1
|
Owolabi O, Riley T, Otupiri E, Polis CB, Larsen-Reindorf R. The infrastructural capacity of Ghanaian health facilities to provide safe abortion and post-abortion care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1104. [PMID: 34654428 PMCID: PMC8520210 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07141-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ghana is one of few countries in sub-Saharan Africa with relatively liberal abortion laws, but little is known about the availability and quality of abortion services nationally. The aim of this study was to describe the availability and capacity of health facilities to deliver essential PAC and SAC services in Ghana. METHODS We utilized data from a nationally representative survey of Ghanaian health facilities capable of providing post-abortion care (PAC) and/or safe abortion care (SAC) (n = 539). We included 326 facilities that reported providing PAC (57%) or SAC (19%) in the preceding year. We utilized a signal functions approach to evaluate the infrastructural capacity of facilities to provide high quality basic and comprehensive care. We conducted descriptive analysis to estimate the proportion of primary and referral facilities with capacity to provide SAC and PAC and the proportion of SAC and PAC that took place in facilities with greater capacity, and fractional regression to explore factors associated with higher structural capacity for provision. RESULTS Less than 20% of PAC and/or SAC providing facilities met all signal function criteria for basic or comprehensive PAC or for comprehensive SAC. Higher PAC caseloads and staff trained in vacuum aspiration was associated with higher capacity to provide PAC in primary and referral facilities, and private/faith-based ownership and rural location was associated with higher capacity to provide PAC in referral facilities. Primary facilities with a rural location were associated with lower basic SAC capacity. DISCUSSION Overall very few public facilities have the infrastructural capacity to deliver all the signal functions for comprehensive abortion care in Ghana. There is potential to scale-up the delivery of safe abortion care by facilitating service provision all health facilities currently providing postabortion care. CONCLUSIONS SAC provision is much lower than PAC provision overall, yet there are persistent gaps in capacity to deliver basic PAC at primary facilities. These results highlight a need for the Ghana Ministry of Health to improve the infrastructural capability of health facilities to provide comprehensive abortion care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onikepe Owolabi
- Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th floor, New York, NY 10038 USA
- Vital Strategies, 100 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York, 10005 USA
| | - Taylor Riley
- Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th floor, New York, NY 10038 USA
| | - Easmon Otupiri
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Chelsea B. Polis
- Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th floor, New York, NY 10038 USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
| | - Roderick Larsen-Reindorf
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soleimani Movahed M, Husseini Barghazan S, Askari F, Arab Zozani M. The Economic Burden of Abortion and Its Complication Treatment Cares: A Systematic Review. J Family Reprod Health 2021; 14:60-67. [PMID: 33603795 PMCID: PMC7865195 DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v14i2.4354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Abortion related procedures contribute to a significant economic burden because it resulted in prolonged hospital stays for patients. We aimed to gather available evidence on the economic burden of abortion and post-abortion complication treatment cares worldwide. Materials and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched through November 2019. Two researchers independently conducted the quality assessment and data extraction process. The latest web-based tool adjusted the estimates of costs expressed in one specific currency and price year into a specific target currency (the year 2016 $US). Results: Totally, 2082 records were retrieved and 32 studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis. The mean total costs per patient with abortion or post-abortion care ranged from $23 to $564. The annual costs ranged from 189,000 $US to 134 million $US. Conclusion: Abortion and post-abortion care impose a substantial economic burden on society. Understanding the burdensome of abortion or pregnancy termination among policymakers provides vital information and enables informed decisions to be made to establish health care priorities and allocating scarce resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Soleimani Movahed
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeed Husseini Barghazan
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fariba Askari
- Student Research Committee, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Morteza Arab Zozani
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lattof SR, Coast E, Rodgers YVDM, Moore B, Poss C. The mesoeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic effects of abortion on health systems. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237227. [PMID: 33147223 PMCID: PMC7641432 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the high incidence of abortion around the globe, we lack synthesis of the known economic consequences of abortion care and abortion policies at the mesoeconomic level (i.e. health systems and communities). This scoping review examines the mesoeconomic costs, benefits, impacts, and values of abortion care and policies. METHODS AND FINDINGS Searches were conducted in eight electronic databases. We conducted the searches and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. For inclusion, studies must have examined at least one of the following outcomes: costs, benefits, impacts, and value of abortion care or abortion policies. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted for descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Of the 150 included mesoeconomic studies, costs to health systems are the most frequently reported mesoeconomic outcome (n = 116), followed by impacts (n = 40), benefits (n = 17), and values (n = 11). Within health facilities and health systems, the costs of providing abortion services vary greatly, particularly given the range with which researchers identify and cost services. Financial savings can be realized while maintaining or even improving quality of abortion services. Adapting to changing laws and policies is costly for health facilities. American policies on abortion economically impact health systems and facilities both domestically and abroad. Providing post-abortion care requires a disproportionate amount of health facility resources. CONCLUSIONS The evidence base has consolidated around abortion costs to health systems and health facilities in high-income countries more than in low- or middle-income countries. Little is known about the economic impacts of abortion on communities or the mesoeconomics of abortion in the Middle East and North Africa. Methodologically, review papers are the most frequent study type, indicating that researchers rely on evidence from a core set of costing papers. Studies generating new primary data on mesoeconomic outcomes are needed to strengthen the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha R. Lattof
- Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ernestina Coast
- Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yana van der Meulen Rodgers
- Department of Labor Studies and Employment Relations, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
- Department of Women’s and Gender Studies, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Brittany Moore
- Ipas, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Cheri Poss
- Ipas, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goranitis I, Lissauer DM, Coomarasamy A, Wilson A, Daniels J, Middleton L, Bishop J, Hewitt CA, Weeks AD, Mhango C, Mataya R, Ahmed I, Oladapo OT, Zamora J, Roberts TE. Antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical management of miscarriage in low-income countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the AIMS trial. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7:e1280-e1286. [PMID: 31402008 PMCID: PMC6695526 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30336-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is ongoing debate on the clinical benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis for reducing pelvic infection after miscarriage surgery. We aimed to study the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical management of miscarriage in low-income countries. METHODS We did an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis using data from 3412 women recruited to the AIMS trial, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical management of miscarriage in Malawi, Pakistan, Tanzania, and Uganda. Economic evaluation was done from a health-care-provider perspective on the basis of the outcome of cost per pelvic infection avoided within 2 weeks of surgery. Pelvic infection was broadly defined by the presence of clinical features or the clinically identified need to administer antibiotics. We used non-parametric bootstrapping and multilevel random effects models to estimate incremental mean costs and outcomes. Decision uncertainty was shown via cost-effectiveness acceptability frontiers. The AIMS trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN97143849. FINDINGS Between June 2, 2014, and April 26, 2017, 3412 women were assigned to receive either antibiotic prophylaxis (1705 [50%] of 3412) or placebo (1707 [50%] of 3412) in the AIMS trial. 158 (5%) of 3412 women developed pelvic infection within 2 weeks of surgery, of whom 68 (43%) were in the antibiotic prophylaxis group and 90 (57%) in the placebo group. There is 97-98% probability that antibiotic prophylaxis is a cost-effective intervention at expected thresholds of willingness-to-pay per additional pelvic infection avoided. In terms of post-surgery antibiotics, the antibiotic prophylaxis group was US$0·27 (95% CI -0·49 to -0·05) less expensive per woman than the placebo group. A secondary analysis, a sensitivity analysis, and all subgroup analyses supported these findings. Antibiotic prophylaxis, if implemented routinely before miscarriage surgery, could translate to an annual total cost saving of up to $1·4 million across the four participating countries and up to $8·5 million across the two regions of sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. INTERPRETATION Antibiotic prophylaxis is more effective and less expensive than no antibiotic prophylaxis. Policy makers in various settings should be confident that antibiotic prophylaxis in miscarriage surgery is cost-effective. FUNDING UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, and the UK Department for International Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias Goranitis
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David M Lissauer
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amie Wilson
- Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jane Daniels
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Lee Middleton
- Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan Bishop
- Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Catherine A Hewitt
- Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrew D Weeks
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Chisale Mhango
- College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Ronald Mataya
- College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Iffat Ahmed
- The Aga Khan University Hospital and Medical College Foundation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Javier Zamora
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Tracy E Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baynes C, Yegon E, Kimaro G, Lusiola G, Kahwa J. The Unit and Scale-Up Cost of Postabortion Care in Tanzania. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2019; 7:S327-S341. [PMID: 31455628 PMCID: PMC6711630 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Based on research conducted in 2017, we estimated the cost to the Tanzanian health care system of providing postabortion care (PAC). PAC is an integrated service package that addresses the curative and preventive needs of women experiencing complications from abortion. PAC services include treating complications of miscarriage and incomplete abortion, providing voluntary family planning counseling and services, and engaging the community to reduce future unintended pregnancies and repeat abortions. METHODS Thirty-one public and private health facilities, representing 3 levels of health care, were selected for data collection from key care providers and administrators in 3 regions. We gathered data on the direct costs of PAC startup (i.e., training and capital costs), as well as the recurrent costs of medicines, supplies, hospitalization, and personnel, and the indirect costs of PAC provision. We also gathered data to estimate PAC clients' out-of-pocket expenses. Estimates of the average cost per client (i.e., unit cost) were calculated for treatment of routine and severe abortion complications, treatment at different levels of health care, postabortion contraception, and various available treatment methods. RESULTS We found that the unit cost of PAC training per provider was US$163.43. The total unit cost was $72.91. The unit recurrent cost of treating routine complications, which included 81% of the cases in our sample, was $36.23. The cost of treating incomplete abortion through manual vacuum aspiration was $22.63, while the cost of treatment with misoprostol was $18.74. The average cost of providing voluntary postabortion family planning was $11.56. We estimated an average client out-of-pocket expenditure on PAC of $22.96. CONCLUSION We applied our unit cost estimates to those on PAC utilization and provision and unmet need for PAC that were derived from research conducted in Tanzania in 2013-2016, and we estimated an annual national cost of PAC of $4,170,476. We estimated the cost of providing PAC for all women who have abortion complications, including those who do not access PAC, at $10,426,299. Investing more resources in voluntary family planning and PAC treatment of routine complications at the primary level would likely reduce health system costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Godfather Kimaro
