Pre- and Postoperative Chemotherapy in Localized Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Expert Survey

Correlation between 18F-FDG PET-derived parameters and quantitative pathological characteristics of soft tissue sarcoma

Background

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been widely used for evaluating patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, uncertainties and overlap among individuals may be observed, and the relevance of these findings remains to be further explored. The present study was aimed at investigating the correlation between PET metabolic parameters and quantitative pathological characteristics in STS.

Methods

We retrospectively collected 39 patients with STS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) examination before treatment. Metabolic parameters including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and intratumoral FDG uptake heterogeneity (IFH) were measured. Histological grading was performed according to the French Federation of Cancer Centers grading system. Continuous staining of tissue sections and digital quantitative analysis methods were used, the characteristics of tumor nucleated cells were observed through hematoxylin-eosin staining, and the expression of CD163, CD68, CD8, and CD4 in tumor tissues was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), then the correlation between FDG metabolic parameters and the above quantitative pathological characteristics in patients with STS were evaluated.

Results

The SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET/CT in STS was positively correlated with the total nuclear area (r=0.355, P=0.027). SUVmax was also positively correlated with the expression levels of CD163, CD68, CD8, and CD4 (r=0.582, 0.485, 0.343, and 0.324, with P<0.001, 0.002, 0.032, and 0.044, respectively), but was not significantly correlated with cell count and mean nuclear area (all P>0.05). However, MTV, TLG, and IFH were not significantly correlated with the above quantitative pathological characteristics. Further multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that only CD163 expression and histological grade were independently correlated with SUVmax. Moreover, SUVmax remained positively correlated with CD163 expression in the low-grade STS (r=0.820, P=0.001) and high-grade STS groups (r=0.430, P=0.028).

Conclusions

18F-FDG uptake was positively correlated with the quantitative pathological features of soft tissue tumors. SUVmax may be a meaningful method reflecting the level of M2 macrophage infiltration and may provide additional valuable information for preclinical evaluation of STS.

Comparison of the Results of Patients Treated With Limb-Sparing Treatment Options in Malignant Bone Tumors: Sharing the Experience of Twelve Bicentric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Extremity-sparing surgery should be the main objective if a functional extremity is to be obtained in cases of malignant bone tumors. After extensive resection, numerous techniques have been described to reconstruct bone defects. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent external radiation therapy and liquid nitrogen biological reconstruction at two different facilities.

METHODS

The study included 12 patients who received biological reconstruction therapy for bone sarcoma and had at least two years of follow-up. Demographic data, pathological diagnosis, presence of systemic metastasis, and recurrence during follow-up were among the information logged. Patients who used liquid nitrogen were placed in group 1, and those who underwent external irradiation were placed in group 2. After being contacted for their final follow-up appointments, the outcomes were compared by recording the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTSS).

RESULTS

For participants with a mean age of 10.75±3.6 (5-17), the follow-up period was 30.2±16.3 months in total. In contrast to the patients in group 1, who experienced union on average after 7.5±1.2 months, those in group 2 experienced union after 7.6±1.1 months. Patients in group 1 had an MSTSS of 75.5±11.8%, while those in group 2 had a score of 77±4.4. There was no discernible difference between the two groups' union times (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups' MSTSS (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

After tumor resection, extracorporeal radiation therapy and the application of liquid nitrogen are still useful treatment options and neither of them is superior to the other.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom

Aim: Describing the treatment patterns, outcomes by line of treatment (LOT), and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS). Patients & methods: In this descriptive, non-interventional, retrospective cohort study, physicians from five European countries reported on patients with recent pharmacological treatment for mSS. Results: Among 296 patients with mSS, 86.1, 38.9 and 8.4% received 1 LOT (1L), 2 LOTs (2L) and 3+ LOTs (L3+), respectively. Common regimens were doxorubicin/ifosfamide-based (37.4%) for 1L and trabectedin-based for 2L (29.7%). For 1L, median time to next treatment was 13.1 and 6.0 months for living and deceased patients, respectively. Median OS was 22.0, 6.0 and 4.9 months in all patients, 2L and 3L, respectively. HCRU data showed median one inpatient hospital admission, 3 days in hospital and four outpatient visits yearly. Conclusion: This large-scale study documents high unmet needs in patients previously treated for mSS and for more effective therapies.

