[Role of the surgical pathologist for tissue management in oncology]

Cell-blocks and other ancillary studies (including molecular genetic tests and proteomics)

Many types of elective ancillary tests may be required to support the cytopathologic interpretations. Most of these tests can be performed on cell-blocks of different cytology specimens. The cell-block sections can be used for almost any special stains including various histochemistry stains and for special stains for different microorganisms including fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii (carinii), and various organisms including acid-fast organisms similar to the surgical biopsy specimens. Similarly, in addition to immunochemistry, different molecular tests can be performed on cell-blocks. Molecular tests broadly can be divided into two main types Molecular genetic tests and Proteomics.

Tissues under-vacuum to overcome suboptimal preservation

The accuracy of histopathological diagnosis is strictly reliant on adequate tissue preservation, which is completely dependent on pre-analytical variables. Among these variables, the time interval between the end of surgical excision to the onset of fixation (the cold ischemia time) may adversely affect preservation of tissue morphology, influencing the interpretation and reproducibility of diagnosis. During this time interval, the activation of enzymes may produce autolysis and degradation of antigens and nucleic acids, thus potentially affecting immunocytochemical and molecular results. Several studies have described under-vacuum at 4 °C storage of fresh surgical specimens as a safe and reliable method to control cold ischemia and preserve fresh tissues, as well as to standardize fixation times and implement tissue-banking. This review article gives a systematic overview of the advantages and drawbacks of the use of under-vacuum tissue preservation and cooling in surgical pathology, highlighting the impact this procedure may have on diagnostic and experimental pathology. It also documents our experience acquired within daily practice and national and international projects.

Utility of ultrasound-guided liver tumor biopsy for next-generation sequencing-based clinical sequencing

AIM

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies allow for evaluation of genetic alterations in various cancer-related genes in daily clinical practice. Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue is often used for NGS-based clinical sequencing assays; however, the success rate of NGS assays using archival FFPE tumor tissue is reported to be lower than that using fresh tumor tissue. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided liver tumor biopsy for NGS-based multiplex gene assays.

METHODS

We compared the success rate of NGS assays between archival FFPE tumor tissues and US-guided liver tumor biopsy tissues, and summarized the treatment progress of the patients.

RESULTS

Next-generation sequencing assays using US-guided liver biopsy samples were successful in all patients (22/22), whereas the success rate with archival FFPE tumor tissue was 84.8% (151/178, P < 0.05). At least one potentially actionable genetic alteration was identified from the US-guided liver biopsy samples in 20 of 22 patients. Among the 18 patients with actionable genetic alterations targetable with drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, eight initiated mutation-driven targeted therapies. Of these eight patients, four achieved partial response or stable disease for at least 4 months, and three were not assessable for response due to short exposure. There were no biopsy-related complications requiring additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that US-guided liver tumor biopsy is a useful and safe method for obtaining high-quality samples for NGS-based clinical sequencing. In cases with metastatic liver tumors, US-guided biopsy should be considered to provide accurate and optimal sequencing results for patients.

The challenges of evaluating predictive biomarkers using small biopsy tissue samples and liquid biopsies from non-small cell lung cancer patients

The list of theranostic biomarkers for the care of patients with advanced stage or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer has lengthened considerably these last few years. Moreover, the advances in therapeutics will certainly increase the number and complexity of these tests performed in laboratories in the near future. In addition, the methods for investigation of biomarkers that require access to biological tissue are less and less invasive with the consequential increase in the use of small-sized tissue biopsies and cytological and blood samples. Thus, each laboratory must master the management of the biological samples according to the number and type of tests to be performed. This review will provide an update of the difference challenges facing pathologists and biologist in responding to the issues related to new treatments. These challenges concern: (I) the management of the pre-analytical phase; (II) the appropriate choice of the technological approach; (III) the performance of quality control; (IV) the mastering of the delay in obtaining the results; and (V) the economic model of the laboratory.

