1
|
Janfeshan S, Afshari A, Yaghobi R, Roozbeh J. Urinary CXCL-10, a prognostic biomarker for kidney graft injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25:292. [PMID: 39232662 PMCID: PMC11375915 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03728-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The challenges of long-term graft survival and the side effects of current immunosuppressive therapies in kidney transplantation highlight the need for improved drugs with fewer adverse effects. Biomarkers play a crucial role in quickly detecting post-transplant complications, with new biomarkers showing promise for ongoing monitoring of disease and potentially reducing the need for unnecessary invasive biopsies. The chemokines such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), are particularly promising protein biomarkers for acute renal rejection, with urine samples being a desirable source for biomarkers. The aim of this review is to analyze the literature on the potential role of urinary CXCL10 protein in predicting kidney graft injuries. The results of this study demonstrate that evaluating urinary CXCL10 levels is more successful in identifying post-transplant injuries compared to assessing the CXCL10/Cr ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Janfeshan
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Afsoon Afshari
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Ramin Yaghobi
- Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Jamshid Roozbeh
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ettenger RB, Seifert ME, Blydt-Hansen T, Briscoe DM, Holman J, Weng PL, Srivastava R, Fleming J, Malekzadeh M, Pearl M. Detection of Subclinical Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Current and Future Practices. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14836. [PMID: 39147695 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The successes in the field of pediatric kidney transplantation over the past 60 years have been extraordinary. Year over year, there have been significant improvements in short-term graft survival. However, improvements in longer-term outcomes have been much less apparent. One important contributor has been the phenomenon of low-level rejection in the absence of clinical manifestations-so-called subclinical rejection (SCR). METHODS Traditionally, rejection has been diagnosed by changes in clinical parameters, including but not limited to serum creatinine and proteinuria. This review examines the shortcomings of this approach, the effects of SCR on kidney allograft outcome, the benefits and drawbacks of surveillance biopsies to identify SCR, and new urine and blood biomarkers that define the presence or absence of SCR. RESULTS Serum creatinine is an unreliable index of SCR. Surveillance biopsies are the method most utilized to detect SCR. However, these have significant drawbacks. New biomarkers show promise. These biomarkers include blood gene expression profiles and donor derived-cell free DNA; urine gene expression profiles; urinary cytokines, chemokines, and metabolomics; and other promising blood and urine tests. CONCLUSION Specific emphasis is placed on studies carried out in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03719339.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Ettenger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael E Seifert
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Tom Blydt-Hansen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David M Briscoe
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Holman
- Transplant Genomics Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patricia L Weng
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rachana Srivastava
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - James Fleming
- Transplant Genomics Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mohammed Malekzadeh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meghan Pearl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akifova A, Budde K, Oellerich M, Beck J, Bornemann-Kolatzki K, Schütz E, Osmanodja B. Perspective for Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Defining Context of Use and Clinical Implications. Transpl Int 2024; 37:13239. [PMID: 39188271 PMCID: PMC11345135 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of graft failure limiting long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation. Current diagnostic strategy to detect AMR is suboptimal and requires further improvement. Previously suggested treatment regimens for AMR could not demonstrate efficacy, however novel therapeutic agents are currently under investigation. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a novel non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury, that has been mainly studied in the context of rejection. Its short-half-life in circulation and injury-dependent release are its key advantages that contribute to its superior diagnostic accuracy, compared to traditional biomarkers. Moreover, previous studies showed that dd-cfDNA-release is well-linked to histological and molecular features of AMR, and thus able to reflect real-time injury. Further observations suggest that dd-cfDNA can be used as a suitable screening tool for early detection of AMR in patients with donor-specific-anti-HLA-antibodies (DSA), as well as for monitoring AMR activity after anti-rejection treatment. The weight of evidence suggests that the integration of dd-cfDNA in the graft surveillance of patients with AMR, or those suspicious of AMR (e.g., due to the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA-antibodies) has an added value and might have a positive impact on outcomes in this specific cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylin Akifova
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Julia Beck
- Chronix Biomedical GmbH, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta G, Athreya A, Kataria A. Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation: A Rapidly Evolving Landscape. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00820. [PMID: 39020463 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
