Organ-specific Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, with Special Reference to Endocrinopathies

The Current State of Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is genetically a distinct tumor compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), and due to its low mutational burden, it is far less perceptible to the immune system. Thus, treatments that have revolutionized the treatment of CM remain widely inefficient in metastatic UM or only demonstrate effectiveness in a small subpopulation of patients. To this end, the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade is very limited and may come at the expense of severe immune-related adverse events that could potentially affect all organ systems. Notably, tebentafusp, an entirely novel class of anti-cancer drugs, has received official authorization for the treatment of metastatic UM. It is the first agent that demonstrated a survival advantage in a randomized controlled trial of metastatic UM patients. Despite the survival benefit and approval, the restriction of tebentafusp to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients and the low objective response rate indicate the persistent need for additional therapies. Thus, liver-directed therapies are commonly used for tumor control of hepatic metastases and represent a central pillar of the daily management of liver-dominant disease. Further, promising data from targeted therapies independent of MEK-inhibitors, such as the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib, raise hope for additional options in metastatic UM in the future. This narrative review provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape for metastatic UM.

Immunohistochemical expression of TROP‑2 (TACSTD2) on the urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and other types of cancer

In metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), therapeutic options have been limited to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Novel targets and drugs such as antibody drug conjugates have been developed, and enfortumab vedotin targeting nectin-4 and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2), the protein product of the TACSTD2 gene, have been approved. The expression of TROP-2 was investigated within UC and other types of carcinomas, and within the tissue of different healthy organs to understand treatment responses and toxicities. The expression of TROP-2 in the tissues of 42 patients with UC, 13 patients with other types of cancer and in the normal tissues of 11 patients was retrospectively analyzed. Immunohistochemical staining of the TROP-2 protein was performed on a BenchMark ULTRA IHC/ISH System (Roche Tissue Diagnostics; Roche Diagnostics, Ltd.) according to accredited staining protocols in a routine immunohistochemistry accredited and certified facility of the laboratory of immunohistochemistry at the Institute of Pathology (Gerhard-Domagk Institute)- University Hospital Muenster (UKM)-Muenster-Germany]. Different expression levels of TROP-2 were observed, and the highest expression rate of TROP-2 was observed in UC, independent of the tumor stage. However, normal urothelial cells had similar expression levels. Except for ductal carcinoma in situ, the expression of TROP-2 was reduced in other types of cancer and in the healthy tissues from other organs, including pancreas, gall bladder, colon and prostate. Given the treatment response based on the expression level of TROP-2, SG would be effective in almost all cases of UC. However, it would also have an effect on the normal urothelium.

How detection of immune-related adverse events fails during transfer of patients between medical sectors

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mono- or combination therapy may be acute or delayed, partly arising long after termination of treatment. They may be reversible or persistent. Treatment duration with ICIs is usually one year in the adjuvant setting of solid tumors, and until progression or inacceptable toxicity in metastatic disease. In the case of a response in the palliative setting, a patient may be on treatment for many years, based on individual decision making. Thus, every patient is at risk of experiencing clinically highly relevant side effects for a very long time when she/he may be transferred between many sectors of acute medicine including intensive care units (ICUs) until later rehabilitation procedures and observation by general practitioners. While actively treating oncologists in hospitals and outpatient departments have already covered a long (and partly harmful) learning curve, most physicians in other sectors like ICUs or rehabilitation hospitals have not seen many patients and these dangerous side effects to a larger extent, and thus have not trained their awareness and clinical knowledge. In most cases, irAEs appeared before the admission of the patients to their institutions, and they are only asked to control preexisting medications. Only intersectoral education and communication can help to safely overcome this gap and lag time until all medical specialties have gained sufficient experience and gone through their learning processes.

