How is cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia delivered to adults with comorbid persistent musculoskeletal pain and disordered sleep? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Disordered sleep and persistent musculoskeletal pain are highly comorbid. Behavioural interventions such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) have shown promise in the management of both disordered sleep and persistent musculoskeletal pain. The aim of this review was to examine how CBT-I is delivered in randomised controlled trials involving people with comorbid disordered sleep and persistent musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

The protocol for this scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework. Electronic searches of ten database and three clinical trials registries were performed up to 25 October 2023. The methodological quality of each study was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the PEDro tool. The reporting of CBT-I interventions was evaluated using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. TIDieR scores ranged from 7-11/12, with a mean score of 8.8/12. CBT-I always involved two core components-sleep restriction and stimulus control. Furthermore, an additional five components were usually involved-a cognitive component, sleep hygiene, sleep education, relaxation/deactivation procedures and relapse planning. There was also considerable consistency in the frequency (weekly) and duration (5-9 weeks) of CBT-I programmes. Aspects inconsistently reported included who delivered the intervention; what modifications were made, if any; and the session content and duration. PEDro scores ranged from 5-8/10, with a mean score of 6.7/10.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate considerable consistency in the components of CBT-I delivered in clinical trials along with the number of sessions. The frequency of sessions was also consistent where almost all studies held weekly session. However, some aspects were either not reported (e.g., precise content of components) or inconsistent (e.g., use of terminology). CBT-I was delivered both individually and in groups. Greater consistency, and more detailed reporting regarding who delivered the intervention, the training provided, and the specific content of CBT-I components would add clarity, and may enhance CBT-I efficacy and allow better replication.

Nurse-Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in General Practice: Results from a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as the first line of treatment for insomnia in general practice, but CBT-I is rarely available. Nurse-guided Internet-delivered CBT-I might be a solution to improve access to care.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of nurse-guided Internet-delivered CBT-I (I-CBT-I) on insomnia severity experienced by patients in general practice.

METHODS

Nurse-guided I-CBT-I ("i-Sleep") was compared to care-as-usual (and I-CBT-I after 6 months) in 15 participating general practices among 134 patients (≥18 years old) with clinical insomnia symptoms. Assessments took place at 8, 26 and 52 weeks. Primary outcome was self-reported insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were sleep diary indices, depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fatigue, daytime consequences of insomnia, sleep medication and adverse events.

RESULTS

Two thirds of the 69 intervention patients (n = 47; 68%) completed the whole intervention. At the posttest examination, there were large significant effects for insomnia severity (Cohen's d =1.66), several sleep diary variables (wake after sleep onset, number of awakenings, terminal wakefulness, sleep efficiency, sleep quality) and depression. At 26 weeks there were still significant effects on insomnia severity (d = 1.02) and on total sleep time and sleep efficiency. No significant effects were observed for anxiety, fatigue, daily functioning or sleep medication. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-guided I-CBT-I effectively reduces insomnia severity among general practice patients. I-CBT-I enables general practitioners to offer effective insomnia care in accordance with the clinical guidelines.

The effect of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on sedative-hypnotic use: A narrative review

Although cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) is the recommended 'first-line' treatment for insomnia, most patients are initially treated with sedative-hypnotic medications. Given the risk of impaired cognitive and psychomotor performance, serious adverse events, and long-term dependence associated with sedative-hypnotics, guidelines recommend that prescriptions should be limited to short-term use and that patients are provided with support for withdrawal where possible. CBTi is an effective insomnia treatment in the presence of sedative-hypnotic use. Furthermore, guidelines recommended that CBTi techniques are utilised to facilitate withdrawal from sedative-hypnotics. However, there is very little research evaluating the effect of CBTi on reduced medication use. The current narrative review integrates 95 studies including over 10,000 participants, investigating the effect of CBTi on reduced sedative-hypnotic use in different populations (e.g., hypnotic-dependent patients, older adults, military personnel), settings (e.g., primary care settings, psychiatric inpatients), CBTi modalities (e.g., self-administered reading/audio materials, digital, and therapist-administered), and in combination with gradual dose reduction programs. Based on this research, we discuss the theoretical mechanistic effects of CBTi in facilitating reduced sedative-hypnotic use, provide clear recommendations for future research, and offer pragmatic clinical suggestions to increase access to CBTi to reduce dependence on sedative-hypnotics as the 'default' treatment for insomnia.

Combined Program of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and Medication Tapering in Cancer Patients: A Clinic-Based Pilot Study

Objective: This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a combined program of group-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and medication tapering for reducing hypnotic use in cancer patients and to identify predictors of medication continuation. Participants: This study has a retrospective design and uses archival data from patient's medical records. Forty cancer patients with chronic insomnia received clinic- and group-based CBT-I alongside a medication tapering program. Methods: Clinical outcomes were collected from 32 patients who completed a six-week program, via their medical records. Medication dosages, Insomnia Severity Index scores, scores on the Korean version of the 16-item Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep scale, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised inventory scores, and sleep efficiency were measured pre- and posttreatment and at a follow-up after one month. Results: At posttreatment, 68.8% of patients were drug-free and 25.0% were taking hypnotic medication at a reduced dosage or frequency. Patients who were undergoing anticancer treatment were more likely to discontinue hypnotic use than patients who were off the anticancer treatment. Overall relapse rate for sleep medication at the one-month follow-up was 4.5%. Having more somatic symptoms at baseline was a significant predictor for continuing medication after CBT-I. Conclusions: The preliminary results imply that the combined program of group-based CBT-I and medication tapering may be helpful to reduce hypnotics in cancer patients with insomnia in a clinical setting. Along with combined treatment methods, future studies could explore the effects of added treatments for the reduction of physical pain on the prevention of chronic hypnotic use.