Co-stimulatory agonists: An insight into the immunotherapy of cancer

Bispecific therapeutics: a state-of-the-art review on the combination of immune checkpoint ‎inhibition with costimulatory and non-checkpoint targeted therapy

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy and have enhanced the survival of patients with malignant tumors. However, the overall efficacy of ICIs remains unsatisfactory and is faced with two major concerns of resistance development and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have emerged as promising strategies with unique mechanisms of action to achieve a better efficacy and safety than monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or even their combination. BsAbs along with other bispecific platforms such as bispecific fusion proteins, nanobodies, and CAR-T cells may help to avoid development of resistance and reduce irAEs caused by on-target/off-tumor binding effects of mAbs.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was performed using PubMed for English-language articles to provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical and clinical studies on bsAbs specified for both immune checkpoints and non-checkpoint molecules as a well-enhanced class of therapeutics.

EXPERT OPINION

Identifying suitable targets and selecting effective engineering platforms enhance the potential of bsAbs to address the challenges associated with conventional therapies such as ICIs, positioning them as a promising class of therapeutics in the landscape of cancer immunotherapy.

Emerging druggable targets for immune checkpoint modulation in cancer immunotherapy: the iceberg lies beneath the surface

The immune system serves as a fundamental defender against the initiation and progression of cancer. Failure of the immune system augments immunosuppressive action that leading to cancer manifestation. This immunosuppressive effect causes from significant alterations in immune checkpoint expression associated with tumoral progression. The tumor microenvironment promotes immune escape mechanisms that further amplifying immunosuppressive actions. Notably, substantial targeting of immune checkpoints has been pragmatic in the advancement of cancer research. This study highlights a comprehensive review of emerging druggable targets aimed at modulating immune checkpoint co-inhibitory as well as co-stimulatory molecules in response to immune system activation. This modulation has prompted to the development of newer therapeutic insights, eventually inducing immunogenic cell death through immunomodulatory actions. The study emphasizes the role of immune checkpoints in immunogenic regulation of cancer pathogenesis and explores potential therapeutic avenues in cancer immunotherapy.Modulation of Immunosuppressive and Immunostimulatory pathways of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

Tumor necrosis factor superfamily signaling: life and death in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shaped the landscape of cancer treatment. However, many patients either do not respond or suffer from later progression. Numerous proteins can control immune system activity, including multiple tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily (TNFSF) and TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members; these proteins play a complex role in regulating cell survival and death, cellular differentiation, and immune system activity. Notably, TNFSF/TNFRSF molecules may display either pro-tumoral or anti-tumoral activity, or even both, depending on tumor type. Therefore, TNF is a prototype of an enigmatic two-faced mediator in oncogenesis. To date, multiple anti-TNF agents have been approved and/or included in guidelines for treating autoimmune disorders and immune-related toxicities after immune checkpoint blockade for cancer. A confirmed role for the TNFSF/TNFRSF members in treating cancer has proven more elusive. In this review, we highlight the cancer-relevant TNFSF/TNFRSF family members, focusing on the death domain-containing and co-stimulation members and their signaling pathways, as well as their complicated role in the life and death of cancer cells.

Advances in adoptive cellular immunotherapy and therapeutic breakthroughs in multiple myeloma

The basic idea of modulating the immune system to better recognize and fight tumor cells has led to the successful introduction of adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT). ACT-based treatment regimens, in which the patient's own immune cells are isolated and subsequently expanded (ex vivo) and reinfused, have also contributed significantly to the development of a personalized treatment strategy. Complementing this, the unprecedented advances in ACTs as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies and their derivatives such as CAR-NK, CAR-macrophages, CAR-γδT and CAR-NKT have further maximized the therapeutic outcomes. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the development of ACTs in multiple myeloma (MM) and outline how they have evolved from an experimental form to a mainstay of standard clinical settings. Besides, we provide insights into cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy, an alternative form of ACT that (as CIK or CAR-CIK) has enormous potential in the clinical spectrum of MM. We also summarize the results of the major preclinical and clinical studies of adoptive cell therapy in MM and address the current challenges (such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity) that limit its complete success in the cancer landscape.

