Ambulation and independence among Veterans with nontraumatic bilateral lower-limb loss

Predictors of Ambulatory Status at 1 Year Following Major Lower Extremity Amputation

Nearly 60,000 major lower extremity amputations (AKA/BKA) are performed annually in the United States. We created a simple risk score for predicting ambulation at 1 year following AKA/BKA. We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative amputation database for patients who underwent above-knee (AKA) or below-knee (BKA) amputation (2013-2018). The primary endpoint was ambulation at 1 year either independently or with assistance. The cohort was divided into 80% derivation and 20% validation. Using the derivation set, a multivariable model identified preoperatively available independent predictors of 1 year ambulation and an integer-based risk-score was created. Scores were calculated to assign patients to risk groups-low, medium, or high chance of being ambulatory at 1 year. Internal validation was performed by applying the risk score to the validation set. Of 8725 AKA/BKA, 2055 met inclusion criteria-excluded: 2644 nonambulatory prior to amputation, 3753 missing 1-year follow-up ambulatory status. The majority-n = 1366, 66% were BKAs. The indications were CLTI; 47%, ischemic tissue loss; 9%, ischemic rest pain; 35%, infection/neuropathic; 9%, acute limb ischemia. Ambulation at 1 year was higher for BKA than AKA: 67%, versus 50%, p < .0001. In the final prediction model, contralateral BKA/AKA was the strongest predictor of nonambulation. The score provided reasonable discrimination (C-statistic = 0.65) and was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = .24). Sixty-two percent of patients who were ambulatory preoperatively remained ambulatory at 1 year. An integer-based risk score can stratify patients according to chance of ambulation at 1 year after major amputation and may be useful for preoperative patient counseling and selection.

Risk Factors for Major Amputation in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to identify the new and the more specific risk factors for major amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).

METHODS

We used data from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) database of our hospital from February 2014 to July 2020. Patients with DFU and amputation were included in the study. The logistic regression model was adjusted for demographic characteristics and related comorbidities between major and minor amputation groups.

RESULTS

Among 3654 patients with DFU, 363 (9.9%) were amputated. Patients with major versus minor amputation, in multivariable logistic regression models, major amputation independent factors included previous amputation history (odds ratio [OR] 2.31 [95% CI 1.17-4.53], p = 0.02), smoking (2.58 [1.31-5.07], p = 0.01), coronary artery disease (CAD) (2.67 [1.35-5.29], p = 0.03), ankle brachial index (ABI) <0.4 (15.77 [7.51-33.13], p < 0.01), Wagner 5 (5.50 [1.89-16.01], p < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (1.23 [1.03-1.48], p = 0.01), glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (1.23 [1.03-1.48], p = 0.03), hemoglobin (Hb) (0.98 [0.96-1.00], p = 0.01), plasma albumin (ALB) (0.88 [0.81-0.95], p < 0.01) and white blood cell (WBC) (1.10 [1.04-1.16], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Major amputation was associated with previous amputation history, smoking, CAD, Wagner 5, ABI <0.4, HbA1c, Hb, ALB, WBC, and APTT might be a new independent factor. In view of these factors, early prevention and guidance promptly orientated by multidisciplinary is of great significance to reduce the disability rate and economic burden.

[Expert assessment of lower extremity prosthetics]

Although the number of major amputations is declining throughout Germany, more than 57,000 surgical procedures for amputation still take place. As a consequence of high prosthetic care costs, these often lead to disputes before the social court in which expert medical opinions are required. With knowledge of the legal norms, the remit of the expert opinion can be fulfilled. The expert begins with evaluation of the patient's file and a search of the contested parts. The investigation includes a medical history, in addition to a physical examination, in order to be able to comment on the disputed beneficial use of the therapeutic appliance and respond to questions of proof. Questionnaires may be helpful.

Bone-anchored prostheses in patients with traumatic bilateral transfemoral amputations: rehabilitation description and outcome in 12 cases treated with the OPRA implant system

PURPOSE

To describe the rehabilitation experience and outcome of treatment with bone-anchored prostheses in individuals with bilateral transfemoral amputations (TFAs) treated in Sweden over a period of 25 years.

