Targeting BRAF-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Rationally Designed Therapy

A Practical Review of Encorafenib and Binimetinib Therapy Management in Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

According to current guidelines, targeted therapy with a combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors is the preferred first-line treatment for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 PHAROS trial (NCT03915951), the combination of encorafenib, a potent BRAF inhibitor, and binimetinib, a potent MEK inhibitor, demonstrated durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in this patient population. On the basis of the results of this study, the combination of encorafenib plus binimetinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on October 11, 2023, for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib from the PHAROS study. In addition, we discuss strategies to manage adverse reactions with this combination therapy with the intent of minimizing unnecessary treatment discontinuations in these patients.

BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC: disease overview and treatment landscape

In this review, we cover the current understanding of BRAF mutations and associated clinical characteristics in patients with metastatic NSCLC, approved and emerging treatment options, BRAF sequencing approaches, and unmet needs. The BRAFV600E mutation confers constitutive activity of the MAPK pathway, leading to enhanced growth, proliferation, and survival of tumor cells. Testing for BRAF mutations enables patients to be treated with therapies that directly target BRAFV600E and the MAPK pathway, but BRAF testing lags behind other oncogene testing in metastatic NSCLC. Additional therapies targeting BRAFV600E mutations provide options for patients with metastatic NSCLC. Emerging therapies and combinations under investigation could potentially overcome issues of resistance and target non-V600E mutations. Therefore, because targeted therapies with enhanced efficacy are on the horizon, being able to identify BRAF mutations in metastatic NSCLC may become even more important.

Hsp Inhibitor is Affective Against Adenocarcinomic Human Alveolar Basal Epithelial Cells Through Modulating ERK/MAPK Signaling Pathway

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) - mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) is required to activate proto-oncogenic protein kinases and promotes tumor growth through anti-apoptotic effects on A549-non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, deregulation of the ERK-MAPK pathway and abnormal expression of HSP90 are reasonably frequent events in NSCLC. In this study, novel perimidine-pyrazole compounds employed to block ERK-MAPK deregulation through inhibiting HSP dependent cancer cell survival mechanisms. A set of perimidine-pyrazole derivatives effects was monitored on NSCLC cell line. Array experiments performed to understand the effect of the compounds on signaling pathways and results were analyzed by gene enrichment analysis. Further, senescence and apoptosis experiments were performed to support the enrichment results along with in silico methods to determine perimidine-pyrazole/HSP interactions. Treatment of NSCLC cells with perimidine-pyrazole derivatives displayed cancer-inhibitory, pro-senescent and pro-apoptotic effects on NSCLC cells through ERK/MAPK pathway and these compounds are promising templates for designing anticancer drugs.

Detecting acquired V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 V600E mutation associated with osimertinib resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

Osimertinib has demonstrated efficacy as the first- and second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations. However, EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells often acquire resistance to osimertinib. V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutation (BRAF V600E) was detected in a re-biopsy (LC-SCRUM-TRY testing) of a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who was resistant to osimertinib treatment. Currently, the patient is receiving dabrafenib/trametinib combination therapy and is under observation; a slight shrinking effect of cancer has been observed.

Modern therapies of nonsmall cell lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC), particularly nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is one of the most prevalent types of neoplasia worldwide, regardless of gender, with the highest mortality rates in oncology. Over the years, treatment for NSCLC has evolved from conventional surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy to more tailored and minimally invasive approaches. The use of personalised therapies has increased the expected efficacy of treatment while simultaneously reducing the frequency of severe adverse effects (AEs). In this review, we discuss established modern approaches, including immunotherapy and targeted therapy, as well as experimental molecular methods like clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and nanoparticles. These emerging methods offer promising outcomes and shorten the recovery time for various patients. Recent advances in the diagnostic field, including imaging and genetic profiling, have enabled the implementation of these methods. The versatility of these modern therapies allows for multiple treatment options, such as single-agent use, combination with existing conventional treatments, or incorporation into new regimens. As a result, patients can survive even in the advanced stages of NSCLC, leading to increased survival indicators such as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Entanglement of MAPK pathways with gene expression and its omnipresence in the etiology for cancer and neurodegenerative disorders

Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) is one of the most well characterized cellular signaling pathways that controls fundamental cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. These cellular functions are consequences of transcription of regulatory genes that are influenced and regulated by the MAP-Kinase signaling cascade. MAP kinase components such as Receptor Tyrosine Kinases (RTKs) sense external cues or ligands and transmit these signals via multiple protein complexes such as RAS-RAF, MEK, and ERKs and eventually modulate the transcription factors inside the nucleus to induce transcription and other regulatory functions. Aberrant activation, dysregulation of this signaling pathway, and genetic alterations in any of these components results in the developmental disorders, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders. Over the years, the MAPK pathway has been a prime pharmacological target, to treat complex human disorders that are genetically linked such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The current review re-visits the mechanism of MAPK pathways in gene expression regulation. Further, a current update on the progress of the mechanistic understanding of MAPK components is discussed from a disease perspective.

Brief report: High incidence of peridiagnosis thromboembolic events in patients with BRAF-mutant lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine if advanced BRAF-mutant NSCLC has a higher thromboembolic events (TEE) rate than the expected.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2021, 182 patients with BRAF-mutant advanced NSCLC (BRAF V600E, n = 70; BRAF non-V600E, n = 112) were retrospectively identified from 18 centers in Spain. Patients received chemotherapy (n = 147), immunotherapy (n = 69), targeted therapy (n = 42), and immunotherapy + chemotherapy (n = 26).

RESULTS

Incidence rate of TEE was 26.4 % (95%CI: 19.9 %-32.9 %). A total of 72 TEE were documented among 48 patients, as 18 patients (37.5 %) developed more than one event. Median time to TEE onset was 2 months, 69 % of TEE occurred in the peridiagnostic period (+/- 90 days from cancer diagnosis), and in 16 pts. (33 %) TEE was the form of lung cancer presentation. Although most TEE were only venous (82 %; PE, n = 33; DVT, n = 16), arterial events were reported in 31 % and occurred earlier, or TEE presented in atypical locations (13.9 %). TEE were related to high hospitalization rate (59 %), recurrence (23 %), and mortality (10.4 %) despite appropriate anticoagulant/antiaggregant treatment. Median OS in patients without-TEE was 19.4 months (95%CI: 4.6-34.1), and significantly shorter in patients with arterial-TEE vs venous-TEE vs both of them: 9.9 months (95%CI: 0-23.5) vs 41.7 months (95%CI: 11.3-72.2 m) vs 2.7 months (95%CI: 2.1-3.3), p = 0.001. Neither clinical or molecular features (BRAF V600E/non-V600E), nor cancer treatment was associated to TEE occurrence. Khorana score underperformed to predict thrombosis at cancer diagnosis, as only 19.2 % of patients were classified as high-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombotic events represent a new clinical feature of BRAF-mutant lung cancer. Patients with almost a 30 % incidence of TEE should be offered systematic anticoagulation.

