The Development of the Sauropsid Integument: A Contribution to the Problem of the Origin and Evolution of Feathers1

Skin hydrophobicity as an adaptation for self-cleaning in geckos

Hydrophobicity is common in plants and animals, typically caused by high relief microtexture functioning to keep the surface clean. Although the occurrence and physical causes of hydrophobicity are well understood, ecological factors promoting its evolution are unclear. Geckos have highly hydrophobic integuments. We predicted that, because the ground is dirty and filled with pathogens, high hydrophobicity should coevolve with terrestrial microhabitat use. Advancing contact-angle (ACA) measurements of water droplets were used to quantify hydrophobicity in 24 species of Australian gecko. We reconstructed the evolution of ACA values, in relation to microhabitat use of geckos. To determine the best set of structural characteristics associated with the evolution of hydrophobicity, we used linear models fitted using phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS), and then model averaging based on AICc values. All species were highly hydrophobic (ACA > 132.72°), but terrestrial species had significantly higher ACA values than arboreal ones. The evolution of longer spinules and smaller scales was correlated with high hydrophobicity. These results suggest that hydrophobicity has coevolved with terrestrial microhabitat use in Australian geckos via selection for long spinules and small scales, likely to keep their skin clean and prevent fouling and disease.

Gap and tight junctions in the formation of feather branches: A descriptive ultrastructural study

The present study has focused on the distribution and ultrastructure of gap and tight junctions responsible for the formation of the barb/barbule branching in developing feathers using immunocytochemical detection. Apart from desmosomes, both tight and gap junctions are present between differentiating barb/barbule cells and during keratinization. While gap junctions are rare along the perimeter of these cells, tight junctions tend to remain localized in nodes joining barbule cells and between barb cells of the ramus. Occludin and connexin-26 but not connexin-43 have been detected between barb medullary, barb cortical and barbule cells during formation of barbs. Gap junctions are present in supportive cells located in the vicinity of barbule cells and destined to degenerate, but no close junctions are present between supportive and barb/barbule cells. Close junctions mature into penta-laminar junctions that are present between mature barb/barbule cells. Immunolabeling for occludin and Cx26 is rare along these cornified junctions. The junctions allow barb/barbule cells to remain connected until feather-keratin form the mature corneous syncytium that constitutes the barbs. A discussion of the role of gap and tight junctions during feather morphogenesis is presented.

Wedge cells during regeneration of juvenile and adult feathers and their role in carving out the branching pattern of barbs

The present ultrastructural study on regenerating feathers emphasizes the role of supportive cells in determining the branching pattern of barbs. Supportive cells are localized among developing barb and barbule cells, in marginal plates, and underneath the feather sheath, and their differentiative fate, in general, is a form of lipid degeneration. The Latter process determines the carving out of barb branching in both downfeathers and pennaceous feathers. In the latter feathers, some supportive cells (barb vane cells and cylindrical cells of marginal plates) degenerate within each barb ridge leaving separate barbules. Other supportive cells, here termed wedge cells, form columns of cornified material that merge into elongated corneous scaffolds localized among barbs and the rachis. This previously undescribed form of cornification of supportive cells derives from the aggregation of periderm and dense granules present in wedge cells. The latter cells give origin to a corneous material different from feather keratin that may initially sustain the early and soft barbules. After barbules are cornified the supportive cells scaffolds are eventually sloughed as the sheath breaks allowing the new feather to open up and form a planar vane. The corneous material of wedge cells may also contribute to molding of the overlapped nodes of barbule cells that form lateral spines or hooklets in mature barbules. Eventually, the disappearance of wedge cell scaffolding determines the regular spacing of barbs attached to the rachis in order to form a close vane.