The last decade has seen an explosion in clinical research focusing on the use of noninvasive biomarkers in kidney transplantation. Much of the published literature focuses on donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Although initially studied as a noninvasive means of identifying acute rejection, it is now clear that dd-cfDNA is more appropriately described as a marker of severe injury and irrespective of the etiology, elevated dd-cfDNA ≥0.5% portends worse graft outcomes. Blood gene expression profiling is also commercially available and has mostly been studied in the context of early identification of subclinical rejection, although additional data is needed to validate these findings. Torque teno virus, a ubiquitous DNA virus, has emerged as a biomarker of immunosuppression exposure as peripheral blood Torque teno virus copy numbers might mirror the intensity of host immunosuppression. Urinary chemokine tests including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 have recently been assessed in large clinical trials and hold promising potential for early diagnosis of both subclinical and acute rejection, as well as, for long-term prognosis. Urinary cellular messenger RNA and exosome vesicular RNA based studies require additional validation. Although current data does not lend itself to conclusion, future studies on multimodality testing may reveal the utility of serial surveillance for individualization of immunosuppression and identify windows of opportunity to intervene early and before the irreversible allograft injury sets in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Gupta
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Division of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Akshay Athreya
- Division of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Ashish Kataria
- Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rroji M, Figurek A, Spasovski G. Advancing kidney transplant outcomes: the role of urinary proteomics in graft function monitoring and rejection detection. Expert Rev Proteomics 2024; 21:297-316. [PMID: 39133121 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2024.2389829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplantation significantly improves the lives of those with end-stage kidney disease, offering best alternative to dialysis. However, transplant success is threatened by the acute and chronic rejection mechanisms due to complex immune responses against the new organ. AREAS COVERED The ongoing research into biomarkers holds promise for revolutionizing the early detection and monitoring of the graft health. Liquid biopsy techniques offer a new avenue, with several diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers showing promise in detecting and monitoring kidney diseases and an early and chronic allograft rejection. EXPERT OPINION Evaluating the protein composition related to kidney transplant results could lead to identifying biomarkers that provide insights into the graft functionality. Non-invasive proteomic biomarkers can drastically enhance clinical outcomes and change the way how kidney transplants are evaluated for patients and physicians if they succeed in this transition. Hence, the advancement in proteomic technologies, leads toward a significant improvement in understanding of the protein markers and molecular mechanisms linked to the outcomes of kidney transplants. However, the road from discovery to the use of such proteins in clinical practice is long, with a need for continuous validation and beyond the singular research team with comprehensive infrastructure and across research groups collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merita Rroji
- Faculty of Medicine, University Department of Nephrology, University of Medicine Tirana, Tirana, Albania
| | - Andreja Figurek
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Goce Spasovski
- Medical Faculty, University Department of Nephrology, University of Skopje, Skopje, Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mačionienė E, Serapinas D, Miglinas M. Endobiogenic Biology of Function Indices in a Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1016. [PMID: 38929633 PMCID: PMC11205680 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60061016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Endobiogeny is a global systems approach to human biology based on the concept that the endocrine system manages the metabolism. Biology of function (BoF) indices are diagnostic tools in endobiogenic medicine that reflect the action of the endocrine system on the cells and the metabolic activity of an organism. Kidney transplant recipients are a very specific patient population due to their constant use of immunosuppressive agents such as steroids and anamnesis of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to assess the tendencies of endobiogenic BoF indices in a kidney transplant recipient population and to determine the relationship between BoF index values and histology-proven kidney transplant rejection. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 kidney transplant recipients undergoing surveillance or indication allograft biopsy were included in this study. Endobiogenic BoF indices were calculated from complete blood count tests taken before the kidney biopsy. Histology samples were evaluated by an experienced pathologist according to the Banff classification system. Clinical and follow-up data were collected from an electronic patient medical record system. Results: Overall, <35% of the patients had BoF index values assumed to be normal, according to the general population data. Additionally, >50% of the patients had lower-than-normal adaptation, leucocyte mobilization, genital, and adjusted genital ratio indices, while the Cata-Ana, genito-thyroid ratio, adrenal gland, and cortisol indices were increased in >50% of the transplant recipients. The adaptation index was significantly higher in patients with biopsy-proven transplant rejection and demonstrated an AUC value of 0.649 (95%CI 0.540-0.759) for discriminating rejectors from patients without transplant rejection. Conclusions: Most of the kidney transplant recipients had abnormal BoF index values, reflecting increased corticotropic effects on their cells. The adaptation index distinguished patients with biopsy-proven transplant rejection from those without it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesta Mačionienė
- Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT03101 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| | - Danielius Serapinas
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT44307 Kaunas, Lithuania;
| | - Marius Miglinas
- Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT03101 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gandolfini I, Mordà B, Martinelli E, Delsante M, Rossi G, Gentile M, Alibrandi S, Salvetti D, Fiaccadori E, Palmisano A, Cravedi P, Maggiore U. CXCL9 and CXCL10 as biomarkers of kidney graft inflammation across multiple conditions. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15324. [PMID: 38678588 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Gandolfini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Benedetta Mordà
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Elene Martinelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Marco Delsante
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - GiovanniMaria Rossi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Micaela Gentile
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sara Alibrandi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Daniel Salvetti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Enrico Fiaccadori
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandra Palmisano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Translational Transplant Research Center and Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Nephrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barrett-Chan E, Wang L, Bone J, Thachil A, Vytlingam K, Blydt-Hansen T. Optimizing the approach to monitoring allograft inflammation using serial urinary CXCL10/creatinine testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14718. [PMID: 38553815 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary CXCL10/creatinine (uCXCL10/Cr) is proposed as an effective biomarker of subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study objective was to model implementation in the clinical setting. METHODS Banked urine samples at a single center were tested for uCXCL10/Cr to validate published thresholds for rejection diagnosis (>80% specificity). The positive predictive value (PPV) for rejection diagnosis for uCXCL10/Cr-indicated biopsy was modeled with first-positive versus two-test-positive approaches, with accounting for changes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), BK and CMV viremia, and subsequent recovery. RESULTS Seventy patients aged 10.5 ± 5.6 years at transplant (60% male) had n = 726 urine samples with n = 236 associated biopsies (no rejection = 167, borderline = 51, and Banff 1A = 18). A threshold of 12 ng/mmol was validated for Banff 1A versus no-rejection diagnosis (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.92). The first-positive test approach (n = 69) did not resolve a clinical diagnosis in 38 cases (55%), whereas the two-test approach resolved a clinical diagnosis in the majority as BK (n = 17/60, 28%), CMV (n = 4/60, 7%), UTI (n = 8/60, 13%), clinical rejection (n = 5/60, 8%), and transient elevation (n = 18, 30%). In those without a resolved clinical diagnosis, PPV from biopsy for subclinical rejection is 24% and 71% (p = .017), for first-test versus two-test models, respectively. After rejection treatment, uCXCL10/Cr level changes were all concordant with change in it-score. Sustained uCXCL10/Cr after CMV and BK viremia resolution was associated with later acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Urinary CXCL10/Cr reliably identifies kidney allograft inflammation. These data support a two-test approach to reliably exclude other clinically identifiable sources of inflammation, for kidney biopsy indication to rule out subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Li Wang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Bone
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Thachil
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Vytlingam
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tom Blydt-Hansen
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Waikar SS. Biomarker blues: balancing hope and hype in acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2024; 105:679-682. [PMID: 38519237 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2024.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sushrut S Waikar
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Loon E, Tinel C, de Loor H, Bossuyt X, Callemeyn J, Coemans M, De Vusser K, Sauvaget V, Olivre J, Koshy P, Kuypers D, Sprangers B, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Vaulet T, Anglicheau D, Naesens M. Automated Urinary Chemokine Assays for Noninvasive Detection of Kidney Transplant Rejection: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2024; 83:467-476. [PMID: 37777058 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Prior studies have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of urinary chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 for kidney transplant rejection. However, their benefit in addition to clinical information has not been demonstrated. We evaluated the diagnostic performance for detecting acute rejection of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 when integrated with clinical information. STUDY DESIGN Single-center prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS We analyzed 1,559 biopsy-paired urinary samples from 622 kidney transplants performed between April 2013 and July 2019 at a single transplant center in Belgium. External validation was performed in 986 biopsy-paired urinary samples. TESTS COMPARED We quantified urinary CXCL9 (uCXCL9) and CXCL10 (uCXCL10) using