[A supraorbital trans-eyebrow approach in surgery of chiasmatic-sellar and anterior cranial fossa tumors]

Cosmetic Outcomes of Supraorbital Keyhole Craniotomy Via Eyebrow Incision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background  Supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy is a minimally invasive alternative to a frontotemporal craniotomy and is often used for tumor and vascular pathologies. The purpose of this study was to investigate how patient cosmetic outcomes are affected by technique variations of this approach. Methods  PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched, and results were reported according to PRISMA guidelines. For the meta-analysis portion, the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used, and the primary end points were patient satisfaction and percentage of permanent cosmetic complications. Results  A total of 2,629 manuscripts were identified. Of those, 124 studies (8,241 surgical cases) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 93.04 ± 11.93% of patients reported favorable cosmetic outcome following supraorbital craniotomy, and mean number of cases with permanent cosmetic complications was 6.62 ± 12.53%. We found that vascular cases are associated with more favorable cosmetic outcomes than tumor cases ( p  = 0.0001). Addition of orbital osteotomy or use of a drain is associated with adverse cosmetic outcomes ( p  = 0.001 and p  = 0.0001, respectively). The location of incision, size of craniotomy, utilization of an endoscope, method of cranial reconstruction, skin closure, use of antibiotics, and addition of pressure dressing did not significantly impact cosmetic outcomes ( p  > 0.05 for all). Conclusions  Supraorbital craniotomy is a minimally invasive technique associated with generally high favorable cosmetic outcomes. While certain techniques used in supraorbital keyhole approach do not pose significant cosmetic risks, utilization of an orbital osteotomy and the addition of a drain correlate with unfavorable cosmetic outcomes.

Supraorbital Keyhole Craniotomy via Eyebrow Incision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Supraorbital eyebrow keyhole craniotomy is a minimally invasive alternative to a frontotemporal craniotomy and is often used for tumor resection and aneurysm clipping. The purpose of this study is to provide a contemporary review on the outcomes related to this approach and to determine whether they vary with the type of pathology and the addition of an endoscope.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched, and results were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. For the meta-analysis portion, the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 2629 manuscripts were identified. of those, 124 studies (8241 surgical cases) met the inclusion criteria. Mean total complication rate was 26.7 ± 25.7% and the mean approach-related mortality rate was 1.3 ± 2.8%. Technical success, defined as gross total tumor resection or complete aneurysm clipping, was achieved in 83.6 ± 21.5% of the cases. Vascular pathologies were associated with greater technical success, lower total complications, and longer length of hospital stay compared with tumor cases (P < 0.05 for all). For vascular cases, addition of the endoscope yielded lower technical success (P = 0.001) and lower complication rate (P = 0.041). The use of the endoscope for tumor pathologies did not affect technical success, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, operative time, or reoperation rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The supraorbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision is a feasible minimally invasive approach with an overall high technical success rate for both vascular and tumor pathologies.

Keyhole surgery for giant basal brain tumors. Theoretical explanation with an example of trans-eyebrow subraorbital approach

BACKGROUND

Improvement of modern neurosurgical technology has given rise to keyhole surgery for a wide range of pathologies. Supraorbital trans-eyebrow approach has been described in detail for small tumors of anterior cranial fossa and suprasellar neoplasms. Can we use this small and less traumatic approach for a more complex tumor extending beyond the suprasellar region?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze own experience of surgical treatment of large and giant parasellar tumors via supraorbital approach, to identify the principles of such operations, indications and possible limitations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 58 resections of parasellar tumors via mini-supraorbital approach had been performed between 2016 and 2021 at the 2nd pediatric neurosurgical department. We selected 42 patients with large and giant tumors extending beyond the chiasmal-sellar zone and causing occlusive hydrocephalus (mean volume 44.2 cm³). Preoperative status of patients, postoperative clinical data and logistics of in-hospital treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Total resection was performed in all cases. No redo surgeries or revisions were required. There were no cases of wound infection, CSF leakage and damage to large vessels.

CONCLUSION

We standardized planning of surgeries for large neoplasms considering available knowledge about the nature of diseases, analysis of clinical and X-ray data, goals and objectives of surgery. The reader is offered a theoretical substantiation of applicability of keyhole surgery for chiasmal-sellar tumors on the example of well-known mini-supraorbital approach. We gave certain advices on planning such operations and illustrated clinical examples.