1
|
Baiocco G, Bartzsch S, Conte V, Friedrich T, Jakob B, Tartas A, Villagrasa C, Prise KM. A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2022; 61:545-559. [PMID: 36220965 PMCID: PMC9630194 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-00989-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The outcome of the exposure of living organisms to ionizing radiation is determined by the distribution of the associated energy deposition at different spatial scales. Radiation proceeds through ionizations and excitations of hit molecules with an ~ nm spacing. Approaches such as nanodosimetry/microdosimetry and Monte Carlo track-structure simulations have been successfully adopted to investigate radiation quality effects: they allow to explore correlations between the spatial clustering of such energy depositions at the scales of DNA or chromosome domains and their biological consequences at the cellular level. Physical features alone, however, are not enough to assess the entity and complexity of radiation-induced DNA damage: this latter is the result of an interplay between radiation track structure and the spatial architecture of chromatin, and further depends on the chromatin dynamic response, affecting the activation and efficiency of the repair machinery. The heterogeneity of radiation energy depositions at the single-cell level affects the trade-off between cell inactivation and induction of viable mutations and hence influences radiation-induced carcinogenesis. In radiation therapy, where the goal is cancer cell inactivation, the delivery of a homogenous dose to the tumour has been the traditional approach in clinical practice. However, evidence is accumulating that introducing heterogeneity with spatially fractionated beams (mini- and microbeam therapy) can lead to significant advantages, particularly in sparing normal tissues. Such findings cannot be explained in merely physical terms, and their interpretation requires considering the scales at play in the underlying biological mechanisms, suggesting a systemic response to radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Baiocco
- Radiation Biophysics and Radiobiology Group, Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Valeria Conte
- Istituto Nazionale Di Fisica Nucleare INFN, Laboratori Nazionali Di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Burkhard Jakob
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Adrianna Tartas
- Biomedical Physics Division, Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Carmen Villagrasa
- IRSN, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - Kevin M Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pfuhl T, Friedrich T, Scholz M. A double-strand-break model for the relative biological effectiveness of electrons based on ionization clustering. Med Phys 2022; 49:5562-5575. [PMID: 35686448 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of ionizing radiation regarding DNA damage induction depends on its spatial energy deposition pattern. For electrons an increased effectiveness is observed at low kinetic energies due to the enhanced density of energy deposition events at electron track ends. PURPOSE A model is presented, which enables the calculation of the double-strand-break (DSB) yield and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for DSB induction of electrons. METHODS The model applies the mean free path between two ionizations and the assumption that two ionizations within a certain threshold distance are necessary to potentially lead to a DSB. Next to an expression for the electron RBE according to its common definition, a local RBE is determined, which describes the electrons' local effectiveness at a defined point on their track. RESULTS This local RBE allows a better understanding of microscopic processes resulting from radiation and can be used, for instance, to describe the mean effectiveness of the mixed electron radiation field as a function of the radial distance to the center of an ion track. CONCLUSIONS The presented model reflects the experimentally observed increased effectiveness of low-energetic electrons. It will be used in a future work to improve RBE predictions for ions performed with the local effect model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabea Pfuhl
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schneider U, Vasi F, Schmidli K, Besserer J. A model of radiation action based on nanodosimetry and the application to ultra-soft X-rays. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2020; 59:439-450. [PMID: 32277259 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-020-00842-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
A radiation action model based on nanodosimetry is presented. It is motivated by the finding that the biological effects of various types of ionizing radiation lack a consistent relation with absorbed dose. It is postulated that the common fundamental cause of these effects is the production of elementary sublesions (DSB), which are created at a rate that is proportional to the probability to produce more than two ionisations within a volume of 10 base pairs of the DNA. The concepts of nanodosimetry allow for a quantitative characterization of this process in terms of the cumulative probability F2. The induced sublesions can interact in two ways to produce lethal damage. First, if two or more sublesions accumulate in a locally limited spherical volume of 3-10 nm in diameter, clustered DNA damage is produced. Second, consequent interactions or rearrangements of some of the initial damage over larger distances (~ µm) can produce additional lethal damage. From the comparison of theoretical predictions deduced from this concept with experimental data on relative biological effectiveness, a cluster volume with a diameter of 7.5 nm could be determined. It is shown that, for electrons, the predictions agree well with experimental data over a wide energy range. The only free parameter needed to model cell survival is the intersection cross-section which includes all relevant cell-specific factors. Using ultra-soft X-rays it could be shown that the energy dependence of cell survival is directly governed by the nanodosimetric characteristics of the radiation track structure. The cell survival model derived in this work exhibits exponential cell survival at a high dose and a finite gradient of cell survival at vanishing dose, as well as the dependence on dose-rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Schneider
- Department of Physics, Science Faculty, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Fabiano Vasi
- Department of Physics, Science Faculty, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Schmidli
- Department of Physics, Science Faculty, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Besserer
