Cost-effectiveness of aliskiren in type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway modulators in chronic kidney disease: A comparative review

Chronic kidney disease presents a health challenge that has a complex underlying pathophysiology, both acquired and inherited. The pharmacotherapeutic treatment options available today lower the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life but cannot completely cure it. This poses a challenge to the healthcare provider to choose, from the available options, the best way to manage the disease as per the presentation of the patient. As of now, the recommended first line of treatment to control the blood pressure in chronic kidney disease is the administration of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modulators. These are represented mainly by the direct renin inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. These modulators are varied in their structure and mechanisms of action, hence showing varying treatment outcomes. The choice of administration of these modulators is determined by the presentation and the co-morbidities of the patient, the availability and affordability of the treatment option, and the expertise of the healthcare provider. A direct head-to-head comparison between these significant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modulators is lacking, which can benefit healthcare providers and researchers. In this review, a comparison has been drawn between the direct renin inhibitor (aliskiren), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. This can be of significance for healthcare providers and researchers to find the particular loci of interest, either in structure or mechanism, and to intervene as per the case presentation to obtain the best possible treatment option.

Modeling Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review of Models, Data Sources, and Derivation Cohorts

INTRODUCTION

As novel therapies for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) become available, their long-term benefits should be evaluated using CKD progression models. Existing models offer different modeling approaches that could be reused, but it may be challenging for modelers to assess commonalities and differences between the many available models. Additionally, the data and underlying population characteristics informing model parameters may not always be evident. Therefore, this study reviewed and summarized existing modeling approaches and data sources for CKD in T2DM, as a reference for future model development.

METHODS

This systematic literature review included computer simulation models of CKD in T2DM populations. Searches were implemented in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to October 2021. Models were classified as cohort state-transition models (cSTM) or individual patient simulation (IPS) models. Information was extracted on modeled kidney disease states, risk equations for CKD, data sources, and baseline characteristics of derivation cohorts in primary data sources.

RESULTS

The review identified 49 models (21 IPS, 28 cSTM). A five-state structure was standard among state-transition models, comprising one kidney disease-free state, three kidney disease states [frequently including albuminuria and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)], and one death state. Five models captured CKD regression and three included cardiovascular disease (CVD). Risk equations most commonly predicted albuminuria and ESKD incidence, while the most predicted CKD sequelae were mortality and CVD. Most data sources were well-established registries, cohort studies, and clinical trials often initiated decades ago in predominantly White populations in high-income countries. Some recent models were developed from country-specific data, particularly for Asian countries, or from clinical outcomes trials.

CONCLUSION

Modeling CKD in T2DM is an active research area, with a trend towards IPS models developed from non-Western data and single data sources, primarily recent outcomes trials of novel renoprotective treatments.

Can Aliskiren be Considered as a New Novel Drug for Hypertension?

Hypertension is one of the most common causes of death across the globe. Many trials and drugs have been used for controlling the debilitating effects of hypertension. One such new class of drug is direct renin inhibitors (DRI), e.g., aliskiren, which block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). It blocks the very first step in the RAS system. Multiple trials have been carried out debating the outcome of monotherapy and combination therapy with other classes of hypertensive drugs. Focus on compliance, adverse effects, and the cost have also been in the news. Extensive studies are still needed to justify the clinical use of a DRI in the effective treatment of hypertension.

Renin inhibition in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease

Inhibition of the RAAS (renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system) plays a pivotal role in the prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy and a spectrum of other proteinuric kidney diseases. Despite documented beneficial effects of RAAS inhibitors in diabetic patients with nephropathy, reversal of the progressive course of this disorder or at least long-term stabilization of renal function are often difficult to achieve, and many patients still progress to end-stage renal disease. Incomplete inhibition of the RAAS has been postulated as one of reasons for unsatisfactory therapeutic responses to RAAS inhibition in some patients. Inhibition of renin, a rate-limiting step in the RAAS activation cascade, could overcome at least some of the abovementioned problems associated with the treatment with traditional RAAS inhibitors. The present review focuses on experimental and clinical studies evaluating the two principal approaches to renin inhibition, namely direct renin inhibition with aliskiren and inhibition of the (pro)renin receptor. Moreover, the possibilities of renin inhibition and nephroprotection by interventions primarily aiming at non-RAAS targets, such as vitamin D, urocortins or inhibition of the succinate receptor GPR91 and cyclo-oxygenase-2, are also discussed.

Safety and efficacy of aliskiren in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic overview

INTRODUCTION

Aliskiren is the first orally active direct renin inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. Aliskiren's inhibitory effect on angiotensin I generation, through renin blockade, is highly specific and long-lasting (24 hours). This feature differentiates aliskiren from traditional antihypertensive drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the results of various clinical trials which investigate the safety and efficacy of aliskiren on blood pressure (BP) reduction and clinical end points.

EXPERT OPINION

Aliskiren is suitable for once-daily administration. Its antihypertensive effect is comparable or superior to that of other antihypertensive agents at recommended doses. The tolerability profile of aliskiren is placebo-like at the licensed doses of 150 and 300 mg. In particular, the discontinuation of therapy due to clinical adverse events occurs similarly among patients treated with either aliskiren or placebo. Aliskiren is not recommended in association with ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment. Pending disclosure of full results, the early termination of the ALTITUDE seems to confirm previous concerns about the safety of the dual pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in these patients. Aliskiren is a well-tolerated antihypertensive drug that may help to achieve the recommended targets of BP control.