METHOD

Hospital records were reviewed for all patients with traumatic bilateral TFAs treated until 2015. The use of prostheses, walking aids and wheelchairs was noted.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 12 patients (nine men and three women with a mean age 35 years at treatment) and the median follow-up time was seven years (1-20). At baseline, 9/12 used prostheses and 3/12 did not. The main means of locomotion was in a wheelchair without wearing prostheses (n = 8/12) or in a wheelchair in combination with prosthetic walking supported by walking aids (n = 4/12). All prosthetic users had problems with sitting comfort. At follow-up, 11/12 patients used prostheses, while one did not. The means of locomotion was prosthetic walking in 3/12 cases, a combination of a wheelchair and prosthetic walking in 4/12, a wheelchair while wearing prostheses but not walking in 4/12 and a wheelchair without wearing prostheses in 1/12. Three patients walked unsupported by walking aids. Seven patients had no problem with prosthetic sitting comfort (n = 3 had small problems).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone-anchored prostheses in patients with bilateral TFAs resulted in more prosthesis use during everyday locomotion, due hypothetically to improved comfort while wearing prostheses. The results further underline the importance of other assistive devices such as wheelchairs and walking aids used in combination with prostheses in this group of patients facing severe functional limitations. Implications for Rehabilitation This study provides an insight into the details of the rehabilitation and outcome in patients with traumatic bilateral transfemoral amputations treated with bone-anchored prostheses in Sweden. The treatment can lead to a large amount of prosthetic use, but most patients will also use a range of assistive devices including full-length prostheses, stubbies, walking aids and wheelchairs after treatment. The importance of sitting in comfort while wearing prostheses should not be underestimated in patients with bilateral transfemoral amputations.

General outcomes and risk factors for minor and major amputations in Brazil

Objectives Major and minor amputations are associated with significant rates of mortality. However, little is known about the impact of unplanned redo-amputation during the same hospitalization on outcomes. The objectives of this study were to identify the risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality after both major and minor amputations as well as the results of unplanned redo-amputation on outcome. Methods Retrospective study of 342 consecutive patients who were treated with lower extremity amputation in Brazil between January 2013 and October 2014. Results The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in major compared to minor amputation (25.6% vs. 4.1%; p < 0.0001). Whereas chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and planned staged amputation predicted in-hospital mortality after major amputation, age, and congestive heart failure predicted mortality after minor amputation. The white blood cell count predicted in-hospital mortality following both major and minor amputation. However, postoperative infection predicted in-hospital mortality only following major amputation. Conclusions In-hospital mortality was high after major amputations. Unplanned redo-amputation was not a predictor of in-hospital mortality after major or minor amputation. Planned staged amputation was associated with reduced survival after major but not minor amputation. Postoperative infection predicted mortality after major amputation. Systemic diseases and postoperative white blood cell were associated with in-hospital mortality. This study suggests a possible link between a pro-inflammatory state and increased in-hospital mortality following amputation.

Hip prosthesis in sitting posture for bilateral transfemoral amputee after burn injury: a case report

BACKGROUND

To overcome the challenges of rehabilitation of bilateral transfemoral amputees, we developed a novel "hip prosthesis in the sitting posture." Case Description and Methods: A 64-year-old male bilateral transfemoral amputee was transferred for rehabilitation 4 months following a burn injury. His wounds remained unhealed for 20 months; thus, he was unable to participate in standing training with the standard prosthetic sockets. Hip prosthesis in the sitting posture has very little friction between the sockets and residual limbs, which facilitated our patient to begin standing and walking exercises. Findings and Outcomes: The patient's refractory wounds healed 1 month after initiating exercises using hip prosthesis in the sitting posture, and he could begin rehabilitation with the standard prostheses.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Hip prosthesis in the sitting posture enabled a bilateral transfemoral amputee with unhealed residual limbs to stand, walk, and begin balance training. Hip prosthesis in the sitting posture is an effective temporary prosthesis to prevent disuse until wounds are healed and to continue rehabilitation with standard prostheses. Clinical relevance Hip prosthesis in the sitting posture is useful for bilateral transfemoral amputees with unhealed residual limbs after burn injuries to prevent disuse and maintain motivation for walking.