A review of recent advances in the novel therapeutic targets and immunotherapy for lung cancer

Lung cancer is amongst the most pervasive malignancies having high mortality rates. It is broadly grouped into non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The concept of personalized medicine has overshadowed the conventional chemotherapy given to all patients with lung cancer. The targeted therapy is given to a particular population having specific mutations to help in the better management of lung cancer. The targeting pathways for NSCLC include the epidermal growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, MET (Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor) oncogene, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). SCLC targeting pathway includes Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP) inhibitors, checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK 1) pathway, WEE1 pathway, Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR)/Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), and Delta-like canonical Notch ligand 3 (DLL-Immune checkpoint inhibitors like programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/ programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) blockade are also utilized in the management of lung cancer. Many of the targeted therapies are still under development and require clinical trials to establish their safety and efficacy. This review summarizes the mechanism of molecular targets and immune-mediated targets, recently approved drugs, and their clinical trials for lung cancer.

BRAF/MEK inhibition in NSCLC: mechanisms of resistance and how to overcome it

Targeted therapy for oncogenic genetic alterations has changed the treatment paradigm of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Mutations in the BRAF gene are detected in approximately 4% of patients and result in hyper-activation of the MAPK pathway, leading to uncontrolled cellular proliferation. Inhibition of BRAF and its downstream effector MEK constitutes a therapeutic strategy for a subset of patients with NSCLC and is associated with clinical benefit. Unfortunately, the majority of patients will develop disease progression within 1 year. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that resistance mechanisms involve the restoration of MAPK signaling which becomes inhibition-independent due to upstream or downstream alterations, and the activation of bypass pathways, such as the PI3/AKT/mTOR pathway. Future research should be directed to deciphering the mechanisms of cancer cells' oncogenic dependence, understanding the tissue-specific mechanisms of BRAF-mutant tumors, and optimizing treatment strategies after progression on BRAF and MEK inhibition.

A phase II study of daily encorafenib in combination with biweekly cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: the NEW BEACON study

BACKGROUND

Patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a poor prognosis. The introduction of BRAF targeted therapy with encorafenib and weekly administered cetuximab have shown improved survival with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 4.3 months. However, a regimen with cetuximab given every second week may have comparable efficacy and is more convenient for patients. While BRAF targeted therapy is a new standard therapy in pre-treated patients with BRAF V600E mutated mCRC, resistance invariably occurs and is an emerging challenge. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of cetuximab given every second week in combination with daily encorafenib and to explore the correlation between markers of resistance and outcome.

METHODS

The study is an open label, single arm, phase II study, investigating the efficacy and tolerability of cetuximab given every second week in combination with encorafenib in patients with BRAF V600E mutated mCRC. Furthermore, we will be investigating mechanisms of response and resistance against BRAF targeted therapy though comprehensive genomic profiling on tumor tissue and blood for circulating tumor DNA analysis. A total of 53 patients (19 + 34 in two steps) will be included according to Simon's optimal two stage design. The primary end point of the study is 2 months PFS rate.

DISCUSSION

By combining BRAF inhibitor with cetuximab given every second week we can halve the number of visits in the hospital compared to the currently approved regimen with weekly cetuximab. This seems particularly relevant in a group of patients with a median overall survival of 9.3 months. Resistance after initial response to targeted therapy can be either adaptive (e.g., epigenetic, or transcriptomic alterations) or acquired (selective genetic alterations - e.g., activating de novo mutations) resistance. It is of great importance to untangle these complex mechanisms of resistance in patients with BRAF V600E mutated mCRC to improve treatment strategies in the future potentially even further.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EU Clinical Trial Register, Eudract no. 2020-003283-10 . Registered on 11 November 2020.

The Biology and Therapeutic Potential of the Src-YAP Axis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common lung cancer type which accounts for the majority (~85%) of all lung cancer cases [...].

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Targeted Therapy: Drugs and Mechanisms of Drug Resistance

The advent of precision medicine has brought light to the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), expanding the options for patients with advanced NSCLC by targeting therapy through genetic and epigenetic cues. Tumor driver genes in NSCLC patients have been uncovered one by one, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mesenchymal lymphoma kinase (ALK), and receptor tyrosine kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) mutants. Antibodies and inhibitors that target the critical gene-mediated signaling pathways that regulate tumor growth and development are anticipated to increase patient survival and quality of life. Targeted drugs continue to emerge, with as many as two dozen approved by the FDA, and chemotherapy and targeted therapy have significantly improved patient prognosis. However, resistance due to cancer drivers' genetic alterations has given rise to significant challenges in treating patients with metastatic NSCLC. Here, we summarized the main targeted therapeutic sites of NSCLC drugs and discussed their resistance mechanisms, aiming to provide new ideas for follow-up research and clues for the improvement of targeted drugs.

Prevalence and breakdown of non-small cell lung cancer BRAF driver mutations in a large UK cohort

BRAF inhibitors have been shown in clinical trials to improve patient outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbouring selected BRAF driver mutations with a limited side effect profile, and therefore show potential as therapeutics in clinical practice. To utilise BRAF inhibitors effectively, understanding the prevalence of BRAF mutations within the local patient population is crucial, especially since NSCLC driver mutation rates have been observed to vary in different populations around the world. We interrogated a clinical archive of next generation sequencing (NGS) data representative of 7 years of routine UK practice in the National Health Service (NHS) to investigate the frequency of BRAF mutations, the breakdown of mutation classes and co-occurrence of other oncogenic driver mutations. Tissue biopsies from NSCLC cases referred to the Sarah Cannon Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory between January 2015 and February 2022 from multiple centres across UK were included in this study. Somatic mutation hotspots in relevant cancer-associated genes were analysed using amplicon/ion-torrent based NGS assays, and all NSCLC samples which harboured recognised BRAF driver mutations were identified through a combination of automated and manual data retrieval. Data regarding any other detected mutations and basic demographic information were also collected. Over the 7-year period, 5384 NSCLC samples were sequenced, with BRAF mutation identified in 185 (3.44%) of cases. These 185 cases represented a total of 73 Class I BRAF mutations (39.5%), 61 Class II mutations (33.0%) and 51 Class III mutations (27.6%). Of the 73 identified Class I mutations, 69 (69/185, 37.3%) were V600E and four (4/185, 2.16%) were non-V600E mutations. Five V600E cases had co-mutations (5/185, 2.7%). Various other known driver mutations were also identified in these 185 tumour samples, with KRAS (18/185, 9.73%) and PIK3CA (7/185, 3.78%) occurring at the highest frequency. This is the first large cohort-level study in the UK to profile the breakdown of BRAF-positive NSCLC biopsy samples using NGS in routine clinical practice. This study defines the proportion of NSCLC patients that may be expected to benefit from BRAF inhibitors and highlights the utility of using NGS as a diagnostic tool to improve targeted therapy stratification for NSCLC patients.

