1
|
Abstract
SUMMARY As value-based care gains traction in response to towering health care expenditures and issues of health care inequity, hospital capacity, and labor shortages, it is important to consider how a value-based approach can be achieved in plastic surgery. Value is defined as outcomes divided by costs across entire cycles of care. Drawing on previous studies and policies, this article identifies key opportunities in plastic surgery to move the levers of costs and outcomes to deliver higher value care. Specifically, outcomes in plastic surgery should include conventional measures of complication rates and patient-reported outcome measures to drive quality improvement and benchmark payments. Meanwhile, cost reduction in plastic surgery can be achieved through value-based payment reform, efficient workflows, evidence-based and cost-conscious selection of medical devices, and greater use of outpatient surgical facilities. Lastly, the authors discuss how the diminished presence of third-party payers in aesthetic surgery exemplifies the cost-conscious and patient-centered nature of value-based plastic surgery. To lead in future health policy and care delivery reform, plastic surgeons should strive for high-value care, remain open to new ways of care delivery, and understand how plastic surgery fits into overall health care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thomas C Tsai
- Boston, MA
- From the Harvard Medical School
- Divisions of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
| | - Justin M Broyles
- From the Harvard Medical School
- Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang K, Sutherland JM, Liu G, Crump T, Bazzarelli A, Dingee C, Pao JS, Warburton R, McKevitt E. Preoperative depression and anxiety associated with younger age and receipt of immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 2024; 231:106-112. [PMID: 38350745 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As survivorship for breast cancer continues to improve, emphasis of care falls upon improving patients' quality of life. Understanding physical and mental health in the preoperative period is needed to aid surgical decision making and improve patient experience. METHODS Consecutive patients awaiting total mastectomy (TM), TM with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and breast conserving surgery (BCS) were prospectively recruited. Scores for PHQ-9, GAD-7, Breast-Q, EQ5D(5L), PEG were collected preoperatively. Association was measured with multivariate analyses. RESULTS 477 participants (374 BSC, 46 TM, 84 IBR) were included. Younger patients and those choosing IBR reported worse depression and anxiety symptoms. Clinical tumor features did not affect patient reported outcomes. Higher Breast-Q scores were seen with BCS and lower scores with TM. CONCLUSIONS Patients scheduled for IBR and younger patients reported worse symptoms of depression and anxiety, regardless of clinical features. This will help with surgical decision making and identify patients in need for additional perioperative supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelynn Tang
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - Jason M Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Guiping Liu
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Trafford Crump
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Amy Bazzarelli
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada; Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC, V5T 3N4, Canada.
| | - Carol Dingee
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada; Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC, V5T 3N4, Canada.
| | - Jin-Si Pao
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada; Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC, V5T 3N4, Canada.
| | - Rebecca Warburton
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada; Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC, V5T 3N4, Canada.
| | - Elaine McKevitt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada; Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC, V5T 3N4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Myers SP, Bayard S, Tadros AB, Sevilimedu V, Matros E, Nelson JA, Le T, Garcia P, Morrow M, Lee MK. Examining Race and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy with Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:966-973. [PMID: 37973646 PMCID: PMC11110644 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14527-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known regarding racial differences in satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). In this study, we aim to characterize associations between race, and postoperative satisfaction and well-being, utilizing the validated BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with stage 0-III unilateral breast cancer and underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction at our institution between 2016 and 2022. BREAST-Q surveys were administered in routine clinical care preoperatively and postoperatively to assess QOL. We assessed whether the relationship between race, and domains of satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being differed by receipt of CPM compared with unilateral mastectomy at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years following reconstruction. RESULTS Of 3334 women, 2040 (61%) underwent unilateral mastectomy and 1294 (39%) underwent CPM. Compared with White and Asian women who received CPM, Black women who underwent CPM were more likely to have higher BMI (p < 0.001), undergo autologous reconstruction (p = 0.006), and receive postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) (p < 0.001). There was no association between race and domains of satisfaction of breasts or psychosocial well-being for women who underwent unilateral mastectomy (p = 0.6 and p > 0.9, respectively) or CPM (p = 0.8 and p = 0.9, respectively). PMRT was negatively associated with both satisfaction with breasts (p < 0.001) and psychosocial well-being (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Differences in satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being at 3-year follow-up were not associated with race but rather treatment variables, particularly the receipt of PMRT. Further investigations with a larger and more diverse population are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P Myers
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Solange Bayard
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistical Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiana Le