The diagnosis, classification, and treatment of sarcoma in this era of artificial intelligence and immunotherapy

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a group of rare and heterogeneous tumors associated with several challenges, including incorrect or late diagnosis, the lack of clinical expertise, and limited therapeutic options. Digital pathology and radiomics represent transformative technologies that appear promising for improving the accuracy of cancer diagnosis, characterization and monitoring. Herein, we review the potential role of the application of digital pathology and radiomics in managing patients with STS. We have particularly described the main results and the limits of the studies using radiomics to refine diagnosis or predict the outcome of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. We also discussed the current limitation of implementing radiomics in routine settings. Standard management approaches for STS have not improved since the early 1970s. Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment; nonetheless, immuno-oncology agents have not yet been approved for patients with STS. However, several lines of evidence indicate that immunotherapy may represent an efficient therapeutic strategy for this group of diseases. Thus, we emphasized the remarkable potential of immunotherapy in sarcoma treatment by focusing on recent data regarding the immune landscape of these tumors. We have particularly emphasized the fact that the development of immunotherapy for sarcomas is not an aspect of histology (except for alveolar soft-part sarcoma) but rather that of the tumor microenvironment. Future studies investigating immunotherapy strategies in sarcomas should incorporate at least the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures as a stratification factor in their design, besides including a strong translational program that will allow for a better understanding of the determinants involved in sensitivity and treatment resistance to immune-oncology agents.

Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2–G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included.

Results

Initial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / − chemotherapy are ongoing.

Conclusions

Retrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02072-9.

The role of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in the management of localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities includes limb-sparing surgery combined with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy (RT). The role of perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) remains uncertain. STS patients with high-risk features for local recurrence, distant metastases, and increased mortality may require additional systemic therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors of outcome regarding local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) in a large single-center cohort of patients suffering from localized high-grade STS (grade 2/3, G2/G3). Special emphasis was put on a subgroup of patients who received combined neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT).

METHODS

Overall, 115 adult STS patients were included in this retrospective study. The median follow-up was 34 months. Twenty-three patients (20.0%) were treated with neoadjuvant RCT, 92 (80.0%) received other therapies (adjuvant RT alone (n = 58); neoadjuvant CTX + adjuvant RT (n = 17); adjuvant RCT (n = 10), neoadjuvant RT alone (n = 7)). To assess potential prognostic factors on LC, OS, and FFDM, univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models were applied.

RESULTS

UVA showed significantly better LC rates in the neoadjuvant RCT group (p = 0.025), with trends in MVA (p = 0.057). The 3-year LC rate was 89.7% in the neoadjuvant RCT group vs. 75.6% in the "other therapies" group. UVA also showed significantly better OS rates in the neoadjuvant RCT group (p = 0.049), however, this was not confirmed in MVA (p = 0.205), the 3-year OS rate was 85.8% for patients treated with neoadjuvant RCT compared to 73.5% in the "other therapies" group. UVA showed significantly better FFDM rates in (p = 0.018) and a trend towards better FFDM rates in MVA (p = 0.059). The 3-year FFDM rate was 89.7% for patients treated with neoadjuvant RCT compared to 65.9% in the "other therapies" group. In the subgroup of patients with G3 STS, neoadjuvant RCT was a significant positive predictor of LC and FFDM in MVA (p = 0.047, p = 0.027) but not for OS. Overall grade 3 and 4 toxicities were significantly higher (p = 0.019) in the neoadjuvant RCT group and occurred in 73.9% vs. 38.0% in patients receiving other therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that neoadjuvant RCT might improve LC and FFDM in patients with localized G3 STS while also being associated with increased acute complication rates. Further prospective research is warranted to confirm these findings.

