The long-term benefits of bariatric surgery in elderly and super-obese populations

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Vs Sleeve Gastrectomy in Super Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are safe procedures that may present sub-optimal results in superobesity (SO). A meta-analysis was performed aiming to summarize the available evidence on weight loss (primary outcome) and comorbidities resolution of LRYGB and LSG in patients with SO (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2). From the 16 included studies, 7 integrated the meta-analysis. LRYGB showed a significantly higher weight loss at 6 to 12-months, but not after 24 months and a higher dyslipidemia resolution at 12 months. When compared with LSG, LRYGB achieved better weight loss after 6 and 12 months and higher dyslipidemia resolution after 1 year. There were no significant differences for resolution of the other co-morbidities studied.

Long-Term Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Body Composition and Bone Mass Density

BACKGROUND

Currently, the two most common bariatric procedures are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Long-term data comparing the two interventions in terms of their effect on body composition and bone mass density (BMD) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess body composition and BMD at least 5 years after LSG and LRYGB.

SETTING

Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, St. Claraspital Basel and St. Clara Research Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.

METHODS

Bariatric patients at least 5 years after surgery (LSG or LRYGB) were recruited, and body composition and BMD were measured by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Data from body composition before surgery were included in the analysis. Blood samples were taken for determination of plasma calcium, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D3, alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal telopeptide, and the individual risk for osteoporotic fracture assessed by the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score was calculated. After surgery, all patients received multivitamins, vitamin D3, and zinc. In addition, LRYGB patients were prescribed calcium.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included, 72 LSG and 70 LRYGB, before surgery: median body mass index 43.1, median age 45.5 years, 62.7% females. Follow-up after a median of 6.7 years. For LRYGB, the percentage total weight loss at follow-up was 26.3% and for LSG 24.1% (p = 0.243). LRYGB led to a slightly lower fat percentage in body composition. At follow-up, 45% of both groups had a T score at the femoral neck below -1, indicating osteopenia. No clinically relevant difference in BMD was found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At 6.7 years after surgery, no difference in body composition and BMD between LRYGB and LSG was found. Deficiencies and bone loss remain an issue after both interventions and should be monitored.