Tumor mutational burden in non-small cell lung cancer-the pathologist's point of view

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the pathologist has contributed to the development of personalized medicine from the determination of the right histological type to EGFR and ALK/ROS1 molecular screening for targeted therapies. With the development of immunotherapies, pathologists intervene forefront with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical testing, companion test for pembrolizumab monotherapy, first line and complementary test to the other programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) PD-L1 inhibitors. Recently, tumor mutational burden has emerged as a promising tool to evaluate sensitivity to immunotherapy (IO). The pathologist has a crucial role in the setting of tumor mutational burden (TMB) testing for the selection and the preparation of the sample for high throughput molecular analysis, and in the first steps of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow.

Immunohistochemistry for Diagnosis of Metastatic Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site

Immunohistochemistry has become an essential ancillary examination for the identification and classification of carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUPs). Over the last decade, the diagnostic accuracy of organ- or tumour-specific immunomarkers and the clinical validation of effective immunohistochemical panels has improved significantly. When dealing with small sample sizes, diagnostic accuracy is crucial, particularly in the current era of targeted molecular and immune-based therapies. Effective systematic use of appropriate immunohistochemical panels enables accurate classification of most of the undifferentiated carcinomas as well as careful preservation of tissues for potential molecular or other ancillary tests. This review discusses the algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of CUPs using CK7 and CK20 staining patterns. It outlines the most frequently used tissue-specific antibodies, provides some pitfalls essential in avoiding potential diagnostic errors and discusses the complementary tools, such as molecular tumour profiling and mutation-specific antibodies, for the improvement of diagnosis and prediction of the treatment response.

Any Place for Immunohistochemistry within the Predictive Biomarkers of Treatment in Lung Cancer Patients?

The identification of certain genomic alterations (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF) or immunological markers (PD-L1) in tissues or cells has led to targeted treatment for patients presenting with late stage or metastatic lung cancer. These biomarkers can be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or by molecular biology (MB) techniques. These approaches are often complementary but depending on, the quantity and quality of the biological material, the urgency to get the results, the access to technological platforms, the financial resources and the expertise of the team, the choice of the approach can be questioned. The possibility of detecting simultaneously several molecular targets, and of analyzing the degree of tumor mutation burden and of the micro-satellite instability, as well as the recent requirement to quantify the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells, has led to case by case development of algorithms and international recommendations, which depend on the quality and quantity of biological samples. This review will highlight the different predictive biomarkers detected by IHC for treatment of lung cancer as well as the present advantages and limitations of this approach. A number of perspectives will be considered.

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for non-small cell lung carcinoma: which strategy should be adopted?

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 detection with immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the only predictive biomarker available to date for PD-L1/PD1 immunotherapy in thoracic oncology. While many studies have been published on this biomarker, they raise a number of questions concerning mainly, (i) the type of antibody for use and its condition of utilization, (ii) the threshold to be used, (iii) the message and information to communicate to the thoracic oncologist and, (iv) the adoption of this methodology as part of the daily practices of a pathology laboratory. Areas covered: This review provides an update on the use of the different PD-L1 antibodies for IHC in the context of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discusses their use as companion or complementary diagnostic tests. The limits of PD-L1 IHC as a predictive test, the precautions to be adopted as well as some perspectives will then be considered. Expert commentary: IHC for PD-L1 can be considered as a theranostic test, which implies providing an extremely reliable result that avoids any false positive and negative results. PD-L1 IHC requires considerable expertise and specific training of pathologists. PD-L1 IHC can be a companion or complementary diagnostic test depending on the clone employed, the molecular therapy prescribed and the indication of use.

Analysis of Pre-Analytic Factors Affecting the Success of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing of Solid Organ Malignancies

Application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to routine clinical practice has enabled characterization of personalized cancer genomes to identify patients likely to have a response to targeted therapy. The proper selection of tumor sample for downstream NGS based mutational analysis is critical to generate accurate results and to guide therapeutic intervention. However, multiple pre-analytic factors come into play in determining the success of NGS testing. In this review, we discuss pre-analytic requirements for AmpliSeq PCR-based sequencing using Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) (Life Technologies), a NGS sequencing platform that is often used by clinical laboratories for sequencing solid tumors because of its low input DNA requirement from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissue. The success of NGS mutational analysis is affected not only by the input DNA quantity but also by several other factors, including the specimen type, the DNA quality, and the tumor cellularity. Here, we review tissue requirements for solid tumor NGS based mutational analysis, including procedure types, tissue types, tumor volume and fraction, decalcification, and treatment effects.