1
|
Zheng S, Jin S, Jiao M, Wang W, Zhou X, Xu J, Wang Y, Dou P, Jin Z, Wu C, Li J, Ge X, Xu K. Tumor-targeted Gd-doped mesoporous Fe 3O 4 nanoparticles for T 1/T 2 MR imaging guided synergistic cancer therapy. Drug Deliv 2021; 28:787-799. [PMID: 33866915 PMCID: PMC8079076 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1909177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, a novel intelligent nanoplatform to integrate multiple imaging and therapeutic functions for targeted cancer theranostics. The nanoplatform, DOX@Gd-MFe3O4 NPs, was constructed Gd-doped mesoporous Fe3O4 nanoparticles following with the doxorubicin (DOX) loading in the mesopores of the NPs. The DOX@Gd-MFe3O4 NPs exhibited good properties in colloidal dispersity, photothermal conversion, NIR triggered drug release, and high T1/T2 relaxicity rate (r1=9.64 mM−1s−1, r2= 177.71 mM−1s−1). Benefiting from the high MR contrast, DOX@Gd-MFe3O4 NPs enabled simultaneous T1/T2 dual-modal MR imagining on 4T1 bearing mice in vivo and the MR contrast effect was further strengthened by external magnetic field. In addition, the DOX@Gd-MFe3O4 NPs revealed the strongest inhibition to the growth of 4T1 in vitro and in vivo under NIR irradiation and guidance of external magnetic field. Moreover, biosafety was also validated by in vitro and in vivo tests. Thus, the prepared DOX@Gd-MFe3O4 NPs would provide a promising intelligent nanoplatform for dual-modal MR imagining guided synergistic therapy in cancer theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaohui Zheng
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Shang Jin
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Min Jiao
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Wenjun Wang
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhou
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Jie Xu
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yong Wang
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Peipei Dou
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Zhen Jin
- College of Medical Engineering, Xinxiang Key Laboratory of Neurobiosensor, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan , China
| | - Changyu Wu
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Jingjing Li
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Xinting Ge
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| | - Kai Xu
- School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Medical Imaging and Digital Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luo Y, McShan DL, Matuszak MM, Ray D, Lawrence TS, Jolly S, Kong FM, Ten Haken RK, Naqa IE. A multiobjective Bayesian networks approach for joint prediction of tumor local control and radiation pneumonitis in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for response-adapted radiotherapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:10.1002/mp.13029. [PMID: 29862533 PMCID: PMC6279602 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Individualization of therapeutic outcomes in NSCLC radiotherapy is likely to be compromised by the lack of proper balance of biophysical factors affecting both tumor local control (LC) and side effects such as radiation pneumonitis (RP), which are likely to be intertwined. Here, we compare the performance of separate and joint outcomes predictions for response-adapted personalized treatment planning. METHODS A total of 118 NSCLC patients treated on prospective protocols with 32 cases of local progression and 20 cases of RP grade 2 or higher (RP2) were studied. Sixty-eight patients with 297 features before and during radiotherapy were used for discovery and 50 patients were reserved for independent testing. A multiobjective Bayesian network (MO-BN) approach was developed to identify important features for joint LC/RP2 prediction using extended Markov blankets as inputs to develop a BN predictive structure. Cross-validation (CV) was used to guide the MO-BN structure learning. Area under the free-response receiver operating characteristic (AU-FROC) curve was used to evaluate joint prediction performance. RESULTS Important features including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), micro RNAs, pretreatment cytokines, pretreatment PET radiomics together with lung and tumor gEUDs were selected and their biophysical inter-relationships with radiation outcomes (LC and RP2) were identified in a pretreatment MO-BN. The joint LC/RP2 prediction yielded an AU-FROC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86) upon internal CV. This improved to 0.85 (0.75-0.91) with additional two SNPs, changes in one cytokine and two radiomics PET image features through the course of radiotherapy in a during-treatment MO-BN. This MO-BN model outperformed combined single-objective Bayesian networks (SO-BNs) during-treatment [0.78 (0.67-0.84)]. AU-FROC values in the evaluation of the MO-BN and individual SO-BNs on the testing dataset were 0.77 and 0.68 for pretreatment, and 0.79 and 0.71 for during-treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS MO-BNs can reveal possible biophysical cross-talks between competing radiotherapy clinical endpoints. The prediction is improved by providing additional during-treatment information. The developed MO-BNs can be an important component of decision support systems for personalized response-adapted radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Daniel L. McShan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Martha M. Matuszak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Dipankar Ray
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Theodore S. Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Shruti Jolly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Feng-Ming Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202 United States
| | - Randall K. Ten Haken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103 United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Since the discovery of X-rays, the goal of radiotherapy has been to deliver an optimal dose in the target volume and the lowest possible dose in the normal tissues. The history of radiotherapy can be divided in three periods. The Kilovoltage era (1900-1939) where only superficial and radiosensitive tumours could be controlled, the Megavoltage era (1950-1995) where Telecobalt and linear accelerators could deliver high doses in all parts of the body. Radiotherapy has since been playing an important curative and conservative role for most cancers. The Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy era (1995-2010) now provides the capacity to optimise the dose distribution in three dimensions. Dose is better conformed to the target volume and organ at risk are better preserved. intensity modulated radio-therapy (IMRT) allows to "shape" concave isodoses and to spare the parotids when irradiating oropharyngeal tumours. Moving targets (lung, liver etc.) are efficiently irradiated using "on-line tracking" and "image-guided radiotherapy". Stereotactic irradiation, first initiated for brain lesions, is now performed for extra-cranial tumours and due to its millimetric precision opens the way back to hypo-fractionated treatments. The next period, already ongoing, is Hadrontherapy with protons and soon helium or carbon ions techniques. In a multidisciplinary strategy, progress in radiotherapy is based on a global approach of the patient and tailored/personalized well targeted treatment of the tumour.
Collapse
|