Andexanet Alfa and its Clinical Application

Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Reversal of Sulfonated Di- and Triblock Copolymers as Novel Parenteral Anticoagulants

Despite targeting different coagulation cascade sites, all Food and Drug Administration-approved anticoagulants present an elevated risk of bleeding, including potentially life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage. Existing studies have not thoroughly investigated the efficacy and safety of sulfonate polymers in animal models and fully elucidate the precise mechanisms by which these polymers act. The activity and safety of sulfonated di- and triblock copolymers containing poly(sodium styrenesulfonate) (PSSS), poly(sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate) (PAMPS), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(sodium methacrylate) (PMAAS), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), and poly(sodium 11-acrylamidoundecanoate) (PAaU) blocks are synthesized and assessed. PSSS-based copolymers exhibit greater anticoagulant activity than PAMPS-based ones. Their activity is mainly affected by the total concentration of sulfonate groups and molecular weight. PEG-containing copolymers demonstrate a better safety profile than PAA-containing ones. The selected copolymer PEG47-PSSS32 exhibits potent anticoagulant activity in rodents after subcutaneous and intravenous administration. Heparin Binding Copolymer (HBC) completely reverses the anticoagulant activity of polymer in rat and human plasma. No interaction with platelets is observed. Selected copolymer targets mainly factor XII and fibrinogen, and to a lesser extent factors X, IX, VIII, and II, suggesting potential application in blood-contacting biomaterials for anticoagulation purposes. Further studies are needed to explore its therapeutic applications fully.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Versus Enoxaparin in Prevention of Recurrence of Venous Thrombo-Embolism Events in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to enoxaparin in patients diagnosed with cancer and venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A search of Pub Med, Scopus, and Google Scholar, from inception through April 2023 was conducted. Articles comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin in patients with cancer and VTE/PE/DVT were included. Review Manager Version 5.2 was utilised for the analysis of the following outcomes; VTE, PE, DVT, major bleeding, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 8 articles and 2276 patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis showed that rivaroxaban had a statistically insignificant reduced association with VTE occurrence (RR:0.83, 95% CI:0.58-1.18, P:0.3) as well as a statically insignificant reduction in major bleeding (RR:0.79, 95% CI:0.53-1.18, P:0.25). Analysis showcased that there was an insignificant reduction of mortality rivaroxaban as compared to enoxaparin (RR:0.74, 95% CI: 0.46-1.20, P:0.23).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban can serve as a viable alternative to enoxaparin, with no appreciable drawbacks, for preventing and managing VTE in patients with malignancy.