Joint effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, smoking, and XPC polymorphisms on damage in exon 2 of KRAS gene among young coke oven workers

Genetic polymorphisms may contribute to individual susceptibility to DNA damage induced by environmental exposure. In this study, we evaluate the effects of co-exposure to PAHs, smoking and XPC polymorphisms, alone or combined, on damage in exons. A total of 288 healthy male coke oven workers were enrolled into this study, and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OH-Pyr) was detected. Base modification in exons of KRAS and BRAF gene, and polymorphisms of XPC were determined in plasma by real-time PCR. We observed 1-OH-Pyr was positively related to damage in exon 2 of KRAS (KRAS-2) and in exon 15 of BRAF (BRAF-15), respectively, and KRAS-2 and BRAF-15 were significantly associated with increased 1-OH-Pyr. A stratified analysis found 1-OH-Pyr was significantly associated with KRAS-2 in both smokers and non-smokers, while 1-OH-Pyr was significantly associated with BRAF-15 only in smokers. Additionally, individuals carrying both rs2228001 G-allele (GG+GT) and rs3731055 GG homozygote (GG) genotype appeared to have more significant effect on KRAS-2. The high levels of 1-OH-Pyr were associated with KRAS-2 only in rs2228001 GG+GT genotype carriers and the high levels of 1-OH-Pyr were associated with KRAS-2 only in rs3731055 GG genotype carriers and the most severe KRAS-2 was observed among subjects carrying all four of the above risk factors. Our findings indicated the co-exposure effect of PAHs and smoking could increase the risk of KRAS-2 by a mechanism partly involving XPC polymorphisms.

The Evolution of BRAF Activation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common subtype of lung cancer, of which approximate 4% had BRAF activation, with an option for targeted therapy. BRAF activation comprises of V600 and non-V600 mutations, fusion, rearrangement, in-frame deletions, insertions, and co-mutations. In addition, BRAF primary activation and secondary activation presents with different biological phenotypes, medical senses and subsequent treatments. BRAF primary activation plays a critical role in proliferation and metastasis as a driver gene of NSCLC, while secondary activation mediates acquired resistance to other targeted therapy, especially for epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). Treatment options for different activation of BRAF are diverse. Targeted therapy, especially two-drug combination therapy, is an important option. Besides, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) would be another option since BRAF activation would be a positive biomarker of tumor response of ICIs therapy. To date, no high level evidences support targeted therapy or immunotherapy as prioritized recommendation. After targeted therapy, the evolution of BRAF includes the activation of the upstream, downstream and bypass pathways of BRAF. In this review, therapeutic modalities and post-therapeutic evolutionary pathways of BRAF are discussed, and future research directions are also provided.

Recognition of BRAF by CDC37 and Re-Evaluation of the Activation Mechanism for the Class 2 BRAF-L597R Mutant

The kinome specific co-chaperone, CDC37 (cell division cycle 37), is responsible for delivering BRAF (B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma) to the Hsp90 (heat shock protein 90) complex, where it is then translocated to the RAS (protooncogene product p21) complex at the plasma membrane for RAS mediated dimerization and subsequent activation. We identify a bipartite interaction between CDC37 and BRAF and delimitate the essential structural elements of CDC37 involved in BRAF recognition. We find an extended and conserved CDC37 motif, 20HPNID---SL--W31, responsible for recognizing the C-lobe of BRAF kinase domain, while the c-terminal domain of CDC37 is responsible for the second of the bipartite interaction with BRAF. We show that dimerization of BRAF, independent of nucleotide binding, can act as a potent signal that prevents CDC37 recognition and discuss the implications of mutations in BRAF and the consequences on signaling in a clinical setting, particularly for class 2 BRAF mutations.

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers

BACKGROUND

While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours.

METHODS

Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed through 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P < 0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P = 0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS).

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Predictive Markers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically improved the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients and have increased the possibility of long-term survival. However, few patients benefit from ICIs, and no predictive biomarkers other than tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression have been established. Hence, the identification of biomarkers is an urgent issue. This review outlines the current understanding of predictive markers for the efficacy of ICIs, including PD-L1, tumor mutation burden, DNA mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, human leukocyte antigen class I, tumor/specific genotype, and blood biomarkers such as peripheral T-cell phenotype, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, interferon-gamma, and interleukin-8. A tremendous number of biomarkers are in development, but individual biomarkers are insufficient. Tissue biomarkers have issues in reproducibility and accuracy because of intratumoral heterogeneity and biopsy invasiveness. Furthermore, blood biomarkers have difficulty in reflecting the tumor microenvironment and therefore tend to be less predictive for the efficacy of ICIs than tissue samples. In addition to individual biomarkers, the development of composite markers, including novel technologies such as machine learning and high-throughput analysis, may make it easier to comprehensively analyze multiple biomarkers.

BRAF-mutated colorectal adenocarcinomas: pathological heterogeneity and clinical implications

Advances in molecular biology have markedly increased our understanding of the heterogeneous molecular landscape of colorectal cancer (CRC). Up to 15% of CRCs harbor the BRAF p.V600E somatic mutation (BRAFmt), a well-established negative prognostic marker in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). The BEACON CRC trial set a new standard of care in patients with progressive BRAFmt cancers, consisting of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab. On these bases, BRAF mutational testing is now recommended in patients with mCRC. However, efforts are needed to further stratify patients carrying this mutation. Here, we discuss the heterogeneous pathologic and molecular landscape of BRAFmt CRCs, focusing on the promises and pitfalls of molecular diagnostics, on novel biomarkers to improve patients' stratification and on the current diagnostic scenario for CRC. We believe that a better stratification based on histopathological features and novel molecular biomarkers should be performed to optimize patient management and therapeutic decision-making.

Clinical and genetic characteristics of early-stage multiple primary and independent primary lung adenocarcinoma patients

AIMS

The difference between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IM) in patients with lung cancer is vital but controversial. Moreover, the genetic and clinical significance difference between MPLC and independent primary lung cancers (IPLC) patients is unknown.

