The effect of common wrist orthoses on the stiffness of wrist rotations

Does thermoplastics' thickness influence joint stabilization and movement coordination? An inferential study of wrist orthoses

BACKGROUND

Given the existence of multiple low-temperature thermoplastics, clinicians fabricating can readily modify an orthoses' thickness, weight and flexibility, among other properties. However, there is limited evidence on the impact of such different materials on upper extremities' biomechanics.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate differences in joint stabilization and movement coordination provided by upper extremity orthotics fabricated with low-temperature thermoplastics of different thicknesses.

STUDY DESIGN

Inferential, cross-sectional study.

METHOD

We conducted a kinematic analysis of a standardized task through a three-dimensional motion capture system. Ten participants (5 female) performed the same task under three circumstances: 1) wearing a volar wrist immobilization orthosis, made with a 3.2-mm thick low-temperature thermoplastic; 2) using the same orthotic fabricated with a 1.6-mm thick material; and (3) without orthoses. We divided the standardized task into five logical phases for data analysis, obtaining the active range of motion of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and wrist joints as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included movement smoothness and coordination, measured by the number of motor units, time, and distance travelled by the upper extremity.

RESULTS

Despite changes in thermoplastic thickness, both orthotics significantly restricted the wrist motion during task performance (F(2,16) = 14.32, P < .01, and η2p = 0.797), with no difference between the 2 devices and no significant changes to proximal joints' active range of motion. Although orthoses use increased the time required for task performance (F(2,16) = 23.05, P < .01, and η2p = 0.742), no significant differences in movement smoothness or coordination were noted.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that wrist orthoses fabricated with a 1.6-mm thick low-temperature thermoplastic can provide joint stabilization similar to a device made from a 3.2-mm thickness material, suggesting thinner thermoplastics' efficacy to stabilize joints in the absence of contractures or preexisting chronic conditions.

Design of a lightweight passive orthosis for tremor suppression

Background

Tremor is the most common movement disorder with the highest prevalence in the upper limbs. The mechanical suppression of involuntary movements is an alternative and additional treatment to medication or surgery. Here we present a new, soft, lightweight, task asjustable and passive orthosis for tremor suppression.

Methods

A new concept of a manual, textile-based, passive orthosis was designed with an integrated, task adjustable, air-filled structure, which can easily be inflated or deflated on-demand for a certain daily activity. The air-filled structure is placed on the dorsal side of the wrist and gets bent and compressed by movements when inflated. In a constant volume air-filled structure, air pressure increases while it is inflating, creating a counterforce to the compression caused by bending. We characterised the air-filled structure stiffness by measuring the reaction torque as a function of the angle of deflection on a test bench. Furthermore, we evaluated the efficacy of the developed passive soft orthosis by analysing the suppression of involuntary movements in the wrist of a tremor-affected patient during different activities of daily living (i.e. by calculating the power spectral densities of acceleration).

Results

By putting special emphasis on the comfort and wearability of the orthosis, we achieved a lightweight design (33 g). The measurements of the angular deflection and resulting reaction torques show non-linear, hysteretic, behaviour, as well as linear behaviour with a coefficient of determination (R²) between 0.95 and 0.99. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the soft orthosis significantly reduces tremor power for daily living activities, such as drinking from a cup, pouring water and drawing a spiral, by 74 to 82% (p = 0.03); confirmed by subjective tremor-reducing perception by the patient.

Conclusion

The orthosis we developed is a lightweight and unobtrusive assistive technology, which suppresses involuntary movements and shows high wearability properties, with the potential to be comfortable. This air-structure technology could also be applied to other movement disorders, like spasticity, or even be integrated into future exoskeletons and exosuits for the implementation of variable stiffness in the systems.