- The National Institutes of Medical Research Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aantjes CJ, Gilmoor A, Syurina EV, Crankshaw TL. The status of provision of post abortion care services for women and girls in Eastern and Southern Africa: a systematic review. Contraception 2018; 98:S0010-7824(18)30094-5. [PMID: 29550457 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the status of post-abortion care (PAC) provision in Eastern and Southern Africa with particular reference to reach, quality and costs of these services. STUDY DESIGN We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Science Direct, POPLINE and Web of Science for articles published between 2000 and October 2017 presenting primary or secondary data from one or more countries in the region. RESULTS Seventy articles representing data from fourteen countries were abstracted and included in the review. Implementation of PAC services was found to be patchy across countries for which data was available. However, there is evidence of efforts to introduce PAC at lower level health facilities, to use mid-level providers and to employ less invasive medical techniques. Eleven countries from the region were not represented in this review, exposing a considerable knowledge gap over the state of PAC in the region. The disparate access for rural women and girls, the suboptimal service quality and the neglect of adolescent-specific needs were critical gaps in the current PAC provision. CONCLUSION PAC provision and research in this domain cannot be detached from the broader legal and societal context, as social stigma constitutes a major blockage to the advancement of the service. Adolescent girls are a particularly vulnerable and underserved group in the region. IMPLICATIONS The next generation research on PAC should favor multi-country and interdisciplinary study designs with a view to understanding inter-regional differences and supporting advancement towards universal access of PAC by 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolien J Aantjes
- Health Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
| | - Andrew Gilmoor
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Elena V Syurina
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Tamaryn L Crankshaw
- Health Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Correia LL, Rocha HAL, Leite ÁJM, Campos JS, Silva ACE, Machado MMT, Rocha SGMO, Gomes TN, Cunha AJLAD. Spontaneous and induced abortion trends and determinants in the Northeast semiarid region of Brazil: a transversal series. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE SAÚDE MATERNO INFANTIL 2018. [DOI: 10.1590/1806-93042018000100006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Objectives: this study intends to estimate the rates, associated factors and trends of selfreported abortion rates in the northeast of Brazil. Methods: series of population-based surveys realized in Ceará, northeast of Brazil, one of the poorest states in the country. A sample of about 27,000 women of reproductive age was used. Abortion was assessed according to women´s information and rates were calculated using official population estimates. The trends and the association among socioeconomic and reproductive factors were studied using regressive models. Results: a trend for reduction in rates was identified. For induced abortion, the determinants were: not having a partner, condom in the last sexual intercourse, first child up to 25years old (AOR= 5.21; ACI: 2.9 – 9.34) and having less than 13years old at first sexual intercourse (AOR= 5.88; ACI: 3.29 – 10.51). For spontaneous abortion were: having studied less than 8 years, knowledge and use of morning-after pill (AOR= 26.44; ACI: 17.9 – 39.05) and not having any children (AOR= 3.43). Conclusions: rates may have been low due to self-reporting. Young age and knowledge about contraceptive methods were associated to both kinds of abortion, while education level along with spontaneous and marital status with induced. Programs to reduce abortion rates should focus on single younger women with low education.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cook S, de Kok B, Odland ML. 'It's a very complicated issue here': understanding the limited and declining use of manual vacuum aspiration for postabortion care in Malawi: a qualitative study. Health Policy Plan 2017; 32:305-313. [PMID: 27616307 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Malawi has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world. Unsafe abortions are an important contributor to Malawi's maternal mortality and morbidity, where abortion is illegal except to save the woman's life. Postabortion care (PAC) aims to reduce adverse consequences of unsafe abortions, in part by treating incomplete abortions. Although global and national PAC policies recommend manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for treatment of incomplete abortion, usage in Malawi is low and appears to be decreasing, with sharp curettage being used in preference. There is limited evidence regarding what influences rejection of recommended PAC innovations. Hence, drawing on Greenhalgh et al. 's (2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly 82: 581-629.) diffusion of healthcare innovation framework, this qualitative study aimed to investigate factors contributing to the limited and declining use of MVA in Malawi. Semi-structured interviews with 17 PAC providers in a central hospital and a district hospital indicate that a range of factors coalesce and influence PAC and MVA use in Malawi. Factors pertain to four main domains: the system (shortages of material and human resources; lack of training, supervision and feedback), relationships (power dynamics; expected job roles), the health workers (attitudes towards abortion and PAC; prioritization of PAC) and the innovation (perceived risks and benefits of MVA use). Effective and sustainable PAC policy must adopt a broader people-centred health systems approach which considers all these factors, their interactions and the wider socio-cultural, legal and political context of abortion and PAC. The study showed the value of using Greenhalgh et al. 's (2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly 82: 581-629.) framework to consider the complex interaction of factors surrounding innovation use (or lack of), but provided more insights into rejections of innovations and, particularly, a low- and middle-income country perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinead Cook
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Sexual Health, Cardiff and Vale NHS, Cardiff Royal Infirmary, Cardiff, UK
| | - Bregje de Kok
