Sources of drug coverage among Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD

Annual health care resource utilization and cost among type 2 diabetes patients with newly recognized chronic kidney disease within a large U.S. administrative claims database

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most common complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and results in considerable economic burden. Current studies describing cost and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in T2D patients with CKD in real-world data are few. Even more scarce is evidence that takes into account disease severity and other comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe T2D patients with CKD identified in U.S. administrative claims data using laboratory test results for kidney function that are considered the gold standard criteria for kidney disease diagnosis and (b) estimate the annual HCRU and costs among these patients, overall and by disease severity and comorbidity subgroup. METHODS: Optum CDM data between the years 2008 and 2017 were used to identify T2D patients with newly recognized CKD, using laboratory test results for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The study estimated annualized total, inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs and the number of outpatient, inpatient, and emergency room visits in the first year after CKD identification. Analyses were stratified by prevalent anemia, heart failure (HF), resistant hypertension, and by CKD stages. RESULTS: T2D patients with newly recognized CKD (n = 106,369) had a high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities and incurred on average $24,029 of total cost per person per year in the first year after CKD identification. Patients with HF and anemia incurred on average $41,951 and $31,127 of total annual cost, respectively. Patients identified at stage 5 CKD incurred on average $110,210 of total annual cost and had roughly a 7-fold higher annual inpatient hospitalization rate compared with patients identified at stage 1 CKD. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative claims data linked to laboratory results provide an opportunity to identify CKD patients using the gold standard criteria from clinical practice, minimizing potential misclassification of patients. Identified CKD patients, particularly those with HF, anemia, and more advanced CKD stage, incur high HCRU and cost. Better monitoring, earlier CKD diagnosis, and interventions that are effective in halting or slowing the progression of CKD, as well as at managing comorbid conditions, could be effective means to reduce the economic burden of CKD in T2D. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Bayer. Kelly is an employee of, and owns stock options in, Aetion, which was contracted by Bayer to conduct the study. Petruski-Ivleva was an employee of Aetion during the planning, analysis, and interpretation stages of the study. Kovesdy received honoraria from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Cara Therapeutics, Reata, Takeda, and Tricida. Fried received consultant fees from Bayer, Novo Nordisk, and Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Folkerts, Blankenburg, and Gay are Bayer employees. This work was presented as a poster at the annual European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) conference held in Barcelona, Spain, on September 16-20, 2019.

Osteoporotic fractures in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and end stage renal disease

Background The incidence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is rising. However, the relationship between osteoporotic fractures and SLE in the setting of ESRD remains uninvestigated. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of incident osteoporotic fractures in patients with ESRD with and without SLE, to identify risk factors for fractures in patients with SLE and ESRD, and to examine the contribution of these fractures to mortality. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients with SLE ( n = 716) and a 5% random sample of controls without SLE ( n = 4176) in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) from years 2006-2008 enrolled in Medicare Part D. Results Fractures occurred in 10.6% ( n = 76) of patients with SLE and ESRD and 12.1% ( n = 507) of patients with ESRD without SLE ( p = 0.24). Older age (adjusted relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.04) was associated with an increased risk for fracture in patients with SLE and ESRD. In multivariable analyses, vertebral and hip fractures more than doubled the risk for mortality. Conclusions The frequency of osteoporotic fractures in patients with SLE and ESRD is similar to the general population of patients with ESRD. Vertebral and hip fractures are significant contributors to mortality in patients with SLE and ESRD. Fracture prevention, in particular, for elderly patients with SLE and ESRD, should be considered. Summary SLE is not an independent risk factor for fractures in patients with ESRD. However, among patients with SLE and ESRD, vertebral and hip fractures are significant contributors to mortality.

Utilization and costs of medications associated with CKD mineral and bone disorder in dialysis patients enrolled in Medicare Part D

BACKGROUND

Information is limited regarding utilization patterns and costs for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) medications in Medicare Part D-enrolled dialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Annual cohorts of dialysis patients, 2007-2010.

PREDICTORS

Cohort year, low-income subsidy status, and dialysis provider.

OUTCOMES

Utilization and costs of prescription phosphate binders, oral and intravenous vitamin D analogues, and cinacalcet.

MEASUREMENTS

Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds of medication use for low-income subsidy versus non-low-income subsidy patients and for patients from various dialysis organizations, and we report per-member-per-month and average out-of-pocket costs.

RESULTS

Phosphate binders (∼83%) and intravenous vitamin D (77.5%-79.3%) were the most commonly used CKD-MBD medications in 2007 through 2010. The adjusted odds of prescription phosphate-binder, intravenous vitamin D, and cinacalcet use were significantly higher for low-income subsidy than for non-low-income subsidy patients. Total Part D versus CKD-MBD Part D medication costs increased 22% versus 36% from 2007 to 2010. For Part D-enrolled dialysis patients, CKD-MBD medications represented ∼50% of overall net Part D costs in 2010.

LIMITATIONS

Inability to describe utilization and costs of calcium carbonate, an over-the-counter agent not covered under Medicare Part D; inability to reliably identify prescriptions filled through a non-Part D reimbursement or payment mechanism; findings may not apply to dialysis patients without Medicare Part D benefits or with Medicare Advantage plans, or to pediatric dialysis patients; could identify only prescription drugs dispensed in the outpatient setting; inability to adjust for MBD laboratory values.

CONCLUSIONS

Part D net costs for CKD-MBD medications increased at a faster rate than costs for all Part D medications in dialysis patients despite relatively stable use within medication classes. In a bundled environment, there may be incentives to shift to generic phosphate binders and reduce cinacalcet use.