Solovyeva SE, Paltseva EM, Morozova MM, Kaabak MM, Krainik NA, Matveev AV. [Clinical and morphological signs of viral damage to a kidney transplant].
Arkh Patol 2017;
79:22-28. [PMID:
28418354 DOI:
10.17116/patol201779222-28]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM
Тo compare morphological changes and results of immunohistochemical (IHC) identification of viruses (polyomaviruses, adenoviruses, and herpesviruses) in the biopsy specimens with their clinical manifestations in recipients of renal transplants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Morphological and IHC studies were conducted using 71 needle renal transplant biopsy specimens from patients in the study group and 10 renal biopsy specimens from those in the control group. A number of clinical indicators were estimated.
RESULTS
IHC examination revealed the expression of adenoviral antigens more commonly in patients with posttransplant nephritis than in recipients without nephritis or in control individuals (p<0.05). The association of patient age and time after kidney transplantation with the severity of viral damage was confirmed: graft loss in children occurred within the first months of surgery (p<0.05). Polyomavirus was detected by PCR in patients with the morphological patterns of polyomavirus nephropathy. Determination of HSV-1 and HSV-2 in the biopsy specimens showed no significant associations with morphological changes.
CONCLUSION
By taking into account a variety of factors that influence the development of viral nephritis, morphological and IHC examinations should be combined with evaluation of clinical findings.
Collapse