Six-month prophylaxis is cost effective in transplant patients at high risk for cytomegalovirus infection

Management of cytomegalovirus in adult solid organ transplant patients: GESITRA-IC-SEIMC, CIBERINFEC, and SET recommendations update

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant challenge in solid organ transplantation (SOT). The last international consensus guidelines on the management of CMV in SOT were published in 2018, highlighting the need for revision to incorporate recent advances, notably in cell-mediated immunity monitoring, which could alter the current standard of care. A working group including members from the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplantation and the Immunocompromised Host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), developed consensus-based recommendations for managing CMV infection in SOT recipients. Recommendations were classified based on evidence strength and quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.

Inhibiting the NADase CD38 improves cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cell functionality and metabolism

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common and relevant opportunistic pathogens in people who are immunocompromised, such as kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The exact mechanisms underlying the disability of cytotoxic T cells to provide sufficient protection against CMV in people who are immunosuppressed have not been identified yet. Here, we performed in-depth metabolic profiling of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in patients who are immunocompromised and show the development of metabolic dysregulation at the transcriptional, protein, and functional level of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in KTRs with noncontrolled CMV infection. These dysregulations comprise impaired glycolysis and increased mitochondrial stress, which is associated with an intensified expression of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide nucleotidase (NADase) CD38. Inhibiting NADase activity of CD38 reinvigorated the metabolism and improved cytokine production of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells. These findings were corroborated in a mouse model of CMV infection under conditions of immunosuppression. Thus, dysregulated metabolic states of CD8+ T cells could be targeted by inhibiting CD38 to reverse hyporesponsiveness in individuals who fail to control chronic viral infection.

Cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus conventional antiviral therapies for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus infection with or without genotypic resistance: A US perspective

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with or without resistance. A two-stage Markov model was designed using data from the SOLSTICE trial (NCT02931539), real-world multinational observational studies, and published literature. Stage 1 (0-78 weeks) comprised clinically significant CMV (csCMV), non-clinically significant CMV (n-csCMV), and dead states; stage 2 (78 weeks-lifetime) comprised alive and dead states. Total costs (2022 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for the maribavir and IAT cohorts. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Compared with IAT, maribavir had lower costs ($139 751 vs $147 949) and greater QALYs (6.04 vs 5.83), making it cost-saving and more cost-effective. Maribavir had higher acquisition costs compared with IAT ($80 531 vs $65 285), but lower costs associated with administration/monitoring ($16 493 vs $27 563), adverse events (AEs) ($11 055 vs $16 114), hospitalization ($27 157 vs $33 905), and graft loss ($4516 vs $5081), thus making treatment with maribavir cost-saving. Maribavir-treated patients spent more time without CMV compared with IAT-treated patients (0.85 years vs 0.68 years), leading to lower retreatment costs for maribavir (cost savings: -$42 970.80). Compared with IAT, maribavir was more cost-effective for transplant recipients with refractory CMV, owing to better clinical efficacy and avoidance of high costs associated with administration, monitoring, AEs, and hospitalizations. These results can inform healthcare decision-makers on the most effective use of their resources for post-transplant refractory CMV treatment.

Human cytomegalovirus-related gastrointestinal disease after kidney transplantation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Human-cytomegalovirus (hCMV) infection involving the gastrointestinal tract represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant (KT) recipients (KTRs). Signs and symptoms of the disease are extremely variable. Prompt anti-viral therapy administration and immunosuppression modification are key factors for optimizing management. However, complex work-up strategies are generally required to confirm the preliminary diagnosis. Unfortunately, solid evidence and guidelines on this specific topic are not available. We consequently aimed to summarize current knowledge on post-KT hCMV-related gastrointestinal disease (hCMV-GID).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023399363) about hCMV-GID in KTRs.

RESULTS

Our systematic review includes 52 case-reports and ten case-series, published between 1985 and 2022, collectively reporting 311 cases. The most frequently reported signs and symptoms of hCMV-GID were abdominal pain, diarrhea, epigastric pain, vomiting, fever, and GI bleeding. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were the primary diagnostic techniques. In most cases, the preliminary diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Information on anti-viral prophylaxis were extremely limited as much as data on induction or maintenance immunosuppression. Treatment included ganciclovir and/or valganciclovir administration. Immunosuppression modification mainly consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or calcineurin inhibitor minimization and withdrawal. In total, 21 deaths were recorded. Renal allograft-related outcomes were described for 26 patients only. Specifically, reported events were acute kidney injury (n = 17), transplant failure (n = 5), allograft rejection (n = 4), and irreversible allograft dysfunction (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of local and national registries is strongly recommended to improve our understanding of hCMV-GID. Future clinical guidelines should consider the implementation of dedicated diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Cost-effectiveness of Preemptive Therapy Versus Prophylaxis in a Randomized Clinical Trial for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Seronegative Liver Transplant Recipients With Seropositive Donors

BACKGROUND

The relative costs of preemptive therapy (PET) or prophylaxis for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk donor CMV-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) liver transplant recipients have not been assessed in the context of a randomized trial.