an automated immunoassay platform and normalized the values to urinary creatinine. Urinary chemokines were incorporated into a multivariable model with routine clinical markers (estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor-specific antibodies, and polyoma viremia) (integrated model). This model was then compared with the tissue diagnosis according to the Banff classification for acute rejection. OUTCOME Acute rejection detected on kidney biopsy using the Banff classification. RESULTS Chemokines integrated with routine clinical markers had high diagnostic value for detection of acute rejection (n=150) (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve 81.3% [95% CI, 77.6-85.0]). The integrated model would help avoid 59 protocol biopsies per 100 patients when the risk for rejection is predicted to be below 10%. The performance of the integrated model was similar in the external validation cohort. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional nature obviates investigating the evolution over time and prediction of future rejection. CONCLUSIONS The use of an integrated model of urinary chemokines and clinical markers for noninvasive monitoring of rejection could enable a reduction in the number of biopsies. Urinary chemokines may be useful noninvasive biomarkers whose use should be further studied in prospective randomized trials to clarify their role in guiding clinical care and the use of biopsies to detect rejection after kidney transplantation. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 have been suggested to be good noninvasive biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection. However, defining a context of use and integration with clinical information is necessary before clinical implementation can begin. In this study, we demonstrated that urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, together with clinical information, have substantial diagnostic accuracy for the detection of acute kidney transplant rejection. Application of urinary chemokines together with clinical information may guide biopsy practices following kidney transplantation and potentially reduce the need for kidney transplant biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Van Loon
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Claire Tinel
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven
| | - Henriette de Loor
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven
| | - Xavier Bossuyt
- Clinical and Diagnostic Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven
| | - Katrien De Vusser
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven
| | - Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thibaut Vaulet
- ESAT STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- INSERM U1151, Université de Paris, Paris, France; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, RTRS Centaure, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hirt-Minkowski P, Schaub S. Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:138-143. [PMID: 38235748 PMCID: PMC10919271 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a multiparameter based risk assessment tool, or as an individual biomarker taking relevant confounders into account. A novel Luminex-based CXCL10 assay has been validated in a multicenter study, and proved to be robust, reproducible, and accurate. SUMMARY Urine CXCL10 is a well characterized inflammation biomarker, which can be used to guide performance of surveillance biopsies. Wide implementation into clinical practice depends on the availability of inexpensive, thoroughly validated assays with approval from regulatory authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology
- HLA-Diagnostic and lmmunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park S, Sellares J, Tinel C, Anglicheau D, Bestard O, Friedewald JJ. European Society of Organ Transplantation Consensus Statement on Testing for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection. Transpl Int 2024; 36:12115. [PMID: 38239762 PMCID: PMC10794444 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.12115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
To address the need for improved biomarkers for kidney transplant rejection, European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated working group comprised of experts in kidney transplant biomarkers to review literature pertaining to clinical and subclinical acute rejection to develop guidelines in the screening and diagnosis of acute rejection that were subsequently discussed and voted on during the Consensus Conference that took place in person in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the Working Group on Molecular Biomarkers of Kidney Transplant Rejection are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sookhyeon Park
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Claire Tinel
- Dijon University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1098 Right, UBFC, Dijon, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, INSERM U1151, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - John J. Friedewald
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Haller J, Diebold M, Leuzinger K, Wehmeier C, Handschin J, Amico P, Hirt-Minkowski P, Steiger J, Dickenmann M, Hirsch HH, Schaub S. Urine CXCL10 to Assess BK Polyomavirus Replication After Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2023; 107:2568-2574. [PMID: 37408094 PMCID: PMC10664791 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urine CXCL10 is a biomarker for renal allograft inflammation induced by rejection, urinary tract infection, or BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication. This study aimed to compare urine CXCL10 levels in different stages of BKPyV reactivation and to investigate urine CXCL10 as a biomarker for BKPyV replication. METHODS We included 763 urine samples (235 patients) from an interventional, randomized trial obtained in the context of regular screening for urine CXCL10 levels. All urine samples had a complete urine sediment analysis, no rejection episode noted within 30 d