Patterns of Perioperative Treatment and Survival of Localized, Resected, Intermediate- or High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 2000-2017 Netherlands Cancer Registry Database Analysis

Background

Standard therapy for localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is wide, limb-sparing resection. For intermediate- or high-grade tumors, (neo)adjuvant therapies are frequently added to the treatment plan. In this study, data from a Dutch nationwide database are used to (1) assess whether perioperative management of STS follows ESMO guidelines, (2) characterize prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), and (3) assess the association between perioperative treatment and survival.

Methods

All intermediate- or high-grade, localized STS cases, who have undergone surgery and diagnosed between 2000 and 2017, were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) database. Variables with demographic, treatment, and survival data were obtained. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan–Meier's method, and the effect of prognostic factors on OS was assessed in a multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 4957 patients were identified. There were slightly more males (54.7%). Median age at diagnosis was 64 years, and 53.6% of the tumors were located in the extremities. Radiotherapy (RT) was administered to 2481 (50.1%) patients, and 252 (5.1%) patients were treated with perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The total use of perioperative RT did not significantly change in the last 20 years, but the timing followed clinical guidelines: preoperative RT increased significantly (2000–2008: 3.7%, 2009–2017: 22.3%; p < 0.001), whereas the use of postoperative RT diminished (2000–2008: 45.9%, 2009–2017: 26.1%; p < 0.001). The use of perioperative chemotherapy slightly decreased (2000–2008: 5.9%, 2009–2017: 4.4%; p = 0.015). 5-year OS was 59.6% (95% CI: 58.2–61.0). Sex, age, year of diagnosis, tumor location, tumor size, histological grade, depth, histological subtype, surgical margins, and the use of perioperative RT were identified as independent predictors for OS.

Conclusion

Preoperative RT is gradually replacing postoperative RT for localized STS in the Netherlands. The use of perioperative chemotherapy is rare and has slightly decreased in recent years. Identified baseline characteristics and treatment factors predicting OS may aid in future treatment decisions.

Combined Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Doxorubicin-Ifosfamide Chemotherapy in Marginally Resectable Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

There is no standard treatment for marginally resectable soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) of the extremities and trunk wall, and current approaches produce unsatisfactory results. We hypothesized that the combination of doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) chemotherapy and 5 × 5 Gy hypofractionated radiotherapy can generate a higher ratio of limb-sparing or conservative surgeries with negative microscopic margins (R0) and acceptable treatment toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a single-arm prospective clinical trial. Treatment combined 1 cycle of AI with subsequent 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy within 1 week, followed by 2 cycles of AI and surgery. The primary endpoint was to assess the number of patients in whom en bloc R0 resection was achieved.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients met the eligibility criteria. Three patients had resectable lung metastases at baseline. Forty-two received the planned protocol treatment. In 2 patients, the treatment was prematurely stopped because of the toxicity of chemotherapy. One patient died of septic shock because of severe bone marrow suppression after the second AI cycle; a second death was not related to treatment for STS. Three patients underwent amputation. In 72% of patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, we achieved en bloc R0 resections. Grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03 chemotherapy toxicity requiring dose reduction or treatment interruption occurred in 15 patients. Wound complications occurred in 18 patients, but they were severe in only 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative AI combined with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy is a promising method for the management of marginally resectable STS. This protocol enables a high ratio of R0 limb-sparing or conservative surgeries. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted.

Imaging response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas: Where do we stand?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.

The Feasibility Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Regional Hyperthermia in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Simple Summary

The recommended management of marginally resectable or unresectable soft tissue sarcomas is an attempt of neoadjuvant therapy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is limited in low-grade tumors, sarcomas with chemoresistant pathology or in unfit patients. There is a growing evidence on hypofractionated radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas, but its efficacy may be limited by radioresistance that is frequently associated with chemoresistance. Regional hyperthermia is a potent and minimally invasive radiosensitizer. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia in aforementioned clinical situations. Our findings indicate that proposed combination is feasible while maintaining good short-term local efficacy and tolerance. It could serve as a basis for further studies on radiotherapy with hyperthermia in soft tissue sarcomas.

