1
|
Melo AT, Campanilho-Marques R, Fonseca JE. Golimumab (anti-TNF monoclonal antibody): where we stand today. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:1586-1598. [PMID: 33369527 PMCID: PMC8115761 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1836919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and its overexpression has been implicated in the pathophysiology of several chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Biological therapies, like TNF inhibitors, have been revolutionizing the course of these disorders. Golimumab is a transgenic anti-TNF monoclonal antibody that acts primarily by targeting and neutralizing TNF, thus preventing inflammation. It is approved for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Nonradiographic axial Spondyloarthritis, Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, and Ulcerative Colitis. Clinical trials are also being conducted in other conditions. This review charts the clinical development of golimumab and outlines the data that support its potential use across several Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Teresa Melo
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital De Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto De Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade De Medicina, Universidade De Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Raquel Campanilho-Marques
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital De Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto De Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade De Medicina, Universidade De Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital De Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto De Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade De Medicina, Universidade De Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Samaan MA, Pavlidis P, Digby-Bell J, Johnston EL, Dhillon A, Paramsothy R, Akintimehin AO, Medcalf L, Chung-Faye G, DuBois P, Koumoutsos I, Powell N, Anderson SHC, Sanderson J, Hayee BH, Irving PM. Golimumab: early experience and medium-term outcomes from two UK tertiary IBD centres. Frontline Gastroenterol 2018; 9:221-231. [PMID: 30047549 PMCID: PMC6056089 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To gain an understanding of the effectiveness of golimumab in a 'real-world' setting. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using prospectively maintained clinical records. SETTING Two UK tertiary IBD centres. PATIENTS Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were given golimumab at Guy's & St Thomas and King's College Hospitals between September 2014 and December 2016. INTERVENTION Golimumab, a subcutaneously administered antitumour necrosis factor agent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical disease activity was assessed at baseline and at the first clinical review following induction therapy using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI). Response was defined as an SCCAI reduction of 3 points or more. Remission was defined as an SCCAI of less than 3. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients with UC completed golimumab induction therapy. Paired preinduction and postinduction SCCAI values were available for 31 patients and fell significantly from 7 (2-19) to 3 (0-11) (p<0.001). To these 31, an additional 13 patients who did not have paired SCCAI data but stopped treatment due to documented 'non-response' in the opinion of their supervising clinician, were added. Among this combined cohort, 23/44 (52%) had a clinical response, 15/44 (34%) achieved remission and 13/44 (30%) achieved corticosteroid-free remission.Faecal calprotectin and CRP fell (FC: pre-induction: 1096 (15-4800) μg/g, post-induction: 114 (11-4800) μg/g, p = 0.011; n = 20; CRP: pre-induction: 4 (1-59) mg/L, post-induction: 2 (1-34) mg/L, p = 0.01 for n = 43). Post-induction endoscopy was carried out in 23 patients and a mucosal healing (Mayo 0 or 1) rate of 35% was observed. CONCLUSIONS Our experience mirrors previously reported real-world cohorts and demonstrates similar outcomes to those observed in randomised controlled trials. These data demonstrate a meaningful reduction in clinical, biochemical and endoscopic disease activity as well as a steroid-sparing effect in patients with previously refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Samaan
- IBD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Emma L Johnston
- IBD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angad Dhillon
- IBD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Lucy Medcalf
- IBD Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Guy Chung-Faye
- IBD Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Patrick DuBois
- IBD Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Nick Powell
- IBD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jeremy Sanderson
- IBD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bu' Hussain Hayee
- IBD Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- IBD Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bressler B, Williamson M, Sattin B, Camacho F, Steinhart AH. Real World Effectiveness of Golimumab Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis Regardless of Prior TNF Exposure. