[The Clinical use of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease Cardiovascular Ultrasound (2017)15:7. Translation authors: Arystan A.Zh., Fettser D.V.]

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease: Association with exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension and right ventricle adaptation over time

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is a progressive condition caused by fibrotic thrombi and vascular remodeling in the pulmonary circulation despite prolonged anticoagulation. We evaluated clinical factors associated with CTEPD, as well as its impact on functional capacity, pulmonary haemodynamics at rest and after exercise, and right ventricle (RV) morphology and function.

METHODS

We compared 33 consecutive patients with a history of acute pulmonary embolism and either normal pulmonary vascular imaging (negative Q-scan, group 1, n = 16) or persistent defects on lung perfusion scan (positive Q-scan) despite oral anticoagulation at 4 months (group 2, n = 17). Investigations included thrombotic load, the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score, functional class, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and echocardiographic parameters at rest and after exercise (ESE), at 4 and at 24 months.

RESULTS

Compared with group 1, group 2 featured a higher PESI score (p = 0.02) and a higher thrombotic load (p = 0.004) at hospital admission. At 4 months, group 2 developed exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (Ex-PH) at CPET (p < 0.001) and ESE (p < 0.001). At 24 months group 2 showed higher NT-proBNP (p < 0.001), WHO-FC (p < 0.001), systolic (p<0.001) and diastolic (p = 0.037) RV dysfunction and worse RV-arterial coupling (p < 0.001) despite maintaining a low or intermediate echocardiographic probability of PH.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first "proof of concept" study showing that patients with a positive Q-scan frequently develop Ex-PH and RV functional deterioration as well as reduced functional capacity, generating the hypothesis that Ex-PH could help detect the progression to CTEPD.

Ultrasonographic assessment of cardiac function and disease severity in coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease (CHD) causes many adverse cardiovascular events and poses a threat to the patient’s health and quality of life.

AIM

To evaluate ultrasonography for evaluation of cardiac function and lesion degree in patients with CHD.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with CHD (study group) and 106 healthy individuals (control group) in our hospital from March 2019 to September 2020 were selected for this study. All subjects were examined by ultrasound, and the mitral orifice’s early-to-late diastolic blood flow velocity ratio (E/A), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVDd), and left atrial diameter (LAD) were measured. Values were compared between the study group and healthy group, and the correlation between the ultrasonic parameters of patients with different cardiac function grades and the degree of CHD were assessed. In addition, the ultrasonic parameters of patients with different prognoses were compared after a follow-up for 6 mo.

RESULTS

E/A (1.46 ± 0.34) of the study group was smaller than that of the control group (1.88 ± 0.44), while LVDd (58.24 ± 5.05 mm) and LAD (43.31 ± 4.38 mm) were larger (48.15 ± 3.93 and 34.94 ± 2.81, respectively; P < 0.05). E/A for patients with grade III disease (1.41 ± 0.43) was smaller and their LVDd (60.04 ± 4.21 mm) and LA (44.16 ± 2.79 mm) were larger than those in patients with grade II disease (1.71 ± 0.48, 52.18 ± 3.67 mm, and 39.68 ± 2.37, respectively; P < 0.05). Patients with grade IV disease had smaller E/A (1.08 ± 0.39) and larger LVDd (66.81 ± 5.39 mm) and LAD (48.81 ± 3.95 mm) than patients with grade II and III disease (P < 0.05). In patients with moderate disease, E/A (1.44 ± 0.41) was smaller and LVDd (59.95 ± 4.14 mm) and LAD (45.15 ± 2.97 mm) were larger than in patients with mild disease (1.69 ± 0.50, 51.97 ± 3.88 and 38.81 ± 2.56 mm, respectively; P < 0.05). In patients with severe disease, E/A (1.13 ± 0.36) was smaller and LVDd (67.70 ± 6.11 mm) and LAD (49.09 ± 4.05 mm) were larger than in patients with moderate disease (P < 0.05). E/A was negatively correlated with cardiac function classification and disease severity, while LVDd and LAD were positively correlated with cardiac function classification and disease severity (P < 0.05). E/A (1.83 ± 0.51) for patients with good prognosis was higher than that for those with poor prognosis (1.39 ± 0.32), while LVDd (49.60 ± 4.39 mm) and LAD (36.13 ± 3.05 mm) were lower (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ultrasonic parameters of patients with CHD are abnormal, and differ significantly in patients with different cardiac function grades, lesion degree, and prognosis.