Risk factors for tuberculosis in inflammatory bowel disease: anti-tumor necrosis factor and hospitalization

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on screening and treatment of tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

There is evidence that following the recommendations on screening and treatment of tuberculosis infection does not completely prevent the onset of tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This fact, and the increasing use of new biologics and immunomodulators, has led the Spanish Group Working on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis to update their recommendations for the prevention of tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Diagnostic methods for latent tuberculosis infection, different scenarios in which screening is to be performed, strategies to reduce the risk of tuberculosis once biological treatment is initiated and chemoprophylaxis guidelines for latent tuberculosis infection are reviewed, as well as the management of active tuberculosis during biological treatment. Finally, there is a summary of the current recommendations within the paper and in an algorithm.

Intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease: the importance and difficulty of a differential diagnosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is the most prevalent infection worldwide and affects one third of the population, predominantly in developing countries. Intestinal TB (ITB) is the sixth most frequent extra-pulmonary TB infection. Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that arises from the interaction of immunological, environmental and genetic factors. Due to changes in the epidemiology of both diseases, distinguishing CD from ITB is a challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients and those from areas where TB is endemic. Furthermore, both TB and CD have a predilection for the ileocecal area. In addition, they share very similar clinical, radiological and endoscopic findings. An incorrect diagnosis and treatment may increase morbidity and mortality. Thus, a great degree of caution is required as well as a familiarity with certain characteristics of the diseases, which will aid the differentiation between the two diseases.

Active Tuberculosis in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biologic Therapy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies pose a risk for opportunistic infections, especially for reactivating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to describe the clinical features and mortality rate of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) in psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapies.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed. Studies describing active TB in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy from inception to May 31, 2018 were included. Clinical data as well as mortality rates were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included, evaluating 78 patients with active TB: 11 prospective studies, 13 retrospective, and 27 case reports/series. Most patients (73%) with active TB were male, the mean age was 48 ± 13 years, and 85% were of European or Asian origin. Pre-treatment LTBI screening was negative for 63% of patients. Disease presented in 33% of patients within the first 3 months of treatment, and in 51% within the first 6 months. Most patients (72%) presented with extra-pulmonary TB, and 49% had disseminated disease. The mortality rate was 7%.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of this review are its small sample size and inclusion of case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patients develop active TB despite LTBI screening. Clinicians initiating biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis should be aware of the clinical features of active TB in this scenario.

Low Frequency of Opportunistic Infections in Patients Receiving Vedolizumab in Clinical Trials and Post-Marketing Setting

Background

Vedolizumab (ENTYVIO) is a humanized α4β7 integrin antagonist approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, which selectively blocks gut-specific lymphocyte trafficking. We evaluated the risk of opportunistic infections of interest in patients treated with vedolizumab.

Methods

We determined the frequency of opportunistic infections and tuberculosis in patients receiving vedolizumab in phase 3 clinical trials and post-marketing settings. We also evaluated adverse events reported in the post-marketing setting in patients with a history of or concurrent hepatitis B/C virus infection.

Results

The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients receiving vedolizumab was 0.7 (GEMINI 1 and 2 clinical trials) and 1.0 (long-term safety study) per 100 patient-years, with 217 events reported in approximately 114,071 patient-years of exposure (post-marketing setting). Most opportunistic infections were nonserious and the majority of patients continued treatment with vedolizumab. Clostridium difficile was the most commonly reported infection, with an incidence rate of 0.5 per 100 patient-years (clinical trials). Tuberculosis was reported at 0.1 per 100 patient-years (clinical trials), with 7 events in the post-marketing setting. No tuberculosis-related deaths were reported in either setting. No cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported. In 29 patients with a history of or concurrent hepatitis B/C infection in the post-marketing setting, no viral reactivation was observed.

Conclusions

Clinical trials and post-marketing data showed that the rate of serious opportunistic infections in patients receiving vedolizumab was low and most patients could continue vedolizumab treatment. The frequency of tuberculosis infection was also low and no hepatitis B/C viral reactivation was reported.

Evaluation of a vaccination regimen and care in relation to follow-up and treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

During the clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease, different causes can compromise kidney, liver, and bone marrow function and increase the risk for osteoporosis, infections, and neoplasias. The aim of the present study was to describe the follow-up of Mexican patients with inflammatory bowel disease in relation to their vaccination regimen, treatment-associated risks, and cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted within the time frame of February and June 2017. One hundred patients that had a histopathologic diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease were surveyed about their follow-up vaccination regimen, treatment-associated risks, and cancer screening. SPSS v24 software was employed for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred patients with inflammatory bowel disease were studied (90% with ulcerative colitis and 10% with Crohn's disease; 60% women, 40% men): 75% stated that they had no vaccination regimen. A total of 71.4% of the women had at least one Pap smear in their lives and 28.6% did not have them done annually. Twenty-four percent of the patients wore sun block daily. A total of 18.2% of the patients with more than a 10-year progression of ulcerative colitis had an annual colonoscopy. Yearly kidney function was registered in 57.1% of the patients, 92.9% had a yearly complete blood count, and 78.6% had yearly liver function tests. A total of 34.8% of patients had no bone densitometry in their case records.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are a red flag suggesting the need to reinforce the role of the primary healthcare providers in relation to vaccination follow-up and the need to improve the education of the patient in relation to inflammatory bowel disease.