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paula Garcia
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Minna K Lee
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Neill CJ, Morris-Baguley H, Alam AS, Carlson MA, Blefari N, Rowe CW, Fradgley EA, Paul C. Thyroid cancer patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: analysing acceptability and optimizing recruitment. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2214-2221. [PMID: 37391881 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) can provide valuable metrics in clinical trials and cancer registries. To ensure relevance, patient participation must be optimized and PROMs be highly acceptable to patients. There are few data reporting methods to maximize recruitment and a lack of consensus regarding appropriate PROMs for thyroid cancer survivors. METHODS All patients with a new diagnosis of thyroid (excluding micropapillary and anaplastic) cancer within a single Australian health district between January 2020 and December 2021 were invited to complete PROMs electronically, and self-report ease of use and comprehensiveness of each tool. Participants completed Short Form-12 (SF-12), European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-QLQ-C30), City of Hope Quality of Life-Thyroid Version (COH-TV) and Thyroid Cancer Quality of Life Survey (ThyCaQoL). Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews explored patient priorities. An enhanced, multimodal recruitment strategy was instituted after 12 months due to low response rates. RESULTS Survey completion improved under enhanced recruitment (37/62, 60% versus 19/64, 30%, P = 0.0007) with no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics. Few (4%-7%) respondents rated surveys as difficult to complete. No single PROM comprehensively captured health-related quality of life, with disease-specific tools performing marginally better (54% ThyCaQoL and 52% CoH-TV) compared to generic tools (38% SF-12 and 42% EOROTC-QLQ-C30). Qualitative data suggested that concurrent diagnoses, and survey invitation prior to surgery, made surveys more difficult to complete. CONCLUSION A comprehensive and representative assessment of PROMs in thyroid cancer survivors requires the use of multiple survey tools and specialized staff to maximize recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine J O'Neill
- Surgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Harriet Morris-Baguley
- Surgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ahmad S Alam
- Surgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa A Carlson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Blefari
- Surgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher W Rowe
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Fradgley
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Paul
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pawloski KR, Srour MK, Moo TA, Sevilimedu V, Nelson JA, Garcia P, Kirstein LJ, Morrow M, Tadros AB. Timing of Chemotherapy and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2897-2909. [PMID: 36737530 PMCID: PMC11110643 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13148-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Receipt of chemotherapy is associated with decreased satisfaction after breast surgery, but whether timing as adjuvant versus neoadjuvant (NAC) affects patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unclear. We examined associations between chemotherapy timing and PROs after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (M-IR). METHODS In this retrospective cohort study of patients with stage I-III breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy between January 2017 and December 2019, we compared satisfaction with breasts (SABTR) and chest physical well-being (PWB-CHEST) between chemotherapy groups in BCS and M-IR cohorts. Median SABTR and PWB-CHEST scores (scale 0-100) were compared between chemotherapy groups at baseline and for 3 years postoperatively. Factors associated with SABTR and PWB-CHEST at 1 and 2 years were assessed with multivariable linear regression. RESULTS Overall, 640 patients had BCS and 602 had M-IR; 210 (33%) BCS patients and 294 (49%) M-IR patients had NAC. Following BCS, SABTR was higher than baseline at all postoperative timepoints, whereas 3-year SABTR remained similar to baseline following M-IR, independent of chemotherapy timing. In both surgical cohorts, PWB-CHEST was lowest after NAC at 6 months compared with baseline but was similar to adjuvant counterparts by 3 years. NAC was not a statistically significant predictor of SABTR or PWB-CHEST in either surgical cohort on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS For patients with breast cancer who require chemotherapy, neoadjuvant versus adjuvant timing does not impact long-term PROs in this study. These findings may inform shared decision making regarding the sequence of treatment in patients with operable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate R Pawloski
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marissa K Srour
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paula Garcia
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurie J Kirstein
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamad A, Elazzazy S, Bujassoum S, Rasul K, Gaziev J, Cherif H, Al-Boloshi Z, Hanssens Y, Saleh A, Rasheed HA, Al-Badriyeh D, Babiker A, Hmaidan AA, Al-Hail M. Applying value-based strategies to accelerate access to novel cancer medications: guidance from the Oncology Health Economics Expert Panel in Qatar (Q-OHEP). BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:15. [PMID: 36609388 PMCID: PMC9816531 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08981-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In line with global trends, cancer incidence and mortality may have decreased for specific types of cancer in Qatar. However, the cancer-related burden on patients, healthcare systems, and the economy is expected to expand; thus, cancer remains a significant public healthcare issue in Qatar. Qatar's free access to cancer care represents a considerable economic burden. Ensuring the best utilization of financial resources in the healthcare sector is important to provide unified and fair access to cancer care for all patients. Experts from the Qatar Oncology Health Economics Expert Panel (Q-OHEP) aimed to establish a consistent and robust base for evaluating oncology/hematology medications; involve patients' insights to accelerate access to cutting-edge medications; increase the