Cold and hot tumors: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapy

Immunotherapy has made significant strides in cancer treatment, particularly through immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which has shown notable clinical benefits across various tumor types. Despite the transformative impact of ICB treatment in cancer therapy, only a minority of patients exhibit a positive response to it. In patients with solid tumors, those who respond well to ICB treatment typically demonstrate an active immune profile referred to as the "hot" (immune-inflamed) phenotype. On the other hand, non-responsive patients may exhibit a distinct "cold" (immune-desert) phenotype, differing from the features of "hot" tumors. Additionally, there is a more nuanced "excluded" immune phenotype, positioned between the "cold" and "hot" categories, known as the immune "excluded" type. Effective differentiation between "cold" and "hot" tumors, and understanding tumor intrinsic factors, immune characteristics, TME, and external factors are critical for predicting tumor response and treatment results. It is widely accepted that ICB therapy exerts a more profound effect on "hot" tumors, with limited efficacy against "cold" or "altered" tumors, necessitating combinations with other therapeutic modalities to enhance immune cell infiltration into tumor tissue and convert "cold" or "altered" tumors into "hot" ones. Therefore, aligning with the traits of "cold" and "hot" tumors, this review systematically delineates the respective immune characteristics, influencing factors, and extensively discusses varied treatment approaches and drug targets based on "cold" and "hot" tumors to assess clinical efficacy.

Recent developments in immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tract cancers

The past few decades have witnessed the rise of immunotherapy for Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand-1 antibodies, has become increasingly pivotal in the treatment of advanced and perioperative GI tract cancers. Currently, anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy is considered as first-line regimen for unselected advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJC), mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), and advanced esophageal cancer (EC). In addition, the encouraging performance of claudin18.2-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in later-line GI tract cancers brings new hope for cell therapy in solid tumour treatment. Nevertheless, immunotherapy for GI tumour remains yet precise, and researchers are dedicated to further maximising and optimising the efficacy. This review summarises the important research, latest progress, and future directions of immunotherapy for GI tract cancers including EC, G/GEJC, and CRC.

Advancements in Melanoma Therapies: From Surgery to Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Melanoma is defined as the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer. The treatment of melanoma depends on the disease stage, tumor location, and extent of its spread from its point of origin. Melanoma treatment has made significant advances, notably in the context of targeted and immunotherapies. Surgical resection is the main therapeutic option for earlystage melanoma, and it provides favourable outcomes. With disease metastasis, systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy become increasingly important. The identification of mutations that lead to melanoma has influenced treatment strategies. Targeted therapies focusing on these mutations offer improved response rates and fewer toxicities than conventional chemotherapy. Furthermore, developing immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies, has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in effectively combating cancer cells. These therapeutic agents demonstrate superior effectiveness and a more tolerable side-effect profile, improving the quality of life for patients receiving treatment. The future of melanoma treatment may involve a multimodal approach consisting of a combination of surgery, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy adapted to each patient's profile. This approach may improve survival rates and health outcomes.

Role of ADP ribosylation factor guanylate kinase 1 in the malignant biological behavior of gastric cancer

Aim

This study aims to investigate the influence of ASAP1 (ADP ribosylation factor guanylate kinase 1) on the malignant behavior of gastric cancer (GC) cells and to elucidate the potential molecular mechanisms involved in cancer development and progression.

Methods

We assessed the impact of ASAP1 overexpression and knockdown on GC cell malignancy using CCK8, colony formation, flow cytometry (Annexin V/propidium iodide), Transwell migration, invasion, and scratch assays. Western blot analysis was used to assess the effects of ASAP1 on angiogenesis, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), apoptotic proteins, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins, as well as AKT and p-AKT. The influence of ASAP1 knockdown was also evaluated in nude mice bearing BGC823 cell-derived tumors.

Results

Our findings revealed that ASAP1 was significantly overexpressed in GC cells, enhancing their proliferation, invasion, and migration, while reducing apoptosis. Conversely, ASAP1 knockdown reversed these effects, markedly increasing the expression of cleaved-caspase 3 (Casp3), PARP, and the epithelial marker E-cadherin, and significantly decreasing MMP2, MMP9, VEGFA, and mesenchymal markers such as N-cadherin and vimentin. Additionally, it reduced AKT, and p-AKT levels (P < 0.01). Tumor growth in nude mice was suppressed following ASAP1 knockdown.