Cell structure of barb ridges in down feathers and juvenile wing feathers of the developing chick embryo: Barb ridge modification in relation to feather evolution

The present study deals with the cell structure and three-dimensional organization of barb and barbule cells within barb ridges of down feathers and juvenile feathers in the chick embryo. Juvenile feathers represent the second generation of feathers in the wing, and replace down feathers some weeks after hatching. Within the follicle of juvenile feathers, at 16-18 days of embryonic development, barb ridges are more numerous than in down feathers. Barb ridges of juvenile feathers contain more cells in their barbule and axial plates with respect to barb ridges of down feathers. This condition determines the formation of longer barbules inserted in the rami of juvenile feathers than barbules of down feathers. Barb ridges of juvenile feathers merge with the rachidial ridge so that pennaceous feathers are formed. Barbule cells are surrounded by cytoplasmic elongation from barb vane ridge cells located in the axial plate, which constitute most of the axial plate. The degeneration of supportive cells among barbule cells branching from barbs determine the formation of spaces between barbules. The study emphasizes that, in addition to the size of the dermal papilla, it is the length of barb ridges and the infiltration of barb ridge vane cells among barbule cells that determine the size and length of feathers. The knowledge of the cell structure of barb ridges allows understanding not only of how feathers develop but also gives insights into their evolution. Based on changes of the process of barb ridge morphogenesis some hypotheses on the evolution of plumulaceous and pennaceous feathers are presented. Feathers derived from the process of carving-out supportive cells within barb ridges and from the specific pattern of fusion of barb/barbule cells. This process initially produced variably branched down feathers and later, after barb ridge fusion, a rachis. From the modulation in the pattern of barb ridge formation various pennaceous feathers later evolved.

Cytochemical, biochemical and molecular aspects of the process of keratinization in the epidermis of reptilian scales

The characteristics of scaled skin of reptiles is one of their main features that distinguish them from the other amniotes, birds and mammals. The different scale patterns observed in extant reptiles result from a long evolutive history that allowed each species to adapt to its specific environment. The present review deals with comparative aspects of epidermal keratinization in reptiles, chelonians (turtles and tortoises), lepidosaurian (lizards, snakes, sphenodontids), archosaurians (crocodilians). Initially the morphology and cytology of reptilian scales is outlined to show the diversity in the epidermis among different groups. The structural proteins (alpha-keratins and associated proteins), and enzymes utilized to form the corneous layer of the epidermis are presented. Aside cytokeratins (alpha-keratins), used for making the cytoskeleton, reptilian alpha-keratinocytes produce interkeratin (matrix) and corneous cell envelope proteins. Keratin bundles and degraded cell organelles constitute most of the corneous material of alpha-keratinocytes. Matrix, histidine-rich and sulfur-rich proteins are produced in the soft epidermis and accumulated in the cornified cell envelope. Main emphasis is given to the composition and to the evolution of the hard keratins (beta-keratins). Beta-keratins constitute the hard corneous material of scales. These small proteins are synthesized in beta-keratinocytes and are accumulated into small packets that rapidly merge into a compact corneous material and form densely cornified layers. Beta-keratins are smaller proteins (8-20 kDa) in comparison to alpha-keratins (40-70 kDa), and this size may determine their dense packing in corneocytes. Both glycine-sulfur-rich and glycine-proline-rich proteins have been so far sequenced in the corneous material of scales in few reptilian species. The latter keratins possess C- and N-amino terminal amino acid regions with sequence homology with those of mammalian hard keratins. Also, reptilian beta-keratins possess a central core with homology with avian scale/feather keratins. Multiple genes code for these proteins and their discovery and sequentiation is presently an active field of research. These initial findings however suggest that ancient reptiles already possessed some common genes that have later diversified to produce the specific keratin-associated proteins in their descendants: extant reptiles, birds and mammals. The evolution of these small proteins in lepidosaurians, chelonians and archosaurians represent the next step to understand the evolution of cornification in reptiles and derived amniotes (birds and mammals).