METHODS

This study retrospectively researched clinical and genetic data of MPLC and IPLC patients from January 2019 to May 2021 at the affiliated hospital of Qingdao University, China. Ninety-four tissue samples from 41 early-stage patients with MPLC, and 94 tissue samples from 94 early-stage patients with IPLC were performed to targeted sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients (88%) showed inconsistent driver mutations, and five MPLC patients (12%) shared single identical EGFR/BRAF/TP53 hotspot mutations in the early stage. In MPLC patients, high-frequency mutations included EGFR (63%), TP53 (12%), BRAF (12%), KRAS (10%), ERBB2 (4%), PIK3CA (3%), and MET (3%). In IPLC patients, high-frequency mutations included EGFR (55%), TP53(26%), KRAS (13%), MAP2K1 (5%), PIK3CA (4%), ERBB2 (4%), NF1 (4%), RET (3%), and BRAF (2%). The higher BRAF and fewer TP53 mutations may be related to the lower malignancy in MPLC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of pathological diagnosis in patients with early-stage MPLC does not need comprehensive molecular evaluation to supplement histology for differentiating early-stage MPLC and IM. Meanwhile, the molecular difference between MPLC and IPLC may be helpful to study the mechanism of MPLC pathogenesis.

Untangling the KRAS mutated lung cancer subsets and its therapeutic implications

The Kirsten rat sarcoma virus transforming protein (KRAS) mutations (predominate in codons 12, 13, and 61) and genomically drive nearly one-third of lung carcinomas. These mutations have complex functions in tumorigenesis, and influence the tumor response to chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors resulting in a poorer patient prognosis. Recent attempts using targeted therapies against KRAS alone have met with little success. The existence of specific subsets of lung cancer based on KRAS mutations and coexisting mutations are suggested. Their interactions need further elaboration before newer promising targeted therapies for KRAS mutant lung cancers can be used as earlier lines of therapy. We summarize the existing knowledge of KRAS mutations and their coexisting mutations that is relevant to lung cancer treatment, in this review. We elaborate on the prognostic impact of clinical and pathologic characteristics of lung cancer patients associated with KRAS mutations. We briefly review the currently available techniques for KRAS mutation detection on biopsy and cytology samples. Finally, we discuss the new therapeutic strategies for targeting KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These may herald a new era in the treatment of KRAS^G12Cmutated NSCLC as well as be helpful to develop demographic subsets to predict targeted therapies and prognosis of lung cancer patients.

Encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Phase II PHAROS study design

BRAF^V600 oncogenic driver mutations occur in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and have been shown to be a clinically relevant target. Preclinical/clinical evidence support the efficacy and safety of BRAF and MEK inhibitor combinations in patients with NSCLC with these mutations. We describe the design of PHAROS, an ongoing, open-label, single-arm, Phase II trial evaluating the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib plus the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with metastatic BRAF^V600-mutant NSCLC, as first- or second-line treatment. The primary endpoint is objective response rate, based on independent radiologic review (per RECIST v1.1); secondary objectives evaluated additional efficacy endpoints and safety. Results from PHAROS will describe the antitumor activity/safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with metastatic BRAF^V600-mutant NSCLC.

[Molecule pathology in the treatment of lung cancer-Interdisciplinary view of the importance in thoracic surgery]

Die Therapie des Lungenkarzinoms wurde in den letzten Jahren zunehmend durch die Etablierung tumorspezifisch zielgerichteter Pharmaka und immunmodulatorischer Ansätze ergänzt und hat dadurch rasant an Komplexität gewonnen. Bessere Überlebensdaten und Erkenntnisse über andere Nebenwirkungensspektren und Rezidivcharakteristika begleiten diese Entwicklung. Dem Kliniker verlangt diese Entwicklung eine stete Wachsamkeit in der Stratifizierung der Behandlungsoptionen ab. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die klinisch aktuell relevanten Ansätze der „targeted therapies“ in der Behandlung des Lungenkarzinoms und stellt Verbindungen zur Thoraxchirurgie dar. Mit der Darstellung der Optionen einer zielgerichteter Therapie wird beantwortet, welche Rolle sie in der adjuvanten Therapie bei nachgewiesener Mutation des Epidermal-growth-factor-Rezeptors (EGFR) spielen, wann eine Salvage-Operation infrage kommt und wie durch die „targeted therapies“ in Einzelfällen ein kuratives Therapiekonzept erarbeitet werden kann. Jedes Lungenkarzinom verlangt ab dem frühestmöglichen Zeitpunkt in der Diagnosefindung nach einer molekularen Analyse auf therapierelevante Mutationsmuster. Interdisziplinäre Konzepte können individualisiert das Langzeitüberleben des Patienten gewährleisten.

Cancer driver gene and non-coding RNA alterations as biomarkers of brain metastasis in lung cancer: A review of the literature

Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common event in patients with lung cancer. Despite multimodal treatments and advances in systemic therapies, development of BM remains one of the main factors associated with poor prognosis and mortality in patients with lung cancer. Therefore, better understanding of mechanisms involved in lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) is of great importance to suppress cancer cells and to improve the overall survival of patients. Several cancer-related genes such as EGFR and KRAS have been proposed as potential predictors of LCBM. In addition, there is ample evidence supporting crucial roles of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in mediating LCBM. In this review, we provide comprehensive information on risk assessment, predictive, and prognostic panels for early detection of BM in patients with lung cancer. Moreover, we present an overview of LCBM molecular mechanisms, cancer driver genes, and ncRNAs which may predict the risk of BM in lung cancer patients. Recent clinical studies have focused on determining mechanisms involved in LCBM and their association with diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes. These studies have shown that alterations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and ALK, as the most frequent coding gene alterations, and dysregulation of ncRNAs such as miR-423, miR-330-3p, miR-145, piR-651, and MALAT1 can be considered as potential biomarkers of LCBM.

Severe Epistaxis Secondary to Dabrafenib and Trametinib Toxicity in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Small Bowel Metastasis

BRAF mutations are estimated to be present in 2-4% of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cases. BRAF inhibitor (dabrafenib) and MEK inhibitor (trametinib) are currently approved to treat NSCLC harboring the BRAF V600E mutation. However, the use of this new combined targeted therapy can be associated with severe and life-threatening toxicities.

Here, we describe the case of a 77-year-old male with a history of BRAF-positive lung adenocarcinoma with metastasis to the brain, adrenals, and small bowel (jejunum), currently on dual therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib, who presented with refractory epistaxis. The dual therapy regimen was started one month prior to his presentation. After initial stabilization with anterior nasal packing, intravenous and nebulized tranexamic acid (TXA) in the emergency department (ED), he suddenly developed respiratory decompensation. He needed emergent intubation for acute hypoxic respiratory failure and airway protection secondary to profuse bleeding. He was extubated 24 hours later as the epistaxis was manageable, and the nasal packing was removed. Shortly after extubating, he started coughing copious amounts of blood and developed respiratory distress with stridor requiring re-intubation. A large blood clot was noted to be partially occluding the vocal cords on laryngoscopy and was removed during intubation. An emergent flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed with the retrieval of a large blood clot extending from the oropharynx down into the distal trachea. There was no evidence of acute bleeding within the lung after the clot was removed. Workup to explore the cause of his bleeding included a coagulation profile, which was unrevealing. His bleeding was most likely consistent with a side effect of his treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib.

