The Relationship Between Risk Factors and Survival in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Interaction between Gallic acid and Asparaginase to potentiate anti-proliferative effect on lymphoblastic leukemia cell line

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) fails in some cases and the side effects cause mortality in certain patients. Gallic acid (GA), a polyhydroxyphenolic compound has biological functions including anti-proliferative properties. The aim of the present study was to investigate the growth inhibition effects of GA in combination with asparaginase (ASP), as a component of combination chemotherapy, in a lymphoblastic leukemia cell line.

METHODS

Jurkat cells were incubated with different concentrations of GA with or without ASP. Proliferation inhibition was investigated using MTS test. The level of apoptosis alterations were evaluated using flow cytometry. The expression of Fas gene level and surface expression were investigated by quantitative real time PCR and flow cytometry respectively.

RESULTS

GA at 50μM concentration and ASP at 0.5 IU/ml inhibited 50% cell proliferation in 48 hours. GA also increased the inhibitory effect of ASP and some combinations had synergistic results. The increase of cell apoptosis and Fas expression were observed in GA-treated cells compared to control. GA increased the effect of ASP on proliferation inhibition, induction of apoptosis and Fas expression.

CONCLUSION

GA is an effective component in proliferation inhibition, apoptosis induction and enhancement of Fas expression level in Jurkat cell line. GA in some combination with ASP increases the effect of the latter on the cells. The study of the mechanism of these effects could be a further step towards target therapy. This study is a preliminary phase to the use of GA and should be carried out by more comprehensive study and animal models.

Prognostic impact of CD200 and CD56 expression in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to determine the prognostic relevance of CD200/ CD56 expression in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

METHODS

The expression of CD200 and CD56 by blast cells was assessed by flow cytometry before the start of chemotherapy in 70 B-ALL patients.

RESULTS

Positive expression of CD200 was detected in forty-six patients (66%) and CD56 was detected in 7 patients (10%) out of 70 patients, respectively. Only three patients (4.3%) had co-expression for CD200⁺ and CD56⁺. Splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia were frequently observed more in CD200⁺ patients. Increased frequency of CD34⁺ was associated with CD200⁺and CD56⁺ patients. The CD200⁺ and CD56⁺ subgroups of B-ALL patients had inferior OS and disease free survival compared to CD 200^- and CD 56^- patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CD200⁺ and/or CD56⁺ positive expression in B-ALL patients at diagnosis is a poor prognostic biomarker. Identification of CD200⁺ and CD56⁺ expression at diagnosis is recommended for a better stratification of adult B-ALL patients.