Structural and Immunocytochemical Characterization of Keratinization in Vertebrate Epidermis and Epidermal Derivatives

This review presents comparative aspects of epidermal keratinization in vertebrates, with emphasis on the evolution of the stratum corneum in land vertebrates. The epidermis of fish does not contain proteins connected with interkeratin matrix and corneous cell envelope formation. Mucus-like material glues loose keratin filaments. In amphibians a cell corneous envelope forms but matrix proteins, aside from mucus/glycoproteins, are scarce or absent. In reptiles, birds, and mammals specific proteins associated with keratin become relevant for the production of a resistant corneous layer. In reptiles some matrix, histidine-rich and sulfur-rich corneous cell envelope proteins are produced in the soft epidermis. In avian soft epidermis low levels of matrix and cornified proteins are present while lipids become abundant. In mammalian keratinocytes, interkeratin proteins, cornified cell envelope proteins, and transglutaminase are present. Topographically localized areas of dermal-epidermal interactions in amniote skin determine the formation of skin derivatives such as scales, feathers, and hairs. New types of keratin and associated proteins are produced in these derivatives. In reptiles and birds beta-keratins form the hard corneous material of scales, claws, beaks, and feathers. In mammals, small sulfur-rich and glycine-tyrosine-rich proteins form the corneous material of hairs, horns, hooves, and claws. Molecular studies on reptilian beta-keratins show they are glycine-rich proteins. They have C- and N-terminal amino acid regions homologous to those of mammalian proteins and a central core with homology to avian scale/feather keratins. These findings suggest that ancient reptiles already possessed some common genes that later diversified to produce some keratin-associated protein in extant reptiles and birds, and others in mammals. The evolution of these small proteins represents the more recent variation of the process of cornification in vertebrates.

Born in a follicle—a historical perspective

A review of major studies of tetrapod skin development since the 1870s illustrates how knowledge of structure and mechanism progressed through phases emphasizing Natural History, morphology, endocrinology, and tissue manipulation prior to the prevailing "molecular era." Each successive phase of investigation, while suffering from its own limitations and constraints, has produced conceptual advances. At various times, different systems in various organisms have been research models of choice for practical and/or technical reasons. Comparative studies of scaled and non-scaled integuments and appendages thereof, e.g., nails, claws, glands, hair, and especially feathers, revealed data that suggested new directions for research programs. Some non-mammalian models still offer unique opportunities for pursuit of specific questions pertinent to studies of hair: arguments between American and British schools concerning feather development that originated in the 1930s remain unresolved and may thus affect interpretation of recent investigations. The current emphasis on the study of diffusible molecules involved in papilla-follicle interactions in hair development and replacement can only be understood in the context of the interwoven history of questions relating sequentially to evolutionary homology, physiological controls of tissue homeostasis, embryonic induction, and, most recently, molecular genetics.

Characterization of beta-keratins and associated proteins in adult and regenerating epidermis of lizards

Reptilian epidermis contains two types of keratin, soft (alpha) and hard (beta). The biosynthesis and molecular weight of beta-keratin during differentiation of lizard epidermis have been studied by autoradiography, immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting. Tritiated proline is mainly incorporated into differentiating and maturing beta-keratin cells with a pattern similar to that observed after immunostaining with a chicken beta-keratin antibody. While the antibody labels a mature form of beta-keratin incorporated in large filaments, the autoradiographic analysis shows that beta-keratin is produced within the first 30 min in ribosomes, and is later packed into large filaments. Also the dermis incorporates high amount of proline for the synthesis of collagen. The skin was separated into epidermis and dermis, which were analyzed separately by protein extraction and electrophoresis. In the epidermal extract proline-labeled proteic bands at 10, 15, 18-20, 42-45, 52-56, 85-90 and 120 kDa appear at 1, 3 and 5 h post-injection. The comparison with the dermal extract shows only the 85-90 and 120 kDa bands, which correspond to collagen. Probably the glycine-rich sequences of collagen present also in beta-keratins are weakly recognized by the beta-1 antibody. Immunoblotting with the beta-keratin antibody identifies proteic bands according to the isolation method. After-saline or urea-thiol extraction bands at 10-15, 18-20, 40, 55 and 62 kDa appear. After extraction and carboxymethylation, weak bands at 10-15, 18-20 and 30-32 kDa are present in some preparations, while in others also bands at 55 and 62 kDa are present. It appears that the lowermost bands at 10-20 kDa are simple beta-keratins, while those at 42-56 kDa are complex or polymeric forms of beta-keratins. The smallest beta-keratins (10-20 kDa) may be early synthesized proteins that are polymerized into larger beta-keratins which are then packed to form larger filaments. Some proline-labeled bands differ from those produced after injection of tritiated histidine. The latter treatment does not show 10-20 kDa labeled proteins, but tends to show bands at 27, 30-33, 40-42 and 50-62 kDa. Histidine-labeled proteins mainly localize in keratohyalin-like granules and dark keratin bundles of clear-oberhautchen layers of lizard epidermis, and their composition is probably different from that of beta-keratin.

