modelling methods and structures, resulting in substantially different outcomes. As models generally focus on first-line treatment without consideration of downstream treatments, there is a profound source of structural uncertainty implying that the cost-effectiveness of treatments across the mCRC pathway remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Martin Vu
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hendrik Koffijberg
- Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Hui-Li Wong
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Effectiveness and Costs Associated to Adding Cetuximab or Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from the Observational FABIO Project. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12040839. [PMID: 32244478 PMCID: PMC7226266 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence available on the effectiveness and costs of biological therapies for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is scarce and contrasting. We conducted a population-based cohort investigation for assessing overall survival and costs associated with their use in a real-world setting. Healthcare utilization databases were used to select patients newly diagnosed with mCRC between 2010 and 2016. Those initially treated with biological therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) added to chemotherapy were propensity-score-matched to those treated with standard chemotherapy alone, and were followed up to June 30th, 2018. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and cumulative costs were compared between the two treatment arms. The study cohort included 1896 mCRC patients treated with biological therapy matched to 5678 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was 21.8 and 20.2 months, respectively. After 84 months of follow-up, RMSTs were 30.9 and 31.9 months (p = 0.193), indicating no differences between the average survival time between treatment arms. Patients treated with biological therapy were associated with higher costs. Cumulative per capita costs were €59,663 and €44,399, respectively. In our study, first-line biological therapy did not improve long-term overall survival and was associated with higher costs as compared to standard chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Raab GT, Lin A, Hillyer GC, Keller D, O'Neil DS, Accordino MK, Buono DL, Hur C, Kiran RP, Wright JD, Hershman DL, Neugut AI. Use of Bevacizumab for Elderly Patients With Stage IV Colon Cancer: Analysis of SEER-Medicare Data. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:e294-e299. [PMID: 31266707 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bevacizumab is used for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer in conjunction with first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we examined receipt of first-line bevacizumab and predictors of its use among older patients with stage IV colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset to identify patients with stage IV colon cancer diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 who received FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan) as first-line therapy. We used multivariable regression analysis to determine demographic and clinical factors associated with use of concomitant bevacizumab. RESULTS We identified 3785 patients with stage IV colon cancer who met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 2352 (62.1%) received bevacizumab. Bevacizumab use has decreased over time from 68.2% in 2005 to 57.6% in 2013 (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.97). Patients were less likely to receive bevacizumab if they were older (compared with 65-69 years, ≥ 80 years: OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80), or had multiple comorbidities (compared with comorbidity score of 0, score of 1: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89). CONCLUSION Over one-half of elderly patients received bevacizumab as part of their first-line therapy for stage IV colon cancer. Bevacizumab use has been slowly decreasing since 2005. Newer anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments have not been supplanting bevacizumab, as first-line biologic use in general has also decreased during this time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel T Raab
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Aijing Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Grace Clarke Hillyer
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Keller
- Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Daniel S O'Neil
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Melissa Kate Accordino
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Donna L Buono
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Chin Hur
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Jason D Wright
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Alfred I Neugut
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schleicher SM, Bach PB, Matsoukas K, Korenstein D. Medication overuse in oncology: current trends and future implications for patients and society. Lancet Oncol 2019; 19:e200-e208. [PMID: 29611528 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30099-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The high cost of cancer care worldwide is largely attributable to rising drugs prices. Despite their high costs and potential toxic effects, anticancer treatments could be subject to overuse, which is defined as the provision of medical services that are more likely to harm than to benefit a patient. We found 30 studies documenting medication overuse in cancer, which included 16 examples of supportive medication overuse and 17 examples of antineoplastic medication overuse in oncology. Few specific agents have been assessed, and no studies investigated overuse of the most toxic or expensive medications currently used in cancer treatment. Although financial, psychological, or physical harms of medication overuse in cancer could be substantial, there is little published evidence addressing these harms, so their magnitude is unclear. Further research is needed to better quantify medication overuse, understand its implications, and help protect patients and the health-care system from overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Schleicher
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter B Bach
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Konstantina Matsoukas
- Information Systems/Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Korenstein
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sarfaty M, Hall PS, Chan KK, Virik K, Leshno M, Gordon N, Moore A, Neiman V, Rosenbaum E, Goldstein DA. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2018; 74:57-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|