Life-threatening bleeding has been reported as a side effect of the combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma. Also, in the phase 2 clinical trial (BRF113928) of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC, 3.2% of subjects developed a grade III or IV hemorrhage. Our case aims to raise physicians' awareness of one of the significant side effects of this combination therapy especially since this combination is being used more frequently and now also in lung cancer.

Nonclinical Safety Profile of Sotorasib, a KRASG12C-Specific Covalent Inhibitor for the Treatment of KRAS p.G12C-Mutated Cancer

Sotorasib is a first-in-class KRAS^G12C covalent inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of tumors with the KRAS p.G12C mutation. A comprehensive nonclinical safety assessment package, including secondary/safety pharmacology and toxicology studies, was conducted to support the marketing application for sotorasib. Sotorasib was negative in a battery of genotoxicity assays and negative in an in vitro phototoxicity assay. Based on in vitro assays, sotorasib had no off-target effects against various receptors, enzymes (including numerous kinases), ion channels, or transporters. Consistent with the tumor-specific target distribution (ie, KRAS^G12C), there were no primary pharmacology-related on-target effects identified. The kidney was identified as a target organ in the rat but not the dog. Renal toxicity in the rat was characterized by tubular degeneration and necrosis restricted to a specific region suggesting that the toxicity was attributed to the local formation of a putative toxic reactive metabolite. In the 3-month dog study, adaptive changes of hepatocellular hypertrophy due to drug metabolizing enzyme induction were observed in the liver that was associated with secondary effects in the pituitary and thyroid gland. Sotorasib was not teratogenic and had no direct effect on embryo-fetal development in the rat or rabbit. Human, dog, and rat circulating metabolites, M24, M10, and M18, raised no clinically relevant safety concerns based on the general toxicology studies, primary/secondary pharmacology screening, an in vitro human ether-à-go-go-related gene assay, or mutagenicity assessment. Overall, the results of the nonclinical safety program support a high benefit/risk ratio of sotorasib for the treatment of patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated tumors.

Treatment of Rare Mutations in Patients with Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a worldwide prevalent malignancy. This disease has a low survival rate due to diagnosis at a late stage challenged by the involvement of metastatic sites. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is presented in 85% of cases. The last decade has experienced substantial advancements in scientific research, leading to a novel targeted therapeutic approach. The newly developed pharmaceutical agents are aimed towards specific mutations, detected in individual patients inflicted by lung cancer. These drugs have longer and improved response rates compared to traditional chemotherapy. Recent studies were able to identify rare mutations found in pulmonary tumors. Among the gene alterations detected were mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), B-type Raf kinase (BRAF), c-ROS proto-oncogene (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET) and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK). Ongoing clinical trials are gaining insight onto possible first and second lines of medical treatment options intended to enable progression-free survival to lung cancer patients.

Clinical application of a lung cancer organoid (tumoroid) culture system

Despite high expectations for lung tumoroids, they have not been applied in the clinic due to the difficulty of their long-term culture. Here, however, using AO (airway organoid) media developed by the Clevers laboratory, we succeeded in generating 3 lung tumoroid lines for long-term culture (>13 months) from 41 lung cancer cases (primary or metastatic). Use of nutlin-3a was key to selecting lung tumoroids that harbor mutant p53 in order to eliminate normal lung epithelial organoids. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis indicated that each lung tumoroid carried BRAFG469A, TPM3-ROS1 or EGFRL858R/RB1E737*, respectively. Targeted therapies using small molecule drugs (trametinib/erlotinib for BRAFG469A, crizotinib/entrectinib for TPM3-ROS1 and ABT-263/YM-155 for EGFRL858R/RB1E737*) significantly suppressed the growth of each lung tumoroid line. AO media was superior to 3 different media developed by other laboratories. Our experience indicates that long-term lung tumoroid culture is feasible, allowing us to identify NGS-based therapeutic targets and determine the responsiveness to corresponding small molecule drugs.

Management of BRAF Gene Alterations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: From Current Therapeutic Strategies to Future Perspectives

BRAF mutations constitute an important poor prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and the development of treatments in this context is of great necessity to prolong patient survival. Although the association between BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) has been known for several years, previous clinical trials have revealed that the former has a limited prognostic impact and that immune checkpoint inhibitors offer a significant survival benefit to mCRC patients with both characteristics. Furthermore, the genomic classification of BRAF mutations according to their molecular functions enables greater understanding of the characteristics of mCRC patients with BRAF mutations, with therapeutic strategies based on this classification made more ideal to improve poor prognosis through the delivery of targeted therapies. Recently, a phase III trial was conducted in previously treated mCRC patients with BRAF V600E-mutated tumors and revealed that the combination therapy approach of BRAF inhibition and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy with or without MEK inhibition was more efficacious than standard chemotherapy alone. This review discusses current treatment strategies and future perspectives in BRAF-mutated mCRC.

Expression of HYOU1 via Reciprocal Crosstalk between NSCLC Cells and HUVECs Control Cancer Progression and Chemoresistance in Tumor Spheroids

Among all cancer types, lung cancer ranks highest worldwide in terms of both incidence and mortality. The crosstalk between lung cancer cells and their tumor microenvironment (TME) has begun to emerge as the "Achilles heel" of the disease and thus constitutes an attractive target for anticancer therapy. We previously revealed that crosstalk between lung cancer cells and endothelial cells (ECs) induces chemoresistance in multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs). In this study, we demonstrated that factors secreted in response to crosstalk between ECs and lung cancer cells play pivotal roles in the development of chemoresistance in lung cancer spheroids. We subsequently determined that the expression of hypoxia up-regulated protein 1 (HYOU1) in lung cancer spheroids was increased by factors secreted in response to crosstalk between ECs and lung cancer cells. Direct interaction between lung cancer cells and ECs also caused an elevation in the expression of HYOU1 in MCTSs. Inhibition of HYOU1 expression not only suppressed stemness and malignancy, but also facilitated apoptosis and chemosensitivity in lung cancer MCTSs. Inhibition of HYOU1 expression also significantly increased the expression of interferon signaling components in lung cancer cells. Moreover, the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway was involved in the HYOU1-induced aggression of lung cancer cells. Taken together, our results identify HYOU1, which is induced in response to crosstalk between ECs and lung cancer cells within the TME, as a potential therapeutic target for combating the aggressive behavior of cancer cells.