Abstract

Introduction: Management of marginally resectable or unresectable soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in patients who are not candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to chemoresistant pathology or contraindications remains a challenge. Therefore, in these indications, we aimed to investigate a feasibility of 10x 3.25 Gy radiotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (HT) that could be followed by surgery or 4x 4 Gy radiotherapy with HT. Materials and methods: We recruited patients with locally advanced marginally resectable or unresectable STS who (1) presented chemoresistant STS subtype, or (2) progressed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or (3) were unfit for chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of the proposed regimen. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. All patients received the first part of the treatment, namely radiotherapy with HT. Among them, 14 received the second part of radiotherapy with HT whereas 13 patients underwent surgery. Three patients did not complete the treatment protocol. The feasibility criteria were fulfilled in 90% of patients. Two patients developed distant metastases. One patient died due to distant progression. One patient developed rapid local recurrence after surgery. Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy with HT is a feasible treatment for marginally resectable or unresectable STS in patients who are not candidates for chemotherapy. Results of this clinical trial support the further validation of RT and HT combinations in STS.

Perioperative chemotherapy and regional hyperthermia for high-risk adult-type soft tissue sarcomas

A group of patients with adult-type soft tissue sarcoma is at high risk of local recurrence and distant metastases. Age, tumour site, histological subtype, tumour size and grade have been identified as the most important independent adverse prognostic factors. Macroscopically complete tumour resection is considered as the mainstay of treatment with the addition of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy for extremity or trunk localisation. Retroperitoneal localisation requires compartmental resection and is associated with a worse prognosis. Here, radiotherapy is of no proven value. Perioperative chemotherapy is considered to treat micrometastatic disease not detectable at the time of diagnosis. The neoadjuvant application gives the risk of distant metastasis the greatest importance as therapy is carried out at the earliest possible time, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy is delayed by surgery and the necessary wound healing. With reported response rates up to 30%, both the operability may be improved and the risk of intraoperative tumour cell dissemination may be reduced, resulting also in reduced local relapse rates. However, the potential risk of early tumour progression may counteract this benefit. Optimised strategies with multimodality approaches including chemotherapy, regional hyperthermia (RHT) and immunotherapeutic agents have been shown to improve survival in high-risk patients. Here, we focus on the data from available randomised studies investigating the use of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with high-risk adult-type soft tissue sarcoma, including the use of RHT for local enhancement of chemotherapy effect and immune induction.

Decision-Making Analysis for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: A Survey by the Executive Committee of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI)

OBJECTIVES

To assess the individual treatment strategies among international experts in peritoneal carcinosis, specifically their decision-making in the process of patient selection for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in women suffering from ovarian cancer, to identify relevant decision-making criteria, and to quantify the level of consensus for or against HIPEC.

METHODS

The members of the executive committee of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) were asked to describe the clinical conditions under which they would recommend HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer and to describe any disease or patient characteristics relevant to their decision. All answers were then merged and converted into decision trees. The decision trees were then analyzed by applying the objective consensus methodology.

RESULTS

Nine experts in surgical oncology provided information on their multidisciplinary treatment strategy including HIPEC for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Three of the total of 12 experts did not perform HIPEC. Five criteria relevant to the decision on whether HIPEC is performed were applied. In patients with resectable disease, a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) <21, and epithelial ovarian cancer without distant metastasis, consent was received by 75% to perform HIPEC for women suffering from recurrent disease. Furthermore, in the primary disease setting, consent was received by 67% to perform HIPEC according to the same criteria.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Among surgical oncology experts in peritoneal surface malignancy and HIPEC, HIPEC plays an important role in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer, and the PCI is the most important criterion in this decision.

