Clinical-endoscopic relevance of incidental colorectal lesions detected by PET-CT

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and grading of incidental colorectal adenomas

PURPOSE

Colorectal adenomas (CRAs) are at a higher risk of progressing to colorectal cancer (CRC) as their histological grade increases. Herein, this study investigated the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and the histological grades of CRAs and constructed the optimal regression model for distinguishing between different histological grades.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 153 patients with CRAs who had colorectal 18F-FDG uptake incidentally found on PET/CT. The patients were categorized into low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) groups based on their histological grade. After the analysis of the relationship between SUVmax measured on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans and histological grades, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to determine the optimal cut-off values for distinguishing between the two groups. Common clinical and pathological factors were included and subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors. A diagnostic model integrating SUVmax and several risk factors was developed with the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

SUVmax was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001) and increased with an elevation in the malignancy degree. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for identifying LGIN and HGIN was 0.796, and the AUC of the combination model was 0.822. Furthermore, SUVmax was an independent risk factor for distinguishing between different histological grades in pairwise comparisons.

CONCLUSION

The regression model involving SUVmax on 18F-FDG PET/CT can distinguish between histological grades of CRAs, which therefore can be used as a noninvasive tool for the accurate diagnosis of CRAs and assist in developing patient-specific treatment strategies before surgery.

Combined SUVmax and localized colonic wall thickening parameters to identify high-risk lesions from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci

Objective

To evaluate the detection ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying high-risk lesions (high-risk adenomas and adenocarcinoma) from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci combining maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and localized colonic wall thickening (CWT). The secondary objective was to investigate the factors of missed detection of high-risk adenomas by 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Patients and methods

A total of 6394 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT in our hospital from August 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analysed, and 145 patients with incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci were identified. The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax for 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis of high-risk lesions was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. SUVmax and localized CWT were combined to identify high-risk lesions from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci. The characteristics of incidental adenomas detected and high-risk adenomas missed by 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared.

Results

Of the 6394 patients, 145 patients were found to have incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake foci (2.3%), and 44 patients underwent colonoscopy and pathological examination at the same time. In fact, 45 lesions, including 12 low-risk lesions and 33 high-risk lesions (22 high-risk adenomas, 11 adenocarcinoma), were found by colonoscopy. The area under the ROC curve of SUVmax for low-risk lesions and high-risk lesions was 0.737, and the optimal cut-off value was 6.45 (with a sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 58.3%). When SUVmax ≥6.45, the combination of localized CWT parameters has little influence on the sensitivity and specificity of detection; when SUVmax &lt;6.45, the combination of localized CWT parameters can improve the specificity of detection of high-risk lesions, but the sensitivity has little change. In addition, the size of high-risk adenomas discovered incidentally by 18F-FDG PET/CT was larger than that of high-risk adenomas missed, but there was no significant difference in lesion location, pathological type or intraepithelial neoplasia between the two groups.

Conclusions

The combination of SUVmax and localized CWT parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT helped identify high-risk lesions from incidental focal colorectal 18F-FDG uptake foci, especially for lesions with SUVmax &lt;6.45. Lesion size may be the only factor in 18F-FDG PET/CT missing high-risk adenomas.

Incidental detection of colorectal lesions on 18 F-FDG-PET/CT is associated with high proportion of malignancy: A study in 549 patients

Background and study aims  Further diagnostics of incidental colorectal lesions on ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is questionable. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical importance of incidentally detected colorectal lesions on FDG-PET/CT. Patients and methods  In the North Denmark Region, a retrospective study was performed among 19,987 patients who had an FDG-PET/CT from January 2006 to December 2015. Among these patients, we identified patients with a colonoscopy within 12 months from the PET/CT scan and a description of incidental colorectal PET-avid lesions on the PET/CT. PET findings were compared with colonoscopy-detected lesions and eventually histopathology. Results  Incidental PET-avid lesions were observed in 549 patients. Colonoscopy revealed lesions in 457 (83 %), among whom 338 patients had a final histopathological diagnosis. Malignant and premalignant lesions were found in 297 patients (54 % among patients with a PET-avid lesion). The lesions were cancer in 76 patients and adenoma in 221 patients of whom 30 had high-grade and 191 low-grade adenomas. The findings changed patient management in 166 cases (30 % of all patients with a PET-avid lesion). A colonoscopy-based surveillance program was initiated for 80 % of patients with high-grade adenoma. No patients with PET-avid lesions but normal colonoscopy developed colorectal cancer during 3 years of observation (median observation time 7 years). Conclusions  Incidental colorectal FDG uptake was infrequently observed, but when present, it was associated with a high rate of malignant or premalignant lesions. Our results indicate that patients with incidental colorectal FDG uptake should be referred to diagnostic work-up including colonoscopy.