METHODS

A decision tree model was constructed based on the probability of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial that compared valganciclovir as PET or prophylaxis for 100 days in 205 D+/R- liver transplant recipients. Itemized costs for each site were obtained from a federal cost transparency database. Total costs included costs of implementation of the strategy and CMV disease treatment-related costs. Net cost per patient was estimated from the decision tree for each strategy.

RESULTS

PET was associated with a 10% lower absolute rate of CMV disease (9% vs 19%). The cost of treating a case of CMV disease in our patients was $88 190. Considering cost of implementation of strategy and treatment-related cost for CMV disease, the net cost-savings per patient associated with PET was $8707 compared to prophylaxis. PET remained cost-effective across a range of assumptions (varying costs of monitoring and treatment, and rates of disease).

CONCLUSIONS

PET is the dominant CMV prevention strategy in that it was associated with lower rates of CMV disease and lower overall costs compared to prophylaxis in D+/R- liver transplant recipients. Costs were driven primarily by more hospitalizations and higher CMV disease-associated costs due to delayed onset postprophylaxis disease in the prophylaxis group.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

The burden of cytomegalovirus infection remains high in high-risk kidney transplant recipients despite six-month valganciclovir prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus continues to be a concern after transplantation despite prophylaxis regimens. Our aim was to analyse post-prophylaxis primary cytomegalovirus infections among kidney transplant recipients after 6-month valganciclovir prophylaxis and to determine the usefulness of surveillance after prophylaxis. Data from all cytomegalovirus D+/R- kidney transplant recipients from January 2004 to October 2018 at our center who received 6-month prophylaxis with valganciclovir were retrospectively analysed (N = 481). Detailed analyses were performed for 136 patients who were monitored every 2-4 weeks for DNAemia after the discontinuation of prophylaxis. Post-prophylaxis primary cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 182/481 (38%) patients median 264 days after transplantation (IQR: 226-367) and median 84 days after the end of prophylaxis (IQR: 46-187). In 49% patients, cytomegalovirus infection occurred over 3 months after the end of prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus infection was not associated with lower patient or graft survival and no independent risk factors for infection were found. From patients monitored closely, 71/136 (52%) patients developed post-prophylaxis primary cytomegalovirus infection. Altogether, 52/136 (38%) patients were diagnosed with probable post-prophylaxis cytomegalovirus disease and 19/136 (14%) patients had asymptomatic CMV infection. Recurrent infection occurred in 38/71 (39%) patients. The incidence of post-prophylaxis primary cytomegalovirus infection among D+/R- kidney transplant recipients remains high despite 6-month prophylaxis. Surveillance after prophylaxis was challenging as a considerable portion of the infections occurred late and already symptomatic.

Prospective Study of Long Noncoding RNA, MGAT3-AS1, and Viremia of BK Polyomavirus and Cytomegalovirus in Living Donor Renal Transplant Recipients

Introduction

Viremia after renal transplantation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and treatment opportunities are limited. Tests to determine the increased risk for viremia would be preferable.

Methods

In a prospective, single-center study, we conducted follow-up of 163 renal transplant recipients after incident living donor renal transplantation. We determined a long noncoding RNA, β-1,4-mannosylglycoprotein 4-β-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-antisense1 (MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratio), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Viremia of BK polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus was diagnosed with more than 1000 plasma copies/ml within the first 3 postoperative months. The MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratio was assessed before viremia was determined.

Results

Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis showed a median MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratio cutoff value of 4.45 × 10^–6 to indicate viremia after transplantation. Samples for 11 of 66 renal transplant recipients (17%) with MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratios below 4.45 × 10^–6 showed viremia of BK polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus compared with only 6 of 97 renal transplant recipients (6%) with higher MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratios (odds ratio [OR]: 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–8.67 by Fisher exact test). Furthermore, samples for 6 of 66 renal transplant recipients (9%) with MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratios below 4.45 × 10^–6 showed BK polyomavirus viremia compared with none of 97 renal transplant recipients (0%) with higher MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratios (OR: 20.95; 95% CI, 1.16–378.85 by Fisher exact test). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratios below the cutoff level remained significantly associated with viremia after transplant. Lower MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratios occurred with rituximab-containing induction therapy.