- Anthropology Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Makenzius M, Oguttu M, Klingberg-Allvin M, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Odero TMA, Faxelid E. Post-abortion care with misoprostol - equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016157. [PMID: 29018067 PMCID: PMC5652492 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of midwives administering misoprostol to women with incomplete abortion seeking post-abortion care (PAC), compared with physicians. DESIGN A multicentre randomised controlled equivalence trial. The study was not masked. SETTINGS Gynaecological departments in two hospitals in a low-resource setting, Kenya. POPULATION Women (n=1094) with incomplete abortion in the first trimester, seeking PAC between 1 June 2013 to 31 May 2016. Participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment from midwives or physicians. 409 and 401 women in the midwife and physician groups, respectively, were included in the per-protocol analysis. INTERVENTIONS 600 µg misoprostol orally, and contraceptive counselling by a physician or midwife. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Complete abortion not needing surgical intervention within 7-10 days. The main outcome was analysed on the per-protocol population with a generalised estimating equation model. The predefined equivalence range was -4% to 4%. Secondary outcomes were analysed descriptively. RESULTS The proportion of complete abortion was 94.8% (768/810): 390 (95.4%) in the midwife group and 378 (94.3%) in the physician group. The proportion of incomplete abortion was 5.2% (42/810), similarly distributed between midwives and physicians. The model-based risk difference for midwives versus physicians was 1.0% (-4.1 to 2.2). Most women felt safe (97%; 779/799), and 93% (748/801) perceived the treatment as expected/easier than expected. After contraceptive counselling the uptake of a contraceptive method after 7-10 days occurred in 76% (613/810). No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives is equally effective, safe and accepted by women as when administered by physicians in a low-resource setting. Systematically provided contraceptive counselling in PAC is effective to mitigate unmet need for contraception. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01865136; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlene Makenzius
- Department of Public Health Sciences Global Health (IHCAR), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Monica Oguttu
- Kisumu Medical and Education Trust (KMET), Reproductive Health, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Marie Klingberg-Allvin
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Department of Women ´s and Children ´s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Departement of Women ´s and Children ´s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Theresa M A Odero
- College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Elisabeth Faxelid
- Department of Public Health Sciences Global Health (IHCAR), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lince-Deroche N, Harries J, Constant D, Morroni C, Pleaner M, Fetters T, Grossman D, Blanchard K, Sinanovic E. Doing more for less: identifying opportunities to expand public sector access to safe abortion in South Africa through budget impact analysis. Contraception 2017; 97:167-176. [PMID: 28780240 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 06/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) To estimate the costs of public-sector abortion provision in South Africa and to explore the potential for expanding access at reduced cost by changing the mix of technologies used. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a budget impact analysis using public sector abortion statistics and published cost data. We estimated the total costs to the public health service over 10 years, starting in South Africa's financial year 2016/17, given four scenarios: (1) holding service provision constant, (2) expanding public sector provision, (3) changing the abortion technologies used (i.e. the method mix), and (4) expansion plus changing the method mix. RESULTS The public sector performed an estimated 20% of the expected total number of abortions in 2016/17; 26% and 54% of all abortions were performed illegally or in the private sector respectively. Costs were lowest in scenarios where method mix shifting occurred. Holding the proportion of abortions performed in the public-sector constant, shifting to more cost-effective service provision (more first-trimester services with more medication abortion and using the combined regimen for medical induction in the second trimester) could result in savings of $28.1 million in the public health service over the 10-year period. Expanding public sector provision through elimination of unsafe abortions would require an additional $192.5 million. CONCLUSIONS South Africa can provide more safe abortions for less money in the public sector through shifting the methods provided. More research is needed to understand whether the cost of expanding access could be offset by savings from averting costs of managing unsafe abortions. IMPLICATIONS South Africa can provide more safe abortions for less money in the public sector through shifting to more first-trimester methods, including more medication abortion, and shifting to a combined mifepristone plus misoprostol regimen for second trimester medical induction. Expanding access in addition to method mix changes would require additional funds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Harries
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Deborah Constant
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Chelsea Morroni
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; EGA Institute for Women's Health and Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melanie Pleaner
- Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Daniel Grossman
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | - Edina Sinanovic
- Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lince-Deroche N, Fetters T, Sinanovic E, Devjee J, Moodley J, Blanchard K. The costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester, medical and surgical safe abortion services in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174615. [PMID: 28369061 PMCID: PMC5378341 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite a liberal abortion law, access to safe abortion services in South Africa is challenging for many women. Medication abortion was introduced in 2013, but its reach remains limited. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing first-trimester medication abortion and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) services to inform planning for first-trimester service provision in South Africa and similar settings. Methods We obtained data on service provision and outcomes from an operations research study where medication abortion was introduced alongside existing MVA services in public hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal province. Clinical data were collected through interviews with first-trimester abortion clients and summaries completed by nurses performing the procedures. In parallel, we performed micro-costing at three of the study hospitals. Using a model built in Excel, we estimated the average cost per medical and surgical procedure and determined the cost per complete abortion performed. Results are presented in 2015 US dollars. Results A total of 1,129 women were eligible for a first trimester abortion at the three study sites. The majority (886, 78.5%) were eligible to choose their abortion procedure; 94.1% (n = 834) chose medication abortion. The total average cost per medication abortion was $63.91 (52.32–75.51). The total average cost per MVA was higher at $69.60 (52.62–86.57); though the cost ranges for the two procedures overlapped. Given average costs, the cost per complete medication abortion was lower than the cost per complete MVA despite three (0.4%) medication abortion women being hospitalized and two (0.3%) having ongoing pregnancies at study exit. Personnel costs were the largest component of the total average cost of both abortion methods. Conclusion This analysis supports the scale-up of medication abortion alongside existing MVA services in South Africa. Women can be offered a choice of methods, including medication abortion with MVA as a back-up, without increasing costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Edina Sinanovic
- Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jaymala Devjee
- King Dinuzulu Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Durban, South Africa
| | - Jack Moodley
- Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rodriguez MI, Mendoza WS, Guerra-Palacio C, Guzman NA, Tolosa JE. Medical abortion and manual vacuum aspiration for legal abortion protect women's health and reduce costs to the health system: findings from Colombia. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS 2017; 22:125-33. [PMID: 25702076 DOI: 10.1016/s0968-8080(14)43788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of abortions in Colombia continue to take place outside the formal health system under a range of conditions, with the majority of women obtaining misoprostol from a thriving black market for the drug and self-administering the medication. We conducted a cost analysis to compare the costs to the health system of three approaches to the provision of abortion care in Colombia: post-abortion care for complications of unsafe abortions, and for legal abortions in a health facility, misoprostol-only medical abortion and vacuum aspiration abortion. Hospital billing records from three institutions, two large maternity hospitals and one specialist reproductive health clinic, were analysed for procedure and complication rates, and costs by diagnosis. The majority of visits (94%) were to the two hospitals for post-abortion care; the other 6% were for legal abortions. Only one minor complication was found among the women having legal abortions, a complication rate of less than 1%. Among the women presenting for post-abortion care, 5% had complications during their treatment, mainly from infection or haemorrhage. Legal abortions were associated not only with far fewer complications for women, but also lower costs for the health system than for post-abortion care. We calculated based on our findings that for every 1,000 women receiving post-abortion care instead of a legal abortion within the health system, 16 women experienced avoidable complications, and the health system spent US $48,000 managing them. Increasing women's access to safe abortion care would not only reduce complications for women, but would also be a cost-saving strategy for the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Camilo Guerra-Palacio
- Medical Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital General de Medellín, and Medical Doctor, Profamilia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Nelson Alvis Guzman
- Director, Grupo de Investigación y Docencia, Facultad de Ciencias Economicas, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - Jorge E Tolosa
- Associate Professor, Oregon Health & Science University, and Founder, Global Network for Perinatal & Reproductive Health, Portland, OR, USA; and Coordinator, FUNDARED-MATERNA, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ilboudo PGC, Greco G, Sundby J, Torsvik G. Estimating the costs for the treatment of abortion complications in two public referral hospitals: a cross-sectional study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:559. [PMID: 27717356 PMCID: PMC5055714 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1822-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment costs of induced abortion complications can consume a substantial amount of hospital resources. This use of hospitals scarce resources to treat induced abortion complications may affect hospitals' capacities to deliver other health care services. In spite of the importance of studying the burden of the treatment of induced abortion complications, few studies have been conducted to document the costs of treating abortion complications in Burkina Faso. Our objective was to estimate the costs of six abortion complications including incomplete abortion, hemorrhage, shock, infection/sepsis, cervix or vagina laceration, and uterus perforation treated in two public referral hospital facilities in Ouagadougou and the cost saving of providing safe abortion care services. METHODS The distribution of abortion-related complications was assessed through a review of postabortion care-registers combined with interviews with key informants in maternity wards and in hospital facilities. Two structured questionnaires were used for data collection following the perspective of the hospital. The first questionnaire collected information on the units and the unit costs of drugs and medical supplies used in the treatment of each complication. The second questionnaire gathered information on salaries and overhead expenses. All data were entered in a spreadsheet designed for studying abortion, and analyses were performed on Excel 2007. RESULTS Across six types of abortion complications, the mean cost per patient was USD45.86. The total cost to these two public referral hospital facilities for treating the complications of abortion was USD22,472.53 in 2010 equivalent to USD24,466.21 in 2015. Provision of safe abortion care services to women who suffered from complications of unsafe induced abortion and who received care in these public hospitals would only have cost USD2,694, giving potential savings of more than USD19,778.53 in that year. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of the complications of abortion consumes a significant proportion (up to USD22,472.53) of the two public hospitals resources in Burkina Faso. Safe abortion care services may represent a cost beneficial alternative, as it may have saved USD19,778.53 in 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G. C. Ilboudo
- Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre MURAZ, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giulia Greco
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, London, UK
| | - Johanne Sundby
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gaute Torsvik