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2018; 1:129-134. [PMID: 31294354 PMCID: PMC6507284 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The efficacy of golimumab to induce and maintain remission in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is established from placebo-controlled trials. However, golimumab's real-world effectiveness, important to physicians and payers, remains unexplored. Aim The goal of this study was to describe real-world use and rate of persistence among UC patients with golimumab therapy and to assess factors that predict discontinuation during golimumab maintenance treatment. Methods A retrospective study of UC patients receiving golimumab maintenance therapy (August 2012-August 2015) was conducted on dosing data from a national case management program. Treatment persistence, defined as time from index prescription to the last dose (gap in dose >60 days), was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Predictors of treatment persistence were explored with Cox proportional hazards regression. Results One hundred thirty-six patients (50.7% male) with a mean (SD) age of 44.4 (15.6) years were included. At golimumab initiation, 72.1% were naïve to anti-TNFs; 77.2% received 200 mg, while 4.4% and 18.4% received 50 mg and 100 mg, respectively, every 4 weeks (induction therapy). The median time to discontinuation was 530 days, with a cumulative probability of 63% to remain on therapy at one year. Age, gender, golimumab induction, golimumab maintenance dose and prior anti-TNF exposure were not significantly associated with treatment persistence. Dose adjustment occurred in 7.4% of patients during maintenance treatment. Conclusions Overall, the persistence rate of golimumab observed in the current real-world study is similar to that described in previous single-centre UC cohorts and consistent with that seen in controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Bressler
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - A Hillary Steinhart
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital IBD Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vasudevan A, Gibson PR, Langenberg DRV. Time to clinical response and remission for therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases: What should the clinician expect, what should patients be told? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:6385-6402. [PMID: 29085188 PMCID: PMC5643264 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
An awareness of the expected time for therapies to induce symptomatic improvement and remission is necessary for determining the timing of follow-up, disease (re)assessment, and the duration to persist with therapies, yet this is seldom reported as an outcome in clinical trials. In this review, we explore the time to clinical response and remission of current therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as medication, patient and disease related factors that may influence the time to clinical response. It appears that the time to therapeutic response varies depending on the indication for therapy (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis). Agents with the most rapid time to clinical response included corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, exclusive enteral nutrition, aminosalicylates and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy which will work in most patients within the first 2 mo. Vedolizumab, methotrexate and thiopurines had a longer time to clinical response and can take several months to achieve maximal efficacy. Factors affecting the time to clinical response of therapies included use of concomitant therapy, disease duration, smoking status, disease phenotype and advanced age. There appears to be marked variation in time to clinical response for therapies used in IBD which is further influenced by disease and patient related factors. Understanding the expected time to therapeutic response is integral to inform further decision making, maintain a patient-centered approach and ensure treatment is given an appropriate timeframe to achieve maximal benefit prior to cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav Vasudevan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
- Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
| | - Peter R Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health and Monash University, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - Daniel R van Langenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
- Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bosca-Watts MM, Cortes X, Iborra M, Huguet JM, Sempere L, Garcia G, Gil R, Garcia M, Muñoz M, Almela P, Maroto N, Paredes JM. Short-term effectiveness of golimumab for ulcerative colitis: Observational multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:10432-10439. [PMID: 28058024 PMCID: PMC5175256 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Revised: 09/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of golimumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) and to identify predictors of response.
METHODS We conducted an observational, prospective and multi-center study in UC patients treated with golimumab, from September 2014 to September 2015. Clinical activity was assessed at week 0 and 14 with the physician’s global clinical assessment (PGA) and the partial Mayo score. Colonoscopies and blood tests were performed, following daily-practice clinical criteria, and the results were recorded in an SPSS database.
RESULTS Thirty-three consecutive patients with moderately to severely active UC were included. Among them, 54.5% were female and 42 years was the average age. Thirty percent had left-sided UC (E2) and 70% had extensive UC (E3). All patients had an endoscopic Mayo score of 2 or 3 at baseline. Twenty-seven point three percent were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment naïve, whereas 72.7% had previously received infliximab and/or adalimumab. Sixty-nine point seven percent showed clinical response and were steroid-free at week 14 (a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score of at least 3 points). Based on PGA, the clinical remission and clinical response rates were 24% and 55% respectively. Withdrawal of corticosteroids was observed in 70.8% of steroid-dependent patients at the end of the study. Three out of 10 clinical non-responders needed a colectomy. Mean fecal calprotectin value at baseline was 300 μg/g, and 170.5 μg/g at week 14. Being anti-TNF treatment naïve was a protection factor, which was related to better chances of reaching clinical remission. Twenty-seven point three percent of the patients required treatment intensification at 14 wk of follow-up. Only three adverse effects (AEs) were observed during the study; all were mild and golimumab was not interrupted.
CONCLUSION This real-life practice study endorses golimumab’s promising results, demonstrating its short-term effectiveness and confirming it as a safe drug during the induction phase.
Collapse
|