Conclusion

The overexpression of ASAP1 significantly promotes malignant behaviors in GC cells, whereas its knockdown diminishes these effects. This modulation is potentially through the downregulation of VEGFA, leading to reduced angiogenesis, Cleaved-Casp3 and Cleaved-PARP overexpression, and a decrease in MMPs, EMT, AKT, and p-AKT activity.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based dual immunotherapies versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone in patients with advanced solid tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. The debate surrounding the potential additive clinical benefits of combination of two immune-oncology (IO) therapies for cancer patients persists.

METHODS

Both published and grey sources of randomized clinical trials that compared anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy combinations with monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were encompassed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed 31 studies comprising 10,341 patients, which covered 12 distinct immune-oncology combination regimens. Across all patients, the immunotherapy combinations exhibited the capability to enhance the ORR (OR = 1.23 [95% CI 1.13-1.34]) and extend PFS (HR = 0.91 [95% CI 0.87-0.95]). However, the observed enhancement in OS (HR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-1.01]) was of no significance. Greater benefits in terms of PFS (HR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.93]) and OS (HR = 0.85 [95% CI 0.73 to 0.99]) may be particularly pronounced in cases where PD-L1 expression is negative. Notably, despite a heightened risk of any-grade TRAEs (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 1.40-2.11]) and grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs (OR = 2.01 [95% CI 1.67-2.43]), toxicity was generally manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that incorporating an additional immunotherapy agent with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can elevate the response rate and reduce the risk of disease progression, all while maintaining manageable toxicity. However, there remains a challenge in translating these primary clinical benefits into extended overall survival.

From Oral Health to Obstetric Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Periodontal Disease and Its Implications for Preeclampsia

Periodontal disease and preeclampsia (PE) are both significant health concerns with implications for maternal and fetal well-being. Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between these two conditions, prompting increased interest in understanding their relationship and clinical implications. This comprehensive review examines the current literature on periodontal disease and PE, focusing on epidemiological evidence, proposed mechanistic pathways, and clinical implications. Epidemiological studies consistently demonstrate an increased risk of PE among pregnant individuals with periodontal disease, independent of traditional risk factors. Proposed mechanisms linking periodontal disease to PE include systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and immune dysregulation. The implications for research include the need for well-designed prospective studies and randomized controlled trials to elucidate further the mechanisms underlying the association and evaluate the effectiveness of periodontal interventions in preventing PE. Clinicians should be aware of the potential link between periodontal disease and PE and consider screening pregnant individuals for periodontal disease as part of routine prenatal care. Interdisciplinary collaboration between obstetricians and periodontists may be beneficial in managing pregnant individuals with periodontal disease to mitigate the risk of PE. By addressing these research gaps, we can further understand the relationship between oral health and obstetric outcomes and develop evidence-based strategies to improve maternal and fetal health.

Costimulatory and Coinhibitory Immune Checkpoints in Atherosclerosis: Therapeutic Targets in Atherosclerosis?

The benefits of current state-of-the-art treatments to combat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have stagnated. Treatments are mostly based on controlling cardiovascular risk factors, especially hyperlipidemia. Although the most recent advances with PCSK-9 inhibitors support the hyperlipidemia aspect of ASCVD, several lines of experimental evidence have outlined that atherosclerosis is also driven by inflammation. In the past years, phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials targeting inflammation to combat ASCVD have revealed that patients do tolerate such immune therapies, show decreases in inflammatory markers, and/or have reductions in cardiovascular endpoints. However, the search for the optimal anti-inflammatory or immune-modulating strategy and the stratification of patients who would benefit from such treatments and appropriate treatment regimens to combat ASCVD is only just beginning. In this review, we focus on immune checkpoint-based therapeutics (costimulation and coinhibition), many of which are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cancer or autoimmune diseases, and discuss their use as a novel immunotherapeutic strategy to treat ASCVD.

Immunotherapy in cervical cancer: From the view of scientometric analysis and clinical trials

Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth most cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Current treatment for patients with advanced cervical cancer is limited. And in the urgent demand for novel effective therapies both as the first and the second line treatment for these patients, immunotherapy is developing fast and has made some achievements.

Methods

This study incorporated 1,255 topic-related articles and reviews from 1999 to 2022 in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The WoS platform, Citespace, and VOS viewer provided the annual distribution of publications and citations, the analysis of researching countries and institutions, references, keywords (co-occurrence analysis, burst analysis, and timeline view analysis), and researching authors, respectively. For clinical trials, 720 trials and 114 trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were retrieved, respectively. And 296 trials were finally incorporated into the analysis.

