Heavier rumen–reticulum organs in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is consistent with dietary bulk not quality

The organs that make up the gastrointestinal tract have high energy demands. Therefore, when these organs vary in mass, they should impact metabolic requirements. Mass of the rumen–reticulum organs, the organs that comprise the largest part of the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants, might vary from bulk or nutrient availability of the diet. We examined differences in mass of the rumen–reticulum organs in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus (Zimmermann, 1780)) from two sites in Texas, USA, with different diet types. Specifically, at one site deer were fed a pelleted ration and at the other site deer consumed a natural browse diet. Accounting for body mass, deer consuming the browse diet had rumen–reticulum organ masses that were about 1.7 times heavier than deer consuming the pelleted diet. Deer consuming the browse diet also had lower diet quality, as indexed by crude protein concentration, than deer consuming the pelleted diet. The digesta loads of deer, however, were similar for the two types of diet. Our study findings are consistent with increased mass of rumen–reticulum organs from greater bulk, not diet quality. Understanding variation in rumen–reticulum organ mass has implications for understanding energy conservation in white-tailed deer.

Use of rumen–reticulum fill to examine nutrient transfer and factors influencing food intake in white-tailed deer (Odocoileusvirginianus)

Estimating relationships of gut fill in mammalian herbivores is useful to understanding digestive functions. Large animals might have more fluid in the gut to facilitate nutrient transfer between the gut lumen and the gut wall. Furthermore, relationships between concentrations of dietary refractory and indigestible fiber (CRIF) and gut fill might indicate whether chemostatic factors or physical distension of the gut affects food intake. We collected white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus (Zimmermann, 1780); 122 males, 152 females) from three sites in central and south Texas that varied in diet quality as indexed by rumen–reticulum crude protein concentrations. Large animals did not have more fluid in their rumina–reticula than small animals because the scalar between body mass and wet mass of rumen–reticulum contents was not greater than the scalar estimated for dry mass of rumen–reticulum contents. We expected a positive or an inverse relationship when rates of forage comminution, digestion, and particle passage were high or low, respectively. At the site where deer had access to a high-quality pelleted diet, we detected a positive relationship between CRIF and dry mass. At sites with free-ranging deer and lower quality diets, relationships between CRIF and dry fill were inversely related. Food intake of deer was probably influenced by chemostatic factors at the site with a high-quality pelleted diet and by physical distension of the gut at the other two sites.