1
|
Pirsl F, Calkins K, Rudolph JE, Wentz E, Xu X, Lau B, Joshu CE. Incidence of prostate cancer in Medicaid beneficiaries with and without HIV in 2001-2015 in 14 states. AIDS Care 2024:1-11. [PMID: 39079500 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2024.2383875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence is reportedly lower in men with HIV compared to men without HIV for unknown reasons. We describe PCa incidence by HIV status in Medicaid beneficiaries, allowing for comparison of men with and without HIV who are similar with respect to socioeconomic characteristics and access to healthcare. Men (N = 15,167,636) aged 18-64 with ≥7 months of continuous enrollment during 2001-2015 in 14 US states were retained for analysis. Diagnoses of HIV and PCa were identified using non-drug claims. We estimated cause-specific (csHR) comparing incidence of PCa by HIV status, adjusted for age, race-ethnicity, state of residence, year of enrollment, and comorbid conditions, and stratified by age and race-ethnicity. Hazard of PCa was lower in men with HIV than men without HIV (csHR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.99), but varied by race-ethnicity, with similar observations among non-Hispanic Black (csHR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.91) and Hispanic (csHR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.09), but not non-Hispanic white men (csHR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.50). Findings were similar in models restricted to men aged 50-64 and 40-49, but not in men aged 18-39. Reported deficits in PCa incidence by HIV status may be restricted to specific groups defined by age and race ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Pirsl
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Keri Calkins
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Mathematica, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jacqueline E Rudolph
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eryka Wentz
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Xiaoqiang Xu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bryan Lau
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Corinne E Joshu
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suneja G, Kimani SM, Gill H, Painschab MS, Knettel BA, Watt MH. Addressing the Intersectional Stigma of Kaposi Sarcoma and HIV: A Call to Action. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300264. [PMID: 38301182 PMCID: PMC10846783 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gita Suneja
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Stephen M. Kimani
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Hailie Gill
- Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Matthew S. Painschab
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Brandon A. Knettel
- School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Melissa H. Watt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khouri A, Stephens MJ, Young J, Galyean P, Knettel BA, Cherenack EM, Zickmund S, Watt MH, Bartlett J, Pollak KI, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A, Suneja G. Cancer Treatment Decision-Making for People Living With HIV: Physician-Reported Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2023; 94:482-489. [PMID: 37949449 PMCID: PMC10642692 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with the general cancer population, people living with HIV (PLWH) and cancer are less likely to receive treatment and have significantly elevated cancer-specific mortality for many common cancer types. Physician recommendations drive the cancer therapy that patients receive, yet there is limited information assessing how cancer treatment decisions are made for people living with HIV and cancer. We sought to understand oncologist decision-making in PLWH and cancer by eliciting barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for enhancing care delivery. SETTING Participants were recruited between May 2019 and May 2021 from one academic medical center in the western United States (n = 13), another in the southeastern United States (n = 7), and community practices nationwide (n = 5). METHODS Using an inductive qualitative approach, we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 oncologists from two academic medical centers and community practices. RESULTS Facilitators of cancer care delivery included readily available information regarding HIV status and stage, interdepartmental communication, and antiviral therapy adherence. Barriers included a lack of formal education on HIV malignancies, perceptions of decreased life expectancy, fear of inadvertent disclosure, and drug-drug interactions. Recommendations included improved provider communication, patient social and mental health resources, and continuing education opportunities. CONCLUSION The study revealed drivers of cancer treatment decision-making, highlighting physician-reported barriers and facilitators, and recommendations to support treatment decision-making. This is the first known study examining oncologists' perceptions of caring for PLWH. Given that cancer is a leading cause of death among PLWH, there is an urgent need to improve care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Khouri
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Maya J. Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jeanette Young
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Patrick Galyean
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brandon A. Knettel
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Susan Zickmund
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Melissa H. Watt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Bartlett
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Peter A. Ubel
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC; and