Conclusions

A low MGAT3-AS1/beta-actin ratio indicates an increased risk for viremia of BK polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus in living donor renal transplant recipients.

The impact of cytomegalovirus infection on clinical severity and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but its impact on clinical severity and outcomes in KTRs with PJP is unknown. We reviewed 1994 medical records of KTRs from January 1997 to March 2019. PJP or CMV infection was diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction or culturing using blood or respiratory specimens. We divided patients into PJP and PJP+CMV groups, and evaluated the clinical severity and outcomes. Fifty two patients had PJP (2.6%) in the whole study cohort. Among patients with PJP, 38 (73.1%) had PJP alone and 14 (26.9%) had combined PJP and CMV co-infection. The PJP+CMV group showed worse laboratory findings (serum albumin and C-reactive protein, P = 0.010 for both) and higher requirement of continuous renal replacement therapy than the PJP group (P = 0.050). The pneumonia severity was worse in the PJP+CMV group than in the PJP group (P < 0.05), and CMV infection was a high risk factor of pneumonia severity (odds ratio 16.0; P = 0.002). The graft function was worse in the PJP+CMV group (P < 0.001), and the incidence of graft failure was higher in the PJP+CMV group than in the PJP group (85.7% vs 36.8%; P < 0.001). Mortality was double in the PJP+CMV group than in the PJP group, but not statistically significant (21.4% vs 10.5%; P = 0.370). Our results show that approximately one in four patients with PJP after kidney transplantation develops CMV with increased clinical severity and risk of graft failure. The possibility of increased clinical severity and worse clinical outcomes by CMV co-infection should be considered in KTRs with PJP.

Use of Viral Load as a Surrogate Marker in Clinical Studies of Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been the standard endpoint for clinical trials in organ transplant recipients. Viral load may be a more relevant endpoint due to low frequency of disease. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. We found several lines of evidence to support the validity of viral load as an appropriate surrogate end-point, including the following: (1) viral loads in CMV disease are significantly greater than in asymptomatic viremia (odds ratio, 9.3 95% confidence interval, 4.6-19.3); (2) kinetics of viral replication are strongly associated with progression to disease; (3) pooled incidence of CMV viremia and disease is significantly lower during prophylaxis compared with the full patient follow-up period (viremia incidence: 3.2% vs 34.3%; P < .001) (disease incidence: 1.1% vs 13.0%; P < .001); (4) treatment of viremia prevented disease; and (5) viral load decline correlated with symptom resolution. Based on the analysis, we conclude that CMV load is an appropriate surrogate endpoint for CMV trials in organ transplant recipients.

Role of Secondary Prophylaxis With Valganciclovir in the Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are highly effective antiviral drugs with a well-established role in primary prophylaxis and treatment of CMV disease. Our objective in this study was to examine the effect of secondary prophylaxis (SP) on the risk of relapse in SOTRs following an episode of CMV disease.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of SOTRs from 1995 to 2015 and used propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology to control for confounding by indication. A weighted Cox model was created to determine the effect of SP on time to relapse within 1 year of treatment completion.

Results

Fifty-two heart, 34 liver, 79 kidney, and 5 liver-kidney transplant recipients who completed treatment for an episode of CMV infection/disease were included. A total of 120 (70.6%) received SP (median duration, 61 days; range, 5-365) and 39 (23%) relapsed. SP was protective against relapse from 0 to 6 weeks following treatment completion (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.69). However, after 6 weeks, risk of relapse did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.46-2.99).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that use of SP following treatment of CMV disease did not confer long-term protection against relapse, although it did delay relapse while patients were receiving antivirals. This suggests that SP has limited clinical utility in the overall prevention of recurrent CMV disease.

Cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplantation: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication after heart transplantation with varying prophylaxis strategies employed. We sought to determine the impact of valganciclovir (VGC) duration on the epidemiology of CMV infections after heart transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of CMV donor (D) or recipient (R) seropositive heart transplant recipients from 2005 to 2012 who completed VGC prophylaxis, ranging from 3 to 12 months according to serostatus and induction immunosuppression. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