before urine collection, and a urine decoy cell analysis was conducted within ±3 d. RESULTS Urine CXCL10 levels were 2.31 ng/mmol in samples without BKPyV viruria, slightly rose to 4.35 ng/mmol with BKPyV viruria, and then markedly increased to 16.42 ng/mmol when decoy cells were detectable, but still in the absence of BKPyV DNAemia ( P < 0.001). The highest urine CXCL10 values were observed in samples with BKPyV DNAemia (median 42.59 ng/mmol). The area under the curve of urine CXCL10 levels to detect ≥3 decoy cells was 0.816. At a CXCL10 cutoff of 3 ng/mmol, the negative predictive value was 97%. The area under the curve of urine CXCL10 levels to detect BKPyV DNAemia was 0.882, with a negative predictive value of 99% at a CXCL10 cutoff of 3 ng/mmol. CONCLUSIONS Urine CXCL10 levels are already significantly elevated in BKPyV viruria (especially with decoy cell shedding) and further increase with BKPyV DNAemia. Low urine CXCL10 values can rule out the presence of ≥3 decoy cells and BKPyV DNAemia with high certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Haller
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Diebold
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Karoline Leuzinger
- Clinical Virology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Joelle Handschin
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, Molecular Immune Regulation, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Amico
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Hirt-Minkowski
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Steiger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Dickenmann
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hans H. Hirsch
- Clinical Virology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, Molecular Immune Regulation, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- HLA-Diagnostics and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hirt-Minkowski P, Wehmeier C, Schaub S. Authors' Reply: Of End Points and Context of Use: A Reasonable Silver Lining for Urinary Chemokines Monitoring. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1766-1767. [PMID: 37782547 PMCID: PMC10561820 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Hirt-Minkowski
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pagliazzi A, Van Loon E, Naesens M. Of End Points and Context of Use: A Reasonable Silver Lining for Urinary Chemokines Monitoring. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1765-1766. [PMID: 37782546 PMCID: PMC10561771 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Pagliazzi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elisabet Van Loon
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sarwal MM, Naesens M. Urine trumps the protocol biopsy for subclinical rejection surveillance. Kidney Int 2023; 104:432-439. [PMID: 37599018 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Minnie M Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fank H, Weekers L, Lovinfosse P, Pottel H, Seidel L, Jadoul A, Bouquegneau A, Bonvoisin C, Bovy C, Grosch S, Erpicum P, Hustinx R, Jouret F. The uptake of [ 18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose by the renal allograft correlates with the acute Banff scores of cortex inflammation but not with the 1-year graft outcomes. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2023; 2:1236751. [PMID: 38993925 PMCID: PMC11235230 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1236751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Introduction [18F]FDG PET/CT noninvasively disproves acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected AR. However, the correlation of biopsy-based Banff vs. PET/CT-based scores of acute inflammation remains unknown, as does the prognostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT at one year post suspected AR. Methods From 2012 to 2019, 114 [18F]FDG-PET/CTs were prospectively performed in 105 adult KTRs who underwent per cause transplant biopsies. Ordinal logistic regression assessed the correlation between the extent of histological inflammation and the mean standardized [18F]FDG uptake values (mSUVmean). Functional outcomes of kidney allografts were evaluated at one year post per cause biopsy and correlated to mSUVmean. Results A significant correlation between mSUVmean and acute Banff score was found, with an adjusted R 2 of 0.25. The mSUVmean was significantly different between subgroups of "total i", with 2.30 ± 0.71 in score 3 vs. 1.68 ± 0.24 in score 0. Neither the function nor the survival of the graft at one year was statistically related to mSUVmean. Discussion [18F]FDG-PET/CT may help noninvasively assess the severity of kidney allograft inflammation in KTRs with suspected AR, but it does not predict graft outcomes at one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Fank
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Laurent Weekers
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Pierre Lovinfosse
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Hans Pottel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk (KULAK), Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Laurence Seidel
- Department of Medico-Economic Information and Biostatistic, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Jadoul
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Antoine Bouquegneau
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Catherine Bonvoisin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Christophe Bovy
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
- Division of Renal Pathology, Unilab, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Grosch
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
- Division of Renal Pathology, Unilab, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Pauline Erpicum
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
- Division of Renal Pathology, Unilab, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| | - François Jouret
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Liège Hospital (ULiège CHU), Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|