Lung cancer molecular mutations and abnormal glycosylation as biomarkers for early diagnosis

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in tumor-related deaths in the world. Early detection of tumors can greatly improve the survival rate of patients. However, the lack of reliable blood biomarkers remains a major challenge for early diagnosis. The blood proteins secreted by the lung bronchi and bronchial arteries may have characteristic glycosylation patterns associated with tumors, which are different from normal physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we outline the oncogenic drivers, signaling pathways related to KRAS, gene and protein mutations, and oncogenic regulation of protein glycosylation. Based on to the TCGA transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics data, we discussed oncogene and glycoproteins detected in the blood as tumor biomarkers. We hypothesize that glycoproteins whose glycosylation can be reversed by targeted drugs may serve as potential tumor biomarkers.

Cutaneous Metastasis as the First Presentation of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with a BRAF Mutation: A Case Report

Cutaneous metastasis from a primary visceral malignancy is a relatively uncommon clinical manifestation that occurs as an initial presentation in 1% to 12% of patients with internal malignancies. Additionally, cutaneous metastases are often late signs of an internal malignancy, and in very rare cases they may occur at the same time or before the primary cancer has been detected. Metastasis to the skin has a poor prognosis and is often a sign of widespread malignant tumors. In the present study, we report a 72-year-old male who presented with multiple rapidly growing subcutaneous nodules. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed a hypermetabolic concentration of radiotracer in the left lower lung and multiple organ metastases associated with multiple skin masses. Biopsy of one of the skin nodules and gene detection indicated metastatic adenocarcinoma consistent with a primary lung origin with a BRAF mutation. BRAF mutations are emerging therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as they are present in 2–4% of NSCLC cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report to show that BRAF-mutant lung adenocarcinoma can be associated with cutaneous metastasis. Early diagnosis and individualized treatment strategies may prolong patient survival.

Treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: First line, maintenance and second line - Indian consensus statement update

The management of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is becoming increasingly complex with the identification of driver mutations/rearrangements and development/availability of appropriate targeted therapies. In 2017, an expert group of medical oncologists with expertise in treating lung cancer used data from published literature and experience to arrive at practical consensus recommendations on treatment of advanced NSCLC for use by the community oncologists. This was published subsequently in the Indian Journal of Cancer with a plan to be updated annually. The present document is an update to the 2017 document.

Genomic characteristics of driver genes in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the demographic profile of driver gene alterations, especially low-frequency gene alterations in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 7395 Chinese patients with NSCLC were enrolled in the study. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens collected via either surgical resection or biopsy.

RESULTS

The frequent genomic alterations found in the study were EGFR mutations (51.7%), KRAS mutations (13.1%), MET alterations (5.6%; 3.2% copy number gains and 0.5% exon 14 skipping mutation), HER2 alterations (7.0%; 2.0% copy number gains and 5.4% mutations), ALK alterations (7.2%; 3.9% rearrangements), RET rearrangements (1.4%), ROS1 rearrangements (0.9%), and NTRK rearrangements (0.6%). The EGFR mutation rate was found to be significantly higher in women than in men (69.1% vs. 38.5%, P < 0.001), while the KRAS mutation (17.5% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.001) and MET alteration rates (6.5% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in men than in women. The EGFR mutation rate tended to decrease with age in the group aged >40 years, while the KRAS mutation rate tended to increase with age. The HER2 mutation (13.9% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) and ALK alteration rates (14.3% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group aged <40 years than in groups aged 40 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of different driver genes was diverse in different age-gender groups, and the results of this study may assist clinicians in clinical decision-making and the development of public healthcare strategies in the future.

KEY POINTS

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: This study demonstrated that the frequency of different driver genes was diverse in different age-gender groups. What this study adds It may enable clinicians to make clinical decisions, and assist government, pharmaceutical researchers and insurance companies develop public healthcare strategies.

The landscape of kinase domain duplication in Chinese lung cancer patients

Background

Kinase domain duplication (KDD) is a special type of large genomic rearrangement (LGR), occurring in the kinase domain of protein kinase genes. KDD of some lung cancer driver genes, such as

EGFR

KDD, has been identified and implicated to be oncogenic in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aims to interrogate the spectrum of KDD occurring on classic driver genes in Chinese lung cancer patients without the presence of classic lung cancer driver mutations.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 10,525 Chinese lung cancer patients who met the following inclusion criteria; (I) do not carry classic lung cancer driver mutations in any of the 8 driver genes and (II) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve. Capture-based targeted sequencing was performed on tissue or plasma samples. LGR and KDD were identified by using in-house analysis scripts. The prevalence and distribution of LGR and KDD in our cohort were analyzed.

Results

The median age of the cohort was 64 years with 68.7% being male. Among all patients, 23.2% and 51.8% were diagnosed with stage III and IV disease respectively. We identified 43 cases (0.41%) harboring LGR in one of the driver genes (EGFR/ERBB2/ALK/RET/ROS1/MET/BRAF), with 24 (0.23%) patients harboring KDD. Of the patients harboring KDD, a majority (n=19) harbored canonical EGFR-KDD involving exons 18–25, whilst one patient harbored duplications of EGFR exons 18–26. There were three MET-KDD patients; in two, the alteration occurred in exons 15–21 and in one, the alteration occurred in exons 3–21. One patient harbored RET-KDD involving exons 12–18. KDD showed a comparable prevalence in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (0.33% vs. 0.11%, P=0.118). Nineteen non-KDD LGRs, spanning six genes including EGFR (n=6), MET (n=3), ALK (n=4), ROS1 (n=2), ERBB2 (n=2) and BRAF (n=2), were found, each occurring in one patient. The prevalence of LGR in LUADs and LUSCs was comparable (0.55% vs. 0.38%, P=0.452).

Conclusions

We observed a prevalence of 0.41% and 0.23% for LGR and KDD, respectively. Twenty-four different LGR alterations, including 5 KDDs and 19 non-KDD LGRs, were observed. KDDs mainly occurred in EGFR involving exons 18–25 and non-KDD LGRs were distributed more randomly. The prevalence of LGR/KDD in LUSCs and LUADs was comparable.

Immunotherapy Benefit in a Patient With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and a Rare BRAF Mutation

Immunotherapy is less effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and some may extrapolate this trend to other driver mutations. Up to 4% of NSCLC cases contain a BRAF mutation. Most BRAF mutations are V600E, and little is known about the impact of treatment in rare BRAF G469A mutations. We present a case of a patient found to have BRAF G469A mutated NSCLC. She was diagnosed with Stage IIIB NSCLC and treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. Post-treatment imaging demonstrated disease progression and she was started on nivolumab, resulting in a dramatic and prolonged response which is ongoing after 76 cycles. Her substantial response and prolonged benefit suggest that BRAF-mutated NSCLC may respond better than EGFR- or ALK-driven disease to immunotherapy. Due to the rarity of specific mutations, this case adds to the limited current published literature on NSCLC harbouring a BRAF G469A mutation and suggests that immunotherapy is a reasonable treatment option.