value of cancer care; and reach a consensus for using cost-effective strategies and efficient methodologies in cancer treatment. METHODS The Q-OHEP convened on 30 November 2021 for a 3-hour meeting to discuss cancer management, therapeutics, and health economics in Qatar, focusing on four domains: (1) regulatory, (2) procurement, (3) treatment, and (4) patients. Discussions, guided by a moderator, focused on a list of suggested open-ended questions. RESULTS Some of the salient recommendations included the development of a formal, fast-track, preliminary approval pathway for drugs needed by patients with severe disease or in critical condition; and encouraging and promoting the conduct of local clinical trials and real-world observational studies using existing registry data. The Q-OHEP also recommended implementing a forecast system using treatment center data based on the supply/demand of formulary oncology drugs to detect treatment patterns, estimate needs, expedite procurement, and prevent shortages/delays. Furthermore, the panel discussed the needs to define value concerning cancer treatment in Qatar, implement value-based models for reimbursement decision-making such as health technology assessment and multiple-criteria decision analysis, and promote patient education and involvement/feedback in developing and implementing cancer management guidelines. CONCLUSION Herein, we summarize the first Q-OHEP consensus recommendations, which aim to provide a solid basis for evaluating, registering, and approving new cancer medications to accelerate patient access to novel cancer treatments in Qatar; promote/facilitate the adoption and collection of patient-reported outcomes; and implement value-based cancer care in Qatar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Hamad
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XPharmacy Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Shereen Elazzazy
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XPharmacy Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Salha Bujassoum
- grid.466917.b0000 0004 0637 4417Medical Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Kakil Rasul
- grid.466917.b0000 0004 0637 4417Medical Oncology Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Javid Gaziev
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XHematology Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Honar Cherif
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XHematology Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Zakiya Al-Boloshi
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XDrug Supply Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Yolande Hanssens
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XPharmacy Executive Office, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ayman Saleh
- grid.467063.00000 0004 0397 4222Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Sidra Medicine, PO Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hadi Abu Rasheed
- Professional Development & Scientific Research Department, Qatar Cancer Society, PO Box 22944, Doha, Qatar
| | - Daoud Al-Badriyeh
- grid.412603.20000 0004 0634 1084College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ahmed Babiker
- grid.498619.bRegistration & Drugs Pricing Section, Pharmacy & Drug Control Department, Ministry of Public Health, PO Box 42, Doha, Qatar
| | - Amid Abu Hmaidan
- grid.498619.bNational Cancer Program, Directorate of Policy, Ministry of Public Health, PO Box 42, Doha, Qatar
| | - Moza Al-Hail
- grid.413548.f0000 0004 0571 546XPharmacy Executive Office, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McKevitt E, Saleeb M, Liu G, Warburton R, Pao JS, Dingee C, Bazzarelli A, Tang K, Crump T, Sutherland JM. Differences in Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life between Women Receiving Mastectomy or Breast Conserving Surgery in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2022; 30:118-129. [PMID: 36661659 PMCID: PMC9857337 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As rates of total mastectomy rise, the relationships between surgery modality with domains of health-related quality of life is not well understood. This study reports differences in depression, anxiety, pain, and health status among a cohort of women scheduled to receive total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patient-reported outcomes measured preoperative differences between patients receiving total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery in a cross-sectional design. Regression analyses was used to model health outcomes and adjust for patient demographics on patient measures. Participants scheduled for total mastectomy were more likely to report more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. This association was non-significant after adjusting for demographic differences. Younger participants were more likely to be scheduled for total mastectomy. Age was negatively associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Screening patients for mental health symptoms may be particularly important among younger patients who were more likely to report depression and anxiety before their surgery and were more likely to receive total mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine McKevitt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3N4, Canada
| | - Maria Saleeb
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Guiping Liu
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Rebecca Warburton
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3N4, Canada
| | - Jin-Si Pao
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3N4, Canada
| | - Carol Dingee
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3N4, Canada
| | - Amy Bazzarelli
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3N4, Canada
| | - Katelynn Tang
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Trafford Crump