- University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vlassoff M, Singh S, Onda T. The cost of post-abortion care in developing countries: a comparative analysis of four studies. Health Policy Plan 2016; 31:1020-30. [PMID: 27045001 PMCID: PMC5013781 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last five years, comprehensive national surveys of the cost of post-abortion care (PAC) to national health systems have been undertaken in Ethiopia, Uganda, Rwanda and Colombia using a specially developed costing methodology—the Post-abortion Care Costing Methodology (PACCM). The objective of this study is to expand the research findings of these four studies, making use of their extensive datasets. These studies offer the most complete and consistent estimates of the cost of PAC to date, and comparing their findings not only provides generalizable implications for health policies and programs, but also allows an assessment of the PACCM methodology. We find that the labor cost component varies widely: in Ethiopia and Colombia doctors spend about 30–60% more time with PAC patients than do nurses; in Uganda and Rwanda an opposite pattern is found. Labor costs range from I$42.80 in Uganda to I$301.30 in Colombia. The cost of drugs and supplies does not vary greatly, ranging from I$79 in Colombia to I$115 in Rwanda. Capital and overhead costs are substantial amounting to 52–68% of total PAC costs. Total costs per PAC case vary from I$334 in Rwanda to I$972 in Colombia. The financial burden of PAC is considerable: the expense of treating each PAC case is equivalent to around 35% of annual per capita income in Uganda, 29% in Rwanda and 11% in Colombia. Providing modern methods of contraception to women with an unmet need would cost just a fraction of the average expenditure on PAC: one year of modern contraceptive services and supplies cost only 3–12% of the average cost of treating a PAC patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Vlassoff
- Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA
| | - Susheela Singh
- Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Onda
- Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Benson J, Gebreselassie H, Mañibo MA, Raisanen K, Johnston HB, Mhango C, Levandowski BA. Costs of postabortion care in public sector health facilities in Malawi: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:562. [PMID: 26677840 PMCID: PMC4683960 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1216-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems could obtain substantial cost savings by providing safe abortion care rather than providing expensive treatment for complications of unsafely performed abortions. This study estimates current health system costs of treating unsafe abortion complications and compares these findings with newly-projected costs for providing safe abortion in Malawi. METHODS We conducted in-depth surveys of medications, supplies, and time spent by clinical personnel dedicated to postabortion care (PAC) for three treatment categories (simple, severe non-surgical, and severe surgical complications) and three uterine evacuation (UE) procedure types (manual vacuum aspiration (MVA), dilation and curettage (D&C) and misoprostol-alone) at 15 purposively-selected public health facilities. Per-case treatment costs were calculated and applied to national, annual PAC caseload data. RESULTS The median cost per D&C case ($63) was 29% higher than MVA treatment ($49). Costs to treat severe non-surgical complications ($63) were almost five times higher than those of a simple PAC case ($13). Severe surgical complications were especially costly to treat at $128. PAC treatment in public facilities cost an estimated $314,000 annually. Transition to safe, legal abortion would yield an estimated cost reduction of 20%-30%. CONCLUSIONS The method of UE and severity of complications have a large impact on overall costs. With a liberalized abortion law and implementation of induced abortion services with WHO-recommended UE methods, current PAC costs to the health system could markedly decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Chisale Mhango
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Brooke A Levandowski
- Department of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 475 Irving Avenue, Suite 200, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mangham-Jefferies L, Pitt C, Cousens S, Mills A, Schellenberg J. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14:243. [PMID: 25052536 PMCID: PMC4223592 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 07/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Each year almost 3 million newborns die within the first 28 days of life, 2.6 million babies are stillborn, and 287,000 women die from complications of pregnancy and childbirth worldwide. Effective and cost-effective interventions and behaviours for mothers and newborns exist, but their coverage remains inadequate in low- and middle-income countries, where the vast majority of deaths occur. Cost-effective strategies are needed to increase the coverage of life-saving maternal and newborn interventions and behaviours in resource-constrained settings. Methods A systematic review was undertaken on the cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the demand and supply of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Peer-reviewed and grey literature published since 1990 was searched using bibliographic databases, websites of selected organizations, and reference lists of relevant studies and reviews. Publications were eligible for inclusion if they report on a behavioural or health systems strategy that sought to improve the utilization or provision of care during pregnancy, childbirth or the neonatal period; report on its cost-effectiveness; and were set in one or more low-income or lower-middle-income countries. The quality of the publications was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. Incremental cost per life-year saved and per disability-adjusted life-year averted were compared to gross domestic product per capita. Results Forty-eight publications were identified, which reported on 43 separate studies. Sixteen were judged to be of high quality. Common themes were identified and the strategies were presented in relation to the continuum of care and the level of the health system. There was reasonably strong evidence for the cost-effectiveness of the use of women’s groups, home-based newborn care using community health workers and traditional birth attendants, adding services to routine antenatal care, a facility-based quality improvement initiative to enhance compliance with care standards, and the promotion of breastfeeding in maternity hospitals. Other strategies reported cost-effectiveness measures that had limited comparability. Conclusion Demand and supply-side strategies to improve maternal and newborn health care can be cost-effective, though the evidence is limited by the paucity of high quality studies and the use of disparate cost-effectiveness measures. Trial registration PROSPERO_