Future directions and management of liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer represents the world’s most common cause of cancer death. In recent years, we moved from a generic therapeutic strategy to a personalized approach, based on the molecular characterization of the tumor. In this view, liquid biopsy is becoming an important tool for assessing the progress or onset of lung disease. Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive procedure able to isolate circulating tumor cells, tumor educated platelets, exosomes and free circulating tumor DNA from body fluids. The characterization of these liquid biomarkers can help to choose the therapeutic strategy for each different case. In this review, the authors will analyze the main aspects of lung cancer and the applications currently in use focusing on the benefits associated with this approach for predicting the prognosis and monitoring the clinical conditions of lung cancer disease.

Role of imaging biomarkers in mutation-driven non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for a vast majority of lung cancers, has shifted to personalized, targeted therapy following discoveries of several targetable oncogenic mutations. Targeting of specific mutations has improved outcomes in many patients. This success has led to several target-specific agents replacing chemotherapy as first-line treatment in certain mutated NSCLC. Several researchers have reported that there may be imaging biomarkers that may be predictive of the presence of these mutations. These features, when present, have the potential in triaging patients into the most appropriate diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Distinct imaging features and patterns of metastases that have been associated with NSCLC with various targetable oncogenic mutations are presented in this review.

Combined osimertinib, dabrafenib and trametinib treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with an osimertinib-induced BRAF V600E mutation

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have reported an acquiredBRAF V600E mutation as a potential resistance mechanism to osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with an activating mutation in EGFR. However, the therapeutic effect of combining dabrafenib and trametinib with osimertinib remains unclear. Here we report treatment efficacy in two cases with acquired BRAF V600E mutations.

METHODS

Two patients with anEGFR exon 19 deletion and a T790 M mutation, both treated with osimertinib, acquired a BRAF V600E mutation at disease progression. Following the recommendation of the molecular tumor board, a concurrent combination of dabrafenib and trametinib plus osimertinib was administered.

RESULTS

Because of toxicity, one patient ultimately received a reduced dose of dabrafenib and trametinib combined with a normal dose of osimertinib. Clinical response in this patient lasted for 13.4 months. Re-biopsy upon tumor progression revealed loss ofBRAF V600E and emergence of EGFR C797S. The other patient, treated with full doses of the combined therapy, had progression with metastases in lung and brain one month after starting therapy.

CONCLUSION

BRAF V600E may be a resistance mechanism induced by osimertinib in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Combined treatment using dabrafenib/trametinib concurrently with osimertinib needs to be explored for osimertinib-induced BRAF V600E mutation.

The Crosstalk between Src and Hippo/YAP Signaling Pathways in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

The advancement of new therapies, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies, has improved the survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the last decade. Some NSCLC patients still do not benefit from therapies or encounter progressive disease during the course of treatment because they have intrinsic resistance, acquired resistance, or lack a targetable driver mutation. More investigations on the molecular biology of NSCLC are needed to find useful biomarkers for current therapies and to develop novel therapeutic strategies. Src is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase protein that interacts with cell surface growth factor receptors and the intracellular signaling pathway to maintain cell survival tumorigenesis in NSCLC. The Yes-associated protein (YAP) is one of the main effectors of the Hippo pathway and has been identified as a promoter of drug resistance, cancer progression, and metastasis in NSCLC. Here, we review studies that have investigated the activation of YAP as mediated by Src kinases and demonstrate that Src regulates YAP through three main mechanisms: (1) direct phosphorylation; (2) the activation of pathways repressing Hippo kinases; and (3) Hippo-independent mechanisms. Further work should focus on the efficacy of Src inhibitors in inhibiting YAP activity in NSCLC. In addition, future efforts toward developing potentially reasonable combinations of therapy targeting the Src–YAP axis using other therapies, including targeted therapies and/or immunotherapies, are warranted.

Real-world assessment of the BRAF status in non-squamous cell lung carcinoma using VE1 immunohistochemistry: A single laboratory experience (LPCE, Nice, France)

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines recommend BRAF mutational status assessment in treatment-naive advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients since the presence of a BRAFV600 mutation enables specific BRAF inhibitor treatment. For this purpose, the mutational status needs to be obtained in 10 working days. Herein, we prospectively evaluated the feasibility of systematic assessment of the BRAF status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a single institution (LPCE, Nice) at baseline for NSCLC diagnosed.

METHODS

1317 NSCLC were evaluated using BRAF IHC from 2011 to 2019. Initially the BRAF status was prospectively assessed using NGS and/or pyrosequencing in 618 consecutively diagnosed NSCLC patients from 2012 to 2016; BRAFV600E and BRAF nonV600E mutated tumors detected in this cohort were retrospectively evaluated using BRAF IHC. Secondarily, 699 biopsies of NSCLC were prospectively analyzed between 2017 and 2019 using BRAF IHC. BRAF IHC positive tumors were tested using a rapid BRAF specific PCR based assay.

RESULTS

Initially, 21/618 (3%) of tumors (15 early and 6 late stage tumors) were BRAFV600E mutated according to the results of NGS and/or pyrosequencing. BRAF IHC was positive in 21/21 of these cases and negative in 51/51 (100 %) BRAF non V600E mutated cases. In the prospective BRAF IHC tested cohort of patients, 24/699 (3%) tumors (13 early and 11 late stage tumors) were positive with VE1 IHC. The BRAF PCR assay was positive in 20/24 (83 %) of these cases.

CONCLUSION

BRAFV600E IHC screening of treatment-naïve NSCLC patients is a rapid, specific and very sensitive method which can lead in advanced stage positive NSCLC tumors to a BRAF inhibitor treatment. This test can be routinely integrated into mandatory predictive biomarker 'testing of NSCLC. According to the organization of patient care and the physician's request, this practice can be proposed as an alternative to NGS-based tissue biopsy made at baseline.