Among 159 heart transplant recipients during the study period, 130 (82%) were eligible for VGC prophylaxis. CMV D/R serostatus was as follows: 24% D+/R-, 30% D+/R+, and 29% D-/R+. 65% and 21% received basiliximab and thymoglobulin induction, respectively, followed by maintenance tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Twenty-one (16%) recipients suffered CMV infection. There was no association with comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or mechanical assist devices, nor were there associations with rejection, treatments of rejection, or mortality. When VGC prophylaxis duration was stratified by ≤6 vs ≥12 months, time from heart transplantation to CMV infection was delayed (median 247 vs 452 days, P = .002) but there was no difference in days from VGC discontinuation to onset of CMV infection (median 72 vs 83 days, P = .31). CMV infection occurred most frequently within 6-16 weeks of VGC cessation, and 95% of infections occurred during the 6 months post-prophylaxis period.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to ≤6 months, ≥12 months of VGC did not reduce incidence of CMV infection and only delayed time to onset. 95% of CMV infection occurs within 6 months after cessation of VGC.

A Markov Analysis of Screening for Late-Onset Cytomegalovirus Disease in Cytomegalovirus High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Management strategies are unclear for late-onset cytomegalovirus infection occurring beyond 6 months of antiviral prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus high-risk (cytomegalovirus IgG positive to cytomegalovirus IgG negative) kidney transplant recipients. Hybrid strategies (prophylaxis followed by screening) have been investigated but with inconclusive results. There are clinical and potential cost benefits of preventing cytomegalovirus-related hospitalizations and associated increased risks of patient and graft failure. We used decision analysis to evaluate the utility of postprophylaxis screening for late-onset cytomegalovirus infection.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We used the Markov decision analysis model incorporating costs and utilities for various cytomegalovirus clinical states (asymptomatic cytomegalovirus, mild cytomegalovirus infection, and cytomegalovirus infection necessitating hospitalization) to estimate cost-effectiveness of postprophylaxis cytomegalovirus screening strategies. Five strategies were compared: no screening and screening at 1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-week intervals. Progression to severe cytomegalovirus infection was modeled on cytomegalovirus replication kinetics. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as a ratio of cost difference between two strategies to difference in quality-adjusted life-years starting with the low-cost strategy. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model's robustness.

RESULTS

There was an incremental gain in quality-adjusted life-years with increasing screening frequency. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $783 per quality-adjusted life-year (every 4 weeks over no screening), $1861 per quality-adjusted life-year (every 3 weeks over every 4 weeks), $10,947 per quality-adjusted life-year (every 2 weeks over every 3 weeks), and $197,086 per quality-adjusted life-year (weekly over every 2 weeks). Findings were sensitive to screening cost, cost of hospitalization, postprophylaxis cytomegalovirus incidence, and graft loss after cytomegalovirus infection. No screening was favored when willingness to pay threshold was <$14,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, whereas screening weekly was favored when willingness to pay threshold was >$185,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Screening every 2 weeks was the dominant strategy between willingness to pay range of $14,000-$185,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

CONCLUSIONS

In cytomegalovirus high-risk kidney transplant recipients, compared with no screening, screening for postprophylactic cytomegalovirus viremia is associated with gains in quality-adjusted life-years and seems to be cost effective. A strategy of screening every 2 weeks was the most cost-effective strategy across a wide range of willingness to pay thresholds.

Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient

These guidelines cover the care of patients from the period following kidney transplantation until the transplant is no longer working or the patient dies. During the early phase prevention of acute rejection and infection are the priority. After around 3-6 months, the priorities change to preservation of transplant function and avoiding the long-term complications of immunosuppressive medication (the medication used to suppress the immune system to prevent rejection). The topics discussed include organization of outpatient follow up, immunosuppressive medication, treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and prevention of complications. The potential complications discussed include heart disease, infection, cancer, bone disease and blood disorders. There is also a section on contraception and reproductive issues.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and AD depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.

Use of leflunomide in renal transplant recipients with ganciclovir-resistant/refractory cytomegalovirus infection: a case series from the University of Chicago

Introduction

Although antiviral prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) is widely used, CMV infection remains common in renal transplant recipients with adverse consequences.

Methods

We report 5 cases of renal transplant recipients with resistant CMV infection who were successfully managed with leflunomide at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Results

Five renal transplant recipients (2 simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants, 3 deceased donor kidney transplants) were diagnosed with GCV-resistant CMV infection from 2003 to 2011. Of the 4 patients who had resistance genotype testing, 3 showed a UL97 mutation and 1 patient had a clinically resistant CMV infection. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with valganciclovir for 3 months. The number of days from the date of transplant to viremia ranged from 38 to 458 days (median 219). All 5 patients received other antiviral agents (e.g. ganciclovir, foscarnet), and in 4 patients, viremia was cleared before leflunomide was initiated as consolidation (or maintenance) therapy.