Results

The scientometric analysis showed that the study of immunotherapies in cervical cancer developed fast in recent years. Most publications were from the United States, followed by China. Seven of the top 10 co-cited references belong to clinical trials, and five of them were published in recent five years. There are lots of clinical trials us specific treatment patterns, some of which have represented excellent effects.

Conclusions

Both the scientometric analysis of the 1,255 publications and the analysis of clinical trials showed that the field of immunotherapies in cervical cancer developed so fast in recent years. It was found that a lot of clinical trials using various immunotherapies (mainly vaccine therapy, adoptive cell therapy, immune checkpoint blockade, and antibody-drug conjugate) for advanced cervical cancer are currently ongoing or have represented considerable effect. Centered in immunotherapies, immune checkpoint blockades have represented great efficacy and huge potential, especially combined with other therapies such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and other immunotherapies.

Immune-based combination therapy to convert immunologically cold tumors into hot tumors: an update and new insights

As a breakthrough strategy for cancer treatment, immunotherapy mainly consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other immunomodulatory drugs that provide a durable protective antitumor response by stimulating the immune system to fight cancer. However, due to the low response rate and unique toxicity profiles of immunotherapy, the strategies of combining immunotherapy with other therapies have attracted enormous attention. These combinations are designed to exert potent antitumor effects by regulating different processes in the cancer-immunity cycle. To date, immune-based combination therapy has achieved encouraging results in numerous clinical trials and has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for certain cancers with more studies underway. This review summarizes the emerging strategies of immune-based combination therapy, including combinations with another immunotherapeutic strategy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, targeted therapy, bacterial therapy, and stroma-targeted therapy. Here, we highlight the rationale of immune-based combination therapy, the biomarkers and the clinical progress for these immune-based combination therapies.

Construction of a prognostic assessment model for colon cancer patients based on immune-related genes and exploration of related immune characteristics

Objectives: To establish a novel risk score model that could predict the survival and immune response of patients with colon cancer. Methods: We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to get mRNA expression profile data, corresponding clinical information and somatic mutation data of patients with colon cancer. Limma R software package and univariate Cox regression were performed to screen out immune-related prognostic genes. GO (Gene ontology) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) were used for gene function enrichment analysis. The risk scoring model was established by Lasso regression and multivariate Cox regression. CIBERSORT was conducted to estimate 22 types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and immune cell functions in tumors. Correlation analysis was used to demonstrate the relationship between the risk score and immune escape potential. Results: 679 immune-related genes were selected from 7846 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). GO and KEGG analysis found that immune-related DEGs were mainly enriched in immune response, complement activation, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and so on. Finally, we established a 3 immune-related genes risk scoring model, which was the accurate independent predictor of overall survival (OS) in colon cancer. Correlation analysis indicated that there were significant differences in T cell exclusion potential in low-risk and high-risk groups. Conclusion: The immune-related gene risk scoring model could contribute to predicting the clinical outcome of patients with colon cancer.

CXCR5+CD8 T cells: Potential immunotherapy targets or drivers of immune-mediated adverse events?

CXCR5⁺CD8 T cells have attracted significant interest within multiple areas of immunology, cancer, and infection. This is in part due to their apparent dual functionality. These cells perform as cytotoxic cells in a variety of infection states including LCMV, HBV, HIV and SIV. However, CXCR5⁺CD8 T cells also associate with B cells in peripheral organs and function to stimulate B cell proliferation, antibody/B cell receptor class-switch, and antibody production. CXCR5⁺CD8 T cells are similar to CXCR5⁺CD4 T follicular helpers in their genetic make-up, B cell interactions, and functionality despite possessing elevated programmed cell death 1 and cytotoxic proteins. Within cancer CXCR5⁺CD8 T cells have risen as potential prognostic markers for overall survival and are functionally cytotoxic within tumor microenvironments. In inflammatory disease and autoimmunity, CXCR5⁺CD8 T cells are implicated in disease progression. During viral infection and cancer, CXCR5 expression on CD8 T cells generally is indicative of progenitor memory stem-like exhausted cells, which are more responsive to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome immune exhaustion in cancer, and subsequent consequence of immune adverse events, highlights the dual nature of the cellular immune response. This review will detail the functionality of CXCR5⁺CD8 T cells in cancer and autoimmunity with potential repercussions during immune checkpoint blockade therapy discussed.