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Jason M. Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou K, Bellanger M, Le Lann S, Robert M, Frenel JS, Campone M. The predictive value of patient-reported outcomes on the impact of breast cancer treatment-related quality of life. Front Oncol 2022; 12:925534. [PMID: 36313651 PMCID: PMC9613969 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been widely used to measure breast cancer (BC) treatment outcomes. However, evidence is still limited on using routinely PROs to personalize treatment decision-making, including or not chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. Using patient baseline PRO scores, we aimed to use PROs before treatment initiation to predict improvement or decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to treatment that they receive. Methods In two French cancer sites, women with non-metastatic BC completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and BREAST-Q questionnaires to assess their PROs at baseline and again at 6 months. The outcome measured was post-operative change in PROs with minimal important difference for QLQ-C30 domains. We performed multivariate ordinal logistic regression to estimate the incremental probability of post-operative PRO improvements and deteriorations depending upon treatment options and baseline HRQoL. Results One hundred twenty-seven women completed questionnaires. Chemotherapy had significant negative impacts on Global health status (GHS) and on physical and social functioning. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased patient fatigue scores after adjusting for clinical factors (p< 0.01 and p< 0.05, respectively). The incremental probability of GHS deteriorations for chemotherapy was +0.3, +0.5, and +0.34 for patients with baseline GHS scores of 40, 70, and 100, respectively. This showed that different pre-treatment PROs might predict differential effects of chemotherapy on women change in HRQoL. Conclusion Patients with different baseline PRO scores may experience dissimilar impacts from BC treatments on post-operative PROs in terms of improvements and deteriorations. Oncologists might decide to adapt the treatment option based on a given level of the negative impact. Future studies should concentrate on incorporating this information into routine clinical decision-making strategies to optimize the treatment benefit for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Zhou
- Department of Human and Social Sciences, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
- *Correspondence: Ke Zhou,
| | - Martine Bellanger
- Department of Human and Social Sciences, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
- UMR CNRS6051 Rennes1 – EHESP School of Public Health, Rennes, France
| | - Sophie Le Lann
- Department of Quality, Risk Management and Organization, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Marie Robert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Sebastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
- CRCINA Team 8, UMR 1232 INSERM, Université de Nantes, Université d’Angers, Institut de Recherche en Santé-Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
- SIRIC ILIAD, Institut de Recherche en Santé-Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
- CRCINA Team 8, UMR 1232 INSERM, Université de Nantes, Université d’Angers, Institut de Recherche en Santé-Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
- SIRIC ILIAD, Institut de Recherche en Santé-Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kantor O, Dominici L. Recognizing Disparities in Breast Cancer Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7945-7946. [PMID: 36167938 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12537-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Kantor
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura Dominici
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Vasconcelos Silva ACP, Araujo BM, Spiegel T, da Cunha Reis A. May value-based healthcare practices contribute to comprehensive care for cancer patients? A systematic literature review. J Cancer Policy 2022; 34:100350. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
11
|
Allar BG, Eruchalu CN, Rahman S, Mou D, Ortega G, Reich A, Pusic A, Brook CD, Sisodia R, Bergmark RW. Lost in translation: A qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to collecting patient reported outcome measures for surgical patients with limited English proficiency. Am J Surg 2022; 224:514-521. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
Nagra NS, Tsangaris E, Means J, Hassett MJ, Dominici LS, Bellon JR, Broyles J, Kaplan RS, Feeley TW, Pusic AL. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Breast Cancer Care Delivery. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:510-521. [PMID: 34374913 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10465-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate measurement of healthcare costs is required to assess and improve the value of oncology care. OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine the cost of breast cancer care provision across collaborating health care organizations. METHODS We used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to calculate the complete cost of breast cancer care-initial treatment planning, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical resection and reconstruction, and ancillary services (e.g., psychosocial oncology, physical therapy)-across multiple hospital sites. Data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020. TDABC steps involved (1) developing process maps for care delivery pathways; (2) determine capacity cost rates for staff, medical equipment, and hospital space; (3) measure the time required for each process step, both manually through clinic observation and using data from the Real-Time Location System (RTLS); and (4) calculate the total cost of care delivery. RESULTS Surgical care costs ranged from $1431 for a lumpectomy to $12,129 for a mastectomy with prepectoral implant reconstruction. Radiation therapy was costed at $1224 for initial simulation and patient education, and $200 for each additional treatment. Base costs for chemotherapy delivery were $382 per visit, with additional costs driven by chemotherapy agent(s) administered. Personnel expenses were the greatest contributor to the cost of surgical care, except in mastectomy with implant reconstruction, where device costs equated to up to 60% of the cost of surgery. CONCLUSION The cost of complete breast cancer care depended on (1) treatment protocols; (2) patient choice of reconstruction; and (3) the need for ancillary services (e.g., physical therapy). Understanding the actual costs and cost drivers of breast cancer care delivery may better inform resource utilization to lower the cost and improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navraj S Nagra
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Elena Tsangaris
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Means
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Justin Broyles
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert S Kaplan
- Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas W Feeley
- Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|