Biological reconstruction in the treatment of extremity sarcoma in femur, tibia, and humerus

To understand the feasibility, clinical effect, and complications related to biological reconstruction techniques for long limb malignant bone tumors after excision.This retrospective study included eighty patients with malignant bone tumors treated at our hospital between January 2007 and January 2019. After tumor resection, 52 cases of intercalary and 28 cases of osteoarticular bone grafts were used. The implanted bone included devitalized recycling bone, fibular, and allograft.The average follow up period was 42.19 months for 80 patients, among whom 15 (18.75%) died. The 5-year EFS and OS were 58% and 69%, respectively. The average length of the replanted bone was 18.57 cm. The MSTS scores of intercalary and osteoarticular bone grafts were 87.24% and 64.00%, respectively. In 23 cases (44.23%) of metaphyseal and 26 cases (32.5%) of the diaphysis, bone graft union was obtained at the first stage. The factors affecting bone union were the patient's gender, age, devitalization bone methods and whether the implanted bone was completely fixed. Postoperative complications included delayed bone union in 15 patients, fractures in 25 cases, nonunion in 22 cases, bone resorption in 14 cases, and postoperative infection in 4 cases. Twenty-eight cases of bone grafting required revision surgery, including replacement of internal fixation, autologous bone graft, debridement, removal of internal fixation, and replacement with prosthetic replacement.Biological reconstructions with massive bone grafts are useful in the reconstruction of certain malignant extremity bone tumors after wide excision.

Choice of first line systemic treatment in pancreatic cancer among national experts

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer depend on various factors, including performance status, tumor burden and patient preferences. Metastatic pancreatic cancer is incurable and many systemic treatment options have been investigated over the past decades. This analysis of patterns of practice was performed to identify decision criteria and their impact on the choice of first-line management of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Members of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Gastrointestinal Cancer Group were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Decision trees for the first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer from 9 centers in Switzerland were collected and analyzed based on the objective consensus methodology to identify consensus and discrepancies in clinical decision-making.

RESULTS

The final treatment algorithms included 3 decision criteria (comorbidities, performance status and age) and 5 treatment options: FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine mono and best supportive care.

CONCLUSION

We identified multiple decision criteria relevant to all participating centers. We found consensus for the treatment of young (age below 65) patients with good performance status with FOLFIRINOX. For patients with increasing age and reducing performance status there was a decreasing trend to use gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine monotherapy was typically offered to patients in the presence of comorbidities. For patients with ECOG 3-4, most of the experts recommended BSC.

Multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: An update

Standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma, based on complete surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has not substantially changed during the last several decades. Nevertheless, recent advances have contributed to considerable improvement in the management of these patients; for example, new magnetic resonance imaging sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics can better assess tumor extension and even estimate its grade. Detection of circulating genetic material (liquid biopsy) and next-generation sequencing are powerful techniques for genetic analysis, which will increase our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and may reveal potential therapeutic targets. The role of chemotherapy in non-metastatic disease is still controversial, and there is a need to identify patients who really benefit from this treatment. Novel chemotherapeutic regimens have entered clinical praxis and can change the outcome of patients with metastatic disease. Advances in radiotherapy have helped decrease local adverse effects and sustain good local control of the disease. The following report provides an updated view of the diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives on the management of patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

Synovial sarcoma disease characteristics and primary tumor sites differ between patient age groups: a report of the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS)

BACKGROUND

Older age is associated with worse outcome in synovial sarcoma (SS) patients. Differences in disease presentation among distinct age groups, however, are currently unknown.

METHODS

SS patients < 21 years registered in consecutive CWS trials over the period of 1981-2018 were evaluated. Characteristics were analyzed according to age groups using the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The study population included 432 SS patients. Disease characteristics differed according to age groups of children (0-12 years, n = 176), adolescents (13-16 years, n = 178), and young adults (17-21 years, n = 78). The proportion of invasive tumors (T2) was significantly higher in older patients: children 33%, adolescents 39% and young adults 54%, p = 0.009805. Similarly, the proportion of tumors > 10 cm was higher (13%, 21%, 31%; p = 0.005657) whereas conversely, the proportion of small tumors < 3 cm was lower in older patients (29%, 24%, 6%; p = 0.000104). The presence of metastases at first diagnosis was also highest in older patients (6%, 10%, 21%, p = 0.000963). Notably, the proportion of thigh tumors was higher in older patients (p = 0.04173), whereas the proportion of head-neck tumors was lower in older patients (p = 0.08896).