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Salt Lake City VA Center for Informatics, Decision Enhancement, and Surveillance (IDEAS), Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Henry V, Stephens MJ, Galyean P, Young J, Zickmund S, Knettel BA, Bartlett J, Watt MH, Pollak KI, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A, Suneja G. Improving Cancer Care for People Living With HIV: A Qualitative Study of Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:60-67. [PMID: 36724857 PMCID: PMC11349291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer is now the leading cause of non-AIDS death in the US population with HIV. People living with HIV (PLWH) are known to have lower cancer treatment rates and worse cancer outcomes. Disparate cancer treatment is driven by health system, patient, and clinician factors. Little attention has been given to the factors oncologists consider when making cancer treatment recommendations to PLWH. This study sought to examine oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices that influence cancer treatment decision-making. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study used qualitative methods to explore oncologists' treatment decision-making processes for PLWH and cancer. The sample included 25 radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists from 2 academic centers and 5 community practices. The interview domains were developed from the Andersen Healthcare Utilization Model, the Health Belief Model, and the PEN-3 Model, as well as our prior survey research. RESULTS This study describes elements of cancer treatment decision-making for PLWH. Oncologists highlighted the need for formal HIV education to support cancer treatment. One main concern with patient-provider interactions pertained to maintaining patient confidentiality during clinical encounters. Lastly, the importance of multidisciplinary care among health care providers allowed oncologists to facilitate both cancer care and logistical support. CONCLUSIONS As cancer becomes an increasingly common cause of death among PLWH, it is critical to understand the drivers of the observed disparities in cancer treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to describe oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward patients who have a comorbid diagnosis of HIV and cancer. Several themes for future interventions emerge, including HIV training for cancer care providers, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, enhancing HIV education for oncology learners and clinicians, and minimizing implicit bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valencia Henry
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, South Carolina
| | - Maya J Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Patrick Galyean
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jeanette Young
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Susan Zickmund
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Brandon A Knettel
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John Bartlett
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Melissa H Watt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Salt Lake City VA Center for Informatics, Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Islam JY, Nogueira L, Suneja G, Coghill A, Akinyemiju T. Palliative Care Use Among People Living With HIV and Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2018). JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1683-e1693. [PMID: 35867956 PMCID: PMC9663140 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE People living with HIV (PLWH) diagnosed with cancer are less likely to receive quality cancer treatment compared with HIV-negative patients. Timely provision of palliative care (PC) during cancer treatment can increase patient's survival and improve quality of life. Our objective was to compare the use of PC by HIV status among adults diagnosed with cancer in the United States. METHODS More than 19 million individuals age 18-90 years diagnosed with the 11 most common cancers among PLWH were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004-2018). The National Cancer Database defined PC as any surgery, radiation, systemic therapy, or pain management treatment with noncurative intent. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between HIV status and PC receipt by cancer site and stage after adjustment for covariates. RESULTS The study population included 52,306 HIV-positive (average age: 56.5 years) and 19,115,520 HIV-negative (average age: 63.7 years) cancer cases. PLWH diagnosed with stage I-III cancer were more likely to receive PC compared with their HIV-negative counterparts (adjusted odds ratio [aO]: 1.96; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.14); however, they were also less likely to receive curative cancer treatment (aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.59). PLWH diagnosed with stage IV cancer were less likely to receive PC (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.74) compared with HIV-negative patients. When evaluated by cancer site, PLWH diagnosed with stage IV lung (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.87) and colorectal (aOR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95) cancers were less likely to receive PC than HIV-negative patients. CONCLUSION PLWH diagnosed with stage IV cancer, particularly lung and colorectal cancers, were less likely to receive PC compared with cancer patients without HIV. PLWH with nonmetastatic disease were more likely to receive PC but less likely to receive curative treatment, reinforcing that clinical strategies are needed to improve the quality of care among PLWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y. Islam
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, Center for Immunization and Infection in Cancer, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Gita Suneja
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Anna Coghill
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, Center for Immunization and Infection in Cancer, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Tomi Akinyemiju
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|