Conclusion

Leflunomide was well tolerated and successful in preventing recurrence of viremia in renal transplant recipients with resistant CMV infection. The beneficial effect of leflunomide in this setting warrants further investigation.

Cytomegalovirus disease in patients with glomerular diseases treated by immunosuppressive treatment

PURPOSE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important complication in organ and bone marrow recipients as well as patients infected with HIV. Although screening and prophylaxis have been defined in these patients, there are few data about the frequency of CMV disease in glomerular diseases treated by immunosuppression.

METHODS

We recruited 133 patients with glomerular diseases treated by immunosuppression between 2006 and 2013. Patients who had any symptoms suggestive of CMV disease were screened for viral DNA. Immunosuppressive treatments were as follows: Group 1, steroid only; Group 2, steroid with cyclophosphamide (CP); Group 3, steroid with cyclosporine A; and Group 4, steroid with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine.

RESULTS

Patients developing CMV and non-CMV disease were compared for age, sex, renal pathology, hypertension, diabetes, baseline creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate, and immunosuppressive regimen. At follow-up, 55 patients were tested for CMV disease during immunosuppressive treatment. Twenty-six patients had CMV DNA positivity of 1,112-205,500 copies/mL. Patients with CMV disease were all seen within the first 5 months of immunosuppressive treatment, and the disease was observed most commonly (14 patients, 53 %) in the first 2 months of treatment. Multiple regression analysis revealed that high baseline creatinine levels, older age, and use of steroids with CP were independent risk factors for development of CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV disease is not an uncommon complication in patients with glomerular diseases treated by immunosuppression. Further prospective studies and prophylaxis should be addressed in future studies, including particular groups of patients.

The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of valacyclovir in cytomegalovirus prevention in solid organ transplantation

Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection using antiviral prophylaxis or the pre-emptive therapy approach is an integral part of management of patients after solid organ transplantation. Regarding renal transplantation, valacyclovir is currently the only antiviral agent recommended for prophylaxis as an alternative to valganciclovir. This review article discusses studies documenting the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir prophylaxis as well as those comparing valacyclovir with other prophylactic regimens or with pre-emptive therapy. Also addressed are the economic aspects supporting the cost-effectiveness of valacyclovir prophylaxis and demonstrating lower costs compared with other cytomegalovirus preventive strategies.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatric kidney transplantation: the Dutch experience

Many children receiving a kidney transplant are seronegative for CMV and therefore, highly susceptible to a primary CMV infection. This study aims at evaluating incidence, time of occurrence, and severity of CMV infection in the first year post-transplantation in relation to different types of CMV prophylaxis. Transplantations in three centers in the Netherlands between 1999 and 2010 were included. Retrospective, observational, multicenter study. Clinical data and PCR measurements of CMV were collected. Prophylaxis in high-risk patients (CMV serostatus D+R-) consisted of (val)ganciclovir during three months, or acyclovir plus CMV immunoglobulin at a former stage. Intermediate-risk patients (R+) received (val)acyclovir, or acyclovir plus CMV immunoglobulin at a former stage. Low-risk patients (D-R-) did not receive prophylaxis. Infection was defined as CMV PCR above 50 geq/mL plasma or whole blood, a clinically relevant infection above 1000 geq/mL. One hundred and fifty-nine transplantations were included. CMV infection was documented for 41% of high-risk, 24% of intermediate-risk, and 13% of low-risk patients, in the latter two groups typically during the first three months. The infection rate was highest in the high-risk group after cessation of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Valganciclovir provided better protection than did acyclovir + CMV immunoglobulin. Adding an IL2-receptor blocker to the immunosuppressive regimen did not affect the infection rate. Acute graft rejection was not related with CMV infection. Valganciclovir prophylaxis effectively prevents CMV infection in high-risk pediatric kidney recipients, but only during prophylaxis. Valacyclovir prophylaxis in intermediate-risk patients is less effective.

Cytomegalovirus disease in African-American kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a serious infection after kidney transplantation. The risk factors and the impact of CMV disease in African-American (AA) kidney transplant patients have not been well characterized.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on 448 AA patients transplanted between 1996 and 2005. A 3-month universal chemoprophylaxis with ganciclovir or valganciclovir was administered to CMV donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) patients and to those treated with anti-thymocyte globulin for rejection, but not routinely to those with other D/R serostatus.