CRD42012003255.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ilboudo PGC, Greco G, Sundby J, Torsvik G. Costs and consequences of abortions to women and their households: a cross-sectional study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Health Policy Plan 2014; 30:500-7. [PMID: 24829315 PMCID: PMC4385818 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the costs and consequences of abortions to women and their households. Our aim was to study both costs and consequences of induced and spontaneous abortions and complications. We carried out a cross-sectional study between February and September 2012 in Ouagadougou, the capital city of Burkina Faso. Quantitative data of 305 women whose pregnancy ended with either an induced or a spontaneous abortion were prospectively collected on sociodemographic, asset ownership, medical and health expenditures including pre-referral costs following the patient’s perspective. Descriptive analysis and regression analysis of costs were performed. We found that women with induced abortion were often single or never married, younger, more educated and had earlier pregnancies than women with spontaneous abortion. They also tended to be more often under parents’ guardianship compared with women with spontaneous abortion. Women with induced abortion paid much more money to obtain abortion and treatment of the resulting complications compared with women with spontaneous abortion: US$89 (44 252 CFA ie franc of the African Financial Community) vs US$56 (27 668 CFA). The results also suggested that payments associated with induced abortion were catastrophic as they consumed 15% of the gross domestic product per capita. Additionally, 11–16% of total households appeared to have resorted to coping strategies in order to face costs. Both induced and spontaneous abortions may incur high expenses with short-term economic repercussions on households’ poverty. Actions are needed in order to reduce the financial burden of abortion costs and promote an effective use of contraceptives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G C Ilboudo
- Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene
| | - Giulia Greco
- Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway
| | - Johanne Sundby
- Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway
| | - Gaute Torsvik
- Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vlassoff M, Musange SF, Kalisa IR, Ngabo F, Sayinzoga F, Singh S, Bankole A. The health system cost of post-abortion care in Rwanda. Health Policy Plan 2014; 30:223-33. [PMID: 24548846 PMCID: PMC4325535 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Based on research conducted in 2012, we estimate the cost to the Rwandan health-care system of providing post-abortion care (PAC) due to unsafe abortions, a subject of policy importance not studied before at the national level. Thirty-nine public and private health facilities representing three levels of health care were randomly selected for data collection from key care providers and administrators for all five regions. Using an ingredients approach to costing, data were gathered on drugs, supplies, material, personnel time and hospitalization. Additionally, direct non-medical costs such as overhead and capital costs were also measured. We found that the average annual PAC cost per client, across five types of abortion complications, was $93. The total cost of PAC nationally was estimated to be $1.7 million per year, 49% of which was expended on direct non-medical costs. Satisfying all demands for PAC would raise the national cost to $2.5 million per year. PAC comprises a significant share of total expenditure in reproductive health in Rwanda. Investing more resources in provision of contraceptive services to prevent unwanted or mistimed pregnancies would likely reduce health systems costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Vlassoff
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Sabine F Musange
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Ina R Kalisa
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Fidele Ngabo
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Felix Sayinzoga
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Susheela Singh
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Akinrinola Bankole
- Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, School of Public Health, National University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 5229, Kigali, Rwanda and Maternal and Child Health Unit, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 84, Kigali, Rwanda
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Unsafe abortion is a significant contributor to maternal mortality in Nigeria, and treatment of postabortion complications drains public healthcare resources. Provider estimates of medications, supplies, and staff time spent in 17 public hospitals were used to estimate the per-case and annual costs of postabortion care (PAC) provision in Ogun and Lagos states and the Federal Capital Territory. PAC with treatment of moderate complications (US $112) cost 60% more per case than simple PAC (US $70). In cases needing simple PAC, treatment with dilation and curettage (D&C, US $80) cost 18% more per case than manual vacuum aspiration (US $68). Annually, all public hospitals in these 3 states spend US $807 442 on PAC. This cost could be reduced by shifting service provision to an outpatient basis, allowing service provision by midwives, and abandoning the use of D&C. Availability of safe, legal abortion would further decrease cost and reduce preventable deaths from unsafe abortion.
Collapse
|
20
|
Vlassoff M, Fetters T, Kumbi S, Singh S. The health system cost of postabortion care in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 118 Suppl 2:S127-33. [PMID: 22920616 DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)60011-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
To address the knowledge gap that exists in costing unsafe abortion in Ethiopia, estimates were derived of the cost to the health system of providing postabortion care (PAC), based on research conducted in 2008. Fourteen public and private health facilities were selected, representing 3 levels of health care. Cost information on drugs, supplies, material, personnel time, and out-of-pocket expenses was collected using an ingredients approach. Sensitivity analysis was used to determine the most likely range of costs. The average direct cost per client, across 5 types of abortion complications, was US $36.21. The annual direct cost nationally ranged from US $6.5 to US $8.9 million. Including indirect costs and satisfying all demand increased the annual national cost to US $47 million. PAC consumes a large portion of the total expenditure in reproductive health in Ethiopia. Investing more resources in family planning programs to prevent unwanted pregnancies would be cost-beneficial to the health system.
Collapse
|
21
|
Johnston HB, Akhter S, Oliveras E. Quality and efficiency of care for complications of unsafe abortion: a case study from Bangladesh. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 118 Suppl 2:S141-7. [PMID: 22920618 DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)60013-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Treating complications of unsafe abortion can be financially draining for health systems. This analysis assessed incremental health system costs of service delivery for abortion-related complications in the Bangladesh public health system and confirmed that providing postabortion care with vacuum aspiration is less expensive than using dilation and curettage (D&C). Implementing several evidence-based best practices, such as replacing D&C with vacuum aspiration, reducing use of high-level sedation, authorizing midlevel providers to offer postabortion care, and providing postabortion contraceptive counseling and services to women while still at the health facility, could increase the quality and cost efficiency of postabortion care in Bangladesh.
