[Features of the neuroradiological picture of ganglioglioma on the example of 20 clinical cases]

[The structural basis of epileptogenesis in an adult patient: the comprehensive diagnostics experience]

On the example of the diagnosis of the structural basis of focal epilepsy in an adult patient, the possibilities of a multimodal and interdisciplinary approach to diagnosis, combining the latest methods of neuroimaging with the results of neurophysiological examinations, are considered. The interaction and high qualification of specialists in epileptology, neuroradiology and pathomorphology provide a high probability to determine the cause of the focal forms of epilepsy. Along with the introduction of super-inductive MR systems, it is important to use their capabilities correctly and optimize the scanning protocol for the individual characteristics of the patient. With a long-term pharmacoresistant course of focal epilepsy, accompanied by low quality of life, the progression of neurological deficits and the aggravation of cognitive and personality problems in patients, it becomes obvious that these patients, even with negative results of standard MRI, are candidates for a more in-depth comprehensive examination to identify the structural basis of epileptogenesis and subsequent epileptic surgery. However, the problem of epilepsy pseudoresistance should be considered, when a patient with uncontrolled seizures takes antiepileptic drugs for a long time in inadequate dosages. Modern comprehensive diagnostics offers new rational approaches to antiepileptic therapy indication on the part of the doctor, as well as to improve the patient's compliance to the treatment.

A novel histopathological grading system for ganglioglioma

Gangliogliomas are central nervous system tumors located in the temporal lobe of young patients, frequently associated with epilepsy. In this paper, we propose a grading system based solely on histopathological criteria. We reevaluated all cases of ganglioglioma, atypical ganglioglioma, and anaplastic ganglioglioma diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 in the Pathology Department of the Emergency Clinical Hospital Bagdasar-Arseni, based on the type of glial mitoses, the number of neuronal and glial mitoses, presence of necrosis, microvascular proliferation, eosinophilic granular bodies, hypercellularity, presence and disposition of inflammatory infiltrate and atypical pleomorphism. Based on the proposed grading system, a score of 0–4 corresponded to a benign ganglioglioma, 5–9 to an atypical ganglioglioma, and 10–18 to an anaplastic ganglioglioma. The survival rates were 90% for benign ganglioglioma, 71.43% for atypical ganglioglioma, and 62.54% for anaplastic ganglioglioma. One case of benign ganglioglioma underwent a malignant transformation into anaplastic ganglioglioma, and recurrences were noticed in 28.57% of atypical ganglioglioma cases and 30.7% of all anaplastic gangliogliomas. The presence of rare glial mitoses and hypercellularity was correlated with mortality in cases of atypical ganglioglioma. We believe this histopathological scoring system could be used as a three-tier system to identify atypical ganglioglioma cases that are bound to have an aggressive course of evolution and require close follow-up. The other option would be to convert it to a two-tier grading system that can separate low-grade gangliogliomas from high-grade ones. The latter category can encompass both atypical and anaplastic ganglioglioma due to the high mortality of both entities.