- Department of Physics, Science Faculty, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kochan JA, van den Belt M, von der Lippe J, Desclos ECB, Steurer B, Hoebe RA, Scutigliani EM, Verhoeven J, Stap J, Bosch R, Rijpkema M, van Oven C, van Veen HA, Stellingwerf I, Vriend LEM, Marteijn JA, Aten JA, Krawczyk PM. Ultra-soft X-ray system for imaging the early cellular responses to X-ray induced DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:e100. [PMID: 31318974 PMCID: PMC6753493 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of the proteins involved in processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) accumulate at the damage sites. Real-time imaging and analysis of these processes, triggered by the so-called microirradiation using UV lasers or heavy particle beams, yielded valuable insights into the underlying DSB repair mechanisms. To study the temporal organization of DSB repair responses triggered by a more clinically-relevant DNA damaging agent, we developed a system coined X-ray multi-microbeam microscope (XM3), capable of simultaneous high dose-rate (micro)irradiation of large numbers of cells with ultra-soft X-rays and imaging of the ensuing cellular responses. Using this setup, we analyzed the changes in real-time kinetics of MRE11, MDC1, RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1—proteins involved in the signaling axis of mammalian DSB repair—in response to X-ray and UV laser-induced DNA damage, in non-cancerous and cancer cells and in the presence or absence of a photosensitizer. Our results reveal, for the first time, the kinetics of DSB signaling triggered by X-ray microirradiation and establish XM3 as a powerful platform for real-time analysis of cellular DSB repair responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub A Kochan
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Cell Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Matthias van den Belt
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia von der Lippe
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C B Desclos
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Steurer
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron A Hoebe
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Enzo M Scutigliani
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Stap
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben Bosch
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meindert Rijpkema
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carel van Oven
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk A van Veen
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Stellingwerf
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne E M Vriend
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen A Marteijn
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob A Aten
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Przemek M Krawczyk
- Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assessment of Radio-Induced Damage in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with 40 kVp, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays by Means of Micro and Nanodosimetric Calculations. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20246204. [PMID: 31835321 PMCID: PMC6940891 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20246204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this work was to study the differences in terms of early biological effects that might exist between different X-rays energies by using a mechanistic approach. To this end, radiobiological experiments exposing cell monolayers to three X-ray energies were performed in order to assess the yields of early DNA damage, in particular of double-strand breaks (DSBs). The simulation of these irradiations was set in order to understand the differences in the obtained experimental results. Hence, simulated results in terms of microdosimetric spectra and early DSB induction were analyzed and compared to the experimental data. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were irradiated with 40, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays. The Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit and its extension Geant4-DNA were used for the simulations. Microdosimetric calculations aiming to determine possible differences in the variability of the energy absorbed by the irradiated cell population for those photon spectra were performed on 10,000 endothelial cell nuclei representing a cell monolayer. Nanodosimetric simulations were also carried out using a computation chain that allowed the simulation of physical, physico-chemical, and chemical stages on a single realistic endothelial cell nucleus model including both heterochromatin and euchromatin. DNA damage was scored in terms of yields of prompt DSBs per Gray (Gy) and per giga (109) base pair (Gbp) and DSB complexity was derived in order to be compared to experimental data expressed as numbers of histone variant H2AX (γ-H2AX) foci per cell. The calculated microdosimetric spread in the irradiated cell population was similar when comparing between 40 and 220 kVp X-rays and higher when comparing with 4 MV X-rays. Simulated yields of induced DSB/Gy/Gbp were found to be equivalent to those for 40 and 220 kVp but larger than those for 4 MV, resulting in a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.3. Additionally, DSB complexity was similar between the considered photon spectra. Simulated results were in good agreement with experimental data obtained by IRSN (Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire) radiobiologists. Despite differences in photon energy, few differences were observed when comparing between 40 and 220 kVp X-rays in microdosimetric and nanodosimetric calculations. Nevertheless, variations were observed when comparing between 40/220 kVp and 4 MV X-rays. Thanks to the simulation results, these variations were able to be explained by the differences in the production of secondary electrons with energies below 10 keV.
Collapse
|
6
|
Clustered DNA Damages induced by 0.5 to 30 eV Electrons. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20153749. [PMID: 31370253 PMCID: PMC6695612 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Low-energy electrons (LEEs) of energies ≤30 eV are generated in large quantities by ionizing radiation. These electrons can damage DNA; particularly, they can induce the more detrimental clustered lesions in cells. This type of lesions, which are responsible for a large portion of the genotoxic stress generated by ionizing radiation, is described in the Introduction. The reactions initiated by the collisions of 0.5-30 eV electrons with oligonucleotides, duplex DNA, and DNA bound to chemotherapeutic platinum drugs are explained and reviewed in the subsequent sections. The experimental methods of LEE irradiation and DNA damage analysis are described with an emphasis on the detection of cluster lesions, which are considerably enhanced in DNA-Pt-drug complexes. Based on the energy dependence of damage yields and cross-sections, a mechanism responsible for the clustered lesions can be attributed to the capture of a single electron by the electron affinity of an excited state of a base, leading to the formation of transient anions at 6 and 10 eV. The initial capture is followed by electronic excitation of the base and dissociative attachment-at other DNA sites-of the electron reemitted from the temporary base anion. The mechanism is expected to be universal in the cellular environment and plays an important role in the formation of clustered lesions.
Collapse
|