[Advantages of Kasai procedure through minimally invasive approach in children with biliary atresia (in Russian only)]

Laparoscopic versus open portoenterostomy for treatment of biliary atresia: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to compare laparoscopic portoenterostomy versus open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the databases EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane, we carried out a thorough literature search up to 2022. Studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of biliary atresia were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies comparing laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LPE) (n = 689) and open portoenterostomy (OPE) (n = 818) were considered appropriate for meta-analysis. Age at surgery time was lower in the LPE group than OPE group (I² = 84%), (WMD - 4.70, 95% CI - 9.14 to - 0.26; P = 0.04). Significantly decreased blood loss (I² = 94%), (WMD - 17.85, 95% CI - 23.67 to - 12.02; P < 0.00001) and time to feed were found in the laparoscopic group (I² = 97%), (WMD - 2.88, 95% CI - 4.71 to - 1.04; P = 0.002). Significantly decreased operative time was found in the open group (I² = 85%), (WMD 32.52, 95% CI 15.65-49.39; P = 0.0002). Weight, transfusion rate, overall complication rate, cholangitis, time to drain removal, length of stay, jaundice clearance, and two-year transplant-free survival were not significantly different across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic portoenterostomy provides advantages regarding operative bleeding and the time to begin feeding. No differences in remain characteristics. Based on the data presented to us by this meta-analysis, LPE is not superior to OPE in terms of overall results.

Laparoscopic vs open portoenterostomy in biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hepatoportoenterostomy remains the cornerstone of treatment for biliary atresia. Current employed techniques include laparoscopy and open surgery. This study aims to determine if either method provides an advantage. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Nineteen studies were included. Mean operative time 34.98 (95% CI 20.10, 49.85; p ≤ 0.00001) was longer in laparoscopic while bleeding volumes - 16.63 (95% CI - 23.39, - 9.86; p ≤ 0.00001) as well as the time to normal diet - 2.42 (95% CI - 4.51, - 0.32; p = 0.02) were lower in the laparoscopic group. No differences were observed in mean length of stay - 0.83. Similar complication, transfusions, postoperative cholangitis 0.97, and transplant free survival rates 1.00 (0.63, 1.60; p = 0.99) were seen between groups. Laparoscopic portoenterostomy provides advantages on operative time and bleeding as well as to normal diet when compared to open procedures. Both procedures showed no differences in length of stay, complications, cholangitis, and importantly, native liver survival. Level of evidence: III.

Long-Term Effects of Kasai Portoenterostomy for Biliary Atresia Treatment in Russia

This prospective study enrolled 144 patients after surgical treatment of biliary atresia in early infancy. We analyzed the immediate effectiveness of the surgery and the age-related structure of complications in the up to 16-year follow-up. The immediate 2-year survival rate after the surgery constituted 49.5%. At the time of this writing, 17 of the patients had celebrated their 10th birthdays with good quality of life and no indications for transplantation of the liver. The obtained results underscore the critical importance of surgical correction of biliary atresia by Kasai surgery in the first 60 days of life and subsequent dynamic follow-up of patients for the purpose of the early detection and timely correction of possible complications.