External Quality Assessment Schemes for Biomarker Testing in Oncology: Comparison of Performance between Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded-Tissue and Cell-Free Tumor DNA in Plasma

Liquid biopsies have emerged as a useful addition to tissue biopsies in molecular pathology. Literature has shown lower laboratory performances when a new method of variant analysis is introduced. This study evaluated the differences in variant analysis between tissue and plasma samples after the introduction of liquid biopsy in molecular analysis. Data from a pilot external quality assessment scheme for the detection of molecular variants in plasma samples and from external quality assessment schemes for the detection of molecular variants in tissue samples were collected. Laboratory performance and error rates by sample were compared between matrices for variants present in both scheme types. Results showed lower overall performance [65.6% (n = 276) versus 89.2% (n = 1607)] and higher error rates [21.0% to 43.5% (n = 138) versus 8.7% to 16.7% (n = 234 to 689)] for the detection of variants in plasma compared to tissue, respectively. In the plasma samples, performance was decreased for variants with an allele frequency of 1% compared to 5% [56.5% (n = 138) versus 74.6% (n = 138)]. The implementation of liquid biopsy in the detection of circulating tumor DNA in plasma was associated with poor laboratory performance. It is important both to apply optimal detection methods and to extensively validate new methods for testing circulating tumor DNA before treatment decisions are made.

Next generation sequencing in lung cancer: An initial experience from India

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 35% of NSCLC patients in East Asia have EGFR mutations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides a comprehensive mutational profile in lung cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Clinicopathologic characteristics and mutational profiling data was analyzed from nonsmall cell lung carcinoma /Adenocarcinoma over a duration of 42 months (October 2014 to March 2018) using next-generation sequencing Ion Ampliseq Cancer Hotspot panel v2 (Ampliseq, Life Technologies) on the Ion torrent PGM platform.

RESULTS

A total of 154 cases were processed during this period. The average number of mutations/case varied from one to four 72.07% (111/154), of these cases had minimum one genetic alteration. The most common mutated gene was TP53 gene (37.6%, n = 58) followed by EGFR (32.4%, n = 50), KRAS (18.18%, n = 28), ERBB2 (3.2%, n = 5), BRAF (1.94%, n = 3). EGFR positivity was more in females (43.3%) and non-smokers (52.08%) in comparison to males (26.7%) and smokers (16.1%).

CONCLUSION

In this paper, we have described the comprehensive mutational profiling of a large cohort of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients from the eastern part of India. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies from the country describing mutations in BRAF, ERBB2, TP53 genes and their clinicopathologic/histopathologic associations in lung cancers.

Overall survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring "niche" mutations: an observational study

Objective: In addition to the most common somatic lung cancer mutations (i. e., KRAS and EGFR mutations), other genes may harbor mutations that could be relevant for lung cancer. We defined BRAF, c-MET, DDR2, HER2, MAP2K1, NRAS, PIK3CA, and RET mutations as “niche” mutations and analyzed. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the differences in the overall survival (OS) of patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring niche somatic mutations.

Results: Data were gathered for 252 patients. Mutations were observed in all genes studied, except c-MET, DDR2, MAP2K1, and RET. The multivariable analysis showed that 1) niche mutations had a higher mortality than EGFR mutations (HR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.2–4.4; p = 0.009); 2) KRAS mutations had a higher mortality than EGFR mutations (HR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.4–4.5; p = 0.003); 3) niche mutations presented a similar mortality to KRAS mutations (HR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.6–1.5; p = 0.797).

Methods: Three cohorts of mutations were selected from patients with lung adenocarcinoma and their OS was compared. Mutations that were searched for, were 1) BRAF, c-MET, DDR2, HER2, MAP2K1, NRAS, PIK3CA, and RET; 2) K-RAS; and 3) EGFR. Differences in OS between these three cohorts were assessed by means of a multivariable Cox model that adjusted for age, sex, smoking habits, clinical stages, and treatments.

Conclusions: Niche mutations exhibited an increased risk of death when compared with EGFR mutations and a similar risk of death when compared with KRAS mutations.

Targeting non-small cell lung cancer: driver mutation beyond epidermal growth factor mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion

The identification of driver mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, the BRAF and ROS1 genes and subsequent successful clinical development of kinase inhibitors not only significantly improves clinical outcomes but also facilitates the discovery of other novel driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. These driver mutations can be categorized into mutations in or near the kinase domain, gene amplification or fusion. In this review, BRAF V600E, EGFR and HER-2 exon 20 mutation, FGFR1-4, K-RAS, MET, neuregulin-1, NRTK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RET and ROS1 gene aberration and their therapeutics will be discussed.

The Current Understanding Of Asbestos-Induced Epigenetic Changes Associated With Lung Cancer

Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral consisting of extremely fine fibres that can become trapped in the lungs after inhalation. Occupational and environmental exposures to asbestos are linked to development of lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining surrounding the lung. This review discusses the factors that are making asbestos-induced lung cancer a continuing problem, including the extensive historic use of asbestos and decades long latency between exposure and disease development. Genomic mutations of DNA nucleotides and gene rearrangements driving lung cancer are well-studied, with biomarkers and targeted therapies already in clinical use for some of these mutations. The genes involved in these mutation biomarkers and targeted therapies are also involved in epigenetic mechanisms and are discussed in this review as it is hoped that identification of epigenetic aberrations in these genes will enable the same gene biomarkers and targeted therapies to be used. Currently, understanding of how asbestos fibres trapped in the lungs leads to epigenetic changes and lung cancer is incomplete. It has been shown that oxidoreduction reactions on fibre surfaces generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) which in turn damage DNA, leading to genetic and epigenetic alterations that reduce the activity of tumour suppressor genes. Epigenetic DNA methylation changes associated with lung cancer are summarised in this review, and some of these changes will be due to asbestos exposure. So far, little research has been carried out to separate the asbestos driven epigenetic changes from those due to non-asbestos causes of lung cancer. Asbestos-associated lung cancers exhibit less methylation variability than lung cancers in general, and in a large proportion of samples variability has been found to be restricted to promoter regions. Epigenetic aberrations in cancer are proving to be promising biomarkers for diagnosing cancers. It is hoped that further understanding of epigenetic changes in lung cancer can result in useful asbestos-associated lung cancer biomarkers to guide treatment. Research is ongoing into the detection of lung cancer epigenetic alterations using non-invasive samples of blood and sputum. These efforts hold the promise of non-invasive cancer diagnosis in the future. Efforts to reverse epigenetic aberrations in lung cancer by epigenetic therapies are ongoing but have not yet yielded success.

Oncogene addiction and tumor mutational burden in non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical significance and limitations

Lung cancer incidence has increased worldwide over the past decades, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the vast majority (85%) of lung cancer specimens. It is estimated that lung cancer causes about 1.7 million global deaths per year worldwide. Multiple trials have been carried out, with the aim of finding new effective treatment options. Lately, special focus has been placed on immune checkpoint (PD1/PD-L1) inhibitors which impact the tumor immune microenvironment. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been found to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conversely, recent studies have weakened the significance of TMB as a predictor of response to therapy and survival. In this review article, we discuss the significance of TMB, as well as possible limitations. Furthermore, we give a concise overview of mutations frequently found in NSCLC, and discuss the significance of oncogene addiction in lung cancer as an essential driver of tumorigenesis and tumor progression.