1
|
Zagari RM, Frazzoni L, Fuccio L, Bertani H, Crinò SF, Magarotto A, Dajti E, Tringali A, Da Massa Carrara P, Cengia G, Ciliberto E, Conigliaro R, Germanà B, Lamazza A, Pisani A, Spinzi G, Capelli M, Bazzoli F, Pasquale L. Adherence to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Performance Measures for Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Nationwide Survey From the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:868449. [PMID: 35463020 PMCID: PMC9018975 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.868449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has been recently identified as a major priority being associated with many outcomes and patient's experience. Objective To assess adherence of endoscopists to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality performance measures for upper and lower GI endoscopy in Italy. Methods All endoscopist members of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) were invited from October 2018 to December 2018 to participate to a self-administered questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire included questions on demographics and professional characteristics, and the recent ESGE quality performance measures for upper and lower GI endoscopy. Results A total of 392 endoscopists participated in the study. Only a minority (18.2%) of participants recorded the duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and 51% provided accurate photo documentation in the minimum standard of 90% of cases. Almost all endoscopists correctly used Prague and Los Angeles classifications (87.8% and 98.2%, respectively), as well as Seattle and Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS) biopsy protocols (86.5% and 91.4%, respectively). However, only 52.8% of participants monitored complications after therapeutic EGD, and 40.8% recorded patients with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE). With regard to colonoscopy, almost all endoscopists (93.9%) used the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale for measuring bowel preparation quality and reported a cecal intubation rate ≥90%. However, about a quarter (26.2%) of participants reported an adenoma detection rate of <25%, only 52.8% applied an appropriate polypectomy technique, 48% monitored complications after the procedure, and 12.4% measured patient's experience. Conclusion The adherence of endoscopists to ESGE performance measures for GI endoscopy is sub-optimal in Italy. There is a need to disseminate and implement performance measures and endorse educational and scientific interventions on the quality of endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Helga Bertani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Magarotto
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elton Dajti
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Tringali
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Enrico Ciliberto
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Crotone, Italy
| | - Rita Conigliaro
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Baggiovara University Hospital, Baggiovara, Italy
| | - Bastianello Germanà
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Antonietta Lamazza
- Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pisani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology “Saverio de Bellis”, Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Spinzi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Maurizio Capelli
- Kiwa Cermet Certification Body, Statistical Department, Bologna, Italy
| | - Franco Bazzoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luigi Pasquale
- UOC Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale Frangipane, Avellino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabadas Avión R, Leal Ruiloba MS, Vázquez López S, Ojea Cendón M, Wi Hijazi I, Baluja González MA, Álvarez-Escudero J. A descriptive monitoring study of a non-anesthetist sedation quality program. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2018; 111:55-62. [PMID: 30424678 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5763/2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION sedation substantially improves the quality of digestive endoscopy procedures but may result in severe complications. METHODS a joint commission-based multidisciplinary protocol was used to define a protocol for sedation by non-anesthesiologists. ASA 4 patients were excluded, as well as patients with a difficult airway, complex procedures and deep sedation. Quality based on the analysis of 9 indicators were monitored. Incomplete procedures were also monitored in order to assess efficacy. RESULTS patient safety was established based on a very low incidence of complications and a rate of respiratory events of 1.07. Furthermore, a low rate of hypotension and bradycardia was found, as well as a low rate of pain, either during or after endoscopy and an incidence of unexpected admissions lower than 0.5%. The quality indicators measured reflect the evolution of the results of the program. CONCLUSIONS ongoing sedation program monitoring in endoscopy allows the control of different quality dimensions and the implementation of steps for process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Julián Álvarez-Escudero
- Anestesiología y Reanimación, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, España
| |
Collapse
|