RESULTS

A total of 31 AA patients (7%) developed clinical CMV disease. Compared with other D/R serostatus groups, the D+/R- group had the highest 3-year cumulative incidence of CMV disease (16.9% vs. 6.3% in D+/R+, 4.9% in D-/R+, and 2.4% in D-/R-). The D+/R- group also had the worst 3-year death-censored allograft survival (75% vs. 92% in D+/R+, 94% in D-/R+, and 96% in D-/R-, log-rank P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis found that D+/R- serostatus (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-48.2, P = 0.003) and donor age > 60 years (OR 9.1, 95% CI 1.3-65, P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for CMV disease.

CONCLUSION

The D+/R- group has the highest incidence of CMV disease and the worst 3-year renal allograft survival despite 3-month universal prophylaxis. Prolonged chemoprophylaxis may be needed to prevent the late development of CMV disease and to improve allograft survival in the high-risk group of AA kidney transplant recipients.

CMV: Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common infection after organ transplantation and has a major impact on morbidity, mortality and graft survival. Optimal prevention, diagnosis and treatment of active CMV infection enhance transplant outcomes, and are the focus of this section. Methods to prevent CMV include universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy; each has its merits, and will be compared and contrasted. Diagnostics have improved substantially in recent years, both in type and quality, allowing for more accurate and savvy treatment; advances in diagnostics include the development of an international standard, which should allow comparison of results across different methodologies, and assays for cellular immune function against CMV. Therapy primarily involves ganciclovir, now rendered more versatile by data suggesting oral therapy with valganciclovir is not inferior to intravenous therapy with ganciclovir. Treatment of resistant virus remains problematic, but is enhanced by the availability of multiple novel therapeutic agents.

Six-month low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus D+/R- kidney transplant patients receiving thymoglobulin induction

BACKGROUND

The use of T-cell-depleting antibody, such as thymoglobulin, is a risk factor for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We studied the effectiveness of 6 months of low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in CMV-naive kidney transplant recipients of CMV-positive donor kidney (D+/R-) receiving thymoglobulin induction.

METHODS

We included all D+/R- kidney transplant patients between October 2005 and December 2010 who received valganciclovir 450 mg daily for 6 months as per center protocol. CMV infection was confirmed by positive viremia. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses were employed to compare the risk of CMV infection between patients with and without the use of thymoglobulin induction.

RESULTS

Out of 170 D+/R- kidney transplant patients, 42 cases of CMV infection (24.6%) were diagnosed after a median follow-up of 3.2 years: six patients from the noninduction (9.4%) and 36 from the induction cohort (34.0%). The induction with thymoglobulin was associated with four times greater risk of developing CMV infection (adjusted hazard ratio: AHR 4.15, 95% 1.75, 9.86, P = .001). The use of thymoglobulin was associated with leukopenia but not neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional measures are needed to reduce the elevated incidence of CMV infection in D+/R- kidney transplant patients receiving induction with thymoglobulin.

Face allotransplantation and burns: a review

Burns may represent one of the main indications for face allotransplantation. Severely disfigured faces featuring a devastating appearance and great functional impairments are not only seen as burn sequelae but also occur as a result of other traumatic injuries, oncological surgical resections, benign tumors (eg, neurofibromatosis), and major congenital malformations. To date, 20 human face composite tissue allotransplants have been performed with success. Despite the initial scepticism about its applicability, due mainly to ethical and technical reasons, the previous worldwide cases and their associated positive outcomes, including acceptable immunosuppressive regimens, excellent aesthetic and functional results, and good psychological acceptance by the recipient, enable the conclusion that face composite tissue allotransplantation has become another therapeutic strategy in the reconstructive surgical armamentarium, which bears special consideration when dealing with severely disfigured burned patients. The aim of this review is to describe the basics of face composite tissue allotransplantation and give an overview of some of the cases performed until now, with special attention paid to debating the pros and cons of its applicability in burn patients.

[Risk factors for cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important opportunistic pathogen in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation and increases mortality due to both direct and indirect effects. The most important risk factor for the development of CMV disease is discordant donor-recipient CMV serology (positive donor and negative recipient), which confers more than 50% risk of developing CMV disease if no prophylaxis is given. The use of highly potent antiviral agents for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients has changed the characteristics of CMV disease in this population. Other classical risk factors for CMV disease include acute graft rejection, the type of organ transplanted, coinfection with other herpesviruses and the type of immunosuppressive agents employed. New risk factors for this complication have recently been described, including variations in the CMV genotype between donor and recipient and genetic alterations in the recipient's innate immunity. The present review discusses classical risk factors and the latest findings reported on the development of CMV in organ transplant recipients.

[Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in pancreatic transplantation]

Pancreatic transplantation carries a higher risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection than renal transplantation alone. The management of CMV disease in pancreatic transplantation depends on the risk indicated by the donor's and recipient's serological profiles (CMV IgG) and the use of antibodies as immunosuppressive therapy (especially thymoglobulin). Most clinical guidelines recommend the use of prophylaxis in preference to preemptive therapy in both donor (D)+/recipient (R)- and D+/R+ pancreatic transplantations. In combinations with highest risk (D+/R-), prophylaxis with valganciclovir 900mg per day for 3 to 6 months is recommended, adjusted to renal funtion. In D+/R+ combinations, if antibody therapy was used in the transplant or in rejection, valgancioclovir prophylaxis is also recommended for 1 to 3 months. When prophylaxis is finished, in both cases, viral load determination (quantitative polymerase chain reaction of CMV) or antigenemia should be carried out for the first year. In D-/R-combinations, preemptive therapy can be considered with determinations of viral load or antigenemia at each follow-up visit during the first year. Once prophylaxis has been suspended, special attention should be paid to the development of delayed CMV disease.

Impact of cytomegalovirus disease in D+/R- kidney transplant patients receiving 6 months low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis

Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease remains common in CMV serology naïve kidney transplant patients of CMV serology positive organs (D+/R-) despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis. We studied clinical efficacy of 6-month low-dose valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis, risk factors for late-onset CMV disease and its impact on kidney transplant outcomes. Between October 2005 and December 2009, 166 consecutive D+/R- kidney alone and simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients received VGCV 450 mg daily for 6 months after transplantation. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 30 cases of CMV disease occurred within the first 2 years after transplantation with a cumulative incidence of 11.5 and 18.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The use of an induction agent with rabbit antithymocyte globulin and older donor age were factors associated with the risk of late-onset CMV disease (AHR 2.91, 95% CI 1.18-7.20, p = 0.021 and AHR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.016, respectively). Late-onset CMV disease was associated with increased risk for death-uncensored graft loss (AHR 2.95, 95% CI 1.15-7.61, p = 0.025). In conclusion, late-onset CMV disease continues to negatively impact kidney transplant outcome despite 6-month low-dose VGCV prophylaxis. Investigations focusing on novel preventive approaches should be emphasized.

Endorsement of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines on kidney transplantation: a European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement

KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) is an international independent body aiming to 'improve the care and outcomes of kidney disease patients worldwide, through the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines'. Recently, the KDIGO work group has produced comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for the care of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy and other complications that are common in KTRs, including haematological and bone disorders. Because most guidelines were 'soft' rather than 'strong', and because global guidelines need to be adapted and implemented into the regional context where they are used, the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board appointed a work group of transplant nephrologists and surgeons to review the newest KDIGO guideline and comment on its relevance and applicability for European KTRs. In this article, we concentrate only on those guidelines which we considered worth amending or adapting. All guidelines not mentioned are fully endorsed.

Effectiveness of valganciclovir 900 mg versus 450 mg for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in transplantation: direct and indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

valganciclovir (VGC) 900 mg is approved for CMV prophylaxis, but it has been associated with 10%-40% leucopenia rate. We hypothesize that VGC 450 mg daily may be as effective as and safer than 900 mg daily.

METHODS

studies evaluating valganciclovir 900 mg and 450 mg daily against controls were evaluated. Direct comparisons were performed by random-effects models and indirect comparisons by the Bucher method.

RESULTS

twelve trials with VGC 900 mg (1543 patients) and 8 trials with VGC 450 mg (1531 patients) were included. The risk of CMV disease with VGC 900 mg versus controls was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], .64-1.76; P = .81; I2=29%) and with VGC 450 mg vs controls .77 (95%CI, .49-1.18; P = .23; I2=24%). The risk of leucopenia was 5.24 (2.09-13.15; P = .0004; I2=44%) for VGC 900 mg versus controls and 1.58 (.96-2.61; P = .07; I2=36%) for VGC 450 mg versus controls; the risk for acute allograft rejection was 1.71 (.45, -6.50; P = .43) for VGC 900 mg and .80 (.50-1.28; P = .34) for VGC 450 mg. Adjusted indirect comparison between VGC 900 mg and VGC 450mg: the risk for CMV disease was not significantly different: odds ratio (OR), 1.38 (.84-2.25); P = .19; the risk of leucopenia was significantly increased with VGC 900 mg: 3.32 (1.76-6.26); P = .0002; and the risk of rejection was significantly increased with VGC 900 mg: 2.56 (1.50-4.53); P = .0005. Results remained consistent after adjustments by allograft, CMV control strategy, and immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

valganciclovir 900 mg showed no superiority efficacy compared to controls (ganciclovir or preemptive) and equivalent efficacy to VGC 450 mg (statistical power: 94% and 97%, respectively) for CMV universal prophylaxis.VGC 900 mg was significantly associated with 3 times increase in the risk of leucopenia and 2 times increase in the risk of rejection compared with VGC 450 mg.