Collapse
|
22
|
Vlassoff M, Mugisha F, Sundaram A, Bankole A, Singh S, Amanya L, Kiggundu C, Mirembe F. The health system cost of post-abortion care in Uganda. Health Policy Plan 2012; 29:56-66. [PMID: 23274438 PMCID: PMC3872370 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This article presents estimates based on the research conducted in 2010 of the cost to the Ugandan health system of providing post-abortion care (PAC), filling a gap in knowledge of the cost of unsafe abortion. Thirty-nine public and private health facilities were sampled representing three levels of health care, and data were collected on drugs, supplies, material, personnel time and out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, direct non-medical costs in the form of overhead and capital costs were also measured. Our results show that the average annual PAC cost per client, across five types of abortion complications, was $131. The total cost of PAC nationally, including direct non-medical costs, was estimated to be $13.9 million per year. Satisfying all demand for PAC would raise the national cost to $20.8 million per year. This shows that PAC consumes a substantial portion of the total expenditure in reproductive health in Uganda. Investing more resources in family planning programmes to prevent unwanted and mistimed pregnancies would help reduce health systems costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Vlassoff
- Senior Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, New York, NY, USA. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brookman-Amissah E. Saving women's lives in Africa through access to comprehensive abortion care. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2012; 17:241-4. [PMID: 22758895 DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2012.688150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
24
|
Babigumira JB, Stergachis A, Veenstra DL, Gardner JS, Ngonzi J, Mukasa-Kivunike P, Garrison LP. Estimating the costs of induced abortion in Uganda: a model-based analysis. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:904. [PMID: 22145859 PMCID: PMC3293098 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2011] [Accepted: 12/06/2011] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The demand for induced abortions in Uganda is high despite legal and moral proscriptions. Abortion seekers usually go to illegal, hidden clinics where procedures are performed in unhygienic environments by under-trained practitioners. These abortions, which are usually unsafe, lead to a high rate of severe complications and use of substantial, scarce healthcare resources. This study was performed to estimate the costs associated with induced abortions in Uganda. METHODS A decision tree was developed to represent the consequences of induced abortion and estimate the costs of an average case. Data were obtained from a primary chart abstraction study, an on-going prospective study, and the published literature. Societal costs, direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, indirect (productivity) costs, costs to patients, and costs to the government were estimated. Monte Carlo simulation was used to account for uncertainty. RESULTS The average societal cost per induced abortion (95% credibility range) was $177 ($140-$223). This is equivalent to $64 million in annual national costs. Of this, the average direct medical cost was $65 ($49-86) and the average direct non-medical cost was $19 ($16-$23). The average indirect cost was $92 ($57-$139). Patients incurred $62 ($46-$83) on average while government incurred $14 ($10-$20) on average. CONCLUSION Induced abortions are associated with substantial costs in Uganda and patients incur the bulk of the healthcare costs. This reinforces the case made by other researchers--that efforts by the government to reduce unsafe abortions by increasing contraceptive coverage or providing safe, legal abortions are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B Babigumira
- Global Medicines Program, Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Unsafe abortion is a significant cause of death and ill health in women in the developing world. A substantial body of research on these consequences exists, although studies are of variable quality. However, unsafe abortion has a number of other significant consequences that are much less widely recognized. These include the economic consequences, the immediate costs of providing medical care for abortion-related complications, the costs of medical care for longer-term health consequences, lost productivity to the country, the impact on families and the community, and the social consequences that affect women and families. This article will review the scientific evidence on the consequences of unsafe abortion, highlight gaps in the evidence base, suggest areas where future research efforts are needed, and speculate on the future situation regarding consequences and evidence over the next 5-10 years. The information provided is useful and timely given the current heightened interest in the issue of unsafe abortion, growing from the recent focus of national and international agencies on reducing maternal mortality by 75% by 2015 (as one of the Millennium Development Goals established in 2000).
Collapse
|
26
|
Costs of post-abortion care in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 108:165-9. [PMID: 20035938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2009] [Revised: 08/20/2009] [Accepted: 10/15/2009] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality of costing studies of post-abortion care from low- and middle-income countries and to describe costs in various settings. METHODS A systematic review identified unit costs. Descriptive statistical analysis and univariate regression analysis identified drivers of unit costs of post-abortion care. RESULTS There are few cost studies from Asia or Eastern Europe. Data indicate that the cost (in 2007 international dollars) of post-abortion care in Africa and Latin America is $392 and $430, respectively, per case. CONCLUSION Differences in post-abortion care costs were associated with region, procedure, facility level, case severity, and whether the study was operations research. Methods varied between studies, and efforts should be made in future research to improve consistency. Additional data are needed from Asia and Eastern Europe, as well as the costs of medical methods of uterine evacuation. These data justify improved access to contraception and safe, legal abortion.
Collapse
|
27
|
McDougall J, Fetters T, Clark KA, Rathavy T. Determinants of Contraceptive Acceptance Among Cambodian Abortion Patients. Stud Fam Plann 2009; 40:123-32. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00195.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|