Revolution of CAR Engineering For Next-Generation Immunotherapy In Solid Tumors

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have enormous potentials for clinical therapies. The CAR-T therapy has been approved for treating hematological malignancies. However, their application is limited in solid tumors owing to antigen loss and mutation, physical barriers, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To overcome the challenges of CAR-T, increasing efforts are put into developing CAR-T to expand its applied ranges. Varied receptors are utilized for recognizing tumor-associated antigens and relieving immunosuppression. Emerging co-stimulatory signaling is employed for CAR-T activation. Furthermore, other immune cells such as NK cells and macrophages have manifested potential for delivering CAR. Hence, we collected and summarized the last advancements of CAR engineering from three aspects, namely, the ectodomains, endogenous domains, and immune cells, aiming to inspire the design of next-generation adoptive immunotherapy for treating solid tumors.

Development of Immunotherapy Strategies Targeting Tumor Microenvironment Is Fiercely Ongoing

Tumor immune microenvironment is a very complex system that is influenced by a wide range of factors; in this microenvironment, various immune cells, stromal cells, and cytokines can interact with tumor cells and jointly regulate this complex ecosystem. During tumor development, the tumor microenvironment (TME) shows the upregulation of inhibitory signals and downregulation of activating signals, which result in an immunosuppressive microenvironment and lead to tumor immune escape. In recent years, a variety of precision immunotherapy strategies have been developed to remodel the TME into a positive immune microenvironment by stimulating or restoring the inherent tumor inhibition ability of the immune system so as to improve anti-tumor therapeutic efficacy. This review focuses on immunotherapy strategies targeting the TME, including those that target the microenvironment to inhibit signaling, activate signaling, and specifically involve many new targets such as physical barriers, immune cells and their surface molecular receptors, cytokines, and metabolic factors. Furthermore, it summarizes the challenges faced while conducting research on the tumor immune microenvironment and the corresponding solutions.

Landscape and perspectives of macrophage -targeted cancer therapy in clinical trials

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) exert integrated effects in all aspects of tumor progression, including tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Recently, considerable preclinical and clinical trials have demonstrated that TAM-targeted therapy is an effective antitumor therapeutic approach, especially as a complementary strategy in combination with conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or emerging immunotherapy. Here, we review all of the current clinical trials targeting TAMs worldwide up to May 2021 and highlight instances of the synergetic therapeutic efficacy of TAM-targeted combined therapeutic strategies. In total, 606 clinical trials were conducted, including 143 tested products. There has been explosive growth in macrophage-targeted therapy around the world during the past decade. Most trials were at early phase, and two-thirds used macrophage-targeting therapy as part of a combination approach. The most common combination is that of traditional chemotherapy with TAM-targeted therapy, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted drugs. TAM-targeted therapeutic approaches are a newly emerging but rapidly developing area of anticancer therapy, especially as a combinatorial therapeutic approach. Further investigation of promising combination strategies will pave the way to more effective anticancer therapies.

An Integrated Fibrosis Signature for Predicting Survival and Immunotherapy Efficacy of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: Fibrosis, a primary cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is intimately associated with inflammation, the tumor microenvironment (TME), and multiple carcinogenic pathways. Currently, due to widespread inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity of HCC, the efficacy of immunotherapy is limited. Seeking a stable and novel tool to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response is imperative. Methods: Using stepwise Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and random survival forest algorithms, the fibrosis-associated signature (FAIS) was developed and further validated. Subsequently, comprehensive exploration was conducted to identify distinct genomic alterations, clinical features, biological functions, and immune landscapes of HCC patients. Results: The FAIS was an independent prognostic predictor of overall survival and recurrence-free survival in HCC. In parallel, the FAIS exhibited stable and accurate performance at predicting prognosis based on the evaluation of Kaplan-Meier survival curves, receiver operator characteristic curves, decision curve analysis, and Harrell's C-index. Further investigation elucidated that the high-risk group presented an inferior prognosis with advanced clinical traits and a high mutation frequency of TP53, whereas the low-risk group was characterized by superior CD8⁺ T cell infiltration, a higher TIS score, and a lower TIDE score. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group might yield more benefits from immunotherapy. Conclusion: The FAIS was an excellent scoring system that could stratify HCC patients and might serve as a promising tool to guide surveillance, improve prognosis, and facilitate clinical management.