Efficacy and safety of a lower-dose valganciclovir (valcyte) regimen for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the current cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis regimen used at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted in a regional renal transplantation center at a tertiary teaching facility.

STUDY POPULATION

Seventy patients who underwent kidney and/or pancreas transplantation from October 2006 through December 2008 were observed for a period of six months after the procedure. Transplant recipients at risk for developing CMV disease received valganciclovir 450 mg daily.

RESULTS

Outcome measures were incidence of CMV disease and incidence of severe leukopenia during the six-month postoperative period. Of 70 patients, seven (10%) developed CMV disease and five (7.1%) developed severe leukopenia while taking valganciclovir. Based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serostatus, the incidence of CMV disease and severe leukopenia incidence was highest in the D+/R- group. Severe leukopenia developed in one patient with CMV disease who had a D+/R-kidney transplant. No statistical calculations were performed.

CONCLUSION

The current lower-dose valganciclovir regimen at our institution was found to be efficacious and safe, and it provided significant cost savings.

[Cytomegalovirus effects in solid organ transplantation and the role of antiviral prophylaxis]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) belongs to β-Herpesviridae family. Morbidity related to this infectious agent remains a serious concern in the context of immunosuppression. Occurence of CMV infection within the first 3 months post-renal transplantation without any antiviral prophylaxis is about 70% of patients. Direct and indirect effects of CMV infection in the setting of organ transplantation are described in this review. A 3 to 6 months course of prophylaxis with valganciclovir is advised concerning high-risk transplant recipients (D+/R-) but recommendation regarding intermediate-risk transplant recipients (CMV-seropositive patients) is still unclear. Recent studies highlight a benefit of long time prophylaxis (until 6 months) in terms of CMV disease occurence among D+/R- patients. News assays that measures IFNγ responses to a variety of CMV epitopes (Quantiferon(®) and Elispot IFNγ) are developped to predict CMV disease onset after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis. These assays could contribute to adapt prophylaxis to each recipient.

Primary CMV infections are common in kidney transplant recipients after 6 months valganciclovir prophylaxis

Prolonging cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in CMV seronegative recipients of a kidney from CMV seropositive donor (D+/R-) may reduce the incidence of late infections. We analyzed late-onset primary CMV infections after 6 months valganciclovir prophylaxis. Data from all CMV D+/R- kidney transplant recipients between January 2004 and December 2008 at our center were analyzed. Patients with a functioning graft at 6 months after transplantation who received 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis 900 mg once daily were included (N = 127). CMV was diagnosed with quantitative PCR. Prophylaxis was completed in 119 patients. Prophylaxis was stopped at 3-5 months due to leukopenia or gastrointestinal side effects in eight patients. Late-onset primary CMV infection developed in 47/127 (37%) patients median 244 days after transplantation (range 150-655) and median 67 days after the cessation of prophylaxis (range 1-475). Four infections were asymptomatic. In others, symptoms included fever (N = 28), gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) (N = 24), respiratory tract symptoms (N = 12), and hepatopathy (N = 6). Median peak viral load was 13500 copies/mL (range 400-2,831,000). Recurrent CMV infection developed in 9/47 (19%) patients. No significant risk factors for CMV infection were identified. Symptomatic primary CMV infections were commonly detected also after prolonged valganciclovir prophylaxis.

The efficacy and safety of 200 days valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients

Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem with a standard 3-month prophylaxis regimen. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of 200 days' versus 100 days' valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) in 326 high-risk (D+/R-) kidney allograft recipients. Significantly fewer patients in the 200-day group versus the 100-day group developed confirmed CMV disease up to month 12 posttransplant (16.1% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.0001). Confirmed CMV viremia was also significantly lower in the 200-day group (37.4% vs. 50.9%; p = 0.015 at month 12). There was no significant difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection between the groups (11% vs. 17%, respectively, p = 0.114). Adverse events occurred at similar rates between the groups and the majority were rated mild-to-moderate in intensity and not related to study medication. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that extending valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) to 200 days significantly reduces the incidence of CMV disease and viremia through to 12 months compared with 100 days' prophylaxis, without significant additional safety concerns associated with longer treatment. The number needed to treat to avoid one additional patient with CMV disease up to 12 months posttransplant is approximately 5.