The role of renin inhibition in treating the hypertensive patient with diabetes: a summary of preclinical and clinical evidence

Comorbid hypertension and diabetes is common and associated with substantially greater cardiovascular and renal risk relative to hypertension alone. Tissue renin-angiotensin system (RAS) overactivity is a hallmark of diabetes and contributes to target organ damage. Treatment guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for reducing cardiorenal risk in patients with hypertension plus diabetes. However, these agents only partially prevent cardiovascular and renal morbidity/mortality. Further attempts to improve clinical outcomes have focused on the use of an ACE inhibitor plus an ARB, but this combination has not demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile. Direct renin inhibitors provide a more comprehensive blockade of the RAS compared with ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and may be of particular benefit in counteracting tissue RAS overactivity. In this article, the role of the RAS in diabetic hypertension and the preclinical and clinical effects of direct renin inhibitor therapy on target organs are reviewed.

Doubling of serum creatinine in clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and individual patients: adequate use in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The predictive value of doubling of serum creatinine (DSC) has never been assessed in renal transplantation. We evaluated it in terms of its use for clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and individual patients.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal study in 896 renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Death-censored graft loss occurred in 133 patients, during follow-up (up to 21 years). DSC was a risk factor for graft loss; however, the relative risk was different in patients with glomerular filtration rate less than 40 vs. more than or equal to 40 mL/min (hazard ratio: 14.5 [95% confidence interval: 7.4-28.4] vs. 47.8 [28.4-80.6], P=0.0051). Parameters influencing creatinine value (weight, age, sex) did not modify DSC's predictive value. The use of the composite endpoint DSC or death-censored graft loss instead of death-censored graft loss alone in clinical trials would reduce sample size by 7.1% to 9.0%. The annual probability of DSC to graft loss transition decreased from 76% (follow-up <1 year) to 5% (follow-up ≥10 years). Median graft half-life after DSC was 10 months [95% confidence interval: 6-18] but varied with increasing time to DSC (<1 year: 1 month [0.5-6]; 3-4.9 years: 15 months 5/67) and reference creatinine (<130 μmol/L: 3 months 2/6); ≥130 μmol/L: 25 months 15/37).

CONCLUSIONS

DSC may be adequately used to refine the risk of death-censored graft loss for individual patients. However, the use of DSC as an endpoint in clinical trials marginally affects sample size, and the probability of DSC to graft loss transition is not constant, which limits the use of DSC in cost-effectiveness analyses of renal transplantation.

Epigenetics in diabetic kidney disease

Regulated gene expression by transcription factor networks is critical for normal kidney function. Disruption of these complex networks leads to biochemical aberrations associated with many renal diseases. Epigenetic mechanisms not involving changes in DNA sequence, such as DNA methylation and post-translational modifications of nucleosomal histones, also play a critical role in gene regulation by modulating chromatin access to the cellular machinery for transcription. These epigenetic modifications can be affected by intrinsic and extrinsic environmental factors and play a central role in dictating biologic phenotypes including pathologic disease. Emerging evidence also suggests, apart from traditional genetic predisposition, that epigenetic processes can persist across generations to play a modulating role in the development of renal diseases such as diabetic nephropathy. Recent advances in epigenome research has increased our understanding of epigenetic mechanisms involved in renal dysfunction that in turn may lead to identification of novel new therapeutic targets.

Combined aliskiren-amlodipine treatment for hypertension in African Americans: clinical science and management issues

While it may seem at first that antihypertensive drug combinations run counter to the desire to 'personalize' the management of hypertension, the best combinations have predictable efficacy in different individuals and subpopulations. Race is probably not a valid surrogate for clinically meaningful genetic variation or guide to therapy. Most guidelines suggest similar blood pressure goals for different races but drug treatment recommendations have diverged. In the United States, race is not considered to be a major factor in drug choice, but in England and other countries, initial therapy with renin-angiotensin system blocking drugs is not recommended in Blacks. In this review we: (1) examine new trends in race-based research; (2) emphasize the weaknesses of race-based treatment recommendations; and (3) explore the effects of a new combination, renin inhibition (aliskiren) and amlodipine, in African Americans.

Urinary proteomics based on capillary electrophoresis-coupled mass spectrometry in kidney disease: discovery and validation of biomarkers, and clinical application

Use of capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) technology in proteome analysis has increased, with a focus on the identification of biomarker peptides in clinical proteomics. Among the reported applications, the main focus is on the urinary biomarkers for kidney disease. In this review, we discuss the principal, theoretical, and practical obstacles that are encountered when using CE-MS for the analysis of body fluids for biomarker discovery. We present several examples of a successful application of CE-MS for biomarker discovery in kidney disease, implications for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy evaluation, and will also discuss current challenges and possible future improvements.

Uremia (end-stage renal disease): how cost-effective are preventive strategies?

Many strategies have been shown to be cost-effective for prevention of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), most often by Markov modeling using assumptions based on randomized clinical trails and observational studies. Targeted screening for proteinuria in diabetics and in hypertensive patients is cost-effective for prevention of ESRD, but such screening is not cost-effective when applied to the general population. Screening for chronic kidney disease based on estimated glomerular filtration rate alone is not recommended. Perhaps, treatment of all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics with an inhibitor of angiotensin-II without screening for proteinuria will also prevent or delay ESRD in a cost-effective manner. Intensive interventions and the use of angiotensin-II inhibition in incipient and overt nephropathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes is also cost-effective in preventing ESRD. Rigorous control of blood pressure to desired targets also lowers the risks of ESRD in both diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies, most likely in a cost-effective manner. Newer strategies involving statins and new combinations of agents are emerging but have not yet been tested for their cost-effectiveness in preventing ESRD cost-effectiveness.