[Combined treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Experience of the Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute]

Surgical management outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations after preoperative embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has been shown to mitigate morbidity for high-risk AVMs, chiefly by reducing lesional blood flow before resection. However, associated risks include postembolization AVM rupture, and the effect of preoperative embolization on outcome remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature on preoperative embolization for microsurgically treated AVMs.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all English-language publications reporting clinical outcomes after combined embolization and surgical resection for AVMs. Single- and 2-arm analyses were performed using random-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies with 2108 patients were included in this analysis. Most patients (90.6%) who underwent embolization had at least a 50% obliteration of AVMs on posttreatment preoperative angiography, with a mean rate of obliteration of approximately 80% (range 28.8-100%). Among patients who had combined treatment, 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-4.6%) experienced embolization-related hemorrhagic complications before surgery. Both treatment groups achieved excellent postsurgical complete resection rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% CI 0.60-1.85). Neither the clinical outcome (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.84-2.40) nor the total number of hemorrhagic complications (OR 1.84; 95% CI 0.88-3.85) was significantly different between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, preoperative embolization appears to have substantially reduced the lesional volume with active AV shunting before AVM resection. Anecdotally, preoperative embolization facilitates safe and efficient resection; however, differences in outcomes were not significant. The decision to pursue preoperative embolization remains a nuanced decision based on individual lesion anatomy and treatment team experience.

[Relationship between the features of venous drainage of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage]

BACKGROUND

Intracranial hemorrhage is the most common complication of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM). In recent years, most studies devoted to the features of AVM functioning consider venous drainage as important factor influencing the rupture of malformation.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature data on the relationship between the features of venous drainage of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We found 43 studies discussing the features of AVM venous drainage for the period from 1982 to 2020. Most of reports were published between 2005 and 2020.

RESULTS

Deep venous drainage and a single drainage vein were the most significant factors influencing the risk of hemorrhage. Venous ectasia, reflux, stenosis, number, length and tortuosity of drainage veins were less important for the risk of AVM rupture.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the features of AVM venous drainage can make it possible to predict the natural course of disease and risk of intracranial hemorrhage. These aspects are essential for neurosurgical treatment.

[Molecular mechanisms of growth and relapse of cerebral arteriovenous malformations]

Cerebral AVMs are not static congenital formations, they may grow, recur, and even appear de novo after complete resection, embolization, or radiosurgery. The author analyzes modern literature on the molecular mechanisms of AVM growth. The AVM intranidal vessels are exposed to abnormally high blood flows, which leads to the activation of molecular pathways in endothelial cells, causing proliferation and remodeling of AVM vessels. The existence of cerebral AVM is determined by more than 860 genes, the most important among them are the genetic mutations (SNPs) of VEGF, TGF-β, IL-6, MMP, ANG, ENG. The possible causes of AVM relapse after removal or total embolization are described, as well as the mechanisms of stimulation of angiogenesis after partial embolization: hemodynamic changes in AVM, aseptic inflammation in response to embolizate and the local regional hypoxia inside the AVM. In response to this, growth factors are expressed in the endothelium that further stimulate angiogenesis in AVM. Understanding the complex molecular biology of AVMs is critical to identifying and predicting their behavior, developing new treatments that improve the results of endovascular and surgical treatment.

[Combination treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations using endovascular and microsurgical techniques]

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 40 patients with cerebral AVMs. In the study group, 14 (35%) patients underwent microsurgical resection without preliminary embolization (1st group), and 26 (65%) patients underwent combined treatment (endovascular embolization and microsurgical intervention, 2nd group). The first group included patients with S&M grade I-III AVMs, and the second group included patients with S&M grade II-V AVMs. Treatment outcomes were evaluated with allowance for completeness of AVM resection, operative blood loss, duration of surgery, changes in clinical and neurological impairments according to the modified Rankin scale, and rate of neurological and surgical complications.

RESULTS

According to postoperative findings, AVMs were totally resected in all patients. Persistent focal neurological symptoms developed in 2 (7.7%) cases in the second group; neurological complications occurred in 1 (7.1%) patient in the first group. The mean blood loss during resection of AVMs without preliminary embolization and embolized AVMs in patients with S&M grade I-III AVMs was 271.4 mL and 149.1 mL, respectively. The duration of surgery and blood loss did not differ significantly in microsurgery and combination treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment, including microsurgical intervention after endovascular embolization, is an effective treatment for AVMs, in particular for high grade (S&M grade III-V) AVMs. Teamwork and coordination among the surgeon, endovascular surgeon, and radiologist in treatment of AVMs is a prerequisite for a good outcome.