Practical considerations in the management of proton-pump inhibitors

Safe use of proton-pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed drug groups in developed countries. Their approved indications include gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, and prophylaxis against NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy in specific scenarios. Since their introduction into clinical practice, their usage has significantly increased, leading to concerns about possible inappropriate prescribing, which can result in a higher risk of side effects and increased economic costs. Consequently, in recent years, literature linking PPIs to various adverse effects has emerged, with some supported by robust evidence, while others are based on lower-quality evidence, requiring cautious interpretation. Among the adverse effects of PPIs, significant ones include an increased risk of fragility fractures, deficiencies in certain micronutrients such as vitamin B12 and magnesium, a higher incidence of enteric infections, especially Clostridioides difficile, complications in cirrhotic patients, and pharmacological interactions with other medications. In clinical practice, it is essential to periodically evaluate the rationale for prescribing these drugs and consider discontinuing them if there is no appropriate indication. Despite PPIs being generally safe medications, it is crucial to be aware of their potential adverse effects and appropriate indications to ensure their proper use.

A review on lactoferrin as a proton pump inhibitor

Lactoferrin (Lf) is a versatile natural milk-derived protein that exhibits multiple interesting biological activities. Since it is safe for human administration and currently manufactured using low cost and well-established large-scale processes, the Lf scientific community has been devoted at dissecting its mechanisms of action towards its more rational and efficient use for various applications. Emerging literature has identified proton pumping ATPases as molecular targets of Lf in different cellular models linked to distinct activities of this natural protein. Information on this subject has not been systematically analysed before, hence herein we review the current state of art on the effect of Lf on proton pumping ATPases. Though structurally different, we propose that Lf holds a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-like activity based on the functional resemblance with the classical inhibitors of the stomach H⁺/K⁺-ATPase. The downstream events and outcomes of the PPI-like activity of Lf, as well as its impact for the development of improved Lf applications are also discussed.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Fractures in Adults: A Critical Appraisal and Review of the Literature

Despite the large number of patients worldwide being on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders, uncertainty remains over their long-term safety. Particularly, the potential side effects of these drugs on bone health have been evaluated in the last years. The purpose of our narrative review is to gather and discuss results of clinical studies focusing on the interactions between PPIs and fracture risk. Data generated mainly from nested case-control studies and meta-analysis suggest that long-term/high-dose PPIs users are characterized by an increased risk of fragility fractures, mainly hip fractures. However, in these studies, the PPIs-induced bone impairment is often not adjusted for different confounding variables that could potentially affect bone health, and exposure to PPIs was reported using medical prescriptions without adherence evaluation. The mechanisms of the PPI-related bone damage are still unclear, but impaired micronutrients absorption, hypergastrinemia, and increased secretion of histamine may play a role. Clinicians should pay attention when prescribing PPIs to subjects with a preexistent high risk of fractures and consider antiosteoporotic drugs to manage this additive effect on the bone. However, further studies are needed to clarify PPIs action on the bone.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Z-215 (Azeloprazole Sodium), a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Compared with Rabeprazole Sodium in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The metabolism of many proton pump inhibitors is influenced by CYP2C19 genotype, which is a limitation of their use.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety profile of Z-215 (azeloprazole sodium) as initial treatment for reflux esophagitis (RE), dose response, and optimal dose compared with rabeprazole sodium (RPZ).

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in Japan. Patients with RE aged ≥20 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive 10, 20, or 40 mg Z-215 or 10 mg RPZ (1:1:1:1), and orally administered the respective drug for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the endoscopic healing rate after 8 weeks of treatment (at Week 8). We also assessed the effects of CYP2C19 genotype. Safety end points were the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Five hundred three patients received the study drugs (10 mg Z-215: 125 patients, 20 mg Z-215: 126 patients, 40 mg Z-215: 126 patients, and 10 mg RPZ: 126 patients). The endoscopic healing rate at Week 8 was above 95% in all groups (10 mg Z-215: 95.2%, 20 mg Z-215: 96.8%, 40 mg Z-215: 95.2%, and 10 mg RPZ: 96.8%). The endoscopic healing rate and serum gastrin levels of the Z-215 groups were not influenced by CYP2C19 genotype. In patients with Grade C/D, the endoscopic healing rate at Week 4 was slightly higher in the 40-mg Z-215 group compared with the other groups. Incidences of adverse events/adverse drug reactions did not markedly differ between the Z-215 and 10-mg RPZ groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Z-215 was as effective and well tolerated as 10 mg RPZ in the treatment of RE in this selected population. CYP2C19 genotype status may not influence the efficacy and safety of Z-215. There were no clear dose-response effects between Z-215 doses in the endoscopic healing of RE. These findings suggest that Z-215 may be 1 option for the initial treatment of RE. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 02463643.