At the feet of the dinosaurs: the early history and radiation of lizards

Lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians together constitute the Squamata, the largest and most diverse group of living reptiles. Despite their current success, the early squamate fossil record is extremely patchy. The last major survey of squamate palaeontology and evolution was published 20 years ago. Since then, there have been major changes in systematic theory and methodology, as well as a steady trickle of new fossil finds. This review examines our current understanding of the first 150 million years of squamate evolution in the light of the new data and changing ideas. Contrary to previous reports, no squamate fossils are currently documented before the Jurassic. Nonetheless, indirect evidence predicts that squamates had evolved by at least the middle Triassic, and had diversified into existing major lineages before the end of this period. There is thus a major gap in the squamate record at a time when key morphological features were evolving. With the exception of fragmentary remains from Africa and India, Jurassic squamates are known only from localities in northern continents (Laurasia). The situation improves in the Early Cretaceous, but the southern (Gondwanan) record remains extremely poor. This constrains palaeobiogeographic discussion and makes it difficult to predict centres of origin for major squamate clades on the basis of fossil evidence alone. Preliminary mapping of morphological characters onto a consensus tree demonstrates stages in the sequence of acquisition for some characters of the skull and postcranial skeleton, but many crucial stages--most notably those relating to the acquisition of squamate skull kinesis--remain unclear.

Ultrastructural autoradiographic and immunocytochemical analysis of setae formation and keratinization in the digital pads of the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus (Gekkonidae, Reptilia)

The modified subdigital scales of some lizards allow them to climb vertical surfaces. This is due to the action of millions of tiny setae present in the digital pads. Setae are mainly composed of beta-keratin which may have some modality of aggregation similar to that of barbs and barbules of feathers. Keratins and associated proteins are involved in the organization of setae. The formation of setae in the climbing pad lamellae of the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus has been analyzed under the electron microscope after injection of tritiated histidine and immunocytochemistry for a chick scale beta-keratin. Setae are made up of dense and pale filaments, both oriented along the longer axis of setae. Beta-keratin is present in the oberhautchen layer and in the growing setae which are highly modified oberhautchen cells. Most of the immunolabeling concentrated in the central part of setae. This cross-reactivity suggests that some epitopes in chick beta-keratin are also present in gecko setae. Four hours after injection of tritiated histidine, the labeling is localized over setae, in particular in the dense filaments and less in the pale filaments. Some labeling is also seen in the keratinaceous material present in the cytoplasm of clear cells, which are believed to mold setae. The present observations suggest that both beta-keratin and denser matrix proteins, possibly incorporating histidine, are packed into growing setae. These proteins may be mixed to form pale and dense filaments oriented along the longer axis of setae, a pattern resembling that of barb and barbule cells of feathers. The role of matrix material in the orientation of the deposited beta-keratin during setal outgrowth is discussed with the problem of barb and barbule differentiation in avian feathers.