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of large, invasive tumors and the presence of metastases are significantly associated with older patient age. Localization to the thigh is more frequent in older patients.

DISCUSSION

The causes for these variations require further exploration.

Treatment Options in Oncology

Multiple treatment strategies exist for many oncologic problems. In this review, we provide a summary of various reasons for the existence of multiple treatment options in oncology, including factors that concern the treating physician (eg, treatment preferences), environmental factors (eg, financial, regulatory, and scientific aspects), and individual patient-specific factors (eg, medical condition, preferences). We demonstrate the vital role of available treatment options and their origins for clinical decision making and patient communication. These aspects are particularly helpful in the process of shared decision making, which is increasingly favored in situations where there are multiple medically reasonable options.

Patterns of care in metastatic pancreatic cancer: patient selection in clinical routine

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) is challenging, and the optimal treatment strategy is debated among experts. In an attempt to identify treatment decision criteria and to investigate variations in the first-line management of this disease, we performed an analysis of treatment algorithms among experts in the field of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to identify relevant criteria in the complex process of patient selection and decision making for the management of mPC patients.

METHODS

Experts from the ABCSG (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group) Pancreatic Cancer Club were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Eight experts from seven centers in Austria provided their decision algorithms for the first-line treatment of patients with mPC. Their responses were converted into decision trees based on the objective consensus methodology. The decision trees were used to identify consensus and discrepancies.

RESULTS

The final treatment algorithms included four decision criteria (performance status, age, comorbidities, and symptomatic disease) and six treatment options: mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine mono, 5-FU mono, gemcitabine/erlotinib, and best supportive care (BSC).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified consensus for the treatment of young and fit patients with mFOLFIRINOX. With higher age and reduced performance status, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel was increasingly used. For patients with Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 4, BSC was the treatment of choice. Among experts, different decision criteria and treatment options are implemented in clinical routine. Despite multiple options in current recommendations, a consensus for specific recommendations was identified.

Assessing the Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary High-Risk Truncal/Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis of the Multi-institutional U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is questioned. This study aimed to define which patients may experience a survival advantage with NCT.

METHODS

All the patients from the U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative database (2000-2016) who underwent curative-intent resection of high-grade, primary truncal/extremity STS size 5 cm or larger were included in this study. The primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 4153 patients, 770 were included in the study. The median tumor size was 10 cm, and 669 of the patients (87%) had extremity tumors. The most common histology was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), found in 42% of the patients. Of the 770 patients, 216 (28%) received NCT. The patients who received NCT had deeper, larger tumors (p < 0.001). Of the patients with tumors 5 cm or larger and 8 cm or larger, NCT was not associated with improved RFS or OS. However for the patients with tumors 10 cm or larger, NCT was associated with improved 5-year RFS (51% vs 40%; p = 0.053) and 5-year OS (58% vs 47%; p = 0.043). By location, the patients with extremity tumors 10 cm or larger but not truncal tumors had improved 5-yearr RFS (54% vs 42%; p = 0.042) and 5-year OS (61% vs 47%; p = 0.015) with NCT. According to histology, no subtype had improved RFS or OS with NCT, although the patients with UPS had a trend toward improved 5-year RFS (56% vs 42%; p = 0.092) and 5-year OS (66% vs 52%; p = 0.103) with NCT.

CONCLUSION

For the patients with high-grade STS, NCT was associated with improved RFS and OS when tumors were 10 cm or larger and located in the extremity. However, no histiotype-specific advantage was identified. Future studies assessing the efficacy of NCT may consider focusing on these patients, with added focus on histology-specific strategies.

Diagnostic Nodes of Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Swiss National Multicenter Survey

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal metastases is challenging, and the roles of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are unclear and debated among experts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experts of the Swiss Peritoneal Cancer Group were contacted and agreed to participate in this analysis. Experts from 9 centers in Switzerland provided their decision algorithms for CRS/HIPEC for patients with or at high risk for peritoneal metastases from CRC. Their responses were converted into decision trees on the basis of objective consensus methodology. The decision trees were used as a basis to identify consensus and discrepancies.

