Radiomics in Determining Tumor-to-Normal Brain SUV Ratio Based on 11C-Methionine PET/CT in Glioblastoma

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Issues in Glioma Using Imaging Data: The Challenge of Numerical Twinning

Glial tumors represent the leading etiology of primary brain tumors. Their particularities lie in (i) their location in a highly functional organ that is difficult to access surgically, including for biopsy, and (ii) their rapid, anisotropic mode of extension, notably via the fiber bundles of the white matter, which further limits the possibilities of resection. The use of mathematical tools enables the development of numerical models representative of the oncotype, genotype, evolution, and therapeutic response of lesions. The significant development of digital technologies linked to high-resolution NMR exploration, coupled with the possibilities offered by AI, means that we can envisage the creation of digital twins of tumors and their host organs, thus reducing the use of physical sampling.

[Non-invasive diagnosis of brain gliomas by histological type using neuroradiomics in standardized regions of interest: towards digital biopsy]

The future of contemporary neuroimaging does not solely lie in novel image-capturing technologies, but also in better methods for extraction of useful information from these images. Scientists see great promise in radiomics, i.e. the methodology for analysis of multiple features in medical image. However, there are certain issues in this field impairing reproducibility of results. One such issue is no standards in establishing the regions of interest.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a standardized method for identification of regions of interest when analyzing MR images using radiomics; to test the hypothesis that this approach is effective for distinguishing different histological types of gliomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed preoperative MR data in 83 adults with various gliomas (WHO classification, 2016), i.e. oligodendroglioma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and glioblastoma. Radiomic features were computed for T1, T1-enhanced, T2 and T2-FLAIR modalities in four standardized volumetric regions of interest by 356 voxels (46.93 mm3): 1) contrast enhancement; 2) edema-infiltration; 3) area adjacent to edema-infiltration; 4) reference area in contralateral hemisphere. Subsequently, mathematical models were trained to classify MR-images of glioma depending on histological type and quantitative features.

RESULTS

Mean accuracy of differential diagnosis of 4 histological types of gliomas in experiments with machine learning was 81.6%, mean accuracy of identification of tumor types - from 94.1% to 99.5%. The best results were obtained using support vector machines and random forest model.

CONCLUSION

In a pilot study, the proposed standardization of regions of interest demonstrated high effectiveness for MR-based differential diagnosis of oligodendroglioma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. There are grounds for applying and improving this methodology in further studies.