Adrenal Failure: An Evidence-Based Diagnostic Approach

The diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) requires a high index of suspicion, detailed clinical assessment including detailed drug history, and appropriate laboratory evaluation. The clinical characteristics of adrenal insufficiency vary according to the cause, and the presentation may be myriad, e.g. insidious onset to a catastrophic adrenal crisis presenting with circulatory shock and coma. Secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) often presents with only glucocorticoid deficiency because aldosterone production, which is controlled by the renin angiotensin system, is usually intact, and rarely presents with an adrenal crisis. Measurements of the basal serum cortisol at 8 am (<140 nmol/L or 5 mcg/dL) coupled with adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) remain the initial tests of choice. The cosyntropin stimulation (short synacthen) test is used for the confirmation of the diagnosis. Newer highly specific cortisol assays have reduced the cut-off points for cortisol in the diagnosis of AI. The salivary cortisol test is increasingly being used in conditions associated with abnormal cortisol binding globulin (CBG) levels such as pregnancy. Children and infants require lower doses of cosyntropin for testing. 21-hydoxylase antibodies are routinely evaluated to rule out autoimmunity, the absence of which would require secondary causes of adrenal insufficiency to be ruled out. Testing the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, imaging, and ruling out systemic causes are necessary for the diagnosis of AI. Cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is an emerging cause of both primary AI and SAI and requires close follow up. Several antibodies are being implicated, but more clarity is required. We update the diagnostic evaluation of AI in this evidence-based review.

Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Related Endocrinopathies following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment

In recent years, in the context of the increase in the life expectancy of cancer patients, special attention has been given to immunotherapy and, indeed, to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased rapidly, and approximately 40% of cancer patients are eligible for this treatment. Although their impact is valuable on cancer treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors come with side effects, known as immune-related adverse effects. These can affect many systems, including cutaneous, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neural, and pulmonary systems. In this review, we focus on immune-related endocrinopathies that affect around 10% of all treated patients. Endocrine dysfunctions can manifest as hypophysitis, thyroid dysfunction, hypoparathyroidism, insulin-deficient diabetes mellitus, and primary adrenal insufficiency. Currently, there are multiple ongoing clinical trials that aim to identify possible predictive biomarkers for immune-related adverse effects. The design of those clinical trials relies on collecting a variety of biological specimens (tissue biopsy, blood, plasma, saliva, and stool) at baseline and regular intervals during treatment. In this review, we present the predictive biomarkers (such as antibodies, hormones, cytokines, human leukocyte antigens, and eosinophils) that could potentially be utilized in clinical practice in order to predict adverse effects and manage them appropriately.

Immune-Related Uncommon Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of oncology, and has become standard of care in multiple cancer types in front or late lines of therapy, with some longstanding responses and outstanding results. Notwithstanding, its use has brought a totally unique spectrum of adverse events, characterized by a myriad of diverse manifestations affecting nearly every organ and system of the body, including the endocrine, nervous, cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Uncommon adverse events, defined as those occurring in less than 1% of patients, comprise an even more heterogeneous group of diseases that are being seen more recurrently as the use of immune check-point inhibitors increases and indications spread in different tumor types and stages. Here, we comprehensively review some uncommon, but exceedingly important, immune-related adverse events, with special emphasis in the clinical approach and diagnostic workup, aiming to reunite the evidence published previously, allowing an increase in awareness and knowledge from all specialists implicated in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Radionuclide Imaging of Cytotoxic Immune Cell Responses to Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy is an evolving and promising cancer treatment that takes advantage of the body’s immune system to yield effective tumor elimination. Importantly, immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, resulting in remarkable tumor responses and improvements in patient survival. However, despite impressive tumor effects and extended patient survival, only a small proportion of patients respond, and others can develop immune-related adverse events associated with these therapies, which are associated with considerable costs. Therefore, strategies to increase the proportion of patients gaining a benefit from these treatments and/or increasing the durability of immune-mediated tumor response are still urgently needed. Currently, measurement of blood or tissue biomarkers has demonstrated sampling limitations, due to intrinsic tumor heterogeneity and the latter being invasive. In addition, the unique response patterns of these therapies are not adequately captured by conventional imaging modalities. Consequently, non-invasive, sensitive, and quantitative molecular imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using specific radiotracers, have been increasingly used for longitudinal whole-body monitoring of immune responses. Immunotherapies rely on the effector function of CD8⁺ T cells and natural killer cells (NK) at tumor lesions; therefore, the monitoring of these cytotoxic immune cells is of value for therapy response assessment. Different immune cell targets have been investigated as surrogate markers of response to immunotherapy, which motivated the development of multiple imaging agents. In this review, the targets and radiotracers being investigated for monitoring the functional status of immune effector cells are summarized, and their use for imaging of immune-related responses are reviewed along their limitations and pitfalls, of which multiple have already been translated to the clinic. Finally, emerging effector immune cell imaging strategies and future directions are provided.