RESULTS

The final treatment algorithms included a total of 5 decision criteria (age, Peritoneal Cancer Index [PCI], extraperitoneal metastases, Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score, and various risk factors [RF]) and 2 treatment options (HIPEC, yes or no). HIPEC was never recommended for patients without peritoneal metastases in the absence of RF for peritoneal metastases. For patients with a PCI ≤15 without organ metastases, all centers recommended CRS/HIPEC. There was also a consensus not to perform CRS/HIPEC in elderly patients (80 years and older), those with a PCI >20, and those with unresectable metastases. For patients with a PCI = 16 to 20, there was no consensus.

CONCLUSION

Multiple decision criteria relevant to all participating centers were identified. Because patient selection for CRS/HIPEC remains difficult, uniform criteria for the term "high risk" for peritoneal metastases and systemic metastases are helpful. Future trials and guidelines should take these criteria into account.

The impact of chemotherapy on survival of patients with extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma: revisiting the results of the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised trial

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed at determining whether patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS), as identified using the nomogram Sarculator, benefitted from adjuvant chemotherapy in the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised controlled trial (RCT), which failed to detect an impact for adjuvant doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (Adj) over observation (Obs).

METHODS

Patients with extremity and trunk wall STS in the EORTC-STBSG 62931 RCT were analysed (N = 290/351). Ten-year predicted probability of overall survival (pr-OS) was calculated using the prognostic nomogram Sarculator. Patients were grouped into three categories of predicted pr-OS: high (pr-OS>66%), intermediate (51<pr-OS≤66) and low (pr-OS≤51%). OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Nomogram pr-OS was dispersed (median 72%, interquartile range 57-83%) and had prognostic value for OS and DFS (log-rank test: P < 0.001). One hundred seventy, 68 and 52 patients had high (58.6%, 90 Obs/80 Adj), intermediate (23.5%, 34 Obs/34 Adj) and low pr-OS (17.9%, 24 Obs/28 Adj), respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy halved the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.89) and death (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.94) in the low pr-OS category, while no effect was detected in intermediate and high pr-OS categories. To strengthen these findings, study participants with pr-OS<60% were combined (N = 80, 27.6%, 39 Obs/41 Adj), and a significant DFS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.85) and OS (HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.90) benefit was detected.

CONCLUSION

Patients of the EORTC-STBSG 62931 RCT with extremity and trunk wall STS and a low predicted pr-OS (high-risk patients) had better outcomes when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This may help reconcile the disparate results of clinical studies on adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy in STS.

Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines

Background

Several societies around the world issue guidelines incorporating the latest evidence. However, even the most commonly cited guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) leave the clinician with several treatment options and differ on specific points. We aimed to identify discrepancies and areas of consensus between guidelines to give novel insights into areas where low consensus between the guideline panels exists, and therefore where more evidence might increase consensus.

Methods

The webpages of the 61 members of the Societé Internationale d’Urologie were analysed to identify all listed or linked guidelines. Decision trees for the surgical management of urolithiasis were derived, and a comparative analysis was performed to determine consensus and discrepancies.

Results

Five national and one international guideline (EAU) on surgical stone treatment were available for analysis. While 7 national urological societies refer to the AUA guidelines and 11 to the EAU guidelines, 43 neither publish their own guidelines nor refer to others. Comparative analysis revealed a high degree of consensus for most renal and ureteral stone scenarios. Nevertheless, we also identified a variety of discrepancies between the different guidelines, the largest being the approach to the treatment of proximal ureteral calculi and larger renal calculi.

Conclusions

Six guidelines with recommendations for the surgical treatment of urolithiasis to support urologists in decision-making were available for inclusion in our analysis. While there is a high grade of consensus for most stone scenarios, we also detected some discrepancies between different guidelines. These are, however, controversial situations where adequate evidence to assist with decision-making has yet to be elicited by further research.