Model-based analysis of the stiffness of the wrist joint in active and passive conditions

The control of joint stiffness is a fundamental mechanism used to control human movements. While many studies have observed how stiffness is modulated for tasks involving shoulder and elbow motion, a limited amount of knowledge is available for wrist movements, though the wrist plays a crucial role in manipulation. We have developed a computational framework based on a realistic musculoskeletal model, which al to calculate the passive and active components of the wrist joint stiffness. We first used the framework to validate the musculoskeletal model against experimental measurements of the wrist joint stiffness, and then to study the contribution of different muscle groups to the passive joint stiffness. We finally used the framework to study the effect of muscle co-contraction on the active joint stiffness. The results show that thumb and finger muscles play a crucial role in determining the passive wrist joint stiff- ness: in the neutral posture, the direction of maximum stiffness aligns with the experimental measurements, and the magnitude increases by 113% when they are included. Moreover, the analysis of the controllability of joint stiffness showed that muscle co-contraction positively correlates with the stiffness magnitude and negatively correlates with the variability of the stiffness orientation (p < 0.01 in both cases). Finally, an exhaustive search showed that with appropriate selection of a muscle activation strategy, the joint stiffness orientation can be arbitrarily modulated. This observation suggests the absence of biomechanical constraints on the controllability of the orientation of the wrist joint stiffness.

Control of redundant pointing movements involving the wrist and forearm

The musculoskeletal system can move in more ways than are strictly necessary, allowing many tasks to be accomplished with a variety of limb configurations. Why some configurations are preferred has been a focus of motor control research, but most studies have focused on shoulder-elbow or whole arm movements. This study focuses on movements involving forearm pronation-supination (PS), wrist flexion-extension (FE), and wrist radial-ulnar deviation (RUD) and elucidates how these three degrees of freedom (DOF) combine to perform the common task of pointing, which only requires two DOF. Although pointing is more sensitive to FE and RUD than to PS and could be easily accomplished with FE and RUD alone, subjects tend to involve a small amount of PS. However, why we choose this behavior has been unknown and is the focus of this paper. With the use of a second-order model with lumped parameters, we tested a number of plausible control strategies involving minimization of work, potential energy, torque, and path length. None of these control schemes robustly predicted the observed behavior. However, an alternative control scheme, hypothesized to control the DOF that were most important to the task (FE and RUD) and ignore the less important DOF (PS), matched the observed behavior well. In particular, the behavior observed in PS appears to be a mechanical side effect caused by unopposed interaction torques. We conclude that moderately sized pointing movements involving the wrist and forearm are controlled by ignoring forearm rotation even though this strategy does not robustly minimize work, potential energy, torque, or path length. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Many activities require us to point our hands in a given direction using wrist and forearm rotations. Although there are infinitely many ways to do this, we tend to follow a stereotyped pattern. Why we choose this pattern has been unknown and is the focus of this paper. After testing a variety of hypotheses, we conclude that the pattern results from a simplifying strategy in which we focus on wrist rotations and ignore forearm rotation.

Fundamental Principles of Tremor Propagation in the Upper Limb

Although tremor is the most common movement disorder, there exist few effective tremor-suppressing devices, in part because the characteristics of tremor throughout the upper limb are unknown. To clarify, optimally suppressing tremor requires a knowledge of the mechanical origin, propagation, and distribution of tremor throughout the upper limb. Here we present the first systematic investigation of how tremor propagates between the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and wrist. We simulated tremor propagation using a linear, time-invariant, lumped-parameter model relating joint torques and the resulting joint displacements. The model focused on the seven main degrees of freedom from the shoulder to the wrist and included coupled joint inertia, damping, and stiffness. We deliberately implemented a simple model to focus first on the most basic effects. Simulating tremorogenic joint torque as a sinusoidal input, we used the model to establish fundamental principles describing how input parameters (torque location and frequency) and joint impedance (inertia, damping, and stiffness) affect tremor propagation. We expect that the methods and principles presented here will serve as the groundwork for future refining studies to understand the origin, propagation, and distribution of tremor throughout the upper limb in order to enable the future development of optimal tremor-suppressing devices.